An Open Access E-journal: How to Find Out Readers' Preferences? The Case of the "Sciences Eaux & Territoires" Journal

V. Pagneux, A. Hénaut, Caroline Martin
{"title":"An Open Access E-journal: How to Find Out Readers' Preferences? The Case of the \"Sciences Eaux & Territoires\" Journal","authors":"V. Pagneux, A. Hénaut, Caroline Martin","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How may we best evaluate an open access e-journal that is not intended to be cited in rank “A” scientific journals? In this study, we took the example of a journal that connects research and professionals workers in the environmental sciences. We compared information from downloads with readership surveys. The main finding was that readers remember the best articles from a given issue and classify the issues based on this memory. A clear dichotomy can be observed: some readers are particularly interested in the management of biodiversity and pollution and others reject all that links to it.","PeriodicalId":130180,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Electronic Publishing","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Electronic Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How may we best evaluate an open access e-journal that is not intended to be cited in rank “A” scientific journals? In this study, we took the example of a journal that connects research and professionals workers in the environmental sciences. We compared information from downloads with readership surveys. The main finding was that readers remember the best articles from a given issue and classify the issues based on this memory. A clear dichotomy can be observed: some readers are particularly interested in the management of biodiversity and pollution and others reject all that links to it.
开放获取电子期刊:如何发现读者偏好?《生态与地域科学》期刊案例
我们如何才能最好地评估一份不打算被“A”级科学期刊引用的开放获取电子期刊?在这项研究中,我们以一份期刊为例,该期刊将环境科学领域的研究人员和专业人员联系起来。我们比较了下载和读者调查的信息。研究的主要发现是,读者会记住某一期杂志上最好的文章,并根据这种记忆对这些文章进行分类。可以观察到一个明显的二分法:一些读者对生物多样性和污染的管理特别感兴趣,而另一些人则拒绝与之相关的一切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信