Which orthodontic articles are accessed online the most? Exploring article usage metrics along with citations and altmetrics.

The Angle orthodontist Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2319/060124-426.1

Christos Livas, Konstantina Delli

{"title":"Which orthodontic articles are accessed online the most? Exploring article usage metrics along with citations and altmetrics.","authors":"Christos Livas, Konstantina Delli","doi":"10.2319/060124-426.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To investigate the current state of article usage metrics in orthodontics.Materials and methods: Out of all orthodontic journals listed in Journal Citation Reports 2022, the European Journal of Orthodontics and The Angle Orthodontist fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All journal issues published in 2021 were scrutinized for original research articles and systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and the following features were collected: article type, subject, title, number of words and authors, Altmetric Attention Score (AAS), X (formerly Twitter) posts, and Mendeley reads. Article citations, number of publications, and h-index of the last authors were retrieved from Web of Science (WoS).Results: 181 articles were considered eligible. The median number of views and downloads of included articles was 1296 (range: 355-10,233) and 793 (range: 167-3629). Page views, downloads, and total views were significantly correlated with WoS citations (rho > 0.345; P < .001). There was no correlation between usage metrics, AAS, X posts, and Mendeley reads. Number of downloads were significantly higher in studies dealing with new technologies, and where the last author had 1-40 publications or an h-index of 0-30.Conclusions: Page views, downloads, and total views were positively correlated with WoS citations and, therefore, may serve as an early estimate of future citations. Significant variations in article downloads may be expected in relation to article subject, scientific productivity, and impact of the last authors.","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"96-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/060124-426.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the current state of article usage metrics in orthodontics.

Materials and methods: Out of all orthodontic journals listed in Journal Citation Reports 2022, the European Journal of Orthodontics and The Angle Orthodontist fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All journal issues published in 2021 were scrutinized for original research articles and systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and the following features were collected: article type, subject, title, number of words and authors, Altmetric Attention Score (AAS), X (formerly Twitter) posts, and Mendeley reads. Article citations, number of publications, and h-index of the last authors were retrieved from Web of Science (WoS).

Results: 181 articles were considered eligible. The median number of views and downloads of included articles was 1296 (range: 355-10,233) and 793 (range: 167-3629). Page views, downloads, and total views were significantly correlated with WoS citations (rho > 0.345; P < .001). There was no correlation between usage metrics, AAS, X posts, and Mendeley reads. Number of downloads were significantly higher in studies dealing with new technologies, and where the last author had 1-40 publications or an h-index of 0-30.

Conclusions: Page views, downloads, and total views were positively correlated with WoS citations and, therefore, may serve as an early estimate of future citations. Significant variations in article downloads may be expected in relation to article subject, scientific productivity, and impact of the last authors.

查看原文本刊更多论文

哪些正畸文章在网上访问量最大？探索文章的使用指标以及引用和 Altmetrics。

目的研究正畸学文章使用指标的现状：在《2022 年期刊引证报告》中列出的所有正畸学期刊中，《欧洲正畸学杂志》和《The Angle Orthodontist》符合纳入标准。我们仔细研究了2021年出版的所有期刊的原创研究文章和系统综述/计量分析，并收集了以下特征：文章类型、主题、标题、字数和作者、Altmetric关注度得分（AAS）、X（原Twitter）帖子和Mendeley阅读量。从科学网（WoS）检索了文章引用情况、发表数量和最后一位作者的 h 指数：结果：181 篇文章被认为符合条件。收录文章的浏览量和下载量中位数分别为 1296 次（范围：355-10,233 次）和 793 次（范围：167-3629 次）。页面浏览量、下载量和总浏览量与 WoS 引用有显著相关性（rho > 0.345; P < .001）。使用指标、AAS、X 帖子和 Mendeley 阅读量之间没有相关性。在涉及新技术、最后一位作者发表过 1-40 篇论文或 h 指数为 0-30 的研究中，下载次数明显较高：页面浏览量、下载量和总浏览量与 WoS 引用呈正相关，因此可以作为未来引用的早期估计。文章下载量的显著差异可能与文章主题、科学生产力和最后作者的影响力有关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

The Angle orthodontist

自引率

0.00%

发文量