{"title":"When Database Queries are Fourth Amendment Searches","authors":"E. Berman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2902635","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2902635","url":null,"abstract":"Due to limits on the scope of the Fourth Amendment and numerous exceptions to its warrant requirement, Fourth Amendment doctrine permits the government to collect a great deal of information about Americans with limited constitutional constraints. Both courts and commentators have recognized that this vast collection authority raises significant privacy concerns. The conventional response has been to suggest various modifications to the existing information-collection rules. Data collection, however, is only one part of the problem. The government’s post-collection use of information alone can—and often does—have equally disturbing privacy implications. The most troubling example has been labeled the “aggregation problem.” The aggregation and analysis of data in the government’s possession actually can result in revelations that could not have been gleaned from viewing those data in isolation. This article argues that, as a result, collection-focused solutions to privacy concerns—while valuable—are alone insufficient. They must be supplemented by rules regarding the government’s use of information. Where broad collection authority combines with the capacity to aggregate data in ways that reveal new information, the extraction of that information should be subject to constitutionally based limits. Specifically, this article focuses on one such extraction tool: database “queries.” When queries about U.S. persons are reasonably likely to expose knowledge about those individuals discoverable only by aggregating multiple pieces of data, such queries should be considered searches regulated by the Fourth Amendment. Both the purpose of the Fourth Amendment and the intrusive nature of the information that such queries can reveal support this conclusion. And while such an expansion of Fourth Amendment doctrine is no small undertaking, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court’s oversight of government surveillance programs already provides a blueprint for how to implement this regulation.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134562332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Review of the New Polish Model of Abstract Control of Standard Forms of Agreements Concluded with Consumers","authors":"Paulina Korycińska-Rządca","doi":"10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2016.9.14.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2016.9.14.12","url":null,"abstract":"The Polish Act of 5 August 2015 amending the Act on Competition and Consumer Protection and certain other acts introduced several changes intended to strengthen consumer protection. Its substantial part concerns the abstract control of standard forms of agreements concluded with consumers. The Amendment Act of 2015 has completely changed the previous model of abstract control of standard forms of agreements concluded with consumers by replacing the court proceedings model with the administrative proceedings model. This article presents an analysis of Polish legal rules on the abstract control of standard forms of agreements concluded with consumers as amended by the Amendment Act of 2015. Its purpose is to verify whether the new Polish model may be deemed as an appropriate and effective means of preventing the continued use of unfair terms, within the meaning of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts. The paper analyses the legal rules on the new model of abstract control of standard forms of agreements concluded with consumers (the administrative proceedings model) and compares the new model with its predecessor (the court proceedings model). The paper does not cover the remaining changes introduced into the Polish Competition Act of 2007 by the Amendment Act of 2015, which are not connected to abstract control of standard forms of agreements concluded with consumers.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134550412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Excessive Contractual Penalties in Football","authors":"D. Mavromati","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2872151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2872151","url":null,"abstract":"It is common to have a penalty clause inserted in a football-related contract (e.g. a player-transfer contract) in case of non-compliance with its terms. Due to the fact that contractual penalties are not explicitly regulated in the FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP), Swiss law applies very often for the interpretation of such penalty clauses. Numerous arbitral awards of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) have dealt with this issue (in most cases in appeals against decisions rendered by the FIFA Player Status Committee, PSC but also the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber, DRC), and the CAS panels are called to determine whether a penalty is excessive and reduce it accordingly. Notwithstanding the case-specific character of contractual penalties, the present paper examines a) how penalty clauses are generally treated under Swiss law, b) what are the conditions in order to consider a contractual penalty as being excessive c) what are the criteria to employ in order to reduce an excessive penalty clause under CAS case law and d) what are the limits of control by the Swiss Federal Tribunal (SFT) and e) by foreign jurisdictions that are called to enforce CAS awards.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"26 S66","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113954068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How to Secure Contractual Obligations in Common and Civil Law","authors":"J. Dalhuisen","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2871431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2871431","url":null,"abstract":"Securing contract performance is a very different matter in common and civil law. It goes to the issue of contract validity, defenses and excuses and raises in particular issues when in international transaction a particular domestic law has been chosen by the parties. What does it mean?","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124815362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Purchaser's Damages for Breach of Contract","authors":"R. Bernhardt","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2895792","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2895792","url":null,"abstract":"Consideration of a recent decision awarding purchasers their costs for vendor's breach of contract.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130478720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emmanuel Bernard Jolivet, G. Marchisio, F. Gélinas
