The American journal of hospice & palliative care最新文献

{"title":"Screening for End-of-Life in Acute Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Timothy To, Paul Hakendorf, David C Currow","doi":"10.1177/10499091231226299","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10499091231226299","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients are frequently admitted to hospital in the last year of life. Actively recognising patients at this stage gives the opportunity to plan future care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional survey of all acute medical and surgical inpatients at one tertiary hospital. Two simple screening tools, the <i>indicators for a palliative approach</i> and the <i>surprise question</i> identified a group of patients at greatly increased risk of dying over the next year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The one-year mortality of the study group was 27%, however was 52% and 65% for those identified at risk by the <i>indicators for a palliative approach</i> and <i>surprise question</i> tools. The <i>surprise question</i> had an area under the receiver operator curve value of .84.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These screening tools could be used to help clinicians identify hospital inpatients that would benefit from advance care planning and a tailored approach to their care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139405736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Profile of Antimicrobial Consumption in Patients Assisted by a Palliative Care Team During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil.","authors":"Tulio L Correa, Matheus Ac Quitete, Clara Rs do Nascimento, Rafaela P Carbone, Ricardo T de Carvalho, Juraci A Rocha","doi":"10.1177/10499091231215432","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10499091231215432","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the profile of antimicrobial consumption in patients assisted by a palliative care (PC) team during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted in a quaternary hospital. Patients assisted by the PC team in 2020 were selected. The clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as the outcomes, were assessed using electronic records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 patients were included in the study, of whom 93.4% had used antimicrobials and 24.3% had had COVID-19. COVID-19 patients were more likely to receive at least one course of antimicrobial therapy. Patients who received polytherapy in the first course of treatment were more likely to die and to be still receiving antimicrobials at death. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay, new hospitalization in 12 months, nor the time to death among patients who received monotherapy or polytherapy during the first course of antimicrobial therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a large amount of PC patients receiving antimicrobial therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were more likely to receive antimicrobial therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89721488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"e-PainSupport: A Digital Pain Management Application for Home Hospice Care.","authors":"Masako Mayahara, JoEllen Wilbur, Louis Fogg, Judith A Paice, Arlene M Miller","doi":"10.1177/10499091231211493","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10499091231211493","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>e-PainSupport is a digital pain management application (app) designed to facilitate better pain management in hospice. Early testing revealed caregivers found it was easy to use and successful in communicating patient pain and caregiver administration of analgesics to hospice nurses. However, caregiver knowledge of analgesic management remained low. The purpose of this study was to enhance e-PainSupport by (a) adapting and integrating an evidence-based pain educational intervention; (b) increasing ease of accessing and navigating the app; and (c) facilitating app communication with agency electronic health records (EHRs). An advisory board method, including two key stakeholder groups (an expert panel and a caregiver advisory board), guided the adaptation of an evidence-based pain educational intervention. Further, stakeholders recommended format changes to increase app usability. Study staff worked with four hospice agencies to facilitate app communication with EHRs. While modification to the e-PainSupport app to integrate a pain educational intervention and facilitate usability was successful, EHR integration was challenging. Future evaluation is needed to evaluate the effects of e-PainSupport on pain intensity among home hospice patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186512/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66784732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Continuous Electrocardiographic Monitoring for 24 Hours Before Death in Patients with Terminal Cancer.","authors":"Ko Sato, Mika Baba, Tatsuya Morita, Kento Masukawa, Yasuo Shima, Satoru Tsuneto, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Mitsunori Miyashita","doi":"10.1177/10499091231222184","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10499091231222184","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Purposeless physiological monitoring at the end-of-life is not recommended. However, studies on how families feel regarding the death of patients with terminal cancer without continuous electrocardiographic monitoring (CEM) are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the impact on the quality of care and the feelings and psychological distress experienced by families when CEM is not used during the 24 hours preceding a patient's death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter cross-sectional, self-report questionnaires were distributed to 1087 bereaved families at Japanese specialized palliative care units in 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 671 responses, 394 valid responses were analyzed. Families of nonmonitored patients (NM-group) accounted for 79.2%, while those with bedside electrocardiogram monitoring (MB-group) and remote nurse station monitoring (MC-group) comprised 11.9% and 8.9%, respectively. In the NM-group, 85.5% expressed satisfaction without CEM, which was more than 10% lower than other groups. While 14% in the NM-group desired patient monitoring, families who received adequate explanations about CEM had lower proportions compared to the MB-group (<i>P</i> = .021). Univariate analyses showed no significant