Hiroyuki Ishida , Thomas F. Stoop , Atsushi Oba , Philippe Bachellier , Daisuke Ban , Itaru Endo , Oskar Franklin , Tsutomu Fujii , Aiste Gulla , Thilo Hackert , Asif Halimi , Satoshi Hirano , Jin-Young Jang , Matthew H.G. Katz , Aya Maekawa , William H. Nealon , Giampaolo Perri , Jose M. Ramia , Ingmar F. Rompen , Sohei Satoi , Nicholas J. Zyromski
{"title":"Global survey on surgeon preference and current practice for pancreatic neck and body cancer with portomesenteric venous involvement","authors":"Hiroyuki Ishida , Thomas F. Stoop , Atsushi Oba , Philippe Bachellier , Daisuke Ban , Itaru Endo , Oskar Franklin , Tsutomu Fujii , Aiste Gulla , Thilo Hackert , Asif Halimi , Satoshi Hirano , Jin-Young Jang , Matthew H.G. Katz , Aya Maekawa , William H. Nealon , Giampaolo Perri , Jose M. Ramia , Ingmar F. Rompen , Sohei Satoi , Nicholas J. Zyromski","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evidence regarding the optimal surgical approach for pancreatic neck/body cancer with portomesenteric vein (PV) involvement is scarce. We aimed to clarify the current practice using an international survey.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An online survey was distributed to members of nine international associations and study groups. Surgeons who performed pancreatectomy with PV resection (PVR) in the last 12 months were asked about three clinical scenarios with different PV involvement: scenarios A (<90°; length 1 cm), B (<90°; length 3 cm), and C (90–180°; length 3 cm), with or without common hepatic artery (CHA) involvement. PVR was defined according to the ISGPS definition.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 222 surgeons from 49 countries in 6 continents completed the survey. The most selected procedures were left pancreatectomy with PVR ISGPS-type 1 for scenario A (52.3 %), PVR ISGPS-type 2 for B (28.8 %), and pancreatoduodenectomy with PVR ISGPS-type 3 for C (28.4 %). In patients with CHA involvement, the most selected procedures were left pancreatectomy without arterial reconstruction for A (57.7 %) and B (50.0 %), and total pancreatectomy for C (29.7 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The survey illustrates the heterogeneity in surgical management of pancreatic neck/body cancer with PV involvement, indicating the need for prospective studies and guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 7","pages":"Pages 910-921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hpb","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365182X25000802","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Evidence regarding the optimal surgical approach for pancreatic neck/body cancer with portomesenteric vein (PV) involvement is scarce. We aimed to clarify the current practice using an international survey.
Methods
An online survey was distributed to members of nine international associations and study groups. Surgeons who performed pancreatectomy with PV resection (PVR) in the last 12 months were asked about three clinical scenarios with different PV involvement: scenarios A (<90°; length 1 cm), B (<90°; length 3 cm), and C (90–180°; length 3 cm), with or without common hepatic artery (CHA) involvement. PVR was defined according to the ISGPS definition.
Results
Overall, 222 surgeons from 49 countries in 6 continents completed the survey. The most selected procedures were left pancreatectomy with PVR ISGPS-type 1 for scenario A (52.3 %), PVR ISGPS-type 2 for B (28.8 %), and pancreatoduodenectomy with PVR ISGPS-type 3 for C (28.4 %). In patients with CHA involvement, the most selected procedures were left pancreatectomy without arterial reconstruction for A (57.7 %) and B (50.0 %), and total pancreatectomy for C (29.7 %).
Conclusions
The survey illustrates the heterogeneity in surgical management of pancreatic neck/body cancer with PV involvement, indicating the need for prospective studies and guidelines.
期刊介绍:
HPB is an international forum for clinical, scientific and educational communication.
Twelve issues a year bring the reader leading articles, expert reviews, original articles, images, editorials, and reader correspondence encompassing all aspects of benign and malignant hepatobiliary disease and its management. HPB features relevant aspects of clinical and translational research and practice.
Specific areas of interest include HPB diseases encountered globally by clinical practitioners in this specialist field of gastrointestinal surgery. The journal addresses the challenges faced in the management of cancer involving the liver, biliary system and pancreas. While surgical oncology represents a large part of HPB practice, submission of manuscripts relating to liver and pancreas transplantation, the treatment of benign conditions such as acute and chronic pancreatitis, and those relating to hepatobiliary infection and inflammation are also welcomed. There will be a focus on developing a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, radiological interventions and surgical techniques being strongly represented. HPB welcomes submission of manuscripts in all these areas and in scientific focused research that has clear clinical relevance to HPB surgical practice.
HPB aims to help its readers - surgeons, physicians, radiologists and basic scientists - to develop their knowledge and practice. HPB will be of interest to specialists involved in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease however will also inform those working in related fields.
Abstracted and Indexed in:
MEDLINE®
EMBASE
PubMed
Science Citation Index Expanded
Academic Search (EBSCO)
HPB is owned by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and is also the official Journal of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA), the Asian-Pacific Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) and the European-African Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).