Non-Financial Reporting Beyond the Strict Minimum: Is the Workforce a Well-Informed Stakeholder?

J. Cremers
{"title":"Non-Financial Reporting Beyond the Strict Minimum: Is the Workforce a Well-Informed Stakeholder?","authors":"J. Cremers","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2220226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This working paper by Jan Cremers of the Amsterdam Institute of Advanced Labour Studies summarises the results of an inquiry by the SEEurope network on the current legal framework and practices in 28 European countries regarding non-financial and sustainability-related reporting by European companies and the role and involvement of trade union representatives in this form of reporting.In view of recent efforts at EU level to stimulate companies to go beyond the traditional financial and economic reporting, the results of the study are rather patchy and disappointing. Even in the best countries there is little evidence that non-financial reporting practices of companies go beyond traditional items. Moreover, workforce and workplace conditions are not seen as a key part of sustainability concerns and workers’ representatives are not sufficiently involved in the long-term sustainability policy of their companies.Last but not least, the crisis has placed labour organizations on the defensive in the sense that sustainability issues come to be perceived as a “luxury” at a time when labour law and collective bargaining are subject to organized deregulation attacks.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2220226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This working paper by Jan Cremers of the Amsterdam Institute of Advanced Labour Studies summarises the results of an inquiry by the SEEurope network on the current legal framework and practices in 28 European countries regarding non-financial and sustainability-related reporting by European companies and the role and involvement of trade union representatives in this form of reporting.In view of recent efforts at EU level to stimulate companies to go beyond the traditional financial and economic reporting, the results of the study are rather patchy and disappointing. Even in the best countries there is little evidence that non-financial reporting practices of companies go beyond traditional items. Moreover, workforce and workplace conditions are not seen as a key part of sustainability concerns and workers’ representatives are not sufficiently involved in the long-term sustainability policy of their companies.Last but not least, the crisis has placed labour organizations on the defensive in the sense that sustainability issues come to be perceived as a “luxury” at a time when labour law and collective bargaining are subject to organized deregulation attacks.
非财务报告超过严格的最低限度:员工是一个消息灵通的利益相关者吗?
这份由阿姆斯特丹高级劳工研究所的Jan Cremers撰写的工作报告总结了SEEurope网络对28个欧洲国家的现行法律框架和实践的调查结果,这些法律框架和实践涉及欧洲公司的非财务和可持续发展相关报告,以及工会代表在这种报告形式中的作用和参与。鉴于最近欧盟层面鼓励企业超越传统的财务和经济报告的努力,这项研究的结果相当不一致,令人失望。即使在最好的国家,也几乎没有证据表明公司的非财务报告做法超出了传统项目。此外,劳动力和工作场所条件不被视为可持续性问题的关键部分,工人代表没有充分参与其公司的长期可持续性政策。最后但并非最不重要的是,危机使劳工组织处于守势,因为在劳工法和集体谈判受到有组织的放松管制攻击的时候,可持续性问题被视为一种“奢侈品”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信