differences in evaluations of the quality of care and families' psychological distress (mean scores of Overall Care Satisfaction, Care Evaluation Scale, Good Death Inventory, Brief Grief Questionnaires) across all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the majority of NM-group were satisfied with their patient's care without CEM, the proportion of dissatisfied families was higher than in other groups. Although not using CEM is not a major hindrance to end-of-life care for patients with terminal cancer, providing sufficient explanations may be important for satisfactory care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138812322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Nursing Support for Caregiver Burden in Family Caregivers of Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Kohei Kajiwara, Masamitsu Kobayashi, Miharu Morikawa, Yusuke Kanno, Kimiko Nakano, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Yoichi Shimizu, Taichi Shimazu, Jun Kako","doi":"10.1177/10499091231215808","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10499091231215808","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To identify nursing support for caregiver burden in family caregivers of patients with cancer. <b>Methods:</b> This scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's six-stage scoping review framework. All available published articles from database inception to July 31, 2023 were systematically searched through PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Ichushi-Web of the Japan Medical Abstract Society databases with additional relevant studies from the article list. Each key journal was manually searched. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 502 articles were screened, and 34 were finally included. The results of the qualitative thematic analysis were categorized into 7 components of nursing support: psychological and educational support, psychological and educational support using mainly non-face-to-face (Information and Communication Technology), psychological and educational support mainly using non-face-to-face (telephone) methods, mindfulness to support, support aimed at reducing caregiver stress, support for both patients and caregivers, and others. Of the 34 studies, 23 were randomized controlled trials (RCT), and the remaining 11 were non-RCTs. <b>Conclusion:</b> The results of the scoping review categorized nursing support for caregiver burden in the family caregivers of patients with cancer into 7 components. Future research should examine the feasibility of implementing these components.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367804/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"107593180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"End-of-Life Medical Decisions: The Link Between Sociodemographic Characteristics and Treatment Preferences.","authors":"Ashley Shayya, Yuchi Young","doi":"10.1177/10499091231218988","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10499091231218988","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advance directives (ADs) promote patient autonomy in end-of-life (EOL) care, including an individual's EOL medical treatment preferences. This study aims to better understand preferences regarding EOL medical treatment among community-dwelling adults (18 and older) residing in the United States and examine the association between sociodemographic characteristics and EOL medical treatment preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing a cross-sectional study and snowball sampling methodology, community-dwelling adults completed a survey containing two different ADs and a questionnaire with sociodemographic information. Univariate analyses were used to summarize EOL medical treatment preferences among the sample, and bivariate analyses (Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests) were performed to examine the association between sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, and race/ethnicity) and EOL medical treatment preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the 166 participants was 50 (SD: 21.65, range: 18-93), with 58.4% being White and 61.4% being female. Generally, when EOL scenarios involved brain damage or a coma, more participants indicated that they did not want life-support treatment. Age and race were both associated with EOL medical treatment preferences, but no significant differences were observed in the bivariate results by gender. Largely, young and middle-aged adults, along with Black participants, were more likely to prefer more aggressive EOL medical treatments than older adults and White participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, EOL medical treatment preferences varied among participants. The study findings indicate that adults develop different preferences for EOL medical treatment, with some of the variation attributable to sociodemographic characteristics such as age and race.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138441870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Importance of Spiritual Mindfulness in Palliative Care.","authors":"Jeff Clyde G Corpuz","doi":"10.1177/10499091231213628","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10499091231213628","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Palliative care is a specialized medical approach that aims to improve the quality of life for individuals facing serious illnesses. While palliative care addresses the physical and emotional aspects of illness, one dimension often overlooked but of great significance is spirituality. Many end-of-life caregivers fail to incorporate spirituality as part of the holistic approach in end-of-life care. It is crucial that all physicians and medical professionals possess a holistic understanding of caring for the whole person. Integrating spirituality and mindfulness into palliative care can lead to profound benefits for both patients and caregivers, offering comfort, solace, and a sense of purpose in the face of mortality. This correspondence adds to the discussion on importance of spiritual mindfulness in palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71430726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Impact and Sustainability of a Palliative Care Education Module in Patients With Heart Failure.","authors":"Shelley L Thompson, Allison Lindgren, Jaime McDermott, Stephanie G Barnes, Carolina D Tennyson, Bradi Granger","doi":"10.1177/10499091231220255","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10499091231220255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 6.7 million American adults are living with heart failure (HF). Current therapies are geared toward preventing progression and managing symptoms, as there is no cure. Multiple studies have shown the benefit of including palliative care (PC) in patients with HF to improve symptoms and quality of life. Heart failure guidelines recommend the inclusion of PC in therapy, but referrals are often delayed. A previous pilot project demonstrated increased involvement of PC when targeted education was given to patients with HF.