Grey Literature Publishing in Public Policy: Production and Management, Costs and Benefits

Amanda Lawrence
{"title":"Grey Literature Publishing in Public Policy: Production and Management, Costs and Benefits","authors":"Amanda Lawrence","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public policy and practice, and policy research, relies on diverse forms and types of information and communication, both traditional publications and a myriad of other documents and resources including reports, briefings, legislation, discussion papers, submissions and evaluations and much more. This is sometimes referred to as ‘grey literature’, a collective term for the wide range of publications produced and published directly by organisations, either in print or digitally, outside of the commercial or scholarly publishing industry. In the digital era grey literature has proliferated, and has become a key tool in influencing public debate and in providing an evidence-base for public policy and practice. Despite its ubiquity and influence, grey literature’s role is often overlooked as a publishing phenomenon, ignored both in scholarly research on media and communications and in the debate on the changing nature of open access and academic publishing. This paper looks at the production of grey literature for public policy and practice where the changes enabled by computers and the internet are causing a hidden revolution in the dissemination of knowledge and evidence. It explores the production, dissemination and management of publications by organizations, their nature, purpose and value, and investigates the benefits and the challenges of publishing outside of the commercial or scholarly publishing enterprises. The paper provides estimates of the economic value of grey literature based on online surveys and valuations and considers the costs and benefits of self-publishing by organisations which provides both a dynamic, flexible and responsive publishing system and one in which link rot, duplication and highly varying standards abound. The findings are part of a broader research project looking at role and value of grey literature for policy and practice including consumption, production and collection. It will be of interest to a wide range of policy makers and practitioners as well as academics working in media and communications, public administration and library and information management.","PeriodicalId":130180,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Electronic Publishing","volume":"285 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Electronic Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Public policy and practice, and policy research, relies on diverse forms and types of information and communication, both traditional publications and a myriad of other documents and resources including reports, briefings, legislation, discussion papers, submissions and evaluations and much more. This is sometimes referred to as ‘grey literature’, a collective term for the wide range of publications produced and published directly by organisations, either in print or digitally, outside of the commercial or scholarly publishing industry. In the digital era grey literature has proliferated, and has become a key tool in influencing public debate and in providing an evidence-base for public policy and practice. Despite its ubiquity and influence, grey literature’s role is often overlooked as a publishing phenomenon, ignored both in scholarly research on media and communications and in the debate on the changing nature of open access and academic publishing. This paper looks at the production of grey literature for public policy and practice where the changes enabled by computers and the internet are causing a hidden revolution in the dissemination of knowledge and evidence. It explores the production, dissemination and management of publications by organizations, their nature, purpose and value, and investigates the benefits and the challenges of publishing outside of the commercial or scholarly publishing enterprises. The paper provides estimates of the economic value of grey literature based on online surveys and valuations and considers the costs and benefits of self-publishing by organisations which provides both a dynamic, flexible and responsive publishing system and one in which link rot, duplication and highly varying standards abound. The findings are part of a broader research project looking at role and value of grey literature for policy and practice including consumption, production and collection. It will be of interest to a wide range of policy makers and practitioners as well as academics working in media and communications, public administration and library and information management.
公共政策中的灰色文献出版:生产与管理、成本与收益
公共政策和实践以及政策研究依赖于各种形式和类型的信息和交流,既有传统出版物,也有无数其他文件和资源,包括报告、简报、立法、讨论文件、提交和评估等等。这有时被称为“灰色文学”,这是一个集体术语,指的是商业或学术出版行业以外的组织直接生产和出版的印刷或数字出版物的广泛范围。在数字时代,灰色文献激增,并已成为影响公共辩论和为公共政策和实践提供证据基础的关键工具。尽管灰色文学无处不在,影响巨大,但它作为一种出版现象的作用往往被忽视,无论是在媒体和传播的学术研究中,还是在关于开放获取和学术出版性质变化的辩论中,它都被忽视了。本文着眼于公共政策和实践中灰色文献的产生,其中计算机和互联网带来的变化正在引起知识和证据传播方面的隐性革命。它探讨组织出版物的生产、传播和管理,它们的性质、目的和价值,并调查在商业或学术出版企业之外出版的利益和挑战。本文根据在线调查和评估对灰色文献的经济价值进行了估计,并考虑了组织自行出版的成本和收益,这些组织既提供了一个动态的、灵活的、反应迅速的出版系统,也提供了一个链接腐烂、重复和高度不同的标准。这些发现是一个更广泛的研究项目的一部分,该项目着眼于灰色文献在政策和实践中的作用和价值,包括消费、生产和收集。广泛的决策者和实践者以及从事媒体和通讯、公共行政、图书馆和信息管理工作的学者都将感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信