Empirical Software Engineering最新文献

{"title":"Reinforcement learning for online testing of autonomous driving systems: a replication and extension study.","authors":"Luca Giamattei, Matteo Biagiola, Roberto Pietrantuono, Stefano Russo, Paolo Tonella","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10562-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10562-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a recent study, Reinforcement Learning (RL) used in combination with many-objective search, has been shown to outperform alternative techniques (random search and many-objective search) for online testing of Deep Neural Network-enabled systems. The empirical evaluation of these techniques was conducted on a state-of-the-art Autonomous Driving System (ADS). This work is a replication and extension of that empirical study. Our replication shows that RL does not outperform pure random test generation in a comparison conducted under the same settings of the original study, but with no confounding factor coming from the way collisions are measured. Our extension aims at eliminating some of the possible reasons for the poor performance of RL observed in our replication: (1) the presence of reward components providing contrasting feedback to the RL agent; (2) the usage of an RL algorithm (Q-learning) which requires discretization of an intrinsically continuous state space. Results show that our new RL agent is able to converge to an effective policy that outperforms random search. Results also highlight other possible improvements, which open to further investigations on how to best leverage RL for online ADS testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"30 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538197/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142602130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The effect of data complexity on classifier performance.","authors":"Jonas Eberlein, Daniel Rodriguez, Rachel Harrison","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10554-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10664-024-10554-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The research area of Software Defect Prediction (SDP) is both extensive and popular, and is often treated as a classification problem. Improvements in classification, pre-processing and tuning techniques, (together with many factors which can influence model performance) have encouraged this trend. However, no matter the effort in these areas, it seems that there is a ceiling in the performance of the classification models used in SDP. In this paper, the issue of classifier performance is analysed from the perspective of data complexity. Specifically, data complexity metrics are calculated using the Unified Bug Dataset, a collection of well-known SDP datasets, and then checked for correlation with the defect prediction performance of machine learning classifiers (in particular, the classifiers C5.0, Naive Bayes, Artificial Neural Networks, Random Forests, and Support Vector Machines). In this work, different domains of competence and incompetence are identified for the classifiers. Similarities and differences between the classifiers and the performance metrics are found and the Unified Bug Dataset is analysed from the perspective of data complexity. We found that certain classifiers work best in certain situations and that all data complexity metrics can be problematic, although certain classifiers did excel in some situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"30 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527945/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142570943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An empirical study on developers’ shared conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub pull requests and issues","authors":"Huizi Hao, Kazi Amit Hasan, Hong Qin, Marcos Macedo, Yuan Tian, Steven H. H. Ding, Ahmed E. Hassan","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10540-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10540-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>ChatGPT has significantly impacted software development practices, providing substantial assistance to developers in various tasks, including coding, testing, and debugging. Despite its widespread adoption, the impact of ChatGPT as an assistant in collaborative coding remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we analyze a dataset of 210 and 370 developers’ shared conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub pull requests (PRs) and issues. We manually examined the content of the conversations and characterized the dynamics of the sharing behavior, i.e., understanding the rationale behind the sharing, identifying the locations where the conversations were shared, and determining the roles of the developers who shared them. Our main observations are: (1) Developers seek ChatGPT’s assistance across 16 types of software engineering inquiries. In both conversations shared in PRs and issues, the most frequently encountered inquiry categories include code generation, conceptual questions, how-to guides, issue resolution, and code review. (2) Developers frequently engage with ChatGPT via multi-turn conversations where each prompt can fulfill various roles, such as unveiling initial or new tasks, iterative follow-up, and prompt refinement. Multi-turn conversations account for 33.2% of the conversations shared in PRs and 36.9% in issues. (3) In collaborative coding, developers leverage shared conversations with ChatGPT to facilitate their role-specific contributions, whether as authors of PRs or issues, code reviewers, or collaborators on issues. Our work serves as the first step towards understanding the dynamics between developers and ChatGPT in collaborative software development and opens up new directions for future research on the topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142256337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Quality issues in machine learning software systems","authors":"Pierre-Olivier Côté, Amin Nikanjam, Rached Bouchoucha, Ilan Basta, Mouna Abidi, Foutse Khomh","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10536-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10536-7","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Context</h3><p>An increasing demand is observed in various domains to employ Machine Learning (ML) for solving complex problems. ML models are implemented as software components and deployed in Machine Learning Software Systems (MLSSs).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Problem</h3><p>There is a strong need for ensuring the serving quality of MLSSs. False or poor decisions of such systems can lead to malfunction of other systems, significant financial losses, or even threats to human life. The quality assurance of MLSSs is considered a challenging task and currently is a hot research topic.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>This paper aims to investigate the characteristics of real quality issues in MLSSs from the viewpoint of practitioners. This empirical study aims to identify a catalog of quality issues in MLSSs.