KEKUATAN HUKUM BATIKMARK SEBAGAI SARANA PERLINDUNGAN PRODUK BATIK DI INDONESIA

Devi Andani
{"title":"KEKUATAN HUKUM BATIKMARK SEBAGAI SARANA PERLINDUNGAN PRODUK BATIK DI INDONESIA","authors":"Devi Andani","doi":"10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find out how legal force and consequence of batikmark as protection of batik products in Indonesia. The problem raised is: How legal force of batikmark as protection of batik products in Indonesia?; and Howconsequence of batikmark as protection of batik products in Indonesia? This study includes qualitative research with normative legal research typology. Research data was collected throught literature study, documents, and interviews. Then all data collectedwritten descriptively and analyzed qualitatively.The results of this study show that batikmark as protection of batik products in Indonesia have legal force like constitution. But, batikmark implemented for batik entrepreneurs in Indonesia not effective yet. Proven by the small number of batikmark certificates given by Balai Kerajinan dan Batik until September 2012. Furthermore, whwn viewed from batik entrepreneurs, batikmark implemented not effective yet because no sanctions have been imposed if batik entrepreneurs have not implemented batikmark. Consequence of batikmark there are legal of implemented batikmark is batik products are given quality assurance, throuhgt batikmark can increase consumer trust because batik quality has certain criteria; and batikmark as a differentiator between Indonesian batik or foreign batik. This study recommends the improvement and renewal rule of law of batikmark; socializayion and introduction to batikmark forbatik entrepreneurs in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":130993,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Justiciabelen","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Justiciabelen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to find out how legal force and consequence of batikmark as protection of batik products in Indonesia. The problem raised is: How legal force of batikmark as protection of batik products in Indonesia?; and Howconsequence of batikmark as protection of batik products in Indonesia? This study includes qualitative research with normative legal research typology. Research data was collected throught literature study, documents, and interviews. Then all data collectedwritten descriptively and analyzed qualitatively.The results of this study show that batikmark as protection of batik products in Indonesia have legal force like constitution. But, batikmark implemented for batik entrepreneurs in Indonesia not effective yet. Proven by the small number of batikmark certificates given by Balai Kerajinan dan Batik until September 2012. Furthermore, whwn viewed from batik entrepreneurs, batikmark implemented not effective yet because no sanctions have been imposed if batik entrepreneurs have not implemented batikmark. Consequence of batikmark there are legal of implemented batikmark is batik products are given quality assurance, throuhgt batikmark can increase consumer trust because batik quality has certain criteria; and batikmark as a differentiator between Indonesian batik or foreign batik. This study recommends the improvement and renewal rule of law of batikmark; socializayion and introduction to batikmark forbatik entrepreneurs in Indonesia.
作为印尼蜡染产品的保护手段,巴蒂克马克的法律力量
本研究旨在了解印染标志在印尼作为蜡染产品保护的法律效力和后果。提出的问题是:蜡染标志作为蜡染产品保护在印尼的法律效力如何?蜡染标志作为蜡染产品保护在印尼的影响如何?本研究包括定性研究和规范性法律研究类型学。通过文献研究法、文献研究法和访谈法收集研究资料。然后将收集到的所有数据进行描述和定性分析。研究结果表明,印染标志作为印尼蜡染产品的保护具有宪法般的法律效力。但是,印染企业在印尼实施的印染标志尚未见效。由Balai Kerajinan dan Batik在2012年9月之前提供的少量蜡笔证书证明。此外,从蜡染企业家的角度来看,如果蜡染企业家没有实施蜡染标志,则没有实施制裁,因此实施的蜡染标志尚未生效。蜡染的后果是有法律实施的蜡染产品质量保证,因为蜡染的质量有一定的标准,所以整个蜡染都可以增加消费者的信任;以及作为区分印尼蜡染和外国蜡染的标志。本文建议完善和更新商标法;印尼蜡染企业家对蜡染的社会化和介绍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信