Tarek ElShebiny, Luciane Macedo de Menezes, Stefanos Matthaios, Ioannis A Tsolakis, Juan Martin Palomo
{"title":"Effect of printing technology and orientation on the accuracy of three-dimensional printed retainers.","authors":"Tarek ElShebiny, Luciane Macedo de Menezes, Stefanos Matthaios, Ioannis A Tsolakis, Juan Martin Palomo","doi":"10.2319/120823-812.1","DOIUrl":"10.2319/120823-812.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of printer technology and print orientation on the accuracy of directly printed retainers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Digital retainers were printed with two different printing technologies: digital light processing (DLP) and stereolithography (SLA), using two different orientations: 0° and 90°. After printing, the retainers (n = 40) were scanned using cone-beam computed tomography. The DICOM files were then converted into standard tessellation language (STL) files. Comparison of the printed retainers with a master file was done by superimposition using a three-dimensional (3D) best-fit tool in Geomagic software. A ±0.25 mm tolerance was set to detect differences between the superimposed files. Statistical analysis was conducted (Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests, with Bonferroni correction).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lowest median average deviation was observed for the DLP horizontally printed models (median, [interquartile range (IQR)] = 0.01 mm, [-0.01, 0.02]) followed by the SLA horizontally printed retainers (median, [IQR] = 0.05 mm, [0.03, 0.07]). The highest median inside the tolerance levels ratio was observed for the horizontally SLA printed retainers (median, [IQR] = 78.9%, [74.4, 82.4%]) followed by the horizontally DLP printed retainers (median, [IQR] = 78.2%, [74.5, 80.7%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both technologies (DLP and SLA) showed 3D printed results compatible with orthodontic clinical needs. Printing orientation was more important than printer type regarding its accuracy. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the accuracy of direct printed appliances clinically.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"657-663"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493428/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142083019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kevser Kurt Demirsoy, Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk, Tayyip Bicer
{"title":"How reliable is the artificial intelligence product large language model ChatGPT in orthodontics?","authors":"Kevser Kurt Demirsoy, Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk, Tayyip Bicer","doi":"10.2319/031224-207.1","DOIUrl":"10.2319/031224-207.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the reliability of information produced by the artificial intelligence-based program ChatGPT in terms of accuracy and relevance, as assessed by orthodontists, dental students, and individuals seeking orthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Frequently asked and curious questions in four basic areas related to orthodontics were prepared and asked in ChatGPT (Version 4.0), and answers were evaluated by three different groups (senior dental students, individuals seeking orthodontic treatment, orthodontists). Questions asked in these basic areas of orthodontics were about: clear aligners (CA), lingual orthodontics (LO), esthetic braces (EB), and temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The answers were evaluated by the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information (DISCERN) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total mean DISCERN score for answers on CA for students was 51.7 ± 9.38, for patients was 57.2 ± 10.73 and, for orthodontists was 47.4 ± 4.78 (P = .001). Comparison of GQS scores for LO among groups: students (3.53 ± 0.78), patients (4.40 ± 0.72), and orthodontists (3.63 ± 0.72) (P < .001). Intergroup comparison of ChatGPT evaluations about TMD was examined in terms of the DISCERN scale, with the highest value given in the patients group (57.83 ± 11.47) and lowest value in the orthodontist group (45.90 ± 11.84). When information quality evaluation about EB was examined, it GQS scores were >3 in all three groups (students: 3.50 ± 0.78; patients: 4.17 ± 0.87; orthodontists: 3.50 ± 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT has significant potential in terms of usability for patient information and education in the field of orthodontics if it is developed and necessary updates are made.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"602-607"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493421/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142083022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"More molar distal movement than pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography posterior space available at the root level in mandibular dentition distalization with microimplants.","authors":"Di Sun, Ho-Jin Kim, Hyung-Kyu Noh, Hyo-Sang Park","doi":"10.2319/050724-357.1","DOIUrl":"10.2319/050724-357.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the mandibular posterior space available before treatment and the distance of molar distalization achieved after mandibular dentition distalization with microimplants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 66 Class I or III adult patients (mean age = 24.46 ± 4.89 years) who underwent molar distalization using microimplants were retrospectively included. The posterior space available distal to the second molar before treatment and the distance of distalization achieved after treatment were measured using axial cone-beam computed tomography images (0, 2, 4, and 6 mm apical to the second molar root furcation). Changes in lingual cortical thickness and molar root length after treatment were examined. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare measurements before and after treatment. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between thinning of the cortical plate and root resorption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Achieved distalization distance was significantly greater than pretreatment posterior space available by 0.8 mm at all root levels (P < .001). The difference was greater toward the root apex level and greater in the Class III group than the Class I group. Lingual cortical thickness was significantly decreased after treatment along with resorption of the second molar distal root (P < .001). In addition, a positive correlation was found between thinning of the cortical plate and distal root resorption of the molar (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Achieved distalization distance of the mandibular molar using microimplants was greater than the pretreatment posterior space available. Thinning of the lingual cortex and root resorption were observed after distalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"623-630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493423/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142047688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Evan Booth, Grace Viana, Sajjad Shirazi, Steven Miller, Terry Sellke, Mohammed Elnagar, Marlos Viana, Phimon Atsawasuwan
