HerniaPub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03122-9
Carlos André Balthazar da Silveira, Ana Caroline Rasador, Diego L Lima, Julia Kasmirski, João P G Kasakewitch, Raquel Nogueira, Flavio Malcher, Prashanth Sreeramoju
{"title":"The impact of smoking on ventral and inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Carlos André Balthazar da Silveira, Ana Caroline Rasador, Diego L Lima, Julia Kasmirski, João P G Kasakewitch, Raquel Nogueira, Flavio Malcher, Prashanth Sreeramoju","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03122-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03122-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Individual studies indicate poorer outcomes for smokers after hernia repair. Previous meta-analyses have examined the impact of smoking on specific outcomes such as recurrence and surgical site infection, but there has been a lack of comprehensive consensus or systematic review on this subject. Addressing this gap, our study undertakes a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of smoking on the outcomes of ventral hernia repair (VHR) and inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Source: </strong>A thorough search of Cochrane Central, Scopus, SciELO, and PubMed/MEDLINE, focusing on studies that examined the effect of smoking on inguinal and VHR outcomes was conducted. Key outcomes evaluated included recurrence, reoperation, surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI), and seroma.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Out of 3296 screened studies, 42 met the inclusion criteria. These comprised 25 studies (69,295 patients) on VHR and 17 studies (204,337 patients) on inguinal hernia repair. The analysis revealed that smokers had significantly higher rates of recurrence (10.4% vs. 9.1%; RR 1.48; 95% CI [1.15; 1.90]; P < 0.01), SSO (13.6% vs. 12.7%; RR 1.44; 95% CI [1.12; 1.86]; P < 0.01) and SSI (6.6% vs. 4.2%; RR 1.64; 95% CI [1.38; 1.94]; P < 0.01) following VHR. Additionally, smokers undergoing inguinal hernia repair showed higher recurrence (9% vs. 8.7%; RR 1.91; 95% CI [1.21; 3.01]; P < 0.01), SSI (0.6% vs. 0.3%; RR 1.6; 95% CI [1.21; 2.0]; P < 0.001), and chronic pain (9.9% vs. 10%; RR 1.24; 95% CI [1.06; 1.45]; P < 0.01) rates. No significant differences were observed in seroma (RR 2.63; 95% CI [0.88; 7.91]; P = 0.084) and reoperation rates (RR 1.48; 95% CI [0.77; 2.85]; P = 0.236) for VHR, and in reoperation rates (RR 0.99; 95% CI [0.51; 1.91]; P = 0.978) for inguinal hernias between smokers and non-smokers. Analysis using funnel plots and Egger's test showed the absence of publication bias in the study outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This comprehensive meta-analysis found statistically significant increases in recurrence rates, and immediate postoperative complications, such as SSO and SSI following inguinal and VHR. Also, our subgroup analysis suggests that the MIS approach seems to be protective of adverse outcomes in the smokers group. However, our findings suggest that these findings are not of clinical relevance, so our data do not support the necessity of smoking cessation before hernia surgery. More studies are needed to elucidate the specific consequences of smoking in both inguinal and ventral hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>ID CRD42024517640.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141859628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
HerniaPub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-08-27DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03142-5
Emmanuel E Sadava, Francisco Laxague, Agustin C Valinoti, Cristian A Angeramo, Francisco Schlottmann
{"title":"Outcomes after open posterior component separation via transversus abdominis release (TAR) for incisional hernia repair. A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Emmanuel E Sadava, Francisco Laxague, Agustin C Valinoti, Cristian A Angeramo, Francisco Schlottmann","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03142-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03142-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given its potential advantages, open Transversus Abdominis Release (oTAR) has been proposed as a durable solution for complex AWR. However, its applicability in different scenarios remains uncertain. We aimed to analyze the current available evidence and determine surgical outcomes after oTAR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic electronic search on oTAR in PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Postoperative morbidity and recurrence rates were included as primary endpoints and Quality of life (QoL) was included as secondary endpoint. A random-effect model was used to generate a pooled proportion with 95% confidence interval (CI) between all studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 studies with 4,910 patients undergoing oTAR were included for analysis. Mean hernia defect and mesh area were 394 (140-622) cm<sup>2</sup> and 1065 (557-2206) cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Mean follow-up was 19.7 (1-32) months. The weighted pooled proportion of recurrence, overall morbidity, surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), major morbidity and mortality were: 6% (95% CI, 3-10%), 34% (95% CI, 26-43%), 22% (95% CI, 16-29%), 11% (95% CI, 8-16%), 4% (95% CI, 3-7%), 6% (95% CI, 4-10%) and 1% (95% CI, 1-2%), respectively. A significant improvement in QoL after oTAR was reported among studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Open TAR is an effective technique for complex ventral hernias as it is associated with low recurrence rate and a significant improvement in QoL. However, the relatively high morbidity rates observed emphasize the necessity of further patients' selection and optimization to improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
