International Conference on Electronic Publishing最新文献_第7页

Grey Literature Publishing in Public Policy: Production and Management, Costs and Benefits 公共政策中的灰色文献出版:生产与管理、成本与收益

International Conference on Electronic Publishing Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-85

Amanda Lawrence

{"title":"Grey Literature Publishing in Public Policy: Production and Management, Costs and Benefits","authors":"Amanda Lawrence","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-85","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-85","url":null,"abstract":"Public policy and practice, and policy research, relies on diverse forms and types of information and communication, both traditional publications and a myriad of other documents and resources including reports, briefings, legislation, discussion papers, submissions and evaluations and much more. This is sometimes referred to as ‘grey literature’, a collective term for the wide range of publications produced and published directly by organisations, either in print or digitally, outside of the commercial or scholarly publishing industry. In the digital era grey literature has proliferated, and has become a key tool in influencing public debate and in providing an evidence-base for public policy and practice. Despite its ubiquity and influence, grey literature’s role is often overlooked as a publishing phenomenon, ignored both in scholarly research on media and communications and in the debate on the changing nature of open access and academic publishing. This paper looks at the production of grey literature for public policy and practice where the changes enabled by computers and the internet are causing a hidden revolution in the dissemination of knowledge and evidence. It explores the production, dissemination and management of publications by organizations, their nature, purpose and value, and investigates the benefits and the challenges of publishing outside of the commercial or scholarly publishing enterprises. The paper provides estimates of the economic value of grey literature based on online surveys and valuations and considers the costs and benefits of self-publishing by organisations which provides both a dynamic, flexible and responsive publishing system and one in which link rot, duplication and highly varying standards abound. The findings are part of a broader research project looking at role and value of grey literature for policy and practice including consumption, production and collection. It will be of interest to a wide range of policy makers and practitioners as well as academics working in media and communications, public administration and library and information management.","PeriodicalId":130180,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Electronic Publishing","volume":"285 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132584075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Jupyter Notebooks - a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows Jupyter Notebooks—可重复计算工作流的发布格式

International Conference on Electronic Publishing Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87

T. Kluyver, B. Ragan-Kelley, Fernando Pérez, B. Granger, M. Bussonnier, J. Frederic, Kyle Kelley, Jessica B. Hamrick, J. Grout, S. Corlay, Paul Ivanov, Damián Avila, Safia Abdalla, Carol Willing, Jupyter Development Team

引用次数: 2446

Co-Constructing an Open and Collaborative Manifesto to Reclaim the Open Science Narrative 共建开放协作宣言，重拾开放科学叙事

International Conference on Electronic Publishing Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-293

Leslie Chan, Angela Okune, Denisse Albornoz, A. Posada, Rebecca Hillyer

引用次数: 3

An Open Access E-journal: How to Find Out Readers' Preferences? The Case of the "Sciences Eaux & Territoires" Journal 开放获取电子期刊:如何发现读者偏好?《生态与地域科学》期刊案例

International Conference on Electronic Publishing Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-19

V. Pagneux, A. Hénaut, Caroline Martin

引用次数: 0

Reaching Out to Global Interoperability through Aligning Repository Networks 通过对齐存储库网络实现全球互操作性

International Conference on Electronic Publishing Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-165

Katharina Müller, Maxie Gottschling, K. Shearer

引用次数: 0

Data Policies and Data Archives: A New Paradigm for Academic Publishing in Economic Sciences? 数据政策与数据档案:经济学学术出版的新范式?

International Conference on Electronic Publishing Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-145

Sven Vlaeminck, Lisa-Kristin Herrmann

引用次数: 20

What Is at Stake? Public Participation and the Co-Production of Open Scientific Knowledge 利害攸关的是什么?公众参与与开放科学知识的共同生产

International Conference on Electronic Publishing Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-257

