发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

European Union Politics最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Proposal complexity and report allocation in the European Parliament 提案的复杂性和报告在欧洲议会的分配
IF 2.3 1区 社会学
European Union Politics Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI: 10.1177/14651165221144888
S. Hurka, Maximilian Haag, Constantin Kaplaner
{"title":"Proposal complexity and report allocation in the European Parliament","authors":"S. Hurka, Maximilian Haag, Constantin Kaplaner","doi":"10.1177/14651165221144888","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221144888","url":null,"abstract":"Experience and loyalty have been identified as major explanations for why Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) are selected as committee rapporteurs in the European Parliament. Yet, existing research implicitly assumes that these explanations operate in isolation of what the report is about. In this article, we hypothesize that the effects of experience and loyalty on MEPs’ chances to become rapporteurs should be conditioned by the complexity of the Commission's legislative proposal. We show that party group coordinators indeed distribute the most complex legislative tasks to highly experienced MEPs but cannot confirm such a conditional relationship for the effect of loyalty. Our study contributes to the literature on the legislative organization in the European Parliament by highlighting the role of proposal complexity for the report allocation process.","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"24 1","pages":"307 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43952399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Talking about Europe? Explaining the salience of the European Union in the plenaries of 17 national parliaments during 2006–2019 说的是欧洲?解释2006-2019年期间欧洲联盟在17个国家议会全体会议中的突出地位
IF 2.3 1区 社会学
European Union Politics Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.1177/14651165221143962
Felix Lehmann
{"title":"Talking about Europe? Explaining the salience of the European Union in the plenaries of 17 national parliaments during 2006–2019","authors":"Felix Lehmann","doi":"10.1177/14651165221143962","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221143962","url":null,"abstract":"To provide accountability, Members of Parliament (MPs) are expected to publicly communicate European Union (EU) affairs. Yet, parliamentary communication of EU affairs remains underexplored and existing analyses are conflicting. Against this background, this article sheds light on what drives MPs to talk about the EU, utilizing a novel dataset based on over 20,000 plenary protocols from 17 parliaments during 2006–2019. The study highlights that EU mentions increase in connection to referendums, summits, treaty ratifications, and European elections. Additional drivers include transfers of authority to the EU level, EU legislation, and political incentives. The findings provide some nuance to more pessimistic evaluations of the EU's accountability deficit, but major legitimacy challenges remain concerning national elections and Eurozone integration.","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"24 1","pages":"370 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48716888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Is this crisis different? Attitudes towards EU fiscal transfers in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. 这次危机不同吗?COVID-19大流行后对欧盟财政转移的态度
IF 2.3 1区 社会学
European Union Politics Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1177/14651165221112988
Markus Haverland, Reinout van der Veer, Michal Onderco
{"title":"Is this crisis different? Attitudes towards EU fiscal transfers in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Markus Haverland, Reinout van der Veer, Michal Onderco","doi":"10.1177/14651165221112988","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14651165221112988","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To mitigate the enormous and asymmetric economic implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, the EU has adopted an unprecedented €750 billion fiscal transfer programme, financed by joint member state liabilities. The highly contested decision pitted 'frugal' northern member states against 'profligate' southern member states. However, do citizens from northern countries view EU transfers as unfavourably as their governmental positions suggest? This article focuses on the crucial case of the Netherlands, whose government has become the assertive leader of the 'frugal' coalition. We test COVID-19 specific explanations based on a large-scale survey conducted at the height of the pandemic. Our analysis suggests that citizens who experience the non-material health and social effects of the pandemic more directly are more supportive of fiscal transfers than those to whom the pandemic is more abstract, whereas those who experience negative financial effects and those who believe that COVID-19 is a conspiracy are less supportive.</p>","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"23 1","pages":"680-699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277315/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41638465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
As the twig is bent, the tree is inclined? The role of parental versus own education for openness towards globalisation 树枝弯了，树就倾斜了？父母教育与自身教育在全球化开放中的作用
IF 2.3 1区 社会学
European Union Politics Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI: 10.1177/14651165221140230
S. Kunst, Theresa Kuhn, H. G. van de Werfhorst
