Robotic repair of off-midline abdominal wall hernias: a single institution consecutive case series.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03476-8
Priti Dutta, Gina Kim, Nathan English, Tapasya Katta, Gurudatta Naik, Margaux Mustian, Britney Corey, Abhishek D Parmar
{"title":"Robotic repair of off-midline abdominal wall hernias: a single institution consecutive case series.","authors":"Priti Dutta, Gina Kim, Nathan English, Tapasya Katta, Gurudatta Naik, Margaux Mustian, Britney Corey, Abhishek D Parmar","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03476-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While off-midline hernias represent only a small percentage of abdominal wall defects, symptoms can be debilitating for the affected patients, and repair portends substantial operative challenges for the surgeon. There are no large-scale case series that describe outcomes with extraperitoneal repair using the robotic approach. The objective of this study was to describe our experience of patients undergoing robotic repair of off-midline hernias at a tertiary care medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective review of patients who underwent elective robotic repair of off-midline hernias from June 2019 to October 2024. All adults (≥ 18 years old) diagnosed with a primary (no prior repair) or recurrent off-midline hernia were included. Patient demographics, preoperative clinical variables (smoking status, BMI, ASA score, co-morbidities, presence of pain, hernia type, history of prior hernia repair, type of prior flank operation, and dimensions of the hernia on CT scan), operative variables (perioperative regional pain blocks, operative approach, type and dimensions of mesh used), and postoperative outcomes (hospital length of stay (LOS), follow-up duration, hernia recurrences, and complications including wound occurrences and chronic pain defined as pain > 3 months postop) were abstracted from a prospectively maintained hernia database. Univariate analyses were used to measure and describe all covariates and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 43 patients included in the study. Patients had an average age of 57.5 years and an average BMI of 32.8 kg/m2. 81% of the cohort identified as White race and 65% were female. 26% of the cohort had diabetes mellitus (average HbA1c 5.8), 7% had a smoking history, and 9% had COPD. Most hernias were incisional (51%) or traumatic (47%). Average hernia length and width were 8.0 ± 4.5 and 6.7 ± 2.7 cm. 98% had a clean wound classification. Fascial closure was performed in 86% of the cases and a mesh was placed in 98% of the cases. Average mesh length and width were 21.2 ± 5.9 and 21.1 ± 5.1 cm. There were 6 (14%) hybrid procedures, where the hernia was repaired via a combination of a robotic and open approach. Average hospital length of stay was 1.9 days and average follow up was 4.4 months. There were two (5%) recurrences. There were 15 (35%) postoperative complications. The most common complications were seroma (14%), hematoma (7%) and persistent pain > 3 months (5%). One patient (2%) developed an abscess, two patients (5%) had a nerve injury, and one patient (2%) had a postoperative small bowel obstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic off-midline hernia repair can be performed with minimal morbidity. Most common complication was postoperative seroma. Surgical outcomes were similar to existing literature on outcomes following open repair. Surgeons performing this repair should appropriately counsel their patients on the risks of pain and recurrence postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03476-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While off-midline hernias represent only a small percentage of abdominal wall defects, symptoms can be debilitating for the affected patients, and repair portends substantial operative challenges for the surgeon. There are no large-scale case series that describe outcomes with extraperitoneal repair using the robotic approach. The objective of this study was to describe our experience of patients undergoing robotic repair of off-midline hernias at a tertiary care medical center.

Methods: This study was a retrospective review of patients who underwent elective robotic repair of off-midline hernias from June 2019 to October 2024. All adults (≥ 18 years old) diagnosed with a primary (no prior repair) or recurrent off-midline hernia were included. Patient demographics, preoperative clinical variables (smoking status, BMI, ASA score, co-morbidities, presence of pain, hernia type, history of prior hernia repair, type of prior flank operation, and dimensions of the hernia on CT scan), operative variables (perioperative regional pain blocks, operative approach, type and dimensions of mesh used), and postoperative outcomes (hospital length of stay (LOS), follow-up duration, hernia recurrences, and complications including wound occurrences and chronic pain defined as pain > 3 months postop) were abstracted from a prospectively maintained hernia database. Univariate analyses were used to measure and describe all covariates and outcomes.

