Is mental training suitable for teaching a surgical procedure to students? A single-center study using a hernia model.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03466-w
Miro Kopp, Guido Woeste, Hanan El Youzouri, Ursula Pession, Jasmina Sterz, Miriam Ruesseler, Wolf O Bechstein, Teresa Schreckenbach
{"title":"Is mental training suitable for teaching a surgical procedure to students? A single-center study using a hernia model.","authors":"Miro Kopp, Guido Woeste, Hanan El Youzouri, Ursula Pession, Jasmina Sterz, Miriam Ruesseler, Wolf O Bechstein, Teresa Schreckenbach","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03466-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>New methods of teaching surgical skills are in demand. Mental skills training (MST) has been proven effective in the training of surgeons. However, research on medical students is still rare. This explorative study investigates whether a minimalist form of MST can support surgical performance on a hernia model in medical students in a way comparable to students trained using a conventional 'see one, do one' approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A novel inexpensive benchtop training model for abdominal wall hernias has been developed. Medical students were randomized into an 'See one, do one' and a 'See one' + MST group. Both groups received the same theoretical instructions, after which a tutor demonstrated the operation on the model. While the first group received training in MST afterwards, the 'See one, do one' group was trained using the benchtop model. Subsequently, both groups performed surgery on the model. Their performance was videotaped and evaluated by experienced surgeons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 44 medical students took part in the study. The 'See one, do one' group performed significantly better in the professional examination, although the consistency of the stitching was comparable between the two groups and showed no statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>'See one' + MST group alone without practical training did not result in comparable performance as the 'See one, do one' approach in our study. The MST group performed inferiorly across most objective metrics. While this suggest that MST in isolation may not be sufficient for teaching complex procedures to medical students, it highlights the importance of practical exposure. The potential benefit of combining MST with hands-on training should be investigated in future studies, but cannot be inferred from the current data.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03466-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: New methods of teaching surgical skills are in demand. Mental skills training (MST) has been proven effective in the training of surgeons. However, research on medical students is still rare. This explorative study investigates whether a minimalist form of MST can support surgical performance on a hernia model in medical students in a way comparable to students trained using a conventional 'see one, do one' approach.

Methods: A novel inexpensive benchtop training model for abdominal wall hernias has been developed. Medical students were randomized into an 'See one, do one' and a 'See one' + MST group. Both groups received the same theoretical instructions, after which a tutor demonstrated the operation on the model. While the first group received training in MST afterwards, the 'See one, do one' group was trained using the benchtop model. Subsequently, both groups performed surgery on the model. Their performance was videotaped and evaluated by experienced surgeons.

Results: A total of 44 medical students took part in the study. The 'See one, do one' group performed significantly better in the professional examination, although the consistency of the stitching was comparable between the two groups and showed no statistically significant differences.

Conclusion: 'See one' + MST group alone without practical training did not result in comparable performance as the 'See one, do one' approach in our study. The MST group performed inferiorly across most objective metrics. While this suggest that MST in isolation may not be sufficient for teaching complex procedures to medical students, it highlights the importance of practical exposure. The potential benefit of combining MST with hands-on training should be investigated in future studies, but cannot be inferred from the current data.

心理训练是否适用于向学生教授外科手术?使用疝气模型的单中心研究。
目的:需要新的外科技能教学方法。心理技能训练(MST)在外科医生的培训中已被证明是有效的。然而,对医学生的研究仍然很少。这项探索性研究调查了一种极简形式的MST是否可以在与使用传统“看一做一”方法训练的学生相比的方式上支持医学生疝气模型的手术表现。方法:开发了一种新型的廉价的腹壁疝台式训练模式。医学生被随机分为“看一个,做一个”组和“看一个”+ MST组。两组都接受了相同的理论指导,然后由导师在模型上演示操作。第一组随后接受MST培训,而“看一做一”组则使用台式模型进行培训。随后,两组均对模型进行手术治疗。他们的表现被录像并由经验丰富的外科医生进行评估。结果:共有44名医学生参与本研究。“看一做一”组在专业检查中表现明显更好,尽管两组之间的缝合一致性具有可比性,但没有统计学意义上的差异。结论:单纯的“看一”+ MST组,在没有实际训练的情况下,其效果不如本研究中“看一,做一”的方法。MST组在大多数客观指标上表现较差。虽然这表明孤立的MST可能不足以向医学生教授复杂的程序,但它强调了实际接触的重要性。MST与实践训练相结合的潜在益处应该在未来的研究中进行调查,但不能从目前的数据中推断出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信