Hpb最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Correspondence on: oncological outcomes following left-sided pancreatic resection for grade 1 and grade 2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a population-cohort study comparing open with minimally-invasive surgery. 1级和2级胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤左侧胰腺切除术后的肿瘤预后:一项比较开放手术和微创手术的人群队列研究。
IF 3.3 3区 医学
Hpb Pub Date : 2026-08-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.007
Yuanming Zhang
{"title":"Correspondence on: oncological outcomes following left-sided pancreatic resection for grade 1 and grade 2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a population-cohort study comparing open with minimally-invasive surgery.","authors":"Yuanming Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148864829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reliability of artificial intelligence in hepato-pancreato-biliary clinical decision-making: a retrospective comparative analysis with multidisciplinary team meetings. 人工智能在肝胆胰临床决策中的可靠性:与多学科团队会议的回顾性比较分析。
IF 3.3 3区 医学
Hpb Pub Date : 2026-08-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.006
Ioannis Katsaros, Andreas Panagakis, Adam Mylonakis, Maria Sotiropoulou, Panagiotis Sakarellos, Chrysovalantis Vergadis, Dimitrios Schizas, Evangelos S Felekouras, Michail Vailas
{"title":"Reliability of artificial intelligence in hepato-pancreato-biliary clinical decision-making: a retrospective comparative analysis with multidisciplinary team meetings.","authors":"Ioannis Katsaros, Andreas Panagakis, Adam Mylonakis, Maria Sotiropoulou, Panagiotis Sakarellos, Chrysovalantis Vergadis, Dimitrios Schizas, Evangelos S Felekouras, Michail Vailas","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into clinical decision-making is accelerating, yet its reliability compared to Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) meetings in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery remains underexplored. This study evaluated the concordance between AI recommendations and MDT consensus in real-world HPB oncology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative analysis of all HPB cases discussed at the MDT meetings of the 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, between July 1st and December 31st 2025, was conducted. Anonymized text-only clinical summaries were processed using a large language model (Gemini 3.1 Pro) to generate treatment recommendations. The primary endpoint was the agreement rate between the AI and the MDT decision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An overall agreement rate of 91.7% (k = 0.841; p < 0.01) was observed. Concordance was exceptionally high in straightforward cases (96.7%; k = 0.938; p < 0.01), mirroring standard oncologic workflows. Conversely, in complex scenarios agreement dropped significantly to 62.5% (k = 0.304; p = 0.09). In these instances, AI recommendations diverged from the individualized, clinical judgment applied by the MDT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI platforms demonstrate high concordance with MDTs in routine HPB scenarios, suggesting potential for streamlining standard workloads. Nevertheless, human multidisciplinary expertise remains indispensable for complex cases requiring nuanced clinical intuition.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148812676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hepatic artery aneurysm repair: selection bias, sex-specific risk, and follow-up standardization. 肝动脉瘤修复:选择偏倚、性别特异性风险和随访标准化。
IF 3.3 3区 医学
Hpb Pub Date : 2026-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.004
Zhenxing Wang, Weikai Dong
{"title":"Hepatic artery aneurysm repair: selection bias, sex-specific risk, and follow-up standardization.","authors":"Zhenxing Wang, Weikai Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148818402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is a simplified textbook outcome sensitive enough to capture the true impact of vascular resection during pancreatoduodenectomy ? 简化的教科书结果是否足够敏感,以捕捉胰十二指肠切除术中血管切除的真实影响?
