LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Directive 2006/68/EC Amending the Second Company Law Directive EU as Regards the Maintenance of Public Limited Liability Companies’ Capital and The Acqisition of Own Shares 第2006/68/EC号指令,修订欧盟第二公司法指令,关于维持公众有限责任公司的资本和收购自己的股份
LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic) Pub Date : 2013-03-22 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2237882
Ljiljana Maurović
{"title":"Directive 2006/68/EC Amending the Second Company Law Directive EU as Regards the Maintenance of Public Limited Liability Companies’ Capital and The Acqisition of Own Shares","authors":"Ljiljana Maurović","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2237882","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2237882","url":null,"abstract":"New Directive 2006/68/EC that will amend the Second Company Law directive has to promote business efficiency without reducing the protection offered to shareholders and creditors. The aim of new directive was to simplify some rules about the maintenance of capital, then make it easier and faster for public limited companies to change capital structure. In this paper, the author will analyze the aim of modifications in rules that are in force. These modifications are in connection with the alleviation of conditions for valuation assets that are contributed as consideration other than in cash, then the acquisition of company’s own shares, the prohibition of financial assistance, and pre-emptive rights and creditors’ protection in the case of capital decrease. The author will particularly analyze and comment the acquisition of own shares. The rule limiting the acquisition of own shares to 10% of subscribed capital and 18 months time limit on the authorization of the general meeting has been deemed unnecessarily restrictive. In the second part of this paper the author analyses necessary harmonization of Croatian law with new Directive.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115910511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Non-Financial Reporting Beyond the Strict Minimum: Is the Workforce a Well-Informed Stakeholder? 非财务报告超过严格的最低限度:员工是一个消息灵通的利益相关者吗?
LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic) Pub Date : 2013-02-15 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2220226
J. Cremers
{"title":"Non-Financial Reporting Beyond the Strict Minimum: Is the Workforce a Well-Informed Stakeholder?","authors":"J. Cremers","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2220226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2220226","url":null,"abstract":"This working paper by Jan Cremers of the Amsterdam Institute of Advanced Labour Studies summarises the results of an inquiry by the SEEurope network on the current legal framework and practices in 28 European countries regarding non-financial and sustainability-related reporting by European companies and the role and involvement of trade union representatives in this form of reporting.In view of recent efforts at EU level to stimulate companies to go beyond the traditional financial and economic reporting, the results of the study are rather patchy and disappointing. Even in the best countries there is little evidence that non-financial reporting practices of companies go beyond traditional items. Moreover, workforce and workplace conditions are not seen as a key part of sustainability concerns and workers’ representatives are not sufficiently involved in the long-term sustainability policy of their companies.Last but not least, the crisis has placed labour organizations on the defensive in the sense that sustainability issues come to be perceived as a “luxury” at a time when labour law and collective bargaining are subject to organized deregulation attacks.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121791440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Corporate Governance and the CEO Pay–Performance Link: Australian Evidence 公司治理与CEO薪酬绩效的联系:澳大利亚的证据
LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic) Pub Date : 2013-02-12 DOI: 10.1111/irfi.12012
Emma Schultz, G. Tian, Garry J. Twite
{"title":"Corporate Governance and the CEO Pay–Performance Link: Australian Evidence","authors":"Emma Schultz, G. Tian, Garry J. Twite","doi":"10.1111/irfi.12012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12012","url":null,"abstract":"We examine the influence of corporate governance mechanisms, namely blockholdings and board structure, on CEO pay-performance sensitivity in listed Australian firms. Results highlight blockholders’ role in shaping observed pay-performance associations and their impact varying with their independence and relative magnitude of ownership. Monitoring blockholders increase the sensitivity of long-term at-risk pay to performance, better aligning manager and shareholder interests. However, consistent with a shorter investment horizon, insider blockholders increase (decrease) the responsiveness of cash bonuses (long-term at-risk pay). Finally, consistent with them affording less effective monitoring, larger boards raise (lower) the sensitivity of known pay (long-term at-risk pay) to performance.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126291130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55
Market Imperfections and Regulatory Intervention: The Case of Insider Trading Regulation in the Indian Stock 市场不完善与监管干预:以印度股市内幕交易监管为例
LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic) Pub Date : 2012-12-21 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2258280
Yogesh Chauhan, K. K. Kotha, V. Marisetty
