GeoforumPub Date : 2025-03-15DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104205
Aino Korvensyrjä
{"title":"The ‘Borders of Berlin’: West African protests and the coloniality of Euro-African deportation cooperation","authors":"Aino Korvensyrjä","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104205","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104205","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines diaspora-led protests in Germany and actions in West Africa opposing Euro-African deportation cooperation after 2015. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork (2015–2021) with West Africans facing deportation in Germany and activists, it investigates how the protests effectively challenged the role of West African authorities and embassies in German deportations. As the European Union sought to increase ‘returns’, the protesters contested this framing of deportation, which presupposes symmetrical nation-states, reciprocity, and harmonious belonging. They exposed colonial continuities in European deportation policies and asymmetries in sovereignty, mobility, and access to resources. Building on longstanding West African diaspora critique, the protesters denounced Euro-African borders as the ‘Borders of Berlin’, traced to the 1884–1885 Berlin Conference and reinforced after the fall of the Berlin Wall. They urged African governments to reject deportations and subordination to Europe, reframing migration as decolonisation and redress. Yet, by voicing demands as citizens to nation-state representatives, they also affirmed the identities and nation-states created by the Borders of Berlin. The article contributes to scholarship on colonialism’s influence on European borders and externalisation by centring the analyses and agency of marginalised actors in shaping deportation, Euro-African relations, and international law. It challenges the view of externalisation as Europe’s territorial expansion, highlighting colonial continuities and violence within Europe. Moreover, it underscores the persistence of the national as a frame for resistance and the fragility of the Borders of Berlin as a radical, decolonising imaginary, in contrast to the nation-state order enforced through deportations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104205"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143628652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Resistance in a “sacred geography”: Critical perspectives on land, ecology, and activism among Dersimi Alevis in Turkey","authors":"Hayal Hanoğlu , Dobrosława Wiktor-Mach , Wendelmoet Hamelink , Marcin Skupiński","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104263","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104263","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental actions related to sacred geographies have recently intensified, leading to growing research interest. Many studies have explored indigenous struggles to defend the land, its ecosystems, culture and identity, especially in the Americas. This article employs the concept of sacred geography in Dersim (Tunceli), Turkey, to investigate the unique relationship between the indigenous Alevi population and their land and natural environment. Dersim is also unique for its internal politics and left-wing identity politics, which are rooted in a history of state violence, discrimination and coloniality of nature. Focusing on environmental resistance and women’s initiatives within contemporary Kurdish socio-cultural, environmental and political activism, this article explores the relationship between land and identity and how this connection motivates environmentalist actions in Dersim. Based on ethnographic findings and analysis of secondary sources, we argue that the territorialised Dersimi Alevi identity, rooted in the physical and imaginative realms of the natural landscape, its representations, and its sacredness, is intertwined with widespread resistance to state hegemony, coloniality, and neoliberal and neo-extractivist policies. Social struggles exist in multiple forms, such as protests in defence of a sacred geography; affective relations with the land; and cross-border engagement and social mobilisation through cultural initiatives, for example, the Munzur Festival where culture, environmentalism and politics come together.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143628770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
GeoforumPub Date : 2025-03-11DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104264
Mikel Oleaga
{"title":"Knowledge exchange in peripheral coworking spaces: A study of proximities using social network analysis","authors":"Mikel Oleaga","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104264","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104264","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As coworking spaces expand beyond large urban centres into more peripheral regions, they are emerging as potential entrepreneurial hubs, fostering knowledge exchange networks among entrepreneurs, self-employed individuals and other relevant economic actors. However, the factors influencing the formation of these networks and the role that different actors play remain underexplored. This study analyses the structure of the network of a coworking space and identifies the variables that influence knowledge exchanges, measuring the effect of different proximity dimensions. Using a case study of a well-established coworking in Petrer, a small ‘left-behind’ city in Eastern Spain, the study employs a social network analysis approach to analyse the knowledge-sharing network. In contrast to previous studies, it includes a full-network survey of the community, including not only coworkers but also coworking managers, ex-coworkers, and other collaborators of the space. Additional interviews, a focus group, and participatory observation contribute to providing deeper insights. By mapping and analysing the knowledge exchange network, the study sheds light on the behaviour of the different groups in knowledge sharing, highlighting the relevance of the coworking managers in building these networks. Furthermore, the study employs a multivariate exponential random graph model to demonstrate that while more frequent co-location strengthens social ties, temporary proximity is sufficient to stimulate knowledge exchanges. Moreover, non-geographical dimensions of proximity, such as organisational, social, and, to a lesser extent, institutional, are found to have an effect on knowledge sharing, while cognitive proximity does not appear to be significant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143592328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
GeoforumPub Date : 2025-03-10DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104260
Hsi-Chuan Wang
