知识地理学的黑暗面:对地方创新的影响

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Xionghe Qin , Dong Zhang , Chunguang Hou , Seamus Grimes
{"title":"知识地理学的黑暗面:对地方创新的影响","authors":"Xionghe Qin ,&nbsp;Dong Zhang ,&nbsp;Chunguang Hou ,&nbsp;Seamus Grimes","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The positive attributes of knowledge geography are well recognized, yet its dark side has received little attention. Therefore, we have developed an analytical framework to reveal the dark side of knowledge geography by exploring three aspects of knowledge geography: “linear” structure, “reticular” structure, and “planar” structure. The dark sides of these three structures manifest as knowledge relatedness, knowledge complexity, and knowledge inequality. Subsequently, we employed a heterogeneous panel dataset of Chinese prefecture-level cities to examine the effects of the dark side of knowledge geography on local innovation. We found that knowledge relatedness and complexity negatively affect local innovation performance, whereas knowledge inequality exhibits a non-linear effect on local innovation performance, with its positive impact having an optimal range. We also found that embedding in regional innovation networks, as a manifestation of open innovation behaviour, can effectively alleviate the negative effects of knowledge relatedness and complexity on local innovation performance. Additionally, the Spatial Durbin Model estimation confirms that innovation performance exhibits significant positive spatial spillover effects, meaning a city’s innovation benefits from that of its neighbours. The findings of this study endorse a more contextualized way to understand knowledge geography, as it is not universally beneficial, as presumed in the existing literature, at least within the context of our study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104329"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dark side of knowledge geography: their effect on local innovation in the shadows\",\"authors\":\"Xionghe Qin ,&nbsp;Dong Zhang ,&nbsp;Chunguang Hou ,&nbsp;Seamus Grimes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The positive attributes of knowledge geography are well recognized, yet its dark side has received little attention. Therefore, we have developed an analytical framework to reveal the dark side of knowledge geography by exploring three aspects of knowledge geography: “linear” structure, “reticular” structure, and “planar” structure. The dark sides of these three structures manifest as knowledge relatedness, knowledge complexity, and knowledge inequality. Subsequently, we employed a heterogeneous panel dataset of Chinese prefecture-level cities to examine the effects of the dark side of knowledge geography on local innovation. We found that knowledge relatedness and complexity negatively affect local innovation performance, whereas knowledge inequality exhibits a non-linear effect on local innovation performance, with its positive impact having an optimal range. We also found that embedding in regional innovation networks, as a manifestation of open innovation behaviour, can effectively alleviate the negative effects of knowledge relatedness and complexity on local innovation performance. Additionally, the Spatial Durbin Model estimation confirms that innovation performance exhibits significant positive spatial spillover effects, meaning a city’s innovation benefits from that of its neighbours. The findings of this study endorse a more contextualized way to understand knowledge geography, as it is not universally beneficial, as presumed in the existing literature, at least within the context of our study.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001290\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001290","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

知识地理学的积极属性得到了广泛的认识,但其阴暗面却很少受到重视。因此,我们通过对知识地理学的“线性”结构、“网状”结构和“平面”结构三个方面的探讨,构建了一个揭示知识地理学阴暗面的分析框架。这三种结构的阴暗面表现为知识相关性、知识复杂性和知识不平等。随后,我们利用中国地级市的异质性面板数据来检验知识地理黑暗面对地方创新的影响。研究发现,知识关联度和知识复杂性对地方创新绩效具有负向影响,而知识不平等对地方创新绩效具有非线性影响,其正向影响具有最优范围。研究还发现,作为开放式创新行为的一种表现,嵌入区域创新网络能够有效缓解知识关联度和复杂性对地方创新绩效的负面影响。此外,空间德宾模型的估计证实,创新绩效表现出显著的正空间溢出效应,即一个城市的创新受益于其相邻城市的创新。这项研究的结果支持一种更情境化的方式来理解知识地理学,因为它不是普遍有益的,正如现有文献所假定的那样,至少在我们的研究背景下是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The dark side of knowledge geography: their effect on local innovation in the shadows
The positive attributes of knowledge geography are well recognized, yet its dark side has received little attention. Therefore, we have developed an analytical framework to reveal the dark side of knowledge geography by exploring three aspects of knowledge geography: “linear” structure, “reticular” structure, and “planar” structure. The dark sides of these three structures manifest as knowledge relatedness, knowledge complexity, and knowledge inequality. Subsequently, we employed a heterogeneous panel dataset of Chinese prefecture-level cities to examine the effects of the dark side of knowledge geography on local innovation. We found that knowledge relatedness and complexity negatively affect local innovation performance, whereas knowledge inequality exhibits a non-linear effect on local innovation performance, with its positive impact having an optimal range. We also found that embedding in regional innovation networks, as a manifestation of open innovation behaviour, can effectively alleviate the negative effects of knowledge relatedness and complexity on local innovation performance. Additionally, the Spatial Durbin Model estimation confirms that innovation performance exhibits significant positive spatial spillover effects, meaning a city’s innovation benefits from that of its neighbours. The findings of this study endorse a more contextualized way to understand knowledge geography, as it is not universally beneficial, as presumed in the existing literature, at least within the context of our study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信