European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice最新文献

{"title":"Patient reported medication-related problems, adherence and waste of oral anticancer medication over time.","authors":"Patricia M L A van den Bemt, Margriet Y Blijham, Laura Ten Broek, Jacqueline G Hugtenburg, Bart P H Pouls, Job F M van Boven, Charlotte L Bekker, Bart van den Bemt, Liset van Dijk","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004205","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004205","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients on oral anticancer therapy regularly experience medication-related problems (MRPs), potentially leading to non-adherence and medication waste. Most studies reporting these experiences have cross-sectional designs. The aim of our study was to explore patient reported MRPs, adherence and waste of oral anticancer medication over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective longitudinal quantitative interview study with 4 months follow-up was performed among patients on oral anticancer medication (mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitors, (anti)hormonal therapy, pyrimidine antagonists) using a semi-structured questionnaire. Patients from two Dutch university medical centres were included from March to December 2022 after informed consent was given. Four interviews were performed with 1 month in between. All interviews were audiotaped, after which the data were entered into an electronic case report form. The primary outcome was the mean number of MRPs per patient per interview round. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients with at least one MRP, types of MRPs, perceived non-adherence, medication waste (both in general and specifically for anticancer medication), costs of anticancer medication waste, and factors associated with medication waste as mentioned by the patient. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients were included with a mean (SD) age of 64 (9) years; 43% were male. The mean number of MRPs per patient was 2.1 in the first interview and 1.2, 1.0 and 0.9 in the second, third and fourth interviews, respectively. Adverse drug reactions were the most frequently reported type of MRPs (30 (75%) patients in the first interview and 19 (65%) in the last interview). Unintentional non-adherence was regularly reported, especially in the first interview. Medication changes were frequent and associated medication waste was mentioned in all interviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many patients using oral anticancer treatment report MRPs and this number remains substantial over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141633075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Impact of the use of a drug-drug interaction checker on pharmacist interventions involving well-known strong interactors.","authors":"Fanny Moreau, Bertrand Décaudin, Michel Tod, Pascal Odou, Nicolas Simon","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004052","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Several drug-drug interaction (DDI) checkers such as DDI-Predictor have been developed to detect and grade DDIs. DDI-Predictor gives an estimate of the magnitude of an interaction based on the ratio of areas under the curve. The objective of the present study was to analyse the frequencies of DDIs involving well-known strong interactors such as rifampicin and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), as reported by a clinical pharmacy team using DDI-Predictor, and the pharmacist intervention acceptance rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The pharmacist intervention rate and the physician acceptance rate were calculated for DDIs involving rifampicin or the SSRIs fluoxetine, paroxetine, duloxetine and sertraline. The rates were compared with a bilateral χ² test or Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 284 DDIs recorded, 38 (13.4%) involved rifampicin and 78 (27.5%) involved SSRIs. The pharmacist intervention rate differed significantly (68.4% for rifampicin vs 48.8% for SSRIs; p=0.045) but the physician acceptance rate did not (84.6% for rifampicin vs 81.6% for SSRIs; p=1). Pharmaceutical interventions for SSRIs were more frequent when the ratio of the area under the drug concentration versus time curve in DDI-Predictor was >2. Pharmacists were more likely to issue a pharmacist intervention for DDIs involving rifampicin because of a high perceived risk of treatment failure and were less likely to issue a pharmacist intervention for DDIs involving an SSRI, except when the suspected interaction was strong.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DDI checkers can help pharmacists to manage DDIs involving strong interactors. DDIs involving strong inhibitors versus a strong inducer differ with regard to their intervention and acceptance rates, notably due to the estimation of the magnitude of the DDI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141975443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Adverse drug reactions in paediatric age: analysis of spontaneous reports and reasons for under-reporting in a Local Health Unit in Veneto region.","authors":"Eva Draghi, Virginia De Rossi, Umberto Gallo, Riccardo Bertin, Francesca Bano","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004335","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004335","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Combination of a propofol emulsion with alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists used for multimodal analgesia or sedation in intensive care units: a physicochemical stability study.","authors":"Marine Roche, Damien Rousseleau, Cécile Danel, Héloïse Henry, Gilles Lebuffe, Pascal Odou, Damien Lannoy, Nicolas Simon","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004027","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the physicochemical stability of the combination of a propofol emulsion with an alpha-2 (α2) adrenergic receptor agonist (α2A; clonidine or dexmedetomidine) under conditions mimicking routine practice in an intensive care unit or in multimodal analgesia procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and validated three stability-indicating methods based on high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) detection. Eight different conditions per combination were evaluated in triplicate, with variations in the simulated, bodyweight-adjusted dose level and the drugs' flow rate. The drugs were mixed in clinically relevant concentrations and proportions and then stored unprotected from light, in clear glass vials at room temperature for 96 hours. At each sampling point, we assessed the chemical stability (the HPLC-UV drug level, pH, and osmolality) and physical compatibility (visual aspect, zeta potential (ZP), mean droplet diameter (MDD, Z-average) and polydispersity index (PDI)). We validated our stability findings in positive and negative control experiments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 96-hour test, the concentrations of