Hernia最新文献

{"title":"Perioperative outcomes associated with ventral hernia repair concomitant to gynecologic procedures: similar to hernia repair alone.","authors":"Juliana Melo Bianchi, Luis Arias-Espinosa, Ana Freyria, Anupam Singh Chauhan, Weipeng Xie, Jianing Ma, Li-Ching Huang, Xavier Pereira, Timothy Bussert, Flavio Malcher","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03326-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03326-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this paper is to compare outcomes of patients who underwent combined gynecologic procedures with ventral hernia repair (VHR) with patients that underwent only VHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent VHR with a combined gynecological procedure from 2012 to 2023 were retrospectively identified in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative and categorized into two groups with surgical wound contamination in mind. Group one included patients with concomitant salpingo-oophorectomy (SO), bilateral tubal ligation (BTO), and/or ovarian cystectomy (OC) without hysterectomy. Group two consisted of patients who underwent hysterectomy with or without SO/BTO/OC/ER. C-Sections were excluded. Mesh location was 90% in the sublay space for both groups. Patients who underwent VHR without any concomitant procedure were the control group. Propensity score matching (PSM; ratio 3:1 for control vs. group one and 1:1 for control vs. group two) was performed based on relevant demographic and perioperative covariates (age, hernia width, operative approach, ASA class, BMI, mesh used, current smoker, wound status, year of operation, and recurrent). Postoperative outcomes at 30 days were compared between group one and control and between group two and control based on post-PSM cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 13,982 patients undergoing VHR, 279 (2%) also underwent a concurrent gynecological procedure. Following PSM, 88 patients in Group 1 were matched with 264 patients that underwent VHR alone. Similarly, 186 patients in Group 2 were compared with 186 patients in the control group. Operative time was significantly higher in both groups as compared to control (p < 0.001). A longer LOS and more EBL were observed group 2 but not group 1. No statistically significant differences were observed in either group regarding surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), Surgical site occurrences requiring procedural interventions (SSOPI), recurrence of hernia, reoperations, or readmissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study compares the outcomes of patients that underwent VHR with simultaneous gynecological procedure to patients with VHR alone. Combining hernia repair and gynecologic surgery did not appear to have an adverse impact on clinical outcomes. Our study suggests that further collaboration between gynecology and general surgery can be considered for management of concurrent abdominopelvic pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143803100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Implementation of a prehabilitation program before abdominal wall surgery: a pilot and feasibility study.","authors":"Gaëtan-Romain Joliat, Sonia Krouk, Eddy Cotte, Guillaume Passot","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03325-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03325-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prehabilitation in abdominal wall surgery (AWS) might improve postoperative outcomes, but current data are scant. A prehabilitation program before AWS, including specific hypopressive abdominal exercises, was recently implemented in our department. This study aimed to present the characteristics of the implemented program and to assess the adherence rate to hypopressive abdominal exercises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of all consecutive patients included in the pathway from October 2021 to October 2024 was performed. The multimodal prehabilitation program included nutritional support, physical activities (cardiorespiratory training, muscular strengthening, hypopressive abdominal exercises, and relaxation), and psychological support. Adherence rate was defined as the number of patients who performed the proposed abdominal exercises divided by the total number of included patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 patients were included (43% women, median age: 64, IQR 55-72, median body-mass index: 29 kg/m², IQR 26-33). Most of them had a midline hernia (n = 79, 77%) and underwent a retromuscular mesh repair (n = 93, 90%). Ninety-six patients were adherent to the hypopressive abdominal exercises (adherence rate: 93%). Obese patients had a significantly lower adherence rate to hypopressive abdominal exercises than non-obese patients (29/34 = 85% vs. 67/69 = 97%, p = 0.025). Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2-5) and postoperative complications occurred in 29 patients (28%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a prehabilitation program in AWS was feasible. Moreover, adherence to the hypopressive abdominal exercises was high. Obese patients might require more attention to improve their adherence to the program.