The disappearance of ‘Medical Psychology’ and the controversy over the Medical Section during the early 1950s

Kevin M. Jones
{"title":"The disappearance of ‘Medical Psychology’ and the controversy over the Medical Section during the early 1950s","authors":"Kevin M. Jones","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2018.19.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1950s the Medical Section of the British Psychological Society (BPS) was riven by a dispute which began with issues over the criteria for membership of the Section, and the editorial policy of the British Journal of Medical Psychology, but led to debates about the nature, and the future, of ‘medical psychology’ itself. These developments are documented in an archive of the BPS which is now held by the Wellcome Trust, an archive that has been hitherto overlooked by historians of psychology and psychiatry. This paper will provide some reasons why this debate occurred at this particular moment in history, concluding that this is a critical period of study for those interested in the recent histories of psychology and psychiatry within the United Kingdom, which was one of the major international centres for research in the mental sciences during the immediate post-war period. It will go on to suggest that the relationship between psychiatry and psychology in the UK can be used to make sense of the historical developments that have helped to shape psychology and psychiatry as distinct disciplines.","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2018.19.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 1950s the Medical Section of the British Psychological Society (BPS) was riven by a dispute which began with issues over the criteria for membership of the Section, and the editorial policy of the British Journal of Medical Psychology, but led to debates about the nature, and the future, of ‘medical psychology’ itself. These developments are documented in an archive of the BPS which is now held by the Wellcome Trust, an archive that has been hitherto overlooked by historians of psychology and psychiatry. This paper will provide some reasons why this debate occurred at this particular moment in history, concluding that this is a critical period of study for those interested in the recent histories of psychology and psychiatry within the United Kingdom, which was one of the major international centres for research in the mental sciences during the immediate post-war period. It will go on to suggest that the relationship between psychiatry and psychology in the UK can be used to make sense of the historical developments that have helped to shape psychology and psychiatry as distinct disciplines.
20世纪50年代初,“医学心理学”的消失和关于医学科的争议
20世纪50年代,英国心理学会(BPS)医学分会因一场争论而分裂,这场争论始于该分会成员的标准问题,以及《英国医学心理学杂志》的编辑政策,但后来引发了关于“医学心理学”本身的性质和未来的辩论。这些发展都被记录在一份关于BPS的档案中,该档案现在由威康基金会(Wellcome Trust)保管,迄今为止,该档案一直被心理学和精神病学历史学家所忽视。本文将提供一些原因,为什么这场辩论发生在这个特殊的历史时刻,结论是,这是一个关键时期的研究,为那些感兴趣的心理学和精神病学在英国的近期历史,这是一个主要的国际中心研究在心理科学在战后时期。它将继续表明,英国精神病学和心理学之间的关系可以用来理解历史发展,这些发展有助于将心理学和精神病学塑造成不同的学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信