{"title":"As the twig is bent, the tree is inclined? The role of parental versus own education for openness towards globalisation","authors":"S. Kunst, Theresa Kuhn, H. G. van de Werfhorst","doi":"10.1177/14651165221140230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221140230","url":null,"abstract":"Citizens with higher levels of education are consistently found to be more open to immigration and European integration than those with less education. However, the literature has neglected the issue of whether educational divides in anti-globalisation sentiment result from people's own educational attainment or whether they are a consequence of deep-rooted positions of disadvantage across generations. In this article, we address the question to what extent the attitudes towards globalisation of intergenerationally mobile citizens, that is, those who obtain a different educational outcome than one's parents, adapt to the newly acquired social position or remain attached to the parental milieu. We apply diagonal reference models to study the influence of one's own and parental education level on attitudes to globalisation in 26 European countries using the European Social Survey between 2008 and 2018. Our results indicate that while mobile citizens adjust their attitudes to the achieved education level, there remains an enduring influence of the education level of origin. In addition, we find that the importance of parental educational attainment does not depend on the social fluidity between education levels within countries. Consequently, this study has important implications for studying political socialisation and the future of the educational divide over globalisation.","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"24 1","pages":"264 - 285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47984881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Who talks to whom? Using social network models to understand debate networks in the European Parliament 谁和谁说话?使用社会网络模型来理解欧洲议会的辩论网络
IF 2.3 1区 社会学
European Union Politics Pub Date : 2022-11-20 DOI: 10.1177/14651165221137994
Stefanie Walter, Lucy Kinski, Zsófia Boda
{"title":"Who talks to whom? Using social network models to understand debate networks in the European Parliament","authors":"Stefanie Walter, Lucy Kinski, Zsófia Boda","doi":"10.1177/14651165221137994","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221137994","url":null,"abstract":"Research into parliamentary speech making–behaviour of Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) usually takes a static perspective. We offer an interactive and dynamic approach that understands parliamentary debates as a relational network phenomenon and investigates MEPs’ debate interactions. This allows us to uncover dynamics of inclusiveness and pluralism, self-reinforcing power relationships and transnational policy alliances. Analyzing 11,408 debate interactions between MEPs using a combination of text and dynamic network analysis, we find that male, senior and influential parliamentarians from powerful member states receive more attention with evidence for a self-reinforcing effect over time. Interestingly, seniority matters more for debate attention than leadership positions. Sharing the same nationality and a similar political leaning also shape debate coalitions with the former being more important than the latter.","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"24 1","pages":"410 - 423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47672233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Who holds the union together? Citizens’ preferences for European Union cohesion in challenging times 谁把工会团结在一起？公民在充满挑战的时代对欧盟凝聚力的偏好
IF 2.3 1区 社会学
European Union Politics Pub Date : 2022-11-16 DOI: 10.1177/14651165221138000
A. Reinl, D. Braun
{"title":"Who holds the union together? Citizens’ preferences for European Union cohesion in challenging times","authors":"A. Reinl, D. Braun","doi":"10.1177/14651165221138000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221138000","url":null,"abstract":"Although polarisation risks breaking up the European family, such conflicts paired with transnational challenges can also raise awareness of the need for more European Union (EU) cohesion. In order to approach the hitherto underspecified concept, this article connects the recent literature on social cohesion with research on various facets of public EU support – integration preferences, identity, voting behaviour, and solidarity. Building on survey data from 10 EU countries taken at the end of 2020, a latent class analysis identifies two distinct groups of preferences for EU cohesion: its friends and its foes. EU cohesion can be achieved by highlighting personal advantages of European integration and by stressing joint approaches to crises, civic education, and democratic processes.","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"24 1","pages":"390 - 409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47396448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From causes to consequences: Investigating the effects of differentiated integration on citizens’ EU support 从原因到后果：调查差异化一体化对公民欧盟支持的影响
IF 2.3 1区 社会学
European Union Politics Pub Date : 2022-11-16 DOI: 10.1177/14651165221135742
Ioannis Vergioglou, S. Hegewald
