{"title":"Internationalizing the History of Psychology","authors":"Adrian C. Brock","doi":"10.5860/choice.44-5924","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-5924","url":null,"abstract":"Acknowledgments Introduction Adrian C. Brock1 Constructing Subjectivity in Unexpected Places Johann Louw2 Transatlantic Migration of the Disciplines of the Mind: Examination of the Reception of Wundt's and Freud's Theories in Argentina Cecilia Taiana3 From Tradition through Colonialism to Globalization: Re?ections on the History of Psychology in India Anand C. Paranjpe4 History of Psychology in Turkey as a Sign of Diverse Modernization and Global Psychologization Aydan Gulerce5 Origins of Scienti?c Psychology in China,1899-1949 Geoffrey Blowers6 Behavior Analysis in an International Context Ruben Ardila7 Internationalizing the History of U.S. Developmental Psychology John D. Hogan and Thomas P. Vaccaro8 Psychology and Liberal Democracy: A Spurious Connection? Adrian C. Brock9 Double Rei?cation: The Process of Universalizing Psychology in the Three Worlds Fathali M. Moghaddam and Naomi Lee10 Psychology in the Eurocentric Order of the Social Sciences: Colonial Constitution, Cultural Imperialist Expansion, Postcolonial Critique Irmingard Staeuble11 Universalism and Indigenization in the History of Modern Psychology Kurt DanzigerPostscriptAdrian C. BrockContributors Index","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125210225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Is psychology in ‘crisis’?","authors":"F. Watts","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125625748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A brief history of English disgust","authors":"Richard Firth-Godbehere","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.3","url":null,"abstract":"Generally, researchers assume that the experience of disgust is universal, shared by all humans at all times. It is under this assumption that much of the growing field of the history of disgust studies operates. However, no single concept of disgust exists. For example, while many believe that the causes of disgust are universal, others do not. Others have noted that the English word ‘disgust’ does not have identical equivalents in other languages, pointing to no single, shared concept of disgust. This article looks more closely at that last idea, noting that the word ‘disgust’ did not take on its current usage until the mid-eighteenth century. Beginning with an exploration of modern understandings of disgust, the paper charts the development of the modern English concept of the feeling. It argues that rather than being a universal emotion, the modern concept of disgust began when the word was used by early eighteenth-century taste theorists to describe a feeling of anti-taste – an extreme reaction to the opposite of beauty. Even then, this disgust was somewhat different from modern disgust, with deeper links to displeasure and horror than modern notions of the feeling. The main point of the article is the suggestion that historians of emotion research what look like modern emotions in the past, particularly disgust, that they ought to be cautious. Even if modern feelings appear to apply to historical events and ideas, a more in-depth look will often reveal a more complex era-dependant experience somewhat different from the modern concept.","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132197336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Our Minds, Our Selves: A brief history of psychology","authors":"","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.40","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.40","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131282032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The concept of ‘emotion’: An historical perspective","authors":"F. Watts","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.13","url":null,"abstract":"Though the concept of ‘emotion’ is often accepted uncritically, a historical approach shows that, in the form it takes in modern psychology, it is a product of the 19th century, and replaced an earlier more differentiated vocabulary. In the 17th century there had been another significant shift in the meaning of emotion words when they came to refer to subjective feelings in a new way. There has been much controversy about the concept of ‘basic’ emotions, which is unpopular with historians of emotion. However, I am persuaded that some such distinction is needed; a distinction between primary and secondary emotions is somewhat akin to the earlier distinction between passions and affections. Emotions have various manifestations, including behavioural, physiological and subjective. These are often aligned, though they do not have to be. There has been considerable interest in the couplings between different manifestations. Most current work on the history of emotions is being done by historians but it would be good to see more psychological interest in a historical approach to emotions, and cross fertilisation between the work of historians and psychologists.","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125792862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"‘A bud from the tree of life’: William McDougall’s response to Freud","authors":"A. Lockhart","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.28","url":null,"abstract":"In the interwar period, William McDougall, Wilde Reader in Mental Philosophy at Oxford, then Professor of Psychology at Harvard and Duke universities, was probably Britain’s pre-eminent psychological theorist. While he has been little studied in recent times, he developed a complex and detailed system of psychology centred on instinct and social relations that was very widely circulated in his day. A distinctive aspect of his approach is that he largely rejected reductionism and associationism, preferring a psychological model with a strong note of personalism. He was active in identifying the parallels between his approach and Freud’s, and his non-reductive intuitions generate an interesting rejoinder to