Hugo Ferpozzi

{"title":"What Is at Stake? Public Participation and the Co-Production of Open Scientific Knowledge","authors":"Hugo Ferpozzi","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-257","url":null,"abstract":"Openness has become an explicit subject across science policy and scholarly practice, where it is often vindicated in a rhetoric of optimism. In political discourse, as much as in the scholarly literature, open access to research data and publications is expected to enable what policy has typically failed to achieve by other means: that is, to overcome material, class, and political barriers that stand in the way of knowledge circulation. However, whether openness in science is a good thing or not also seems to depend on what is being opened, to what extent and for whom. In this paper I draw on different critical areas of Latin American science, technology and society studies (LASTS) to suggest that the current dominant views around open science can be limiting, as much as they could be enabling, more inclusive dynamics of access to and uses of scientific knowledge, especially in the peripheral (or non-hegemonic) contexts of science. These limiting views around openness, I argue, are linked with restrictive conceptions about science and its products: scientific activity is understood, by this token, as an invariably universal enterprise. In consequence, science outputs are conceived as self-contained knowledge products, and the processes and practices that account for their production and use are only partly taken into consideration. The aim is hence to elaborate on different forms of participation and exclusion to the processes of knowledge production which could help us understand how different stakeholders become engaged or excluded in the production of knowledge. To do so, I take the case of genomic research and drug development for neglected diseases as my empirical background. The argument draws on two concepts from LASTS. The first one is cognitive exploitation, according to which scientific outputs are used in for-profit contexts by third-parties, but without compensating the original producers. In this way, it is not only producers, users and appropriators of knowledge who become key in the dynamics of knowledge circulation, but also those acting as intermediaries. The other concept is integrated subordination, which refers, on the one hand, to the dynamics by which peripheral regions collaborate with elite research networks, and the difficulties that stand in the way of industrializing scientific knowledge, on the other. These difficulties spawn from the lack of capacities, but also from adherence to international research agendas, which are not necessarily connected with those required to attend to social needs in peripheral contexts. By putting into question the nature and the limits of openness, and by re-examining the types of knowledge at stake (beyond research data and publications), the actors, and their involvement, I suggest other ways in which open scientific knowledge could become effectively used.","PeriodicalId":130180,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Electronic Publishing","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124913941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Framing a Situated and Inclusive Open Science: Emerging Lessons from the Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network 构建定位和包容的开放科学:来自开放和协作科学发展网络的新经验

International Conference on Electronic Publishing Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-18

Leslie Chan, Angela Okune, Rebecca Hillyer, A. Posada, Denisse Albornoz

{"title":"Framing a Situated and Inclusive Open Science: Emerging Lessons from the Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network","authors":"Leslie Chan, Angela Okune, Rebecca Hillyer, A. Posada, Denisse Albornoz","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-18","url":null,"abstract":"What is open science and under what conditions could it contribute towards addressing persistent development challenges? How could we re-imagine and enrich open science so that it is inclusive of local realities and a diversity of knowledge traditions? These are some of the questions that the Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network (OCSDNet) is attempting to answer. In this paper, we provide the rationale and principles underlying OCSDnet, the conceptual and methodological frameworks guiding the research, and preliminary findings from the network’s twelve globally diverse research projects. Instead of a “one-size-fits-all” approach to open science, our findings suggest that it is important to take into account the local dynamics and power structures that affect the ways in which individuals tend to collaborate (or not) within particular contexts. Despite the on-going resistance of powerful actors towards new forms of creating and sharing diverse knowledge, concluding evidence from the twelve research teams suggests that open science does indeed have an important role to play in facilitating inclusive collaboration and transformatory possibilities for development.","PeriodicalId":130180,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Electronic Publishing","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127547190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

Social Reading and eBooks 社交阅读和电子书

International Conference on Electronic Publishing Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-169

H. Heikkilä

{"title":"Social Reading and eBooks","authors":"H. Heikkilä","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-169","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-169","url":null,"abstract":"The success and mainstreaming of e-books is transforming not only the traditional/Gutenbergian idea of the book but also the previous idea of an e-book as mainly an enriched print book. In the new e-book concept, the nature of a book as an artifact is diminishing and disposition as a networked interface to the knowledge is rising. One of the most important emerging concepts is the social reading, which means reading acts while connected to the other people. Social reading is a new and not very well defined area of reading practices. In addition to the traditional reading together and discussing books person to person, social reading includes a large number of networked functions like sharing and receiving shared information. Research of this new phenomena is almost non existent, yet it is expected to be the next big thing in reading and in e-books. This study provides an overview of the history of social reading of printed books and then defines parallel features in the new digital reading activities. Research material consists of popular e-book software and services. The proposed categorization of social reading is based on content analysis of properties that were found in those services. This report claims that social reading functionalities are manifestations of the social needs that have existed during and even before the paper book; digital time enables re-emerging of some of those features, but in a different manner.","PeriodicalId":130180,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Electronic Publishing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129498190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0