HerniaPub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03131-8
Lars Nannestad Jorgensen, Jacob Rosenberg
{"title":"Comment to: Cost analysis of open versus robot-assisted ventral hernia repair.","authors":"Lars Nannestad Jorgensen, Jacob Rosenberg","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03131-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03131-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
HerniaPub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-07-13DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9
Ana Caroline Dias Rasador, Carlos André Balthazar da Silveira, Diego Laurentino Lima, Raquel Nogueira, Flavio Malcher, Prashanth Sreeramoju, Leandro T Cavazzola
{"title":"Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ana Caroline Dias Rasador, Carlos André Balthazar da Silveira, Diego Laurentino Lima, Raquel Nogueira, Flavio Malcher, Prashanth Sreeramoju, Leandro T Cavazzola","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent guidelines indicate the use of mesh in UHR for defects > 1 cm, as it reduces recurrence, with 10% recurrence rate compared to up to 54.5% with primary closure. However, Nguyen et al. shows that primary closure is still widely performed in UHR, especially for small defects (1-2 cm), for which there is no published data to determine the optimal approach. In addition, previous meta-analysis by Madsen et al. comparing mesh repair with primary closure in UHR didn't exclude emergency conditions and recurrent hernias; also, didn't report subgroup analysis on hernia defect size. Thus, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the mesh repairs vs. primary closure of the defect in an open elective primary UHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for studies comparing mesh with suture in open UHR in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Scielo, and Lilacs from inception until October 2023. Studies with patients ≤ 18 years old, with recurrent or emergency conditions were excluded. Outcomes were recurrence, seroma, hematoma, wound infection, and hospital length of stay. Subgroup analysis was performed for: (1) RCTs only, and (2) hernia defects smaller than 2 cm. We used RevMan 5.4. for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics, and random effect was used if I² > 25%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2895 studies were screened and 56 were reviewed. 12 studies, including 4 RCTs, 1 prospective cohort, and 7 retrospective cohorts were included, comprising 2926 patients in total (47.6% in mesh group and 52.4% in the suture group). Mesh repair showed lower rates of recurrence in the overall analysis (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.79; P = 0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 24%) and for hernia defects smaller than 2 cm (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.93; P = 0.03; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Suture repair showed lower rates of seroma (RR 1.88; 95% CI 1.07 to 3.32; P = 0.03; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and wound infection (RR 1.65; 95%CI 1.12 to 2.43; P = 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 15%) in the overall analysis, with no differences after performing subgroup analysis of RCTs. No differences were seen regarding hematoma and hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of mesh during UHR is associated with significantly lower incidence of recurrence in a long-term follow-up compared to the suture repair, reinforcing the previous indications of the guidelines. Additionally, despite the overall analysis showing higher risk of seroma and wound infection for the mesh repair, no differences were seen after subgroup analysis of RCTs.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>A review protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024476854).</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141603516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
HerniaPub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03143-4
M Toma, V Oprea, Florentina Scarlat, Carmen Elena Bucuri, O Andercou, F Mihaileanu, O Grad, M Rosianu, C Molnar
{"title":"Quality of life and abdominal wall functionality after abdominal wall reconstruction: A prospective single center follow-up study.","authors":"M Toma, V Oprea, Florentina Scarlat, Carmen Elena Bucuri, O Andercou, F Mihaileanu, O Grad, M Rosianu, C Molnar","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03143-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03143-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fascial breakdown with the occurrence of an incisional hernia (IH) is an important and challenging complication of any laparotomy. For a long time, the success of the abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) was measured only from the surgeon's perspective by defining outcome measures such as wound morbidity and recurrence. The understanding that complete recovery is difficult to assess without considering patients has shifted the paradigm of optimal outcomes to Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) and Quality of Life (QoL), which are pivotal to evaluate the success and efficacy of AWR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective follow-up study of 91 patients undergoing mesh-augmented abdominal wall reconstruction for primary or recurrent incisional hernia between January 2021 and December 2023. Demographic data, comorbidities, and hernia characteristics were recorded. All patients were evaluated preoperatively by a native abdomino-pelvic CT scan to assess the characteristics of hernia (length, width, surface, and volume of the incisional hernia sac and of peritoneal cavity), the presence of mesh (if previously inserted), and abdominal wall muscles status. All intervention were performed by the same