{"title":"Trade Usages in ICC Arbitration","authors":"Emmanuel Bernard Jolivet, G. Marchisio, F. Gélinas","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199916016.003.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199916016.003.0010","url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter’s analysis of ICC arbitral awards, two different interpretations of usages can be observed: on the one hand, the strict notion of a trade usage as a repeated practice; on the other, a broad notion of usage as encompassing both traditional trade usages and general principles of the law, distilled through the comparison of various legal systems. Noting the ability of usages to adapt quickly to societal changes, the chapter concludes that these two interpretations of usages seem to serve two different purposes: the restrictive interpretation serves to establish the meaning and content of the parties’ contract, while the broad interpretation ensures that the governing law is applied in a way that takes account of the international context in which the contract was made. Both interpretations contribute to a conception of usages as a set of general rules for international arbitration.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130310502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Empowering the Victims of Corruption: The Potential of Sleeping Third-Party Beneficiary Clauses","authors":"Abiola O. Makinwa","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3088964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3088964","url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes that third-party beneficiary clauses, rights ius quaesitum tertio, can be used to create platforms for private actor intervention in the fight against corruption that can help to shape an environment that discourages corruption in a self-regulatory manner. By linking those who bear the brunt of the negative consequences of corruption to public contracts tainted by corruption, third-party beneficiary clauses would give victims of corruption a seat at the table, a right to sue and a right to be engaged in the sanctioning processes with regard to such corrupt transactions. This approach can also act as a check on the actions of government officials and corporations by increasing the risk they incur through corrupt activity. However, there are good reasons for rules of standing; the machinery of justice may break down under the weight of a multiplicity of claims or, worse, an onslaught of frivolous claims. This paper therefore proposes that it is possible to provide third party redress, while also providing mechanisms to avoid encouraging excessive litigation, through establishing a sleeping third-party beneficiary clause in procurement contracts. Such clauses remain dormant unless the third party can demonstrate evidence of corrupt activity relating to the award of a specific contract. A threshold of evidence of corruption or fraud can be defined that will trigger the clause into operation, upon which it automatically comes into effect, making the identified third-party beneficiaries parties to the contract and giving them standing to sue on the contract. Ultimately, such a clause would be most successful if the specter of direct intervention discourages corruption so effectively that the clause is in fact never triggered into operation.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129617135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Beyond the Real and the Paper Deal: The Quest for Contextual Coherence in Contractual Interpretation","authors":"Z. Tan","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12203","url":null,"abstract":"Contract lawyers are often divided between two schools of thought: formalism and contextualism. In the realm of contractual interpretation, this division illuminates various debates surrounding the modern contextual approach. Ultimately, however, the divide between the ‘real and the paper deal’ does not fully reflect the relevant fault lines. The real contest is between rival interpretations attempting to make the most coherent sense of the available text and context surrounding the document. In characterising the true nature of the exercise, I draw upon theories of coherence to articulate a framework of ‘contextual coherence’ that involves concepts of competing narratives, the rational motivations of the parties, and the need for a holistic assessment of the best hypothesis, in accordance with the English courts’ ‘iterative approach’ to interpretation. I demonstrate that this framework enables us to explain and evaluate recent cases such as the UK Supreme Court decision of Arnold v Britton.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125293294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Injunctive Relief: But Let's Agree Not to Have it?","authors":"L. Ho","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12192","url":null,"abstract":"The ability of parties contractually to limit their right to seek injunctive relief has not often been judicially discussed. An interesting case from Singapore now appears to suggest that this is much more than a theoretical possibility. Some arguments can, however, be made to demonstrate that this is perhaps not the vista of opportunity over which some contract draughtsmen might rejoice, and care should be taken to ascertain the boundaries of the law, as explained in this note.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115832508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gus De Franco, Florin P. Vasvari, Dushyantkumar Vyas, Regina Wittenberg Moerman
{"title":"Similarity in Bond Covenants","authors":"Gus De Franco, Florin P. Vasvari, Dushyantkumar Vyas, Regina Wittenberg Moerman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2288723","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2288723","url":null,"abstract":"We examine the economic consequences associated with the inclusion of covenants with similar levels of restrictiveness in bond contracts. Using a unique Moody’s dataset on the quality of bond covenants, we develop measures that capture similarity in bond covenant terms by comparing the restrictiveness of a bond’s covenants with the covenant restrictiveness of previously issued peer bonds. Consistent with similarity in covenants reducing bondholders’ contracting and comparability costs, we document that bonds with more similar covenant restrictiveness receive significantly lower yields at issuance. These bonds are also characterized by greater liquidity in the secondary market and are more likely to be held by long-term bond investors, such as insurance companies. Our results highlight the benefits of covenant similarity and suggest that the use of covenants with similar restrictiveness levels brings contracting and comparability cost savings that may be larger than the monitoring benefits provided by covenants with more tailored credit protection.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131182491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}