{"title":"Seeing self-help urban design as a social movement in the global south: A case in Accra, Ghana","authors":"Hsi-Chuan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104260","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104260","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The literature on urban design has surged to differentiate two groups of practitioners: the “knowing” (self-conscious) urban designer (people who see themselves in such a role) and the “unknowing” (unself-conscious) urban designer (people who do not see themselves in such a role). Both contribute to the making, utilisation, and transformation of places. However, the latter has yet to be adequately explored, partly the drivers behind the ongoing practices. A growing scholarship has been developed in the Global South to address such a direction, considering that the urban theory, spatial logic, and design process differ between the Global North and South. The implications of urban design practices and the role of urban designers are complex to clarify, especially considering the vast self-help activities seen in the Global South. This paper engages with such a conversation and suggests self-help urban design in informal settlements (public spaces planned, constructed, maintained, and replanned by the residents) to be perceived as a form of social movement that practitioners can not manage and predict. This paper utilises an ethnographic approach to contextualise a case in Accra, Ghana, to support the above argument. We stress this understanding, which has yet to be explored in the literature, with implications to help urban designers rethink their roles in placemaking and cope with local social movements for positive outcomes in the Global South.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143577161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
GeoforumPub Date : 2025-03-06DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104247
Chris Brueck , Ingo Liefner
{"title":"Local varieties of state-directed green and digital innovation processes in China: Evidence from Shanghai, Hangzhou, and Longyan","authors":"Chris Brueck , Ingo Liefner","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104247","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104247","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper analyzes the state-directed organization of green and digital innovation processes in China. Building on a qualitative approach, we selected the three case study regions Shanghai, Hangzhou (Zhejiang) and Longyan (Fujian), and conducted 23 expert interviews with various private and government actors. Following an analytical framework based on state rescaling processes, the data were analyzed using a content analysis and categories structured according to government levels, governance processes and technology domains. The findings reveal that state-directed innovation processes are shaped between local actor constellations and national, regional and local government levels, impacting local policy application. While Shanghai pursues a top-down approach in guiding multinational and domestic enterprises, Longyan traces agency-driven bottom-up processes centered around a local flagship company, and Hangzhou combines a top-down approach with selective bottom-up policy. Based on the findings, we develop a typology for local coordination processes during policy implementation. Our findings help to better understand the diversity of the organization of green and digital innovation processes in Chinese cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143548947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
GeoforumPub Date : 2025-03-05DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104241
Ida N.S. Djenontin , Harry W. Fischer , Junjun Yin , Guangqing Chi
{"title":"Unveiling global narratives of restoration policy: Big data insights into competing framings and implications","authors":"Ida N.S. Djenontin , Harry W. Fischer , Junjun Yin , Guangqing Chi","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104241","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104241","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Restoration has become a key environmental policy goal of the contemporary era. Yet, what restoration means and how it is pursued remains an object of debate. This study examines the nature of restoration discourses on Twitter – a large, open, and global record of public discussions around contemporary restoration matters. We apply machine learning-powered text analysis of about 350,000 geolocated tweets spanning 2015-2022, focusing on four main restoration terms – landscape restoration; forest and landscape restoration; ecological restoration; and ecosystem restoration. Findings reveal a wide diversity of environmental policies framed through the language of restoration, underscoring its public appeal and use by different institutions from global to national and subnational scales. Restoration discourses foster both ecological and human-centered framings, with the former being more prominent. Other distinct discourses convey promotional efforts, momentum building, political engagement by proponent actors, and what restoration should deliver. Only a few discourses feature quick fixes such as tree planting, potentially implying that contemporary restoration interventions are more diverse than headline-grabbing targets to plant trees. There is little discussion of rural livelihoods, tenure rights, or tradeoffs between environmental objectives and local needs. Although the discourses vary across the restoration terms, we find some shared discourses as well as unique ones. We underscore how restoration discourses carry different worldviews with implications for the purported socio-ecological benefits of restoration. Our work shows how data-driven analysis of social media can shed light on the rhetoric of restoration policy agendas and their nuances among a broad spectrum of social and policy actors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104241"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143548848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
GeoforumPub Date : 2025-03-05DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104250
Hillary Birch