surgical team according to the techniques described by Rives - Stoppa (RS), Ramirez (ACS), and Novitsky (PCS). Abdominal wall function was assessed using trunk raising (TR) and double leg lowering (DLL) measurements performed preoperatively, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. At the same time, pre- and post-operative quality of life was analysed using the EQ-5D score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of 59.42 ± 12.28 years and a male/female ratio of 35/56 were recorded, most of them being obese. There were 36 (42%) patients with defects larger than 10 cm. The distribution of the type of surgical intervention was: RS 35 patients, ACS 13 patients, and PCS 43 patients. The mean value of combined score for the preoperative abdominal wall functionality was 4.41 ± 1.67 (2-8) while the mean value of preoperative EQ-5D index was 0.652 ± 0.026 (-0.32-1.00). QoL was poor and very poor for 48% (44) of the patients who recorded index values less than 0.56 (50% percentile). Preoperative EQ-5D index was highly correlated with Combined AWF score (r = 0.620; p < 0.0001) and the correlation was specific (AUC = 0.799; p < 0.0001; asymptotic 95%CI = 0.711-0.923). At 12 months, the AWF score increased to 8.13 ± 2.58 (1-10) and the QoL total score to 0.979 ± 0.007 (0.71-1). Good and very good total scores for QoL were recorded for 47 patients (84%) compared to 33 (36%) in the preoperative evaluation (χ<sup>2</sup> with Yates continuity correction for two degrees of liberty = 46.04; p < 0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that patients can expect to see a significant overall improvement in all five components of QoL measured with the help of Eq. 5D questionnaire. This improveme","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530502/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
HerniaPub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-09-21DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03158-x
Xiangwei Fu, Wenting Wang
{"title":"Comment to: Ultrasound‑guided ilioinguinal‑iliohypogastric nerve block with local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia versus local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia prior to shouldice inguinal hernia repair in adults.","authors":"Xiangwei Fu, Wenting Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03158-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03158-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142286033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
HerniaPub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-08-30DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03152-3
Alberto G Barranquero, Yolanda Maestre González, Cristina Gas Ruiz, Marta Sadurni Gracia, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler, Rafael Villalobos Mori
{"title":"Early outcomes of robotic modified retromuscular Sugarbaker technique for end colostomy parastomal hernia repair.","authors":"Alberto G Barranquero, Yolanda Maestre González, Cristina Gas Ruiz, Marta Sadurni Gracia, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler, Rafael Villalobos Mori","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03152-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03152-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The modified retromuscular Sugarbaker or Pauli technique is a technique for parastomal hernia repair, which requires the dissection of the retromuscular space and a transversus abdominis release for stoma lateralization and placement of a retromuscular mesh. Given the limited evidence regarding the robotic approach to this technique, this study aims to evaluate the outcomes of this newly introduced procedure, focusing on the rate of 30-day complications and recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective case series report. Patients included underwent an elective robotic modified retromuscular Sugarbaker technique for the repair of a parastomal hernia associated with an end colostomy. All surgeries were performed at a tertiary referral center from September 2020 to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 patients underwent a robotic modified retromuscular Sugarbaker in our study. The parastomal hernias operated on were classified according to the European Hernia Society as 9.5% (2/21) type I, 52.4% (11/21) type II, 23.8% (5/21) type III, 14.3% (3/21) type IV. Early complications observed included 14.3% (3/21) seroma, 9.5% (2/21) surgical site infection, 19% (4/21) postoperative ileus, and one case of large bowel obstruction due to colitis (4.8%), which was managed conservatively. No Clavien-Dindo grade III complications were reported. The overall recurrence rate was 9.5% (2/21) with a median follow-up of 12.5 months (IQR: 3.9-21.3). Both recurrences occurred during the early phases of the learning curve and were possibly attributed to insufficient lateralization of the stoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic modified retromuscular Sugarbaker for parastomal hernia repair is a challenging procedure with promising early outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142106943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
HerniaPub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03153-2
Tommaso Violante, Davide Ferrari, Ibrahim A Gomaa, Sara A Aboelmaaty, Richard Sassun, Annaclara Sileo, Jyi Cheng, Katherine T Anderson, Robert R Cima