{"title":"Correlations of spheno-occipital synchondrosis, cervical vertebrae, midpalatal suture, and third molar maturation stages.","authors":"Evan Booth, Grace Viana, Sajjad Shirazi, Steven Miller, Terry Sellke, Mohammed Elnagar, Marlos Viana, Phimon Atsawasuwan","doi":"10.2319/041224-295.1","DOIUrl":"10.2319/041224-295.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the joint correlations among cervical vertebrae maturation (CVM), spheno-occipital synchondrosis (SOS), midpalatal suture maturation (MPS), and third molar mineralization (TMM) and to assess the predictive potential of SOS on CVM and MPS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>570 pretreatment cone-beam computed tomogram (CBCT) scans from three private practices were analyzed, and MPS, CVM, SOS, and TMM stages were categorized and recorded by two independent investigators. Intra- and inter-rater reliability tests were evaluated with weighted Cohen's kappa tests. Spearman correlation coefficients for ordinal data were used to estimate the pairwise correlations among SOS, CVM, MPS, and TMM. To evaluate if SOS could predict CVM and MPS, ordinal regression models were estimated and cross-validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis demonstrated a robust positive correlation between SOS and CVM (r = 0.845) and between SOS and MPS (r = 0.742). A significant correlation was also observed between CVM and MPS (r = 0.659). Further correlations were identified between TMM and SOS (r = 0.444), TMM and MPS (r = 0.392), and TMM and CVM (r = 0.358). Ordinal regression models indicated the potential of using SOS as a predictive marker for CVM and MPS stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With a comprehensive analysis, SOS is strongly correlated with CVM and MPS, and SOS stage can be used to predict CVM and MPS using ordinal regression. Since MPS stages are challenging to categorize due to their anatomy, this finding suggests a diagnostic tool using SOS stages or when more information on skeletal maturity of the patient is desired.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"641-647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493427/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nessa A Finlay, Lam Cheng, Elizabeth Kelly, Peter Petocz, Narayan Gandedkar, Mehmet Ali Darendeliler, Oyku Dalci
{"title":"The corrosion products of proprietary and generic orthodontic fixed lingual retainers and their in-vitro cytotoxicity.","authors":"Nessa A Finlay, Lam Cheng, Elizabeth Kelly, Peter Petocz, Narayan Gandedkar, Mehmet Ali Darendeliler, Oyku Dalci","doi":"10.2319/112823-788.1","DOIUrl":"10.2319/112823-788.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the corrosion products and cytotoxicity of generic and proprietary fixed lingual retainers (FLRs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seven FLRs were investigated. Wires were submersed in solution for 34 days, at 37°C, under constant agitation. A proportion of this solution was analyzed to determine the concentration of metallic ions leaching off the wires. The remainder was diluted to 5%, 10% and 20% followed by exposure to human gingival fibroblasts and analysis of cytotoxicity of the wires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three wires (Dentaflex, Universal, and AZDent) released excessive concentrations of lead, two wires (MeshMark and Orthoflex) released excessive concentrations of nickel, and one wire (Universal) released excessive concentrations of molybdenum into solution. No statistically significant difference was found between the wires analyzed (P = .24). Slight cytotoxicity was noted in only one wire (Dentaflex) at a 20% dilution of eluent. This was also the wire which released the highest concentration of lead into solution. All other wires, at all concentrations, were deemed noncytotoxic, but five samples overall were deemed statistically significant (P < .0024). A statistically significant difference existed between wires (P = .013) and concentrations analyzed (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Metals were released in differing quantities from all wires, with some elemental concentrations measuring more than that deemed acceptable in drinking water in Australia. A trend toward increased cell viability across samples was found with only one demonstrating cytotoxicity. There was no indication that generic FLRs were more or less biocompatible than their proprietary counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"664-671"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493422/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142083023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mohammad Rahim Shahbodaghi, Mahsa Zali, Ahmad Behroozian, Hooshang Dadgar
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of clear twin block and traditional twin block on speech: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Mohammad Rahim Shahbodaghi, Mahsa Zali, Ahmad Behroozian, Hooshang Dadgar","doi":"10.2319/030323-149.1","DOIUrl":"10.2319/030323-149.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the effect of clear twin block (CTB) and traditional twin block (TTB) appliances on speech.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, 18 skeletal Class II (Class II, division 1) growing patients were selected and randomly divided into CTB and TTB groups. Objective and semiobjective speech assessment tests were performed for vowel and consonant analyses at four time intervals: before (T0), immediately after (T1), 1 month after (T2), and 3 months after (T3) inserting the appliance. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and independent t-test at the .05 significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intergroup comparisons showed that the CTB group had less speech distortion immediately after insertion of the appliance (P < .05) than the TTB group; however, the differences were not significant at other time intervals. Intragroup comparisons showed that the number of distortions decreased significantly from T1 to T3 in both groups (P < .05). In contrast to CTB, the T0-T3 comparison was significant in the TTB group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although both appliances had some effects on speech, CTB had less speech distortion immediately after insertion, which is a very crucial moment in patient compliance. Additionally, articulation structures adapted to CTB faster than to TTB.