{"title":"More than ‘self-help’: The urban governance of the Ebola outbreak in Monrovia, Liberia","authors":"Hillary Birch","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104250","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104250","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>By tracing logics of urban governance in Monrovia, Liberia, this paper demonstrates how an urban response to the Ebola virus in Monrovia emerged during the West African Ebola epidemic (2014 to 2016) in the context of limited local government capacity and broader structures of exclusion in the city, contributing to debates concerning how cities are governed beyond the formal-informal binary and how these urban governance mechanisms are consolidated over time. A historicized account of the governance of Monrovia is presented, where community ‘self-help’ activities arose from struggles for power and recognition between urban inhabitants and the state, traced through the country’s war, and again during Ebola in a moment of temporary institutionalization when ‘informal’ urban authorities were directly implicated in the success of the formal outbreak response. Drawing on empirical evidence from fieldwork in Monrovia including interviews with actors in the Ebola response and extensive secondary source research, this paper demonstrates how an urban Ebola response built off past choices and institutions laid down by a settler-colonial regime, making it possible for robust community action to coproduce an Ebola response across spatial scales and across formal and informal binaries even within the exclusionary status-quo of local government in Monrovia. In addition, the findings suggest that effectively responding to urban disease outbreaks in extremely resource limited settings such as Monrovia requires attention to how community level actions augment limited capacity in local government and produce a health response capable of adapting to evolving situations across time and scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143548847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
GeoforumPub Date : 2025-03-04DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104258
Dorothee Nussbruch, Lotte Thomsen
{"title":"Struggles over value, access and positionality: Differentiated dis/association agency in humanitarian aid","authors":"Dorothee Nussbruch, Lotte Thomsen","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104258","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104258","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unequal relational dynamics shape struggles over value, access and positionality across geographies. The inclusion of Global South-based actors in, and their exclusion from, ‘the global’ is strengthened by practices of dis/association that simultaneously highlight positive matters and hide negative ones. Yet, the agency of the involved actors has received little conceptual or empirical attention. In this article, we address this limitation by exploring the relational dynamics between global and local humanitarian actors in disaster-affected areas. We develop a conceptual framework for differentiated dis/association agency, distinguishing between dis/associations mobilisation by international lead actors and utilisation by local actors. Empirically, we chronicle how humanitarian lead actors mobilise associations around ethical claims and dissociate unequal power dynamics and how a local business organisation in Vanuatu utilises such dis/associations as it aims to access the humanitarian system. Our study pinpoints the value of dis/association concepts beyond global production in socio-political relations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104258"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143534819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
GeoforumPub Date : 2025-03-03DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104245
Emma Jane Lord , Siddharth Sareen
{"title":"Subjects of injustice: Inequity, misframing and human rights violations in a Tanzanian REDD+ pilot project","authors":"Emma Jane Lord , Siddharth Sareen","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104245","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104245","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest carbon offsetting schemes, including Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+), have attracted criticism from the outset, for building upon former colonial international relations to justify continued fossil fuel emissions and industrialized profit. Typically, implementation contexts in tropical forests feature entrenched inequities of power, wealth and social status. Worryingly, numerous implemented REDD+ projects have adversely impacted marginalized local communities. Impacts include contestation over rights and benefits, violence, and human rights abuses. This manuscript mobilizes <em>misframing</em> as an environmental justice lens to understand a failed REDD+ project in Western Tanzania, with contested land tenure status, boundary conflict and forced evictions. Empirical analysis draws upon 72 individual and 5 group stakeholder interviews, extensive document analysis, and eight months of ethnographic fieldwork, including extensive participant observation, during 2014–2022. Using an interactionist social science approach, we elucidate perspectives of marginalized groups and project practitioners’ justifications for their treatment. We show how misframing works through this REDD+ intervention, shifting the burdens of global climate concerns while injustices and inequities are socially reproduced. To safeguard against misframing and these attendant risks, we argue for mandatory attention to human rights protections in REDD+ projects, and for forest governance to explicitly address marginalized groups’ justice concerns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143529745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
GeoforumPub Date : 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104249
Gregor Schäfer , Claire Maxwell
{"title":"Figurations of belonging – How high-skilled migrants form relations of recognition","authors":"Gregor Schäfer , Claire Maxwell","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104249","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104249","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The search for belonging is universal. Individuals seek comfort, stability and recognition in their relationships and in the social units that organise their lives. The concept of ’belonging’ is often used to capture these dynamics, but we argue that it could be theorised more carefully. Migrants may face a more difficult task in forging relationships of belonging because of the upheaval that cross-border mobility entails. In this paper, we focus specifically on the different figurations of belonging articulated by ’highly skilled migrants’ (HSMs) − a growing category of migrants found in many parts of the world. To inform our analysis, we reconceptualise belonging as shaped by different ’figurations of I-and-We’ (<span><span>Elias, 1978</span></span>) and the fundamental need for ’recognition’ (<span><span>Honneth, 1995</span></span>). Drawing on 54 interviews with HSM and their partners in Denmark, we illustrate two streams of figurations of belonging − one in their private lives and the other in their professional lives, often operating in concert. These figurations also operate at different scales − local, transnational and/or global − and shape how belonging is initiated, experienced and maintained for individuals who have migrated and may migrate again. The paper contributes by placing belonging on a stronger theoretical footing and by developing more specific articulations of the forms of belonging engaged in by HSMs that are maintained and initiated during processes of spatial mobility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104249"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143520413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}