Community Mental Health Journal最新文献

{"title":"The Development of Stakeholder-Driven and Theory-Informed Depression Care Decision Aid for Ethnoracially Diverse Communities in Primary Care.","authors":"Sapana R Patel, Virna Little, Samantha Baca, Vanessa Aryee, Lisa B Dixon, Harold Alan Pincus, Roberto Lewis-Fernández","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01489-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01489-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, we created a depression care decision aid for Latinx and African American individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) at a network of Federally Qualified Health Centers. We surveyed 94 African American and Latinx individuals with MDD about their decision making needs. Focus groups elaborated on these preferences. Results show that about half of the sample preferred a collaborative role in decision making. Respondents report greater preference for receiving information about care compared to lower preferences for shared decision making. Focus group themes included fear of judgment, importance of being informed of care options and exploring care preferences, value of a provider who is a trusted friend and medical expert, and the importance of flexible decision making. Survey and focus groups results were used to iteratively develop a depression care decision aid. Future work will evaluate acceptability, feasibility, and effect of the depression care decision aid.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145022934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Administrative Burdens as Distinct Barriers to Accessing Mental Health Services in Community Mental Health Centers and Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Mixed-Methods Assessment.","authors":"Danielle R Adams","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01506-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01506-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasingly, adolescents are struggling with poor mental health outcomes, making it essential to improve access to high-quality mental health services. Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs) and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) act as key \"safety-net\" health centers for low-income youth seeking mental health services, as the majority accept Medicaid. This study examines how administrative burdens, i.e., challenges citizens face when interacting with a government agency, may act as barriers to accessing mental health services, especially for adolescents and their caregivers. This exploratory sequential mixed-methods study uses data from semi-structured interviews with hospital- and community-based social workers, and from a mystery shopper study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic with CMHCs and FQHCs in a large metropolitan county in the United States. It addresses three questions: (1) what kinds of administrative burdens exist in accessing mental health care for adolescents and their families at FQHCs and CMHCs? (2) how do these burdens convey potential learning, compliance, and psychological costs to prospective clients? (3) how do these burdens act as distinct barriers to accessing mental health services for adolescents and their families within safety-net health centers? Moreso than CMHCs, FQHCs implemented a variety of administrative burdens on prospective clients, such as a requirement to designate their primary care physician into the FQHCs network through their insurance prior to scheduling, difficult-to-navigate phone trees, unanswered voicemails, rude or discriminatory interactions with schedulers, and complex referral processes. This study finds that administrative burdens may act as distinct barriers to accessing mental healthcare. Recommendations to reduce administrative burdens at the organizational- and system-levels are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145005963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Perspectives on the Low Demand Transitional Model in Engaging and Housing hard-to-reach Veterans Experiencing Unsheltered Homelessness.","authors":"Rebecca L Kinney, G Haley, L Misedah-Robinson, M S Young, E E Johnson, J Tsai","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01511-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01511-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nationwide around 226,080 homeless individuals are unsheltered each night. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Low Demand program is a community-based model which provides supportive transitional housing to hard-to-reach, unsheltered veterans who often have complex needs and may be unable or unwilling to participate in supportive services which aim to prevent or rapidly re-house veterans when facing housing instability or homelessness. The goal of this study was to examine Low Demand community providers' perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to Low Demand model engagement and effectiveness among unsheltered homeless veterans. Semi-structured interviews, composed of 20 open-ended questions, were conducted with a convenience sample of VA Low Demand community providers and VA staff affiliated with the programs. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and an inductive approach was employed allowing the data to determine the main categories and subthemes. Three coders independently summarized, coded, and compared transcripts. Qualitative analyses were performed in Atlas.ti. Forty-five Low Demand community providers completed the interview. Providers reported an average four years (range: 3 weeks-14 years) of experience in their current role. Five categories were identified from the qualitative data: (1) Barriers to Low Demand model success, (2) Facilitators of Low Demand model success, (3) Collaborative assessments with VA guide Low Demand program resident retention, (4) Recommendations to reduce returns to homelessness among Low Demand residents, and (5) Low Demand model areas for improvement. Community providers consider the Low Demand model to be an effective option for housing unsheltered veterans who have complex needs. Barriers to retaining and transitioning Low Demand residents to permanent housing were noted. In-facility basic life skills education, financial planning, and relationship reconstruction along with onsite mental health services may support positive program exits. Engaging veterans in aftercare programs and/or retention case management is crucial in the prevention of returns to homelessness. Strong community