BMC Cancer最新文献

{"title":"Safety and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-treated advanced stage malignant mesothelioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Amjad Zafar, Asma Abdul Rashid, Abdul Moeed, Muhammad Junaid Tahir, Ahmad Jamal Khan, Oadi N Shrateh, Ali Ahmed","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13127-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12885-024-13127-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently presented as a viable option in some first line but primarily as a second-line treatment of advanced-stage malignant mesothelioma (asMM). Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of PD-1/L-1 ICIs in advanced-stage malignant mesothelioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched for all studies assessing the safety and efficacy of anti PD-1/PD-L1 agents. Primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Secondary outcomes were median progression free (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS). Safety outcomes were treatment- (TRAEs) and immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to pool medians and to derive event rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies were included with total of 1064 asMM patients. ORR and DCR were 16% and 57%, respectively. A pooled mPFS was 4.53 (CI: 3.40-5.65) and mOS was 10.51 (CI: 9.03-12.00). Overall TRAEs had an event rate of 0.69 (0.50-0.83) whereas IRAEs had an event rate of 0.28 (0.15-0.46). There were no significant differences between pembrolizumab, nivolumab primarily, and avelumab subgroups for all the outcomes. Additionally, meta-regression found no covariate to be a significant factor in ORR and DCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this meta-analysis we found that anti-PD1/PD-L1 treatment could be useful in pretreated asMM as they had at least comparable or greater mPFS, mOS, ORR, and DCR than other second-line agents currently being used.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO prior to the literature search, CRD42023442350.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536716/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142581984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Efficacy and toxicity of lurbinectedin in subsequent systemic therapy of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Jiayi Tang, Tianlei Wang, Hongwei Wu, Xinrui Bao, Ke Xu, Tao Ren","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13104-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12885-024-13104-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to systematically analyze the efficacy and toxicity of lurbinectedin as a second-line or subsequent treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Candidate studies were identified in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and Wanfang databases up to 1 May 2024. Objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted, respectively. The efficacy and toxicity of lurbinectedin in ES-SCLC were analyzed by meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six eligible prospective studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 536 patients with ES-SCLC who received second-line or subsequent treatment. In pooled analysis, the ORR of lurbinectedin was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29-41), DCR was 67% (95%CI 58-76), DOR was 5.33 months (95%CI 4.51-6.16), PFS was 3.38 months (95%CI 2.59-4.17), and OS was 7.49 months (95%CI 5.11-9.87). The incidence of AEs and severe adverse events (SAEs) was 92% (95%CI 78-100) and 37% (95%CI 19-57), respectively. The most common AEs were leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, with incidences of 81% (68-91), 74% (57-88), 73% (35-98) and 57% (46-68), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a promising alternative for second-line treatment for ES-SCLC, lurbinectedin has a certain level of efficacy and a favorable safety profile. The integration of lurbinectedin with other therapeutic modalities presents an emerging area warranting further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1351"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533368/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cT1-2N0 minor salivary gland cancer in oral cavity.","authors":"Peng Li, Xu Zhang, Qigen Fang, Wei Du","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13107-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12885-024-13107-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in cT1/2N0 minor salivary gland cancer (mSGC) located within the oral cavity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with cT1/2N0 oral mSGC, who were categorized into two groups based on neck management approaches. The impact of SLNB versus observation on regional control and overall survival was assessed using a Cox model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 177 patients were included in the study, with 53 cases undergoing SLNB. All patients had at least one sentinel lymph node, with the majority having two sentinel lymph nodes. The sentinel lymph nodes were predominantly situated in level I, followed by level II. Four patients had positive sentinel lymph nodes, all of whom had primary tumors in the tongue or the floor of the mouth, and were classified as cT2 stage. This yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 100%, a false negative rate of 0%, and a negative predictive value of 100% for SLNB in predicting occult metastasis. In terms of regional control, SLNB exhibited a reduced hazard ratio of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.96) compared to observation. However, SLNB did not confer a superior overall survival benefit compared to observation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with cT1/2N0 oral mSGC, SLNB proved to be both technically feasible and oncologically safe. When contrasted with observation, SLNB was associated with enhanced regional control, particularly recommending its use for cases of cT2 mSGC arising from the tongue or the floor of the mouth.