Health affairs scholarPub Date : 2025-03-21eCollection Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf030
Sean R Tunis, Jason Shafrin, Kyi-Sin Than, Melanie D Whittington, Richard J Willke, Murtuza Bharmal
{"title":"Use of real-world evidence in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: A checklist for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and manufacturers.","authors":"Sean R Tunis, Jason Shafrin, Kyi-Sin Than, Melanie D Whittington, Richard J Willke, Murtuza Bharmal","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf030","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Under the Inflation Reduction Act's (IRA's) - Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS's) \"maximum fair price\" must be informed by evidence on factors such as therapeutic advance of the selected drug compared with its alternative, comparative effectiveness across clinical and patient-reported outcomes, the impact on specific populations, and the ability to address unmet medical needs. This paper describes how real-world evidence could improve CMS decision-making and creates a best practices checklist to help CMS evaluate the quality of any manufacturer-submitted evidence. The checklist was developed in four steps: (i) identification of the IRA requirements for determining the maximum fair price through a review of official guidance from CMS, (ii) assessment of provisions that could be supported by real-world evidence (RWE) in addition to clinical trial evidence, (iii) literature review on existing best-practice guidelines relevant to RWE, and (iv) consolidation of these RWE guidelines into a checklist through a series of web conference discussions among experts. The checklist aims to improve the quality of the information available to CMS during the drug price negotiation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 3","pages":"qxaf030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926674/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143694948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health affairs scholarPub Date : 2025-03-21eCollection Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf055
{"title":"Correction to: Medicaid-covered health care visits during the postpartum year: Variation by enrollee characteristics and state.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf019.].</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 3","pages":"qxaf055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927675/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143694947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health affairs scholarPub Date : 2025-03-20eCollection Date: 2025-04-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf058
Arthur S Hong, Sofia Babool, Lesi He, Ethan A Halm
{"title":"Trends in providers participating in Medicare oncology value-based care models.","authors":"Arthur S Hong, Sofia Babool, Lesi He, Ethan A Halm","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf058","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf058","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 4","pages":"qxaf058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970241/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143797509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health affairs scholarPub Date : 2025-03-19eCollection Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf053
{"title":"Correction to: What happens behind closed doors? Investigating care practices in nursing home and assisted living memory care units.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf053","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf026.].</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 3","pages":"qxaf053"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921773/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143665775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health affairs scholarPub Date : 2025-03-18eCollection Date: 2025-04-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf057
Amanda J Koong, Veronica L Irvin, Aditya Narayan, Sujin Song, Robert M Kaplan
{"title":"Evidence available and used by the Food and Drug Administration for the approval of orphan and nonorphan drugs.","authors":"Amanda J Koong, Veronica L Irvin, Aditya Narayan, Sujin Song, Robert M Kaplan","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf057","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are substantial financial incentives to develop orphan drugs for rare diseases, but concerns about the quality and volume of supporting evidence have emerged. We compare evidence used to evaluate orphan and nonorphan drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2016 and 2023. This retrospective cross-sectional analysis utilizes FDA data on approvals and study information from ClinicalTrials.gov to compare characteristics of studies relevant to orphan and nonorphan drugs approved between 2016 and 2023. Of the 368 total drugs approved, 50% were orphan drugs. The FDA-approved drugs based on significantly fewer studies for orphan (1.5 studies/drug) compared to nonorphan (2.4 studies/drug). Additionally, a significantly lower proportion of studies were completed before FDA approval for orphan drugs (25% vs 41%). Orphan drugs were significantly less likely to be evaluated in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (34% vs 63%). Of these RCTs, there were significantly fewer completed before approval (40% vs 54%) and that had results posted (35% vs 53%). There was a significant difference in the available evidence for orphan and nonorphan drugs. As new legislation like Cures 2.0 is developed, it is critical to examine the balance between an expedited approval timeline and the standard of clinical evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 4","pages":"qxaf057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970248/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143797462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health affairs scholarPub Date : 2025-03-18eCollection Date: 2025-04-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf056
Anthony I Roberts, Christopher M Santostefano, Zihan Chen, Brian E McGarry, Elizabeth M White, Linda J Resnik, Fangli Geng, David C Grabowski, Momotazur Rahman
{"title":"Trends in hospital discharge outcomes among high-risk Medicare beneficiaries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Anthony I Roberts, Christopher M Santostefano, Zihan Chen, Brian E McGarry, Elizabeth M White, Linda J Resnik, Fangli Geng, David C Grabowski, Momotazur Rahman","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf056","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medicare beneficiaries face significant health risks and care disruptions during public health emergencies, but little is known about how care patterns evolved throughout the COVID-19 pandemic or differed between traditional Medicare (TM) and Medicare Advantage (MA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Medicare claims data for over 20 million hospital discharges during 2018-2022, we examined trends in hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, and mortality among beneficiaries with 5 major comorbidities (dementia, diabetes, congestive heart failure, hip fracture, and stroke), stratified by COVID status and payer type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that COVID patients initially experienced substantially longer hospital stays (8.3 vs 4.6 days) and higher 30-day mortality (34% vs 5%) compared to patients without COVID. MA beneficiaries showed consistently higher home health utilization but similar mortality patterns to TM enrollees. By mid-2022, most outcome differences had converged between COVID and non-COVID patients, suggesting health system adaptation to the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight how the pandemic was associated with shifts toward home-based post-acute care, emphasizing the need for policies supporting home-based care infrastructure and flexible care delivery models that could help health systems better adapt during future public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 4","pages":"qxaf056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970246/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143797507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health affairs scholarPub Date : 2025-03-17eCollection Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxae184