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>We conduct a set of interviews with practitioners/experts, to gather insights about their experience and practices when dealing with quality issues. We validate the identified quality issues via a survey with ML practitioners.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Based on the content of 37 interviews, we identified 18 recurring quality issues and 24 strategies to mitigate them. For each identified issue, we describe the causes and consequences according to the practitioners’ experience.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>We believe the catalog of issues developed in this study will allow the community to develop efficient quality assurance tools for ML models and MLSSs. A replication package of our study is available on our public GitHub repository.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142216782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An empirical study of token-based micro commits","authors":"Masanari Kondo, Daniel M. German, Yasutaka Kamei, Naoyasu Ubayashi, Osamu Mizuno","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10527-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10527-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In software development, developers frequently apply maintenance activities to the source code that change a few lines by a single commit. A good understanding of the characteristics of such small changes can support quality assurance approaches (e.g., automated program repair), as it is likely that small changes are addressing deficiencies in other changes; thus, understanding the reasons for creating small changes can help understand the types of errors introduced. Eventually, these reasons and the types of errors can be used to enhance quality assurance approaches for improving code quality. While prior studies used code churns to characterize and investigate the small changes, such a definition has a critical limitation. Specifically, it loses the information of changed tokens in a line. For example, this definition fails to distinguish the following two one-line changes: (1) changing a string literal to fix a displayed message and (2) changing a function call and adding a new parameter. These are definitely maintenance activities, but we deduce that researchers and practitioners are interested in supporting the latter change. To address this limitation, in this paper, we define <i>micro commits</i>, a type of small change based on changed tokens. Our goal is to quantify small changes using changed tokens. Changed tokens allow us to identify small changes more precisely. In fact, this token-level definition can distinguish the above example. We investigate defined micro commits in four OSS projects and understand their characteristics as the first empirical study on token-based micro commits. We find that micro commits mainly replace a single name or literal token, and micro commits are more likely used to fix bugs. Additionally, we propose the use of token-based information to support software engineering approaches in which very small changes significantly affect their effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142216784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Software product line testing: a systematic literature review","authors":"Halimeh Agh, Aidin Azamnouri, Stefan Wagner","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10516-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10516-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A Software Product Line (SPL) is a software development paradigm in which a family of software products shares a set of core assets. Testing has a vital role in both single-system development and SPL development in identifying potential faults by examining the behavior of a product or products, but it is especially challenging in SPL. There have been many research contributions in the SPL testing field; therefore, assessing the current state of research and practice is necessary to understand the progress in testing practices and to identify the gap between required techniques and existing approaches. This paper aims to survey existing research on SPL testing to provide researchers and practitioners with up-to-date evidence and issues that enable further development of the field. To this end, we conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with seven research questions in which we identified and analyzed 118 studies dating from 2003 to 2022. The results indicate that the literature proposes many techniques for specific aspects (e.g., controlling cost/effort in SPL testing); however, other elements (e.g., regression testing and non-functional testing) still need to be covered by existing research. Furthermore, most approaches are evaluated by only one empirical method, most of which are academic evaluations. This may jeopardize the adoption of approaches in industry. The results of this study can help identify gaps in SPL testing since specific points of SPL Engineering still need to be addressed entirely.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142216785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Consensus task interaction trace recommender to guide developers’ software navigation","authors":"Layan Etaiwi, Pascal Sager, Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc, Sylvie Hamel","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10528-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10528-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Developers must complete change tasks on large software systems for maintenance and development purposes. Having a custom software system with numerous instances that meet the growing client demand for features and functionalities increases the software complexity. Developers, especially newcomers, must spend a significant amount of time navigating through the source code and switching back and forth between files in order to understand such a system and find the parts relevant for performing current tasks. This navigation can be difficult, time-consuming and affect developers’ productivity. To help guide developers’ navigation towards successfully resolving tasks with minimal time and effort, we present a task-based recommendation approach that exploits aggregated developers’ interaction traces. Our novel approach, Consensus Task Interaction Trace Recommender (CITR), recommends file(s)-to-edit that help perform a set of tasks based on a tasks-related set of interaction traces obtained from developers who performed similar change tasks on the same or different custom instances of the same system. Our approach uses a consensus algorithm, which takes as input task-related interaction traces and recommends a consensus task interaction trace that developers can use to complete given similar change tasks that require editing (a) common file(s). To evaluate the efficiency of our approach, we perform three different evaluations. The first evaluation measures the accuracy of CITR recommendations. In the second evaluation, we assess to what extent CITR can help developers by conducting an observational controlled experiment in which two groups of developers performed evaluation tasks with and without the recommendations of CITR. In