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Educate patients with HF on PC and examine the impact on PC consults, readmission, mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) transfers and evaluate sustainability of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (n = 124) admitted to an academic hospital with a diagnosis of HF were asked to view an educational module on PC. Patients who completed the module were placed in the intervention group (n = 39). Patients who declined were placed in the usual care group (n = 38). The number of PC consults, re-admissions, mortality, and transfers to the ICU were compared among participants and those who declined. Results were compared to previous pilot project.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven patients in the intervention group (IG) requested a PC consult vs one in the usual care group (UCG) (<i>P</i> = .006). There was no statistically significant difference in readmissions, mortality, or ICU transfers between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This sustainable project again demonstrated education on PC increases utilization of PC but does not statistically impact mortality, re-admissions, or transfers to higher levels of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138483593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Caregiver Engagement in Serious Illness Communication in a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Setting.","authors":"Kristin Levoy, Rebecca L Ashare, Niharika Ganta, Nina O'Connor, Salimah H Meghani","doi":"10.1177/10499091231219799","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10499091231219799","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Prolonged management of critical illnesses in long-term acute care hospitals (LTACH) makes serious illness communication (SIC), a clinical imperative. SIC in LTACH is challenging as clinicians often lack training and patients are typically unable to participate-making caregivers central.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This qualitative descriptive study characterized caregiver engagement in SIC encounters, while considering influencing factors, following the implementation of Ariadne Labs' SIC training at a LTACH in the Northeastern United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinicians' documented SIC notes (2019-2020) were analyzed using directed content analysis. Codes were grouped into four categories generated from two factors that influence SIC-evidence of prognostic understanding (yes/no) and documented preferences (yes/no)-and caregiver engagement themes identified within each category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 125 patient cases, 251 SIC notes were analyzed. In the presence of prognostic understanding and documented preferences, caregivers acted as upholders of patients' wishes (29%). With prognostic understanding but undocumented preferences, caregivers were postponers of healthcare decision-making (34%). When lacking prognostic understanding but having documented preferences, caregivers tended to be searchers, intent on identifying continued treatment options (13%). With poor prognostic understanding and undocumented preferences, caregivers were strugglers, having difficulty with the clinicians or family unit over healthcare decision-making (21%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that two factors-prognostic understanding and documented preferences-are critical factors clinicians can leverage in tailoring SIC to meet caregivers' SIC needs in the LTACH setting. Such strategies shift attention away from SIC content alone toward factors that influence caregivers' ability to meaningfully engage in SIC to advance healthcare decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138812121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Narrative Medicine in Hospice and Palliative Care: A Longitudinal Fellowship Curriculum Pilot.","authors":"Trisha K Paul, Taylor Aglio, Austin Dalgo, Erica C Kaye","doi":"10.1177/10499091231223717","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10499091231223717","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Growing evidence suggests that clinician exposure to narrative medicine (NM) may help bolster resilience and mitigate burnout. The value of formal longitudinal training in NM for hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) trainees remains understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 1-year longitudinal NM curriculum for HPM fellows was pilot-tested for feasibility, acceptability, and exploratory impact. Six monthly 45-minute sessions included reading literature, reflective writing, and sharing creative work. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a pre-intervention survey and post-intervention survey administered immediately upon completion of the curriculum. Longitudinal impact was assessed with a post-intervention survey administered three months after completion of the curriculum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All HPM fellows (n = 6) attended at least 5/6 sessions during the 1-year pilot, suggesting intervention feasibility. Participant engagement and self-reported comfort with NM exercises supported intervention acceptability. Post-intervention, participants described the positive influence of NM practice on their clinical practice and stated an intention to integrate NM skills in their future HPM careers. Three months following the intervention, participants had a sustained increase in their comfort level with NM. All participants felt that the NM sessions had been relevant to their life as HPM fellows and anticipated using NM moving forward in their practice of HPM.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This novel NM curriculum was feasible and acceptable to implement in a 1-year HPM fellowship. Longitudinal impact showed sustained increase in trainee comfort and interest in using NM in their future clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11190033/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138833855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}