Freud. This paper reviews McDougall’s system of psychology, discusses the points of intersection he identified with Freudian ideas, and comments on McDougall’s complaint about the narrowness of the Freudian focus on sex.","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134444675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"An emerging science of the mind in 1898","authors":"John Hall","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.34","url":null,"abstract":"This article is an extended review ofHeadhunters: The search for a science of the mind, by Ben Shephard. Shephard realised while preparing his 2002 bookA war of nervesthat, although the role of W.H.R. Rivers was ever present in his reading around the First World War, he was not the only psychologist to have treated war-shocked soldiers. This second book is both an account of an anthropological-psychological expedition and adventure, and the consequences of that expedition for the growth of psychology over the following years, including the impact of the First World War. The narrative is driven by the interplay between the key players in that project, here focusing on the roles of William McDougall, Charles Myers and William Rivers, and the intellectual questions and disputes of their day which underpin our present-day disciplines of anthropology, neurology, psychiatry and psychology.","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133777726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Psychology and sociology in Britain in the 20th century: A brief historical note","authors":"D. Pilgrim","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.19","url":null,"abstract":"As versions of human science, psychology and sociology have overlapping but also contrasting epistemologies. In addition, both national/cultural, as well as global, factors shape their character. These points are applied to the development of the two disciplines in the context of 20th century Britain. The dominant influences of eugenics and empiricism in the first part of the century are examined and contrasted with the later impact of postmodernism. The ambiguous position of social psychology remains at the boundary of the two disciplines today.","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130598269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Addendum on Psychology in 1936","authors":"I. Berlin","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2018.19.1.43","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2018.19.1.43","url":null,"abstract":"Prefatory noteIn 2001 this periodical published, under the title ‘The State of Psychology in 1936’, a memorandum on psychology written by Isaiah Berlin.1In 1936 Berlin was a Fellow of All Souls College, which was considering whether to elect a psychologist for the first time in its history, and the memorandum was written in order to assist the College in making its decision. The 2001 text was taken from a manuscript draft in Berlin’s papers, since the final version was presumed lost. However, a clutch of papers has now surfaced in the course of archival cataloguing at All Souls that includes not only the final printed text, but also two previously unknown contemporary letters from Berlin to the Warden of the College (W.S.G. Adams), as well as other related documents.The text of the memorandum turns out to have been considerably changed and enlarged after the published draft was written. Space prevents complete publication of the final version here, but the main portion is reproduced below. The omitted portions are mainly of more local interest, and can be read as part of the complete text available in the Isaiah Berlin Virtual Library athttp://berlin.wolf.ox.ac.uk/published_works/singles/bib250brevised.pdf. The two new letters are also included there, but since one of them contains interesting observations about Berlin’s informants, and also about a recent book published by Erwin W. Straus, I include most of it after this introductory note.There were meetings of a Psychology Subcommittee (including Berlin) on 11 October and 29 November 1936,2but the proposed appointment was not made.Thanks are due to Norma Aubertin-Potter and Gaye Morgan at All Souls for drawing my attention to the new material, photographing it, and securing permission to reproduce it here; and to Fraser Watts for his help in preparing the present publication.Henry HardyHenry Hardy, Wolfson College, Oxfordhenry.hardy@wolfson.ox.ac.uk","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122288173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The disappearance of ‘Medical Psychology’ and the controversy over the Medical Section during the early 1950s","authors":"Kevin M. Jones","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2018.19.1.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2018.19.1.3","url":null,"abstract":"In the 1950s the Medical Section of the British Psychological Society (BPS) was riven by a dispute which began with issues over the criteria for membership of the Section, and the editorial policy of the British Journal of Medical Psychology, but led to debates about the nature, and the future, of ‘medical psychology’ itself. These developments are documented in an archive of the BPS which is now held by the Wellcome Trust, an archive that has been hitherto overlooked by historians of psychology and psychiatry. This paper will provide some reasons why this debate occurred at this particular moment in history, concluding that this is a critical period of study for those interested in the recent histories of psychology and psychiatry within the United Kingdom, which was one of the major international centres for research in the mental sciences during the immediate post-war period. It will go on to suggest that the relationship between psychiatry and psychology in the UK can be used to make sense of the historical developments that have helped to shape psychology and psychiatry as distinct disciplines.","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132064983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
