国家治理客观争议的展开涉及事实行动

Fellista Ersyta Aji, Laga Sugiarto
{"title":"国家治理客观争议的展开涉及事实行动","authors":"Fellista Ersyta Aji, Laga Sugiarto","doi":"10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The government is a legal subject that has little or no role in the survival of society. In performing its duties to serve the community, not infrequently the government issued a State Administrative Decision which is intended for certain communities. With the government issuing this, certainly not forever it is in accordance with existing regulations. Sometimes, decisions issued by the government actually even give the impact on harm to ordinary people. Then, with the administrative court and Act No. 5 of 1986 on Peratun, at least there are facilities for the public to sue the government and ask to cancel the decision made by the government. Then in Year 2014 came the Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration. In this Government Administration Act more or less supersedes the provisions contained in the Law of the Peratun. Especially in this Law which attracts attention is the expansion of object disputes. The object of the TUN dispute in this Act is different from its elements to the Law of the Peratun. One of these is a written stipulation that includes factual action. There is no explanation for the meaning of factual acts in this Administrative Administration Act. Therefore, further research is needed in this regard","PeriodicalId":130993,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Justiciabelen","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PEMAKNAAN PERLUASAN OBJEK SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MELIPUTI TINDAKAN FAKTUAL\",\"authors\":\"Fellista Ersyta Aji, Laga Sugiarto\",\"doi\":\"10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The government is a legal subject that has little or no role in the survival of society. In performing its duties to serve the community, not infrequently the government issued a State Administrative Decision which is intended for certain communities. With the government issuing this, certainly not forever it is in accordance with existing regulations. Sometimes, decisions issued by the government actually even give the impact on harm to ordinary people. Then, with the administrative court and Act No. 5 of 1986 on Peratun, at least there are facilities for the public to sue the government and ask to cancel the decision made by the government. Then in Year 2014 came the Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration. In this Government Administration Act more or less supersedes the provisions contained in the Law of the Peratun. Especially in this Law which attracts attention is the expansion of object disputes. The object of the TUN dispute in this Act is different from its elements to the Law of the Peratun. One of these is a written stipulation that includes factual action. There is no explanation for the meaning of factual acts in this Administrative Administration Act. Therefore, further research is needed in this regard\",\"PeriodicalId\":130993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Justiciabelen\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Justiciabelen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Justiciabelen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

政府是一个法律主体,在社会的生存中几乎没有作用。在履行服务社区的职责时,政府经常发布针对某些社区的国家行政决定。随着政府的发布,它当然不会永远符合现有的规定。有时,政府发布的决定甚至会对普通人产生伤害的影响。如果有行政法院和1986年第5号有关Peratun的法律,至少可以向政府提起诉讼,要求取消政府的决定。2014年颁布了2014年第30号《政府管理法》。在这方面,《政府管理法》或多或少地取代了《州法》所载的规定。该法中特别引人关注的是客体争议的扩大。本法中屯门争端的对象与其要素不同于《屯门法》。其中之一是包含事实诉讼的书面规定。本行政管理法对事实行为的含义未作解释。因此,这方面还需要进一步的研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PEMAKNAAN PERLUASAN OBJEK SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MELIPUTI TINDAKAN FAKTUAL
The government is a legal subject that has little or no role in the survival of society. In performing its duties to serve the community, not infrequently the government issued a State Administrative Decision which is intended for certain communities. With the government issuing this, certainly not forever it is in accordance with existing regulations. Sometimes, decisions issued by the government actually even give the impact on harm to ordinary people. Then, with the administrative court and Act No. 5 of 1986 on Peratun, at least there are facilities for the public to sue the government and ask to cancel the decision made by the government. Then in Year 2014 came the Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration. In this Government Administration Act more or less supersedes the provisions contained in the Law of the Peratun. Especially in this Law which attracts attention is the expansion of object disputes. The object of the TUN dispute in this Act is different from its elements to the Law of the Peratun. One of these is a written stipulation that includes factual action. There is no explanation for the meaning of factual acts in this Administrative Administration Act. Therefore, further research is needed in this regard
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信