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533395/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Osteosarcoma cells depend on MCL-1 for survival, and osteosarcoma metastases respond to MCL-1 antagonism plus regorafenib in vivo.","authors":"Yanhao Ji, Michael A Harris, Lucas M Newton, Tiffany J Harris, W Douglas Fairlie, Erinna F Lee, Christine J Hawkins","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13088-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12885-024-13088-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Osteosarcoma is the most common form of primary bone cancer, which primarily afflicts children and adolescents. Chemotherapy, consisting of doxorubicin, cisplatin and methotrexate (MAP) increased the 5-year osteosarcoma survival rate from 20% to approximately 60% by the 1980s. However, osteosarcoma survival rates have remained stagnant for several decades. Patients whose disease fails to respond to MAP receive second-line treatments such as etoposide and, in more recent years, the kinase inhibitor regorafenib. BCL-2 and its close relatives enforce cellular survival and have been implicated in the development and progression of various cancer types. BH3-mimetics antagonize pro-survival members of the BCL-2 family to directly stimulate apoptosis. These drugs have been proven to be efficacious in other cancer types, but their use in osteosarcoma has been relatively unexplored to date. We investigated the potential efficacy of BH3-mimetics against osteosarcoma cells in vitro and examined their cooperation with regorafenib in vivo. We demonstrated that osteosarcoma cell lines could be killed through inhibition of MCL-1 combined with BCL-2 or BCL-x_L antagonism. Inhibition of MCL-1 also sensitized osteosarcoma cells to killing by second-line osteosarcoma treatments, particularly regorafenib. Importantly, we found that inhibition of MCL-1 with the BH3-mimetic S63845 combined with regorafenib significantly prolonged the survival of mice bearing pulmonary osteosarcoma metastases. Together, our results highlight the importance of MCL-1 in osteosarcoma cell survival and present a potential therapeutic avenue that may improve metastatic osteosarcoma patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1350"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533409/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparing the performance of DeoxyriboNucleic Acid methylation analysis and cytology for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in women with high-risk human papillomavirus-positive status in a gynecologic outpatient population.","authors":"Hong Tao, Fang Yu, Li Yang, Xiaozhu Pei, Saiping Mao, Xing Fan","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13126-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12885-024-13126-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with cytological triage for women with non-16/18 hrHPV-positive status has become popular in China. However, cytology relies on the subjective judgment of pathologists, leading to inconsistent clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 657 hrHPV-positive women aged 25-64 years were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All participants underwent colposcopic biopsy after cytology triage, with cytology residual specimens undergoing DNA methylation testing. CIN2+ and CIN3+ sensitivity and specificity were compared between the different triage strategies (n=487): PAX1 methylation (PAX1^m) , Glycophorin C methylation (GYPC^m), cytology, and combinations between them or with HPV16/18.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for PAX1^m and GYPC^m in detecting CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) were 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796-0.937) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.808-0.938), respectively. The sensitivities of PAX1^m and GYPC^m were consistent with those of cytology for both CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection. The relative specificities of PAX1^m and GYPC^m for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 2.83 (95% CI: 2.33-2.45) and 3.09 (95% CI: 2.40-3.98), respectively. The relative specificities of combining HPV 16/18 with PAX1^m and GYPC^m for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 3.38 (95% CI: 2.96-3.86) and 3.67 (95% CI: 3.15-4.27), respectively. Compared to low levels of DNA methylation, high levels of PAX1^m and GYPC^m resulted in odd ratios (ORs) of 57.66 (95% CI: 13.57-409.12, p < 0.001) and 23.87 (95% CI: 6.49-115.42, p < 0.001) for CIN3+, adjusted for HPV 16/18 and cytology results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PAX1^m and GYPC^m demonstrated superior ability to identify cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer, with AUC values exceeding 0.85. For detecting CIN2+/CIN3+ in women with hrHPV-positive status, DNA methylation (combined with HPV 16/18) showed higher specificity than cytology (combined with HPV 16/18) and is a potential molecular biomarker for detecting cervical (pre)cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536530/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The optimal timing of breast cancer surgery after COVID-19 infection: an observational study.","authors":"Zhao Bi, Wei-Hao Cheng, Wen-Hao Zheng, Tong-Yue Ren, Peng Chen, Yan-Bing Liu, Peng-Fei Qiu, Wei-Li Wang, Yong-Sheng Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13080-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12885-024-13080-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>It is controversial for the optimal time of breast cancer surgery after COVID-19 infection. Purpose was to assess the risk of postoperative complication in breast cancer patients with COVID-19 infection, in order to select optimal surgery timing after COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Breast cancer patients infected with COVID-19 and performed surgery between December 20th, 2022 to March 20th, 2023 were included in this prospective study (n = 577). Patients performed surgery between May 1, 2019 to October 1, 2019 were listed as control group (n = 329). They had not been infected with COVID-19 before surgery. Patients were grouped by time of surgery relative to COVID-19 infection. Database was evaluated using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients infected with COVID-19 had a higher incidence of complications after surgery compared to that not-COVID-19 infection (6.59% vs. 3.04%). Multivariable logistic analysis demonstrated that timing of surgery was associated with complications (OR = 4.253; 95% CI: 0.855-21.153, P = 0.044). Patients performed surgery within 2 weeks after COVID-19 infection had the highest rates of complication (17.65%) when compared with other groups, while the incidence was decreased into 5.51% when surgery 2 weeks or more after COVID-19 infection. With a median follow-up was 10 months, all patients with complications were recovered without serious complications or death, which had no adverse effect on subsequent anti-tumor therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It needs to be cautious when breast cancer surgery was performed within 2 weeks after COVID-19 infection. Although the incidence of complications in patients undergoing surgery 2 weeks after COVID-19 infection is still slightly high, surgery might be recommended considering urgency of treatment, good prognosis of complications and the lack