{"title":"Robotic parastomal hernia repair in Ileal-conduit patients: short-term results in a single-center cohort study.","authors":"Tommaso Violante, Davide Ferrari, Ibrahim A Gomaa, Sara A Aboelmaaty, Richard Sassun, Annaclara Sileo, Jyi Cheng, Katherine T Anderson, Robert R Cima","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03153-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03153-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe and evaluate safety and feasibility of the robotic modified Sugarbaker technique with intraperitoneal underlay mesh (IPUM) for repairing parastomal hernias associated with ileal conduits (ICPSH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center cohort study analyzed data from 15 adult patients who underwent robotic ICPSH repair using the modified Sugarbaker IPUM technique between July 2021 and July 2023. The primary endpoints were hernia recurrence rates and 30-day morbidity. Secondary endpoints included length of stay, conversion to open surgery, 30-day readmission, and 30-day reoperation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 69.1 years, and 53.3% were female. Most patients (86.6%) had undergone radical cystectomy as the index surgery. The mean operative time was 249 min, with no conversions to open surgery. The 30-day complication rate was 26.7%, and the mean hospital stay was 3.6 days. No hernia recurrences, hydronephrosis, rise in creatinine or distended conduit on imaging suggesting poor drainage were observed during a mean follow-up of 15.2 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The robotic modified Sugarbaker IPUM technique appears safe and feasible for PSH repair in IC patients, with promising short-term outcomes. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy and establish its role in ICPSH management.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
HerniaPub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-09-23DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03100-1
Claiborne J Lucas, M Wes Love, Jeremy A Warren, William S Cobb, Alfredo M Carbonell
{"title":"Effect of surgeon-patient sex discordance on ventral hernia repair outcomes.","authors":"Claiborne J Lucas, M Wes Love, Jeremy A Warren, William S Cobb, Alfredo M Carbonell","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03100-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03100-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Concordance is an important dimension of the physician-patient relationship that may be linked to health care disparities. The purpose of this study was to determine if sex discordance between surgeon and patient impacts surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of prospectively collected data obtained from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry was performed on all patients who underwent ventral hernia repair. Surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infections (SSI), surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI) and 30-day readmission rates were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Female patients operated on by male surgeons have increased odds of having an SSI/SSO (OR 1.099, 95% CI 1.022-1.181), SSOPI (OR 1.156, 95% CI 1.031-1.297), and readmission (OR 1.259, 95% CI 1.128-1.406) when compared to male patients operated on by male surgeons. There was no significant difference in adverse outcomes between patient groups when operated on by female surgeons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sex discordance between surgeon and patient is associated with increased odds adverse outcomes when male surgeons operate on female patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142286036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
HerniaPub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03177-8
Krystle Henderson, Steven Chua, Joseph Hasapes, Kaustubh Shiralkar, Jonah Stulberg, Varaha Tammisetti, Chakradhar Thupili, Todd Wilson, Julie Holihan
{"title":"Recommendations for the diagnosis of occult inguinal hernias using a modified Delphi technique.","authors":"Krystle Henderson, Steven Chua, Joseph Hasapes, Kaustubh Shiralkar, Jonah Stulberg, Varaha Tammisetti, Chakradhar Thupili, Todd Wilson, Julie Holihan","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03177-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03177-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occult inguinal hernias are inguinal hernias that are not felt on physical exam but can often be seen on imaging. Their diagnosis can be challenging, leading to unnecessary surgeon referrals, undue patient stress, and even unneeded surgery. The aim of this project was to develop recommendations for the diagnosis of occult inguinal hernias using a modified Delphi technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Iterative rounds of surveys were administered to an expert panel of surgeons and radiologists. Panelists were asked to rate potential hernia-related topics by levels of importance. Items with 80% agreement were included for further discussion. Panelists were asked to provide their opinion on each included subject. A virtual meeting was conducted to discuss areas without agreement and determine final recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three surgeons and five radiologists participated. There was strong agreement that dynamic ultrasound is a good first/confirmatory imaging choice. There was agreement that the radiology reports for studies assessing inguinal hernias should include hernia contents (80%) and hernia size (100%). Information that should be provided to the radiologist when ordering an imaging study include indication for study, patient symptoms, prior hernia surgery. Items that should be included in a radiology report include whether the presence of an inguinal hernia was assessed, hernia contents, size of defect, +/- hernia type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This collaboration between surgeons and radiologists creates a diagnostic imaging pathway and standardizing imaging reporting which will be used to improve the diagnosis of occult inguinal hernias. Future studies testing these recommendations in a prospective study are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142345673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}