and VA collaborations are essential to maximizing positive Low Demand program outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Types of Coercive Practices, Disability and Days in Crisis in People With Suicide Attempts in Latin American.","authors":"Felipe Agudelo-Hernández, Matías Mejía-Chaves, Paula Andrea Acuña-Mejía, Laura Inés Plata-Casas, Lina Cuadrado","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01503-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01503-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to identify the types of coercive practices in healthcare services and to analyze their relationship with psychosocial disability and days in crisis among individuals with suicide attempts in Colombia. A mixed-methods design was adopted. The quantitative component consisted of an analytical cross-sectional study with a stratified sample of 622 individuals, using validated instruments to assess depressive symptoms, resilience, subjective well-being, loneliness, continuity of care and psychosocial disability. The qualitative component involved 30 semi-structured interviews, analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Multivariate analysis explained 45.1% of the variance in days in crisis. Coercive practices were significantly associated with higher levels of psychosocial disability, more severe depressive symptoms, and lower scores in resilience and subjective well-being (p <.001). Qualitative findings revealed perceptions of dehumanizing treatment, normalization of coercion by health personnel and disruption of the therapeutic relationship. Coercive practices represent a risk factor for psychosocial recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"\"Where are we on the Road Towards Family-focused Practice in Mental Healthcare?\" - Perspectives from a Swedish/Norwegian Research Collaborative.","authors":"Lisbeth Kjelsrud Aass, Bente Weimand, Mats Ewertzon, Hege Skundberg-Kletthagen, Ingrid Lindholm, Øyfrid Larsen Moen, Agneta Schröder, Nina Beate Andfossen","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01499-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10597-025-01499-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a Norwegian/Swedish research network based on a family-focused practice in mental healthcare, we recognise the need to highlight this approach for the future quality and sustainability of the care and services provided. The role of family members in caring for individuals with mental health conditions is situational and diverse, encompassing several support areas such as emotional support, continuation of social and living skills, economic assistance, and monitoring for signs of illness and relapse prevention. In this context, volunteers have also been encouraged to contribute as partners in the support and follow-up of individuals with mental health issues. Although mental health services were primarily hospital-based in the past, there has been a shift in recent decades towards community-based care with support from specialist services. The aim has been to foster a respectful partnership between patients, families, and professionals, including a commitment to increasing family involvement and providing greater support to family members. Despite the recommendation for family-focused practice, we believe that health professionals still prioritise their alliance with the patient as their foremost responsibility. In this article, we advocate for an enhanced emphasis on family-focused approaches and underscore the importance of utilising knowledge-based family-focused practice models.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Applying the Research Domain Criteria to Social Determinants of Community Mental Health in Low-Resource Settings: A Contextualized Framework with Insights from the TOPOWA Study.","authors":"Monica H Swahn, Rachel E Culbreth, Jane Palmier, Anna Kavuma, Tanja Jovanovic","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01508-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01508-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is increasing recognition of the importance of integrating social determinants of mental health (SDoMH) into research frameworks to better understand how socioeconomic and environmental stressors shape mental health outcomes, particularly in low-resource settings. This paper presents an innovative conceptual approach that combines the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) with a social determinants lens to explore the pathways linking social adversity to mental health challenges. Drawing on insights from the NIH-funded TOPOWA Study, which examines the effects of poverty and social disadvantage on young women's mental health in urban Uganda, the approach integrates diverse data sources, including biomarkers, wearable sensors, and self-report surveys, to capture multilevel influences on mental health. This framework illustrates how RDoC can be adapted for community-based, context-sensitive research and supports the development of more targeted mental health interventions in low resource settings. By situating individual-level processes within broader structural conditions, the model contributes to a more nuanced understanding of mental health risk and resilience. While grounded in a specific study, the framework offers a scalable model for advancing mental health research and intervention in other low-resource or underserved contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"\"Stop, Think, and Appreciate\": A Qualitative Exploration of a Challenge Coin Suicide Prevention Intervention among Farmers.","authors":"Jeanne M Ward, Melissa Perkins, John R Blosnich","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01509-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01509-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Farmers are at increased risk for suicide compared to the general population, with estimates 56% higher among males in agriculture/forestry/fishing roles than the male working population. This study explored a farmer-developed suicide prevention intervention using an adapted military challenge coin for agriculture. An agricultural community member shared a message of appreciation with the farmer recipient. Farmers recently receiving a challenge coin were purposively sampled. Semi-structured interviews via telephone/videoconference explored farmers' challenge coin experiences and perceptions. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and de-identified before thematic coding. Participants (n = 14) were aged 28-68 years. All interviewees were non-Hispanic White, and 71% had off-farm jobs. Themes included the reception of the challenge coin, feelings elicited, and protective nature of the challenge coin against suicide, encouraging farmer connectedness and demonstrating appreciation. These data provide initial exploration of challenge coins adapted for farmer suicide prevention, developed within a farming community. Additional research regarding the impact is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Community/Crisis Cafés: Perspectives of Service Users and Carers Scoping Review.","authors":"Neasa Ní Dhoibhilín, Owen Doody, David Bohan, Louise Murphy","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01484-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10597-025-01484-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community/Crisis Cafés offer an alternative, out-of-hours mental health support by providing a safe, peer/clinician-supported environment for individuals in crisis. These cafés utilise peer support models that draw on personal experience, fostering connections and aiding in crisis management. Despite the growing global implementation of these cafés, limited research exists on how service users and carers experience and benefit from them. This study aims to explore the perspectives of service users and carers on accessing and utilising support through community/crisis cafés both nationally and internationally. A scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and included keyword searches of eight databases (Academic Search Complete, APA PsychInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science), combined with grey literature searches of LENSUS, Health Service Executive, WHO Global Index, NHS, and Open Grey. Backward and forward chaining of references was also completed to ensure all literature was sourced. Papers were limited to 2010-2023 and in English. Covidence was used for the screening process, ten papers met the review criteria and are reported as per the PRISMA-ScR checklist and PRISMA flow diagram. The findings of ten papers on service users and carers experiences indicate that Community/Crisis Cafés can have a positive impact on mental health management, alleviate social isolation, and reduce emergency department use. However, challenges such as consistency in service delivery and accessibility were noted. Further research and ongoing evaluation are necessary to fully understand the efficacy and limitations of this alternative co-produced, community mental health service delivery model.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"\"We Have to Evict Certain People Sometimes\": A Descriptive Mixed-Methods Study of Service Providers' Perceptions of the Impacts of High-Risk Issues in Supportive Housing and Housing First.","authors":"Nick Kerman, Sean A Kidd, Tim Aubry, Benjamin F Henwood, Carrie Anne Marshall, Abe Oudshoorn, Frank Sirotich, John Sylvestre, Vicky Stergiopoulos","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01505-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01505-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-risk issues, such as overdose, suicidality, hoarding, violence, property damage, and apartment takeovers, are known challenges in supportive housing and Housing First programs. However, the effects of these incidents on residents, service providers, and programs have been minimally studied. The objective of this mixed-methods study was to understand what service providers perceived as the impacts of various high-risk issues in supportive housing and Housing First programs, with an emphasis on housing tenure. This descriptive study used an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, with unequal weighting (QUAL→quan). In-depth interviews were held with 32 service providers working in supportive housing and Housing First programs, followed by an online survey of 202 additional service providers across Canada. In the qualitative dataset, high-risk issues were identified as having three types of potentially harmful impacts: [1] \"we have to evict certain people sometimes\" (residents' housing stability); [2] \"we're exposed to these traumas as well\" (service providers' mental health); and [3] \"we're losing our stock, basically\" (organizational relationships with landlords and access to housing units). Convergence was generally found in the quantitative findings, with high-risk issues affecting other individuals and property being perceived as more likely to cause housing loss. Service providers working in scattered-site programs reported that hoarding, overdose, and apartment takeovers were significantly more likely to cause housing loss than did participants of single-site programs. Overall, study findings underscore how high-risk issues, particularly those affecting others and property, can be potential housing trajectory-altering events and that this is further shaped by housing and support models.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144858970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Role of the Neighborhood Social Environment on Adulthood Depression: Insights from Midlife in the United States III.","authors":"Breanna J Rogers, Yangyang Deng, Mohammad Moniruzzaman, Kosuke Tamura","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01500-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01500-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a serious public health concern in the United States. Prior research has shown that neighborhood characteristics serve as protective factors against depression in adolescents. Few studies have examined the association between perceived neighborhood characteristics and depression during middle and older adulthood. We examined the association between each perceived neighborhood social environment (i.e., social cohesion and safety) and the presence of MDD among Midlife in the United States III (MIDUS) participants (n = 2,435, mean age = 63.6 years, Female = 54.4%). Moreover, we investigated whether these associations were moderated by sex and income, separately. All models were adjusted for demographic variables. Overall, perceived neighborhood social cohesion and safety were negatively associated with the presence of MDD. The associations varied when analyses were stratified by sex and income. Findings offer support for the perceived neighborhood social environments as protective factors against depression during middle and older adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144793678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}