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143811392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A comparative study on optical trocar entry vs. balloon trocar entry in laparoscopic eTEP inguinal hernia repair - a randomised control trial.","authors":"Tharun Ganapathy Chitrambalam, K S Suryaa Harshan, Ramprakash Ramanathan, Muthuvignesh Vijayakumar, Amit Salim Gilani","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03329-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03329-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The enhanced Totally Extra-Peritoneal (eTEP) technique is a novel minimally invasive approach to inguinal hernia repair that involves entry into the retro-rectus space and dissection of preperitoneal spaces. Aim of this study is to compare two methods for creating the preperitoneal space: optical trocar dissection (Group A) and balloon trocar dissection (Group B).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective, single-blinded, interventional study was conducted with 116 patients, randomized into two groups (58 in each group) undergoing eTEP inguinal hernia repair at SRM Medical College Hospital, India. Key outcomes assessed included the duration of surgery, intraoperative complications, postoperative pain, and postoperative occurences such as seroma and hematoma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that balloon trocar dissection resulted in significantly shorter surgery duration (mean 62 min vs. 75 min, p<0.001) and quicker preperitoneal space creation (13 min vs. 19 min, p<0.0001). Balloon dissection also showed fewer incidents of peritoneal breaches (0% vs. 10.34%, p<0.002), lower postoperative pain scores, and a lower incidence of seroma and hematoma formation (1.72% vs. 17.24%, p<0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that balloon trocar dissection is a safer, more efficient method for eTEP inguinal hernia repair, offering a smoother learning curve for surgeons, especially during the early stages of the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143811371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison between sutures, cyanoacrylate and self-gripping mesh in Lichtenstein hernia repair: a multi arm randomized control trial.","authors":"Sagar Prakash, Oseen Hajilal Shaikh, Chellappa Vijayakumar, Uday Shamrao Kumbhar","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03324-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03324-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143795203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Open and minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair for patients with previous prostatectomy: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.","authors":"João Pedro Gonçalves Kasakewitch, Carlos A Balthazar da Silveira, Marina Eguchi Inaba, Raquel Nogueira, Ana Caroline Dias Rasador, Diego L Lima, Flavio Malcher","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03323-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03323-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair (IHR) after prostatectomy has been considered a challenging procedure due to the presence of scar tissue and adhesions. We aimed to compare the outcomes of open and MIS IHR outcomes in post-prostatectomy patients through a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Material & methods: </strong>PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for studies on open and MIS IHR after prostatectomy. Outcomes such as recurrence, complications, seroma, hematoma, SSI, and conversion rates were analyzed, with subgroup analyses conducted for open, TEP, and TAPP procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 402 screened studies, 18 met the inclusion criteria, covering 8,668 open IHR (64.6%) and 4,761 MIS IHR (35.4%) patients. The rate per 100 events for intraoperative complications was 0.19 (95% CI [0.00; 0.76]; I2 = 71%;), 5.22 per 100 for seroma (95% CI [2.86; 9.34]; I2 = 92%), 0.83 per 100 for SSI (95% CI [0.39; 1.75]; I2 = 48%), 3.16 per 100 for hematoma (95% CI [1.16; 8.31]; I2 = 84%), 3.02 per 100 patients for chronic pain (95% CI [2.53; 3.62]; I2 = 13%), and 0.02 per 100 for recurrence (95% CI [0; 0.16]; I2 = 10%). The conversion rate for MIS was 1.66 per 100 (95% CI [0.89; 3.06]; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference between TEP and TAPP in intraoperative complications (p = 0.70), but a lower seroma rate in TAPP compared to TEP (5.29 vs. 20 per 100; P = 0.01). MIS had significant reduction in SSI (0.08 vs. 0.34 per 100; P < 0.01), hematoma (1.29 vs. 17.86; p < 0.01), and recurrence (0.08 vs. 0.37; p = 0.04) compared to open, with no difference in seroma rates. Funnel plots revealed no evidence of publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In experienced hands, MIS IHR is a safe and effective option for post-prostatectomy patients, with lower complication rates compared to open IHR, although high-quality comparative studies are needed to establish definitive conclusions.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>July 7, 2024 (ID CRD42024562863).