Leonidas G. Barbopoulos, Rui Dai, Tālis J. Putniņš, A. Saunders
{"title":"Market Efficiency in the Age of Machine Learning","authors":"Leonidas G. Barbopoulos, Rui Dai, Tālis J. Putniņš, A. Saunders","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3783221","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3783221","url":null,"abstract":"As machines replace humans in financial markets, how is informational efficiency impacted? We shed light on this issue by exploiting unique data that allow us to identify when machines access company information (8-K filings) versus when humans access the same information. We find that increased access by machines, particularly from cloud computing services, significantly improves informational efficiency, by reducing the price drift following information events. We address identification through a quasi-natural experiment, instrumental variables, and exogenous power outages. We show that machines are better able to handle linguistically complex filings and are less susceptible to bias from negative sentiment, whereas humans are better at combining incremental information.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128608868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Why Did Bank Stocks Crash during COVID-19?","authors":"V. Acharya, R. Engle, Sascha Steffen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3799590","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3799590","url":null,"abstract":"We study the crash of bank stock prices during the COVID-19 pandemic. We find evidence consistent with a \"credit line drawdown channel\". Stock prices of banks with large ex-ante exposures to undrawn credit lines as well as large ex-post gross drawdowns decline more. The effect is attenuated for banks with higher capital buffers. These banks reduce term loan lending, even after policy measures were implemented. We conclude that bank provision of credit lines appears akin to writing deep out-of-the-money put options on aggregate risk; we show how the resulting contingent leverage and stock return exposure can be incorporated tractably into bank capital stress tests.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130089508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A COVID Diary: Searching for Investment Serenity","authors":"A. Damodaran","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3799691","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3799691","url":null,"abstract":"In early February of 2020, when US equities were hitting all-time highs and the US economy was showing strength, a virus, that many believed would be isolated to China and cruise ships, surged into the rest of the world. The resulting economic shut down put stocks into a tailspin, starting the COVID crisis clock. In the days after the meltdown started, I kept a journal chronicling market events and trying to make sense of them, partly to recover my investing balance, and partly to keep a record of my uncertainties and fears, in real time. That journal became the basis for fourteen posts on the crisis, with the first one on February 26, 2020, just a couple of weeks after it started, and the last one on November 5, 2020, as the first vaccines were being readied for approval. In this paper, I use those posts to look at how the crisis played out in markets and across companies, and I use the winners and losers to make judgments about post-crisis lessons for companies and investors.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133871058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Value Investing: Requiem, Rebirth or Reincarnation?","authors":"Bradford Cornell, A. Damodaran","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3779481","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3779481","url":null,"abstract":"For much of the last century, value investors considered themselves to be the winners in the investment world, a result they attributed to their patience, maturity and good sense. That view, at least on the surface, was backed up by evidence that “value” stocks, defined as stocks that trade at low multiples of earnings and book value, earned higher returns than “growth” stocks, defined loosely as companies that trade at high multiples of earnings or book value. It was reinforced by the mythology of great value investors, with Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger taking center stage, as deep thinkers, with profound insights on how markets work. In the last two decades, value investing lost its edge, and a debate has revolved around whether this is a temporary phase, and the result of an unusual macro environment, or a reflection of a permanent change in economies and markets. In this paper, we argue that value investing, at least as practiced today, has become rigid and ritualistic, and that while some of its failures can be attributed to external factors, many can be traced back to practices and rules of thumb that have outlived their usefulness. We argue that if value investing is to be successful in the future, it needs to develop a more dynamic view of value and a greater willingness to live with and invest in the face of uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129117992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Understanding Credit Risk for Chinese Companies using Machine Learning: A Default-Based Approach","authors":"E. Altman, Xiaolu Hu, Jing Yu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3734053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3734053","url":null,"abstract":"In response to the recent elevated corporate credit risk environment in China’s credit market, we develop a probability of default (PD) measure for Chinese companies using actual corporate bond defaults by applying the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) machine learning model. Our PD measure is applicable to publicly listed and also, importantly, to unlisted companies. Our measure’s bond default prediction accuracy outperforms models generated by alternative machine learning techniques and other prominent credit risk measures. Further analysis documents a large pricing effect of corporate default risk using our PD measure in primary and secondary bond markets. The pricing effect of default risk became more pronounced following two crucial market events in 2014 that raised market awareness of credit risk and is stronger for bonds likely traded by retail and foreign investors. In the cross section of bond and stock returns, we observe a positive distress risk premium after controlling for common risk factors. Finally, stocks of low PD firms outperformed those of high PD firms during the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124465017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Divided We Fall","authors":"J. Livnat, Amir Rubin, D. Segal","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3733317","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3733317","url":null,"abstract":"We analyze the effects of partisan Congressional control on the US economy. We find that economic performance is weaker when no party has the majority in both chambers of Congress (divided Congress). This weaker economic performance is attributed to reduced and less effective regulation. We provide evidence that undivided Congresses, whether Democrat or Republican, tend to enhance economic performance. Republicans seem to create value for large firms, whereas Democrats enhance competition and create value for small firms. Overall, we conclude that congressional cycles and effective regulation are important drivers of economic activity.