A brief history of English disgust

Richard Firth-Godbehere
{"title":"A brief history of English disgust","authors":"Richard Firth-Godbehere","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generally, researchers assume that the experience of disgust is universal, shared by all humans at all times. It is under this assumption that much of the growing field of the history of disgust studies operates. However, no single concept of disgust exists. For example, while many believe that the causes of disgust are universal, others do not. Others have noted that the English word ‘disgust’ does not have identical equivalents in other languages, pointing to no single, shared concept of disgust. This article looks more closely at that last idea, noting that the word ‘disgust’ did not take on its current usage until the mid-eighteenth century. Beginning with an exploration of modern understandings of disgust, the paper charts the development of the modern English concept of the feeling. It argues that rather than being a universal emotion, the modern concept of disgust began when the word was used by early eighteenth-century taste theorists to describe a feeling of anti-taste – an extreme reaction to the opposite of beauty. Even then, this disgust was somewhat different from modern disgust, with deeper links to displeasure and horror than modern notions of the feeling. The main point of the article is the suggestion that historians of emotion research what look like modern emotions in the past, particularly disgust, that they ought to be cautious. Even if modern feelings appear to apply to historical events and ideas, a more in-depth look will often reveal a more complex era-dependant experience somewhat different from the modern concept.","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2019.20.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generally, researchers assume that the experience of disgust is universal, shared by all humans at all times. It is under this assumption that much of the growing field of the history of disgust studies operates. However, no single concept of disgust exists. For example, while many believe that the causes of disgust are universal, others do not. Others have noted that the English word ‘disgust’ does not have identical equivalents in other languages, pointing to no single, shared concept of disgust. This article looks more closely at that last idea, noting that the word ‘disgust’ did not take on its current usage until the mid-eighteenth century. Beginning with an exploration of modern understandings of disgust, the paper charts the development of the modern English concept of the feeling. It argues that rather than being a universal emotion, the modern concept of disgust began when the word was used by early eighteenth-century taste theorists to describe a feeling of anti-taste – an extreme reaction to the opposite of beauty. Even then, this disgust was somewhat different from modern disgust, with deeper links to displeasure and horror than modern notions of the feeling. The main point of the article is the suggestion that historians of emotion research what look like modern emotions in the past, particularly disgust, that they ought to be cautious. Even if modern feelings appear to apply to historical events and ideas, a more in-depth look will often reveal a more complex era-dependant experience somewhat different from the modern concept.
英国人厌恶的简史
一般来说,研究人员认为厌恶的经历是普遍的,所有人在任何时候都有。正是在这种假设下,不断发展的厌恶史研究领域的大部分工作都在进行。然而,厌恶并不存在单一的概念。例如,虽然许多人认为厌恶的原因是普遍的,但其他人并不这样认为。其他人注意到,英语单词“厌恶”在其他语言中没有相同的对等词,这表明没有单一的、共同的厌恶概念。这篇文章更仔细地研究了最后一个观点,注意到“厌恶”这个词直到18世纪中期才有了现在的用法。本文从现代对厌恶的理解入手,描绘了现代英语中厌恶概念的发展。它认为,厌恶这个词并不是一种普遍的情感,而是起源于18世纪早期的品味理论家们用它来描述一种反品味的感觉——一种对美的对立面的极端反应。即使在当时,这种厌恶也与现代的厌恶有所不同,与现代的感觉相比,它与不愉快和恐惧有更深的联系。这篇文章的主要观点是,情感研究的历史学家应该谨慎对待过去的现代情感,尤其是厌恶。即使现代情感似乎适用于历史事件和思想,但更深入的观察往往会揭示出一种更复杂的、与时代相关的体验,这种体验与现代概念有些不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信