IF 3.3 3区 医学
Hpb Pub Date : 2026-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.005
Imen Ben Ismail, Mariem Marzouki
{"title":"Is a simplified textbook outcome sensitive enough to capture the true impact of vascular resection during pancreatoduodenectomy ?","authors":"Imen Ben Ismail, Mariem Marzouki","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148792459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Partial hepatectomy after liver transplantation: systematic review and pooled analysis of indications, techniques and outcomes. 肝移植术后部分肝切除术:系统回顾和适应症、技术和结果的汇总分析。
IF 3.3 3区 医学
Hpb Pub Date : 2026-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.002
Lorenzo Bernardi, Raffaello Roesel, Alessandra Cristaudi, Shu Sasaki, Pietro Majno-Hurst, Davide Ghinolfi, Emanuele Balzano
{"title":"Partial hepatectomy after liver transplantation: systematic review and pooled analysis of indications, techniques and outcomes.","authors":"Lorenzo Bernardi, Raffaello Roesel, Alessandra Cristaudi, Shu Sasaki, Pietro Majno-Hurst, Davide Ghinolfi, Emanuele Balzano","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Partial hepatectomy after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a graft-saving option that may be used to avoid or delay re-transplantation. We assessed the indications, techniques and outcomes of partial hepatectomy in OLT recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Original studies reporting partial hepatectomy in OLT recipients were eligible for inclusion. Pooled analysis was used to report clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies (n = 135 patients) were included in the systematic review. Main indications for partial hepatectomy were recurrent HCC (41.5%), biliary complications of OLT (25.9%) and other de novo tumors (16.3%). Pooled analysis showed a mean interval between OLT and partial hepatectomy of 47.0 months, heterogeneous based on the indication for resection. Major hepatectomy was used in 40.2% of cases, minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in 8.8%. Postoperative morbidity, major morbidity and mortality rates were 48.0%, 17.0% and 7.4% respectively. Additional long-term morbidity and re-transplantation rates were 20.3% and 11.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In carefully selected OLT recipients, partial hepatectomy is feasible and safe. The use MILS should be further explored. Prospective data with detailed stratification of patients based on the perioperative risks and expected long-term outcomes are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148792529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Limitations of GATA6 and CK5 as surrogate markers for molecular subtyping in pancreatic cancer. GATA6和CK5作为胰腺癌分子分型替代标记物的局限性
IF 3.3 3区 医学
Hpb Pub Date : 2026-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.001
Jaewon J Lee, Mohammed Aldakkak, Saryn Doucette, Yusha Liu, Ian C McCabe, Naim U Rashid, Alina Iuga, Douglas B Evans, Susan Tsai, Jen Jen Yeh
{"title":"Limitations of GATA6 and CK5 as surrogate markers for molecular subtyping in pancreatic cancer.","authors":"Jaewon J Lee, Mohammed Aldakkak, Saryn Doucette, Yusha Liu, Ian C McCabe, Naim U Rashid, Alina Iuga, Douglas B Evans, Susan Tsai, Jen Jen Yeh","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Molecular subtyping of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may inform prognosis and treatment selection, and its clinical application remains under investigation. Although PurIST is a validated transcriptomic classifier, immunohistochemical (IHC) markers such as GATA6 and CK5 have been proposed as practical surrogates. We evaluated whether GATA6 and CK5 IHC could substitute for transcriptomic PDAC subtyping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RNA-seq and GATA6/CK5 IHC were performed on 130 matched tumor samples. Most patients received neoadjuvant therapy. PurIST subtype assignment served as the reference. Concordance was assessed using Cohen's kappa and overall survival using log-rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PurIST classified 8 tumors (6%) as basal-like. GATA6 alone showed poor concordance with PurIST (kappa=0.18, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.42) and was not prognostic of survival (P=0.98). CK5 showed better concordance (kappa=0.39, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.70) but was not significantly prognostic (P=0.084). Combined GATA6/CK5 improved concordance modestly (kappa=0.54, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.90) and stratified OS in the survival cohort (P=0.041), but generated categories that did not align cleanly with established subtypes. GATA6 IHC correlated weakly with RNA-seq expression (rho=0.178, P=0.0429).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In predominantly post-neoadjuvant PDAC specimens, GATA6 and CK5 capture aspects of subtype biology but are not reliable substitutes for transcriptomic classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148840212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Indocyanine green for intraoperative characterization of liver tumors: a novel injection protocol adapted to routine clinical practice. 吲哚菁绿用于肝肿瘤的术中特征:一种适应常规临床实践的新型注射方案。