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130857922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Passive and Active Attention to Baseball Telecasts: Implications for Content (Re-)Design","authors":"Xiao Liu, M. Shum, Kosuke Uetake","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3717894","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3717894","url":null,"abstract":"Using a unique individual-level data containing high-frequency logs which distinguish whether individuals are attentively or inattentively viewing television broadcasts, we estimate a model of agents’ attention choices during baseball telecasts, and find that the degree of attentiveness depends on current features of gameplay, including suspense and surprise. Overall, only 27% of viewers are actively paying attention and viewers value suspense over surprise. Moreover, agents are more attentive to commercials which play during surprising junctures of the game but less so to those which interrupt the game at suspenseful junctures. These results have implications for content design, as we find that shortening the game to seven innings enhances surprise and suspense which, while increasing viewers’ attention to the telecast, can have offsetting effects which decrease attention to TV commercials that air during baseball games.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133122685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Do Suspense and Surprise Drive Entertainment Demand? Evidence from Twitch.tv","authors":"Andrey Simonov, Raluca M. Ursu, Carolina Zheng","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3711801","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3711801","url":null,"abstract":"We measure the relative importance of suspense and surprise in the entertainment preference of viewers of Twitch.tv, the largest online video game streaming platform. Using detailed viewership and game statistics data from broadcasts of tournaments of a popular video game, Counter Strike: Global Offensive, we compute measures of suspense and surprise for a rational Bayesian viewer. We then develop and estimate a stylized utility model that underlies viewers' decisions to both join and to leave a game stream, allowing for a differential effect of suspense and surprise on these decisions. The estimates reveal that suspense enters the consumer utility but provide little evidence of the effect of surprise. The magnitudes imply that a one standard deviation increase in round-level suspense decreases the probability of leaving a stream by 0.2 percentage points. Consistent with the observation that only current viewers of a game observe the amount of suspense and surprise revealed in the game, we find no detectable effect of suspense and surprise on the decision to join a game. In a simulation exercise, we show that a change in game's realized suspense explains 8.1% of the observed range of the evolution of streams' viewership levels. Our results provide a general tool for content producers and platforms to use when designing and evaluating media products.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128360612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Are Critical Audit Matters Informative?","authors":"Julia Klevak, J. Livnat, D. Pei, Kate Suslava","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3685369","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3685369","url":null,"abstract":"Breaking from a long stretch of using largely standard language in unqualified audit opinions, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) expanded audit reports to disclose Critical Audit Matters (CAMs) and the audit procedures used to address them. The first wave of CAM disclosures began for large accelerated filers after June 2019, with most disclosures occurring in February 2020. Using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, this study examines the types of CAMs disclosed by auditors and the typical audit procedures used to address them. We then explore whether CAMs are informative to investors and security analysts. Our findings are consistent with greater amounts of CAM disclosures as indicators of greater uncertainty. We document that market reactions are more negative for firms with more CAM disclosures; analysts reduce their earnings forecasts to a larger extent for such firms; stock prices become more volatile; and the dispersion of analyst forecasts are greater for firms with more CAM disclosures. We further find that many issues related to CAMs are raised in earnings conference calls with analysts during the immediately subsequent quarter. While these findings indicate that CAMs are informative to investors and analysts, their effects are concentrated around the time of disclosure. We do not find evidence of a drift in returns after the initial disclosures.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114332668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Measuring and Hedging Geopolitical Risk","authors":"R. Engle, Susana Campos-Martins","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3685213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3685213","url":null,"abstract":"Geopolitical events can impact volatilities of all assets, asset classes, sectors and countries. It is shown that innovations to volatilities are correlated across assets and therefore can be used to measure and hedge geopolitical risk. We introduce a definition of geopolitical risk which is based on volatility shocks to a wide range of financial market prices. To measure geopolitical risk, we propose a statistical model for the magnitude of the common volatility shocks. Accordingly, a test and estimation methods are developed and studied using both empirical and simulated data. We provide a novel explanation for why idiosyncratic volatilities comove based on a new way to formulate multiplicative factors. Finally, we propose a new criterion for portfolio optimality which is intended to reduce the exposure to geopolitical risk.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121767010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}