propofol, clonidine and dexmedetomidine did not fall below 90% of the initial value, and the pH and osmolality were stable. The visual aspect of the mixed propofol emulsions did not change. The MDD remained below 500 nm (range 165-195 nm). The PDI was always below 0.4; 78.7% of the measurements were below 0.1 and 21.3% were between 0.1 and 0.4. The ZP measurements (-31.3 to -42.9 mV) suggested that the emulsion was stable. The MDD and PDI increased slightly at 96 hours under some conditions, which might indicate early destabilisation of the emulsion. Given that the MDD remained below 500 nm, these emulsions are compatible with intravenous administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrate the chemical and physical compatibility of propofol-α2 agonist mixtures at concentrations and in proportions representative of standard protocols when stored unprotected from light at room temperature for 96 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139641857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Pharmaceutical care in the screening process of phase I oncohaematological clinical trials.","authors":"Rosa Rodríguez-Mauriz, Monica González-Laguna, Maria Perayre-Badia, Toni Lozano-Andreu, Maria Emilia Miquel-Zurita, Salomé Cañizares-Paz, Lorena Santulario-Verdú, Marina Millan-Coll, Sandra Fontanals, Ana Clopés-Estela","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004168","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the pharmaceutical interventions in patients eligible for phase I cancer clinical trials, focusing specifically on exclusion criteria related to medication or relevant interactions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Descriptive, observational study conducted at a comprehensive cancer centre. Patients undergoing screening for phase I clinical trials (March 2019-December 2022) were included. The pharmacist reviewed concomitant medication and provided a recommendation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concomitant medication of 512 patients eligible to participate in 84 phase I clinical trials was analysed. In 230 (44.9%) patients, the clinical trial treatment included oral medication. The median number of concomitant medications was 5 (IQR 3-8) per patient.A total of 280 pharmaceutical interventions were performed in 140 (27.3%) patients: 240 (85.7%) were due to interactions in 124 (24.2%) patients, and 40 (14.3%) were due to exclusion criteria in 34 (6.6%) patients. Interactions and exclusion criteria were detected in 18 (3.5%) patients. The main groups of drugs involved were 68 (24.3%) antacids and antiulcer drugs, 28 (10.0%) antidepressants and 26 (9.3%) opioids. Acceptance analysis of the recommendation was applicable in 215 cases; in 208 (96.7%), the pharmaceutical intervention was accepted.Differences were identified for exclusion criteria (7 vs 27) and interactions (37 vs 87) between parenteral and oral clinical trial medication (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pharmacist's review of concomitant medication during the screening period in phase I clinical trials enables the detection of prohibited medication or relevant interactions, potentially avoiding screening failures and increasing the efficacy and safety of treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141975444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparing visual inspection methods for parenteral products in hospital pharmacy: between reliability, cost, and operator formation considerations.","authors":"Alexandre Jambon, Marie Forat, Chloé Marchand, Corinne Morel, Camille Merienne, Samira Filali, Fabrice Pirot","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004143","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unforeseen and novel manifestations, as illustrated by the management of drug shortages through the development of hospital production of sterile pharmaceutical preparations (P2S). Visual inspection of P2S is a release control whose methods are described in monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia (2.9.20) and the United States Pharmacopeia (1790). However, these non-automated visual methods require training and proficiency testing of personnel. The main objective of this work was to compare the reliability and speed of analysis of two visual methods and an automated method for detecting visible particles by image analysis in P2S. Furthermore, these methods were used to evaluate sources of particulate contamination during pre-production processes (washing, disinfection, depyrogenation) and production (filling, capping).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three pharmacy technicians examined 41 clear glass vials of type I, 10 and/or 50 mL through manual visual inspection (MVI), semi-automated (SAVI), and automated (AVI) inspection. The vials were distributed as follows: (i) 16 vials of water for injection containing either glass particles (224 µm or 600 µm), stopper fragments, or textile fibres; (ii) five sterile injectable specialties; (iii) 20 vials of water for injection prepared under different pre-production conditions.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>MVI and SAVI detected 100% of visible particles compared with 28% for AVI, which showed a deficiency in detecting textile fibres. All three methods correctly analysed P2S that did not contain visible particles. The three methods detected particles in vials maintained under International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9 pre-production conditions. However, detections by (i) MVI and SAVI, and by (ii) AVI of particles contained in vials maintained under ISO 8 pre-production conditions were deemed satisfactory and unsatisfactory, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The importance of visual inspection of P2S requires rapid, sensitive, and reliable detection methods. In this context, MVI and SAVI have proven to be more effective than AVI for a more competitive financial, training, and implementation investment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141092284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sedation modality in acute respiratory distress syndrome: does method of sedation affect length of stay, outcomes, or adverse events? A systematic review.","authors":"Gursharan Virdee, Jeff Aston, Abi Jenkins","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004117","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening, diffuse inflammatory pulmonary condition characterised by the Berlin criteria. Incidence of ARDS is estimated at 2.5-19% globally with high mortality and morbidity. Interest has been increasing in the use of inhaled sedatives because of a more rapid awakening and fewer adverse effects compared with intravenous propofol. The primary aim of this systematic review protocol is to investigate the length of critical care stay between ARDS patients who have been mechanically ventilated with inhaled anaesthetic sedatives (ie, sevoflurane and isoflurane) compared with those patients who are prescribed conventional sedatives (ie, propofol).