Jurnal Justiciabelen最新文献

筛选

英文中文

PEMAKNAAN PERLUASAN OBJEK SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MELIPUTI TINDAKAN FAKTUAL 国家治理客观争议的展开涉及事实行动

Jurnal Justiciabelen Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI: 10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.492

Fellista Ersyta Aji, Laga Sugiarto

{"title":"PEMAKNAAN PERLUASAN OBJEK SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MELIPUTI TINDAKAN FAKTUAL","authors":"Fellista Ersyta Aji, Laga Sugiarto","doi":"10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.492","url":null,"abstract":"The government is a legal subject that has little or no role in the survival of society. In performing its duties to serve the community, not infrequently the government issued a State Administrative Decision which is intended for certain communities. With the government issuing this, certainly not forever it is in accordance with existing regulations. Sometimes, decisions issued by the government actually even give the impact on harm to ordinary people. Then, with the administrative court and Act No. 5 of 1986 on Peratun, at least there are facilities for the public to sue the government and ask to cancel the decision made by the government. Then in Year 2014 came the Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration. In this Government Administration Act more or less supersedes the provisions contained in the Law of the Peratun. Especially in this Law which attracts attention is the expansion of object disputes. The object of the TUN dispute in this Act is different from its elements to the Law of the Peratun. One of these is a written stipulation that includes factual action. There is no explanation for the meaning of factual acts in this Administrative Administration Act. Therefore, further research is needed in this regard","PeriodicalId":130993,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Justiciabelen","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126425729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

ASPEK HUKUM PEMERINTAHAN TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN TENAGA KERJA ASING DI INDONESIA DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEDAULATAN NEGARA 政府法律对印尼使用外国劳动力的影响及其对国家主权的影响

Jurnal Justiciabelen Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI: 10.30587/JUSTICIABELEN.V1I1.491

Dodi Jaya Wardana

引用次数: 0

KEKUATAN HUKUM BATIKMARK SEBAGAI SARANA PERLINDUNGAN PRODUK BATIK DI INDONESIA 作为印尼蜡染产品的保护手段，巴蒂克马克的法律力量

Jurnal Justiciabelen Pub Date : 2018-09-06 DOI: 10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.483

Devi Andani

{"title":"KEKUATAN HUKUM BATIKMARK SEBAGAI SARANA PERLINDUNGAN PRODUK BATIK DI INDONESIA","authors":"Devi Andani","doi":"10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.483","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find out how legal force and consequence of batikmark as protection of batik products in Indonesia. The problem raised is: How legal force of batikmark as protection of batik products in Indonesia?; and Howconsequence of batikmark as protection of batik products in Indonesia? This study includes qualitative research with normative legal research typology. Research data was collected throught literature study, documents, and interviews. Then all data collectedwritten descriptively and analyzed qualitatively.The results of this study show that batikmark as protection of batik products in Indonesia have legal force like constitution. But, batikmark implemented for batik entrepreneurs in Indonesia not effective yet. Proven by the small number of batikmark certificates given by Balai Kerajinan dan Batik until September 2012. Furthermore, whwn viewed from batik entrepreneurs, batikmark implemented not effective yet because no sanctions have been imposed if batik entrepreneurs have not implemented batikmark. Consequence of batikmark there are legal of implemented batikmark is batik products are given quality assurance, throuhgt batikmark can increase consumer trust because batik quality has certain criteria; and batikmark as a differentiator between Indonesian batik or foreign batik. This study recommends the improvement and renewal rule of law of batikmark; socializayion and introduction to batikmark forbatik entrepreneurs in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":130993,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Justiciabelen","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133475416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

首页上一页