Results: There were 43 patients included in the study. Patients had an average age of 57.5 years and an average BMI of 32.8 kg/m2. 81% of the cohort identified as White race and 65% were female. 26% of the cohort had diabetes mellitus (average HbA1c 5.8), 7% had a smoking history, and 9% had COPD. Most hernias were incisional (51%) or traumatic (47%). Average hernia length and width were 8.0 ± 4.5 and 6.7 ± 2.7 cm. 98% had a clean wound classification. Fascial closure was performed in 86% of the cases and a mesh was placed in 98% of the cases. Average mesh length and width were 21.2 ± 5.9 and 21.1 ± 5.1 cm. There were 6 (14%) hybrid procedures, where the hernia was repaired via a combination of a robotic and open approach. Average hospital length of stay was 1.9 days and average follow up was 4.4 months. There were two (5%) recurrences. There were 15 (35%) postoperative complications. The most common complications were seroma (14%), hematoma (7%) and persistent pain > 3 months (5%). One patient (2%) developed an abscess, two patients (5%) had a nerve injury, and one patient (2%) had a postoperative small bowel obstruction.

Conclusion: Robotic off-midline hernia repair can be performed with minimal morbidity. Most common complication was postoperative seroma. Surgical outcomes were similar to existing literature on outcomes following open repair. Surgeons performing this repair should appropriately counsel their patients on the risks of pain and recurrence postoperatively.

机器人修复腹壁中线外疝:单一机构连续病例系列。
虽然腹壁外疝只占腹壁缺陷的一小部分,但其症状可能使患者虚弱,修复对外科医生来说是一个巨大的手术挑战。目前还没有大规模的病例系列来描述使用机器人方法进行腹膜外修复的结果。本研究的目的是描述我们在三级医疗中心接受机器人修复中线外疝的患者的经验。方法:本研究对2019年6月至2024年10月期间接受选择性机器人修复中线外疝的患者进行回顾性分析。所有被诊断为原发性(先前没有修复)或复发性中线外疝的成年人(≥18岁)被纳入研究。患者人口统计学、术前临床变量(吸烟状况、BMI、ASA评分、合并症、疼痛存在、疝类型、既往疝修补史、既往腹侧手术类型和CT扫描疝尺寸)、手术变量(围手术期局部疼痛阻滞、手术入路、使用补片的类型和尺寸)和术后结果(住院时间(LOS)、随访时间、疝复发、并发症包括伤口发生和慢性疼痛(定义为疼痛(术后3个月))从前瞻性维护的疝气数据库中提取。单变量分析用于测量和描述所有协变量和结果。结果:共纳入43例患者。患者平均年龄57.5岁,平均BMI为32.8 kg/m2。81%的研究对象为白人,65%为女性。26%的队列患者患有糖尿病(平均HbA1c为5.8),7%有吸烟史,9%患有慢性阻塞性肺病。大多数疝气是切口(51%)或外伤性(47%)。平均疝长(8.0±4.5)cm,疝宽(6.7±2.7)cm, 98%伤口干净。86%的病例进行了筋膜闭合,98%的病例放置了补片。平均网长为21.2±5.9 cm,网宽为21.1±5.1 cm。有6例(14%)混合手术,其中疝通过机器人和开放入路的结合进行修复。平均住院时间1.9天,平均随访4.4个月。有2例(5%)复发。术后并发症15例(35%)。最常见的并发症是血肿(14%)、血肿(7%)和持续疼痛(5%)。1例患者(2%)出现脓肿,2例患者(5%)出现神经损伤,1例患者(2%)出现术后小肠梗阻。结论:机器人离中线疝修补术可以以最小的发病率进行。最常见的并发症是术后血清肿。手术结果与现有文献中开放性修复后的结果相似。进行这种修复的外科医生应适当地告知患者术后疼痛和复发的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信