IF 3.3 3区 医学
Hpb Pub Date : 2026-08-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.07.011
Rodrigue N Doamba, Nicolas Golse
{"title":"Indocyanine green for intraoperative characterization of liver tumors: a novel injection protocol adapted to routine clinical practice.","authors":"Rodrigue N Doamba, Nicolas Golse","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.07.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.07.011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148792435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a head-to-head multicenter propensity score-matched analysis. 机器人与腹腔镜肝内胆管癌肝切除术:一项头对头的多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
IF 3.3 3区 医学
Hpb Pub Date : 2026-08-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.07.009
Antonella Delvecchio, Silvio Caringi, Rebecca Marino, Simone Conci, Laura Alaimo, Enrico Gringeri, Clarissa De Nardi, Francesco Ardito, Simone Famularo, Riccardo De Carlis, Leonardo Centonze, Federico Mocchegiani, Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra, Andrea Belli, Maria N Ringressi, Matteo Serenari, Fabio Giannone, Annarita Libia, Fabrizio Di Francesco, Declan McDonnell, Salvatore Gruttadauria, Marcello G Spampinato, Fabrizio Panaro, Matteo Cescon, Gian L Grazi, Francesco Izzo, Marco Vivarelli, Luciano De Carlis, Felice Giuliante, Umberto Cillo, Andrea Ruzzenente, Francesca Ratti, Riccardo Memeo
{"title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a head-to-head multicenter propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Antonella Delvecchio, Silvio Caringi, Rebecca Marino, Simone Conci, Laura Alaimo, Enrico Gringeri, Clarissa De Nardi, Francesco Ardito, Simone Famularo, Riccardo De Carlis, Leonardo Centonze, Federico Mocchegiani, Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra, Andrea Belli, Maria N Ringressi, Matteo Serenari, Fabio Giannone, Annarita Libia, Fabrizio Di Francesco, Declan McDonnell, Salvatore Gruttadauria, Marcello G Spampinato, Fabrizio Panaro, Matteo Cescon, Gian L Grazi, Francesco Izzo, Marco Vivarelli, Luciano De Carlis, Felice Giuliante, Umberto Cillo, Andrea Ruzzenente, Francesca Ratti, Riccardo Memeo","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.07.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.07.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is an aggressive primary liver cancer for which surgical resection with lymphadenectomy remains the only potentially curative treatment. Although minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) provides benefits over open surgery, whether robotic liver resection (RLR) offers advantages over laparoscopic resection (LLR) in oncological adequacy and perioperative outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with iCCA who underwent MILS in 13 Italian hepatobiliary centers. Patients were stratified by surgical approach (LLR vs RLR) and matched 2:1 by propensity score matching (PSM). Primary endpoints were oncological outcomes and adequacy of lymph node dissection (LND). Secondary endpoints included intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 645 patients (468 LLR, 177 RLR) were included; after PSM, 511 patients (334 LLR, 177 RLR) were analyzed. RLR achieved higher R0 resection rates (p = 0.002) and a greater mean lymph node yield (p = 0.001). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were comparable between groups. RLR was also associated with lower conversion rates, fewer postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RLR for iCCA is safe and provides advantages in margin status, lymph node dissection, and perioperative outcomes, while long-term oncological outcomes (OS and DFS) are comparable to LLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148758976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IHPBA news 1 IHPBA新闻
IF 3.3 3区 医学
Hpb Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-05 DOI: 10.1016/S1365-182X(26)00708-2
{"title":"IHPBA news 1","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1365-182X(26)00708-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1365-182X(26)00708-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"28 8","pages":"Page IBC"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148666674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Highlights in this issue 本期重点报道
IF 3.3 3区 医学
Hpb Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-05 DOI: 10.1016/S1365-182X(26)00716-1
{"title":"Highlights in this issue","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1365-182X(26)00716-1","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1365-182X(26)00716-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"28 8","pages":"Page iii"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148666873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书