</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143788343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Glue versus tackers for mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.","authors":"Samuel Kitching, Agastya Patel, Jacob Tan, Jacob Kadamapuzah, Thomas Satyadas","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03315-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-025-03315-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has improved patient outcomes compared to natural tissue repair. The method of fixation of the mesh to the abdominal wall and its impact on patient outcomes has not been determined as part of a trial sequential analysis. The aim of this study is to compare the use of glue and tackers in mesh fixation of inguinal and femoral hernia repair by meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Medline, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched to retrieve relevant randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing glue and tacker fixation in laparoscopic inguinal and femoral hernia repair, resulting in 648 studies, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria. This data was systematically analysed using RevMan and TSA software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2312 patients were included in the 18 RCTs used in this study, with 1149 in the glue cohort and 1163 in the tacker cohort. Glue fixation significantly reduced risk of haematoma formation [MD (95% CI): 0.35 (0.17-0.73), P < 0.01]. Glue fixation resulted in significantly less acute pain [MD (95% CI): - 1.80 (- 2.71 to - 0.89), P < 0.01] and chronic pain [MD (95% CI): 0.42 (0.27-0.64), P < 0.01]. Glue fixation also allowed significantly quicker return to normal activity/work compared to tacker fixation [MD (95% CI): - 1.92 (- 3.17 to - 0.67), P < 0.01]. TSA confirmed that glue fixation significantly reduced early pain scores (< 3 months) and haematoma incidence compared to tacker fixation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mesh fixation with glue is superior to tackers in reducing post-operative pain and haematomas, which means patients return to work/activity significantly faster. Surgeons should be aware of these benefits when consenting the patient for laparoscopic inguinal and femoral hernia repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972183/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143788341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Staged versus concurrent ventral hernia repair with metabolic bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.","authors":"Ali Esparham, Shahab Shahabi, Erfan Sheikhbahaei, Shiva Safari, Hamidreza Zefreh","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03320-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03320-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study compares the outcomes of concurrent metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) and ventral hernia repair (VHR) vs. staged VHR approach after MBS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically searched four main databases with relevant keywords. Two independent authors screened and included studies that compared these two approaches. The I² statistic was utilized to evaluate heterogeneity among the studies; if exceeded 50%, a random effects analysis was conducted, while fixed effects analysis was employed for those without severe heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7 studies with 9244 and 11,961 patients in concurrent and staged groups were included, respectively. Our results showed that the rate of mesh infection was significantly higher in concurrent VHR (3.6% vs. 1.9%, OR: 2.18, p < 0.001), and mortality was insignificantly lower in staged VHR (0.3% vs. 0.1%, OR: 1.70, p = 0.09). Although surgical site infection, seroma, bowel obstruction, hernia recurrence, and reoperation were higher in the staged group, comparisons were statistically insignificant (all p > 0.05). Furthermore, hematoma, venous thromboembolic events, and wound dehiscence had nearly the same rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both approaches are viable options, depending on individual patient circumstances (age, BMI, hernia size, hernia-related symptoms, sac with or without intestinal loops) and surgical preferences (type of MBS, with or without mesh, type of mesh) highlighting the importance of individualized surgical planning for optimization of outcomes and minimizing risks in this specific patient population.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The protocol of this study was submitted to PROSPERO and received the registration code CRD42023444310.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143779879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Long-term outcome of prophylactic biosynthetic mesh reinforcement at the time of loop ileostomy reversal for colorectal cancer- results of a case-matched study.","authors":"Farouk Drissi, Florent Jurczak, André Dabrowski, Olivier Oberlin, Haitham Khalil, Jean-François Gillion, Guillaume Meurette","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03328-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03328-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Stoma site incisional hernia (SSIH) is a frequent complication following ileostomy closure but can be potentially decreased by prophylactic mesh reinforcement. The aim was to assess if the use of a slowly absorbable biosynthetic mesh at the time of ileostomy reversal could reduce the incidence of SSIH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outcomes of consecutive patients receiving prophylactic biosynthetic mesh (poly-4-hydroxybutyrate Phasix^®, BD) implantation at the time of ileostomy reversal for colorectal cancer were prospectively collected in the Club Hernie database. Outcomes were compared with those of matched patients from a historical cohort of patients undergoing ileostomy reversal without mesh augmentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 patients underwent ileostomy reversal: 50 with biosynthetic mesh augmentation (mesh group) and 50 with standard fascial closure without mesh (control group). Mesh augmentation did not increase the operating