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid (Embase, MEDLINE), PubMed, EBSCO (CINAHL Plus), Google Scholar will be searched and stratified by the reviewers. The literature search will be limited to English articles. Published full text peer-reviewed articles will be included.The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) Registration number is: CRD42023390988.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review. The results will be presented at local/regional meetings and dissemination will occur through peer-reviewed publication.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141070498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluation of the appropriateness of vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring in the intensive care unit with a clinical pharmacy approach, a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Sema Dinçel, Eren Demirpolat","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004073","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Vancomycin, a glycopeptide antibiotic has antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria and is frequently used in the intensive care unit (ICU). Inappropriate therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of vancomycin is a common problem encountered in hospital daily practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of vancomycin trough-guided TDM in patients treated in the ICU using a clinical pharmacy approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted retrospectively in patients over 18 years old who had at least one vancomycin trough level and who had received intravenous (IV) vancomycin for ≥3 days between 1 November 2020 and 1 April 2022. The study included 137 patients. Patient demographics and relevant vancomycin TDM data were collected from medical records. The appropriateness of TDM was evaluated according to the criteria established based on the monitoring recommendations specified in consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin published by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) in 2009 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 238 vancomycin trough levels measured in patients, 32.4% were collected at an inappropriate time. When patients were evaluated in terms of TDM appropriateness according to vancomycin level ranges (<10 µg/mL, 10-20 µg/mL and >20 µg/mL), we found the appropriate TDM was significantly higher in the therapeutic range (10-20 µg/mL) (p <0.001). Of the total 238 vancomycin trough concentrations taken from patients, 77 (32.4%) were measured at an inappropriate time. This caused dose withholding, wrong adjustments and therapy failure. The total TDM appropriateness of vancomycin was significantly higher in the therapeutic range defined as 10-20 µg/mL when evaluated based on 'TDM appropriateness criteria' (p <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that appropriate vancomycin TDM increases the likelihood of achieving target trough concentrations. Involvement of clinical pharmacists in TDM management may prevent the development of adverse reactions by ensuring appropriate sampling time and appropriate interpretation of vancomycin levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141247326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Stability of clozapine tablets repackaged in dose administration aids using repackaging machines.","authors":"Marion Emonet, Antony Citterio-Quentin, Sandrine Bourgeois, Vanessa Godard, Clément Boidin, Cynthia Barratier, Jonathan Boisramé","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004036","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of dose administration aids in automated ward dispensing devices requires the repackaging of medications, which may impact their stability compared with the original manufacturer's packaging.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the physical and chemical stability of clozapine tablets for up to 84 days after repackaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 900 tablets of clozapine 100 mg (Viatris) were repackaged and stored under five different conditions to conduct physical and chemical stability tests on days 0, 28, 56 and 84. The results were compared with control tablets in their original packaging. Visual inspections of tablet appearance were performed. Physical tests included assessments of mass uniformity, friability and resistance to crushing, following the standards of the European Pharmacopoeia 11th edition. The chemical stability was determined using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with tandem-mass spectrometry detection (UHPLC-MS/MS) to measure clozapine concentration, N-desmethyl-clozapine, and monitor clozapine degradation to detect formation of any degradation products other than N-desmethyl-clozapine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual examination showed changes in the appearance of tablets only in those stored under UV light. Mass uniformity met standards for all tablets over 84 days. None passed the friability test due to tablet cracking after tumbling. A gradual deterioration in tablet hardness was observed with the resistance to crushing test. In terms of chemical stability, N-desmethyl-clozapine was undetected in any of the tablets stored under all conditions, and the mean concentration of clozapine remained within the target range over 84 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>N-desmethyl-clozapine was not detected and clozapine concentrations remained stable under all storage conditions. The tablets were compliant with the mass uniformity test in each condition. However, the tablets were cracked in the friability test and gradual deterioration in tablet hardness was observed. In the light of these results, the Vinatier Hospital pharmacy has chosen to establish a shelf life for clozapine tablets of 84 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141179310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Neutropenia possibly caused by cefoperazone/sulbactam.","authors":"Yun Li, Xiao Fang He, Ran Wang","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004188","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004188","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neutropenia is a rare complication of drug therapy and is usually underdiagnosed. Cefoperazone/sulbactam is a combination of broad-spectrum antibacterial agents. Data on cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced neutropenia are limited. Herein, we report the case of a 35 year-old female patient who was admitted to the hospital due to an appendiceal abscess. After anti-infective treatment with cefoperazone/sulbactam, the patient developed neutropenia on day 4. After discontinuing treatment with cefoperazone/sulbactam, the patient's white blood cells and neutrophils gradually returned to normal. Hence, clinicians should monitor changes in neutrophil count during cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy and provide timely treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}