Geoffrey M Gusoff, Lina Stepick, Aquilina Soriano-Versoza, Katrina Kazda
{"title":"Centering marginalized care: Home care cooperatives and system change.","authors":"Geoffrey M Gusoff, Lina Stepick, Aquilina Soriano-Versoza, Katrina Kazda","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae184","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxae184","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Home care workers (HCWs), who provide paid in-home support for daily activities, are at the center of the care received by millions of Americans. However, HCWs are profoundly marginalized professionally and economically within our political-economic system, which devalues care work, public goods, and the labor of women, immigrants, and workers of color. This systemic marginalization has contributed to the impoverishment of millions of HCWs and massive workforce shortages, which prevent millions of Americans from accessing the consistent care they need. Home care cooperatives-businesses co-owned and controlled by HCWs-represent an alternative approach that places HCWs at the center. By providing greater compensation, training opportunities, and control over workplace decisions, home care cooperatives have achieved greater continuity of care and half the turnover rates compared with traditional agencies. They demonstrate what is possible when HCWs are centered at an organizational level and what could be achieved if HCWs were centered at a system level. This latter possibility requires the following: (1) reclaiming care work as a public good and investing in it accordingly; (2) structurally empowering HCWs within the care team and broader economy; and (3) new narratives about HCWs that recognize their skills, value, and centrality in providing quality care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 3","pages":"qxae184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909589/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143652882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health affairs scholarPub Date : 2025-03-17eCollection Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf013
Hayden Rooke-Ley, Dana Brown, Colleen Grogan
{"title":"Reviving public provisioning in US health care.","authors":"Hayden Rooke-Ley, Dana Brown, Colleen Grogan","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf013","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As new approaches of political economy gain ground in some sectors, American health care still reflects many aspects of neoliberalism. In this piece, we build on proposals to reorient health care policy around a new industrial policy for health. A core component of this strategy-and our focus here-is a revival of public provisioning of medical services and pharmaceuticals. Although less prevalent today, forms of public provisioning still exist in vital ways. These models demonstrate how public provisioning can not only address urgent capacity needs-it can promote local ownership, operate as a competitive public option that bolsters worker power, and assure societal return on public investments.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 3","pages":"qxaf013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912840/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143652896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health affairs scholarPub Date : 2025-03-17eCollection Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxae170
Seth A Berkowitz
{"title":"The fundamental importance of social insurance for health equity.","authors":"Seth A Berkowitz","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae170","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxae170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People need to consume goods and services that support health, such as nutritious food, medical care, and quality housing, throughout their lives. Many of these goods and services are allocated using markets, which means that people need income to provide purchasing power for these goods and services. However, everyone has times when supporting themselves through paid labor is not possible, so many individuals will not receive the income needed for a healthy life if income distribution is tied solely to economic production. Therefore, a key political economy of health goal is to put in place income-support policy that gets income to those unable to engage in paid labor. The 3 main forms of income-support policy-social assistance, social insurance, and guaranteed income-offer different strengths and limitations. I argue that social insurance, because of its focus on getting income to people in situations in which they cannot or should not engage in paid labor, is a fundamental part of a political economy that supports everyone's health.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 3","pages":"qxae170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909629/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143652823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health affairs scholarPub Date : 2025-03-17eCollection Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf008
Elizabeth Popp Berman
{"title":"Advancing a political economy approach to health using lessons from US antitrust and climate policy.","authors":"Elizabeth Popp Berman","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf008","DOIUrl":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advocates of a political economy approach to US health policy center an analysis of power and the broad political, social, and economic landscape that enables or harms health. They must contend, however, with a dominant policy orientation focused on ensuring individual access to the existing healthcare system. This Policy Inquiry reviews the recent history of US antitrust and climate/industrial policy, both domains where policy movements taking a political economy approach have had significant and unexpected recent success, to draw lessons for health policy, in which a \"care economy\" movement aligned with political economy has had some momentum, but not produced major policy change. Advocates of a political economy approach to US health policy should continue to build on the momentum of the care economy movement while also looking for ways to tie healthcare market reform into the shifts in industrial policy and antitrust. Across both spaces, advocates should center the building of issue networks, make connections to historically resonant political themes, and, where possible, find ways to tap into the energy of youth organizers-all strategies shared across antitrust and climate policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 3","pages":"qxaf008"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909588/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143652878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}