time (mesh group 49.8 min vs. control group 60.5 min, p < 0.01), the incidence of surgical site infection (mesh group 4% vs. control group 6%, p = 1) or the length of hospital stay (mesh group 5 days vs. control group 6 days, p = 0.28). After a mean follow-up of 4 years, the rate of SSIH, diagnosed by CT scan, was significantly lower in the mesh group (mesh group 8% vs. control group 24%, p = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic use of a slowly absorbable biosynthetic mesh at the time of ileostomy reversal for colorectal cancer was safe and effective in reducing the rate of SSIH without increasing surgical site infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143779874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Peripheral blood immunoprofiling in patients with polypropylene mesh implants for hernia repair: a single-center cohort study.","authors":"Barbora Jíšová, Matyáš Ebel, Andrew de Beaux, Barbora East","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03310-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-025-03310-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Surgical mesh, often made from polypropylene, is commonly recommended to enhance hernia repair outcomes in adults. Concerns about polypropylene, as a cause of allergy and/or autoimmune disease prompted this study to evaluate immunological parameters in patients with mesh and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A case-control cohort study was conducted at a university hospital. Electronic patient records of hernia repairs using polypropylene mesh (January 2018-April 2022) were analysed. Blood samples from patients and healthy controls were assessed using various methods, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunofluorescence, immunoblotting, and flow cytometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The database search identified 1544 participants. After applying the exclusion criteria 33 patients remained in the polypropylene mesh group. Patients with mesh had lower median IgG3 levels (p = 0.02) and Rheumatoid factor (RF) IgM (p = 0.018) compared to the control group. Although both IgG3 and RF IgM levels were in the normal reference range. In addition, 5 patients in the mesh group tested positive for serum ANCA levels compared to none in the control group (p = 0.053). No other differences in immunoglobulins, autoantibodies, complement, or immune cell subtypes were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with polypropylene mesh exhibited median IgG3 and RF IgM serum levels that were within the normal reference range but slightly lower compared to the control group. Among patients with polypropylene mesh, five displayed positive serum ANCA levels without autoimmune-related symptoms. Overall, no definitive signs of autoimmunity caused by polypropylene mesh. A larger, prospective study is warranted to further explore potential immune responses to polypropylene mesh.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961455/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143752361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Efficacy of totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"María Alejandra Romero-Silva, Jose Caballero-Alvarado, Carlos Zavaleta-Corvera","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03322-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03322-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) compared to the Lichtenstein hernioplasty in adult patients with uncomplicated inguinal hernia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We included 27 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified through comprehensive searches in Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies comparing TEP and Lichtenstein techniques in adult patients with uncomplicated inguinal hernias were selected. Primary outcomes included hernia recurrence and chronic postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes assessed were surgical wound infection, seroma, hematoma, scrotal edema, operative time, hospital stay (in hours and days), and time to return to daily activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 RCTs with 7,658 patients were analyzed. No significant difference was found in hernia recurrence between TEP and Lichtenstein (RR 1.03; 95% CI [0.62-1.72]; p = 0.90). However, TEP significantly reduced the risk of chronic postoperative pain by 62% (RR 0.38; 95% CI [0.28-0.51]; p < 0.00001), surgical wound infection by 52% (RR 0.48; 95% CI [0.31-0.75]; p = 0.001), and hematoma formation by 37% (RR 0.63; 95% CI [0.41-0.97]; p = 0.04). No significant differences were found for seroma formation (RR 1.17; 95% CI [0.98-1.40]; p = 0.08) or scrotal edema (RR 0.62; 95% CI [0.35-1.10]; p = 0.10). Operative time showed no significant difference (MD 7.78 min; 95% CI [-2.77-18.33]; p = 0.15). Regarding hospital stay, TEP reduced the duration in days (MD -0.83; 95% CI [-1.24 to -0.41]; p < 0.0001), while no difference was observed when measured in hours (MD 0.01; 95% CI [-0.29-0.31]; p = 0.95). Furthermore, TEP was associated with a faster return to daily activities by approximately 5 days (MD -4.74; 95% CI [-6.78 to -2.70]; p < 0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TEP technique is more effective in terms of chronic pain, risk of surgical wound infection, and reduction of hematoma formation than the Lichtenstein technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143752359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}