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"608-614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493417/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142047675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"3D printed indirect bonding trays: transfer accuracy of bar vs shell design in a prospective, randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Gulden Karabiber, Merve Nur Eglenen","doi":"10.2319/020524-90.1","DOIUrl":"10.2319/020524-90.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the transfer accuracy of two different indirect bonding (IDB) trays.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Digital IDB was performed on a total of 30 patients using one of two designs: shell and bar trays, with 15 patients in each group. Trays were designed with the Appliance Designer software (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark). Angular (torque, tip, angulation) and linear (mesiodistal, buccolingual, occlusogingival) differences were compared between the bonded intraoral scans taken immediately after IDB and the virtually bracketed model prepared in Ortho Analyzer software (3Shape A/S) using open source GOM inspect software (GOM GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences found between the bar and shell groups. Within the groups, significant tip differences were found between the incisors, canines, and premolars in both groups (P = .0001). Additionally, a statistically significant torque difference was found in the canines and incisors in the shell group. The percentage of values that deviated from the clinical acceptance limit was relatively higher in the bar group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there was no statistical difference between groups, the shell tray showed better results according to clinical acceptability limits. This study is important as it is the first clinical study to compare directly printed transfer trays with different designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"648-656"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493419/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Nonsurgical orthodontic treatment using bone-anchored maxillary protraction in a patient with unilateral cleft lip and palate.","authors":"Niloufar Azami, Philip Farha, Flavio Uribe","doi":"10.2319/012424-56.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2319/012424-56.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Class III malocclusion due to a retrognathic maxilla is common in patients with cleft lip and palate. Skeletally anchored maxillary protraction using screw-anchored mini-plates combined with intraoral elastics has shown promising results in achieving orthopedic changes and maintaining the outcome until the completion of the growth. This case report presents the course of treatment in a patient with unilateral cleft lip and palate and multiple congenitally missing teeth treated with bone-anchored maxillary protraction until the end of growth. Four mini-plates (Bollard plates) were used during comprehensive fixed orthodontic treatment to protract the dentition and close the space where teeth were missing, extrude the canine, and force eruption of the second premolar using extension arms and cantilevers. A 2-year follow-up at age 17 showed stable occlusion and maintenance of soft tissue results. Bone-anchored maxillary protraction treatment in a patient with cleft lip and palate demonstrates proper orthopedic results and could be a viable alternative to orthognathic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142335563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Strategic treatment for a patient with missing lateral incisor and first molar accompanied by posterior scissor bite and an impacted premolar.","authors":"Boxi Yan, Xuejiao Liu, Kaiyuan Xu, Fanfan Dai","doi":"10.2319/011024-30.1","DOIUrl":"10.2319/011024-30.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Managing orthodontic treatment for adults with missing permanent teeth can be intricate, especially when dealing with a posterior scissor bite and an impacted tooth. This case report presents successful treatment of a female patient with dental and skeletal Class II malocclusion, high mandibular plane angle, missing maxillary left lateral incisor and mandibular right first molar, as well as right posterior scissor bite, and a deeply impacted mandibular left second premolar. In the maxilla, the right second molar and right lateral incisor were strategically extracted to eliminate the scissor bite and enhance frontal esthetic balance. In the mandible, the edentulous space caused by early loss of the first molar was successfully closed and the impacted second premolar was guided into its proper position after surgical exposure. Finally, symmetric frontal esthetics, well-aligned dentition with ideal intercuspation and an improved profile were achieved, which remained stable in the 17 month follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"581-591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363984/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140869694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A M Best, T A Lang, B L Greenberg, J C Gunsolley, E Ioannidou
{"title":"The OHStat guidelines for reporting observational studies and clinical trials in oral health research: manuscript checklist.","authors":"A M Best, T A Lang, B L Greenberg, J C Gunsolley, E Ioannidou","doi":"10.2319/OHStat_Guidelines.1","DOIUrl":"10.2319/OHStat_Guidelines.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising published research, yet ample evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research, statisticians and trialists from academia and industry, identified the minimum information needed to report and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHStat guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The guidelines were subsequently revised by the Task Force writing group. The guidelines draw heavily from the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, and CONSORT harms guidelines, and incorporate the SAMPL guidelines for reporting statistics, the CLIP principles for documenting images, and the GRADE indicating the quality of evidence. The guidelines also recommend reporting estimates in clinically meaningful units using confidence intervals, rather than relying on P values. In addition, OHStat introduces seven new guidelines that concern the text itself, such as checking the congruence between abstract and text, structuring the discussion, and listing conclusions to make them more specific. OHStat does not replace other reporting guidelines; it incorporates those most relevant to dental research into a single document. Manuscripts using the OHStat guidelines will provide more information specific to oral health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":"94 5","pages":"479-487"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363988/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}