{"title":"From causes to consequences: Investigating the effects of differentiated integration on citizens’ EU support","authors":"Ioannis Vergioglou, S. Hegewald","doi":"10.1177/14651165221135742","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221135742","url":null,"abstract":"Research on differentiated integration has paid considerable attention to its causes. However, we know very little about its consequences. Using the synthetic control method and interactive factor models, this article investigates the effects of differentiated integration on citizens’ support for the EU. We find that in cases where member states are granted an opt-out or are allowed to integrate into a policy area they were previously excluded from, support increases. In contrast, support decreases when member states are not granted a requested opt-out or are excluded from a policy area they would like to join. These findings carry important implications for the EU's legitimacy. While differentiated integration has the potential to enhance citizens’ legitimacy perceptions, it can also undermine them simultaneously.","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"24 1","pages":"206 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41549372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Asylum seekers in the machinery of the state: administrative capacity vs. preferences. Recognition rates in EU member states 国家机器中的寻求庇护者：行政能力与偏好。欧盟成员国的认可率
IF 2.3 1区 社会学
European Union Politics Pub Date : 2022-11-13 DOI: 10.1177/14651165221135113
Pierre Georges Van Wolleghem, Hakan G. Sicakkan
{"title":"Asylum seekers in the machinery of the state: administrative capacity vs. preferences. Recognition rates in EU member states","authors":"Pierre Georges Van Wolleghem, Hakan G. Sicakkan","doi":"10.1177/14651165221135113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221135113","url":null,"abstract":"Studies have sought to explain variation in protection recognition rates between EU member states with, however, limited explanatory power. Surprisingly, few have contemplated the role of the administration, despite it being at the centre of the process through which asylum claims are examined. We posit that recognition rates are significantly affected by administrative capacity, although the administration's action may be mitigated by political factors. Our findings show that administrative effectiveness and experience in asylum matters yield higher recognition rates. We show that government preferences and the overall political context affect protection recognition, too. Importantly, we also find that the mechanisms at play are different if we consider the different forms of protection.","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"24 1","pages":"348 - 369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49379078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Loving globalization: High-growth enterprises and public opinion on globalization in Europe 热爱全球化:欧洲的高成长企业和全球化舆论
IF 2.3 1区 社会学
European Union Politics Pub Date : 2022-11-09 DOI: 10.1177/14651165221138026
O. Kiratli
{"title":"Loving globalization: High-growth enterprises and public opinion on globalization in Europe","authors":"O. Kiratli","doi":"10.1177/14651165221138026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221138026","url":null,"abstract":"Building upon the “new” new trade theory, this article proposes that the regional business demography plays a prominent role in shaping Europeans’ preferences on globalization. Specifically, I argue, regional populations of high-growth enterprises that take advantage of internationalization and export opportunities drive positive attitudes on globalization, especially among the “losers” of import competition. Regression models on cross-sectional survey data from Eurobarometer surveys covering ten waves between 2015 and 2019 supplemented by a series of macro-level covariates establish that residents in regions with higher shares of high-growth enterprises are more likely to view globalization as an opportunity. More importantly, the positive association between regional high-growth enterprise shares and support for globalization is particularly pronounced among lower-educated and lower-skilled individuals.","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"24 1","pages":"286 - 306"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43850898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A blessing and a curse? Examining public preferences for differentiated integration 福与祸？审查公众对差异化融合的偏好
IF 2.3 1区 社会学
European Union Politics Pub Date : 2022-11-03 DOI: 10.1177/14651165221133671
Lisanne de Blok, Catherine E. De Vries
{"title":"A blessing and a curse? Examining public preferences for differentiated integration","authors":"Lisanne de Blok, Catherine E. De Vries","doi":"10.1177/14651165221133671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221133671","url":null,"abstract":"This study examines public preferences for two forms of differentiated integration (DI): opt-outs and multi-speed EU. Due to the low salience of DI in domestic politics, we suggest that people use ideological benchmarks when forming opinions about DI mostly relating to their general predispositions towards the EU. While pro-EU citizens are more in favor of DI in the form of multiple speeds as this might pose a solution to overcome gridlock, Euroskeptic citizens display more support for opt-outs as a means to accommodate concerns about national identity and control. These differences are in turn accentuated by people’s left-right ideology. We test our hypotheses using public opinion data from the Eurobarometer between 2004 and 2018 and complete it with novel survey data. Our results suggest that while support for DI has increased in recent years, DI preferences largely coincide with ideological predispositions. Our findings indicate that rather than overcoming preference heterogeneity within the EU, DI might entrench existing fault lines.","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"24 1","pages":"143 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44434891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信