{"title":"Market Imperfections and Regulatory Intervention: The Case of Insider Trading Regulation in the Indian Stock","authors":"Yogesh Chauhan, K. K. Kotha, V. Marisetty","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2258280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2258280","url":null,"abstract":"This paper’s aim is two-fold. First, to investigate whether regulatory intervention, to improve insider trading transparency, leads to higher information production. Second, to understand how market imperfections can distort uniform impact expected out of regulatory intervention. We use Indian stock market regulator-SEBI’s regulatory intervention on insider trading as a natural experiment for our investigation. Using 22,571 insider trades, that occurred between 2007 to 2011, we report the following main findings: (1) Our estimates show that, Firm Officers, on average, made around Rs.4 profit per share more than ordinary shareholders for every round trip transaction during pre-regulatory intervention period. Regulatory intervention reduces such profiteering activity. (2) Regulatory intervention significantly improved information production associated with insider trades. (3) Market imperfections in the form of variations in firm organisation structure and competition environment, can explain lack of uniform impact due to regulatory intervention. Our results lead us to conclude that regulatory intervention is generally effective (Brochet, 2010), however the efficacy cannot be uniform unless regulatory intervention goes hand-in-hand with regulatory investment and coordination aimed at addressing market imperfections (Fernandes and Ferreira, 2008).","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128023825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Dealing with Perception - A Look at Overseas-Listed Chinese Firms in Singapore 应对认知——以在新加坡上市的中国公司为例
LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic) Pub Date : 2012-11-21 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2342784
Zu Hao Peh
{"title":"Dealing with Perception - A Look at Overseas-Listed Chinese Firms in Singapore","authors":"Zu Hao Peh","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2342784","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2342784","url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the world today, overseas-listed Chinese firms (\"OLCFs\") have received much flak from media, securities regulators and investors alike. Despite their initial popularity, the performances of OLCFs have been dismal across the board, both in terms of corporate governance and relative performance. All in all, the prevailing rhetoric seems to suggest that OLCFs as a whole are not only poorly governed, but are also predisposed to be so. While there might be some truth attached to this perception, this author would caution against perpetuating these warnings or taking them at face value. This author will therefore attempt to answer two questions in this paper. In the first part of the paper, the author seeks to explore whether perceptions about OLCFs are justified. In the second part of the paper, this author aims to explore possible ways to correct the issues underlying such a perception. This author will attempt to answer both questions in the context of Singapore's capital markets and their regulatory environment.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127239019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hard, Soft, and Embedded: Implementing Principles on Promoting Responsible Sovereign Lending and Borrowing 硬的、软的和嵌入的:促进负责任的主权借贷的实施原则
LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic) Pub Date : 2012-11-20 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2041027
Anna Gelpern
{"title":"Hard, Soft, and Embedded: Implementing Principles on Promoting Responsible Sovereign Lending and Borrowing","authors":"Anna Gelpern","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2041027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2041027","url":null,"abstract":"This paper, prepared for UNCTAD’s initiative on responsible sovereign lending and borrowing, considers concrete strategies for implementing the Principles. It draws on studies in soft law and new governance, and on the recent experience in promoting best practices in international finance, including project finance, extraction revenue management, foreign aid, sovereign investment, and sovereign borrowing in the capital markets. It recommends maintaining the current non-binding character of the Principles, while embedding implementation in multi-stakeholder arrangements for ongoing disclosure, assessment, interpretation, and adaptation. This strategy has the best chance of changing behavior in sovereign lending and borrowing by creating constituencies for implementation and sustained compliance.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133358477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 and the Primacy of Contract 《2006年公司法》第994条和合同的首要性
LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic) Pub Date : 2012-11-01 DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00938.x
Harry McVea
{"title":"Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 and the Primacy of Contract","authors":"Harry McVea","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00938.x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00938.x","url":null,"abstract":"The Court of Appeal's decision in Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Richards & Anor is both of interest and significance. By embracing the idea of the parties’ ability to ‘contract out’ of their statutory right to petition the court for relief under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 (the so‐called ‘unfair prejudice’ remedy), their Lordships have not only contrived to stunt the future development of unfair prejudice as a minority shareholder remedy but, and more importantly for the purposes of this case note, their decision has reasserted and extended the contractual analogy in modern UK company law.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121403335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Regulating Political Donations by Companies: Challenges and Misconceptions 规范公司政治献金:挑战与误解
LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic) Pub Date : 2012-11-01 DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00932.x
Richard Williams
{"title":"Regulating Political Donations by Companies: Challenges and Misconceptions","authors":"Richard Williams","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00932.x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00932.x","url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the regulation of company political donations in the UK. It argues that UK policy makers have failed to understand the nature of company donors and, consequently, that the UK Companies Act 2006 requirement for shareholder consent for company donations is not an effective solution to concerns about company donors. To this end, the paper presents a comprehensive empirical analysis of company donations to show that the vast majority of donor companies are closely held or owner‐managed entities where shareholder consent rules are ineffective. The paper highlights particular concerns that arise with donation by such companies and argues for a more accurate understanding of company donations in order to formulate effective policy responses to concerns about the role of company donors.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133262728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Intra-Firm Trade Law - Contract-Enforcement & Dispute Resolution in Transnational Corporations 公司内部贸易法:跨国公司的合同执行与纠纷解决
LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic) Pub Date : 2012-10-13 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2161314
Gralf-Peter Calliess, Stephan Freiherr von Harder
{"title":"Intra-Firm Trade Law - Contract-Enforcement & Dispute Resolution in Transnational Corporations","authors":"Gralf-Peter Calliess, Stephan Freiherr von Harder","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2161314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2161314","url":null,"abstract":"While intra-firm trade accounts for at least one third of world exports, we know very little about the institutions which are employed to resolve intra-firm trade conflicts. According to Oliver Williamson, courts are not accessible and conflicts resulting from intra-firm trade are resolved by directives based on the authority of ownership instead (law of forbearance). Williamson's description of the law of forbearance, however, depicts an ideal typical form of a firm, which is characterised by low incentive intensity and high administrative costs. Yet, in order to improve on these attributes, large transnational enterprises changed their organisational structure in the past decades. Nowadays, large-scale enterprises usually have a decentralised structure and use intra-firm pricing and incentive systems. Against this backdrop, Williamson's description of the contract law regime of intra-firm trade appears all too general. This paper addresses the question of how contract enforcement in transnational corporations is institutionally organized on the basis of preliminary results of expert interviews conducted with officials from transnational corporations. In a first step we illustrate that conflicts originating in intra-firm transactions are basically of the same type and nature than conflicts arising out of market transactions. We argue that the settlement of these disputes is of relevance both for legal (e.g. corporate and tax law) and economic reasons (e.g. coordination, control and motivation functions of profit centers). In a second step we analyze the governance mechanisms which are employed by transnational corporations to resolve intra-firm trade conflicts.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"139-140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114407432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Non-Signatories and Abuse of Corporate Structure in International Commercial Arbitration 国际商事仲裁中的非签署人与公司结构滥用
LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic) Pub Date : 2012-07-30 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2148900
R. Daujotas
{"title":"Non-Signatories and Abuse of Corporate Structure in International Commercial Arbitration","authors":"R. Daujotas","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2148900","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2148900","url":null,"abstract":"Modern practice of international business requires companies to structure their corporate form into one which would be advantageous and safe for the management, growth and sustainability of business. However, when corporate structuring is used to avoid obligations of the company, the latter may become and abusive tool in international commerce. One could not deny that corporate structuring, such as mergers and acquisitions, reorganization or liquidation of business may serve as a tool to avoid one’s liability arising from a breach or violation of contract. Such a practice is even more often when it comes to international contracts containing arbitration clauses. Large international companies often use complex networks of subsidiaries to allocate the risk of different international contracts and this often becomes a tool to escape arbitration procedure while claiming that the parent company is not liable for the contracts concluded by its subsidiaries, so the parent company could not be bound by arbitration clause. Similar situations may arise where company is reorganized and the contract containing arbitration clause is allocated to certain newly created company. This article aims to analyze such an abusive practice and to inquire what legal measures and theories could be used against such form of abuse of corporate structuring, as well as means to extend the arbitration clause against such defaulting parties (non-signatories).","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125805198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信