the third and last evaluation, we compare CITR to a state-of-the-art recommendation approach, MI. Results report with statistical significance that CITR can correctly recommend on average 73% of the files to be edited. Furthermore, they show that CITR can increase developers’ successful task completion rate. CITR outperforms MI by an average of 31% higher recommendation accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"420 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142216786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"On combining commit grouping and build skip prediction to reduce redundant continuous integration activity","authors":"Divya M. Kamath, Eduardo Fernandes, Bram Adams, Ahmed E. Hassan","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10477-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10477-1","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Context</h3><p>Continuous Integration (CI) is a resource intensive, widely used industry practice. The two most commonly used heuristics to reduce the number of builds are either by grouping multiple builds together or by skipping builds predicted to be safe. Yet, both techniques have their disadvantages in terms of missing build failures and respectively higher build turn-around time (delays).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>We aim to bring together these two lines of research, empirically comparing their advantages and disadvantages over time, and proposing and evaluating two ways in which these build avoidance heuristics can be combined more effectively, i.e., the ML-CI model based on machine learning and the Timeout Rule.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>We empirically study the trade-off between reduction in the number of builds required and the speed of recognition of failing builds on a dataset of 79,482 builds from 20 open-source projects.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We find that both of our hybrid heuristics can provide a significant improvement in terms of less missed build failures and lower delays than the baseline heuristics. They substantially reduce the turn-around-time of commits by 96% in comparison to skipping heuristics, the Timeout Rule also enables a median of 26.10% less builds to be scheduled than grouping heuristics.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Our hybrid approaches offer build engineers a better flexibility in terms of scheduling builds during CI without compromising the quality of the resulting software.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142216789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Data-access performance anti-patterns in data-intensive systems","authors":"Biruk Asmare Muse, Kawser Wazed Nafi, Foutse Khomh, Giuliano Antoniol","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10535-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10535-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Data-intensive systems handle variable, high-volume, and high-velocity data generated by human and digital devices. Like traditional software, data-intensive systems are prone to technical debts introduced to cope-up with the pressure of time and resource constraints on developers. Data-access is a critical component of data-intensive systems, as it determines their overall performance and functionality. While data access technical debts are getting attention from the research community, technical debts that affect performance are not well investigated. This study aims to identify, categorize, and validate data-access performance anti-patterns. We collected issues from NoSQL-based and polyglot persistence open-source data-intensive systems, implemented in Java programing language, and identified 14 new data access-performance anti-patterns categorized under seven high-level categories. We conducted a developer survey to evaluate the perceived relevance and criticality of the newly identified anti-patterns and found that <i>Improper Handling of Node Failures</i>, <i>Using Synchronous Connection</i>, and <i>Inefficient Driver API</i> performance anti-patterns are the most critical data-access performance anti-patterns. The study findings can help improve the quality of data-intensive software systems by raising awareness of practitioners about the impact of the data-access performance anti-patterns. At the same time, the findings will help quality assurance teams to prioritize the correction of performance anti-patterns based on their criticality.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142216790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An extensive replication study of the ABLoTS approach for bug localization","authors":"Feifei Niu, Enshuo Zhang, Christoph Mayr-Dorn, Wesley Klewerton Guez Assunção, Liguo Huang, Jidong Ge, Bin Luo, Alexander Egyed","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10537-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10537-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bug localization is the task of recommending source code locations (typically files) that contain the cause of a bug and hence need to be changed to fix the bug. Along these lines, information retrieval-based bug localization (IRBL) approaches have been adopted, which identify the most bug-prone files from the source code space. In current practice, a series of state-of-the-art IRBL techniques leverage the combination of different components (e.g., similar reports, version history, and code structure) to achieve better performance. ABLoTS is a recently proposed approach with the core component, TraceScore, that utilizes requirements and traceability information between different issue reports (i.e., feature requests and bug reports) to identify buggy source code snippets with promising results. To evaluate the accuracy of these results and obtain additional insights into the practical applicability of ABLoTS, we conducted a replication study of this approach with the original dataset and also on two extended datasets (i.e., additional Java dataset and Python dataset). The original dataset consists of 11 open source Java projects with 8,494 bug reports. The extended Java dataset includes 16 more projects comprising 25,893 bug reports and corresponding source code commits. The extended Python dataset consists of 12 projects with 1,289 bug reports. While we find that the TraceScore component, which is the core of ABLoTS, produces comparable or even better results with the extended datasets, we also find that we cannot reproduce the ABLoTS results, as reported in its original paper, due to an overlooked side effect of incorrectly choosing a cut-off date that led to test data leaking into training data with significant effects on performance. Additionally, we conduct experiments to assess the performance of various composers that aggregate scores from different components, revealing that Logistic Regression, fixed weight, and CombSUM outperform the other composers across all three datasets, while decision tree and random forest exhibited subpar performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"181 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142216805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}