of influence on subsequent adjuvant therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1348"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533406/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142567068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cancer care treatment attrition in adults: Measurement approaches and inequities in patient dropout rates - a rapid review.","authors":"Jenny Shand, Elizabeth Stovold, Lucy Goulding, Kate Cheema","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13096-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12885-024-13096-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer treatment attrition refers to the discontinuation of prescribed cancer therapies before completion. It can significantly impact patient outcomes and cancer survival rates making it a critical concern. There is growing evidence on inequalities in cancer care, the avoidable systematic differences in the health of different groups of people. Understanding the extent of treatment attrition, why it happens, for whom, and associated inequalities may improve cancer care delivery and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid review was conducted to identify existing evidence on measures of cancer treatment attrition, definitions, reasons for attrition and potential inequalities. The review followed a systematic approach but with abbreviated processes to facilitate quicker evidence synthesis. Searches were restricted to MEDLINE and Embase databases from their inception dates to May 7, 2024. Additional searches were performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, and key grey literature from relevant organizations. Inclusion criteria were adults with any type of cancer undergoing treatment, with studies reporting quantitative or qualitative data on treatment attrition conducted outside of clinical trials. Exclusion criteria included studies on children or adolescents, clinical trials, non-English publications, and various non-research article types. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using standardized tools, and studies were synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search retrieved 1,353 references, with 40 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective. Studies covered various cancer types and treatments, reporting measures of attrition and reasons for treatment drop-out. Factors influencing attrition included disease progression, death, clinical deterioration, treatment toxicity, and socioeconomic factors such as lower income or socioeconomic disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights significant variability in how treatment attrition is measured and defined, and suggests potential inequalities in who discontinues treatment. Standardized measures of attrition and data collection on reasons for discontinuation are essential to improve cancer care outcomes and equity. Future research should focus on developing these standardized metrics and exploring interventions targeting identified disparities to support cancer patients to complete treatment and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1345"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528991/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142557140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Establishment and validation of a population pharmacokinetic model for apatinib in patients with tumors.","authors":"Li'an Zuo, Jing Ling, Nan Hu, Rong Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13118-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12885-024-13118-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model for oral apatinib in Chinese oncology patients and investigate the factors influencing the pharmacokinetics of apatinib.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We gathered 199 blood concentration monitoring data points from 91 inpatient oncology participants receiving oral apatinib at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Covariates, such as age, gender, body weight, and indices of liver and renal function, were examined to assess their influence on the pharmacokinetic parameters of apatinib. The PPK model was developed using the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling procedure (NONMEM), and model validation was conducted using the bootstrap method and normalized prediction distribution error (NPDE) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The structural model adopted a one-compartment structure with first-order elimination. Notably, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and the co-administered drug type emerged as primary covariates affecting apatinib clearance (CL/F). The finalized model was expressed as CL/F (L/h) = 56.7 × (AST/26.6)^-0.298 × θ, when apatinib was combined with monoclonal antibodies, θ was 1; when combined with paclitaxel, θ was 0.58; when combined with other drugs (e.g., platinum, capecitabine, or the combination of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium), θ was 1.60; When used as monotherapy, θ was 1.38. V/F = 674 L, and the absorption rate constant (Ka) was fixed at 0.08 h^-1. Bootstrap results affirmed the model's reliability and stability, while NPDE outcomes attested to the model's fit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study successfully established a PPK model for apatinib in oncology patients, revealing that liver function status and co-administered drug types significantly impacted apatinib CL/F. This finding underscored the potential necessity for dose adjustments to optimize efficacy, particularly in patients undergoing different chemotherapy regimens involving apatinib.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529441/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142563737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Integrated bulk and single-cell profiling characterize sphingolipid metabolism in pancreatic cancer.","authors":"Biao Zhang, Bolin Zhang, Tingxin Wang, Bingqian Huang, Lijun Cen, Zhizhou Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13114-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12885-024-13114-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abnormal sphingolipid metabolism (SM) is closely linked to the incidence of cancers. However, the role of SM in pancreatic cancer (PC) remains unclear. This study aims to explore the significance of SM in the prognosis, immune microenvironment, and treatment of PC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-cell and bulk transcriptome data of PC were acquired via TCGA and GEO databases. SM-related genes (SMRGs) were obtained via MSigDB database. Consensus clustering was utilized to construct SM-related molecular subtypes. LASSO and Cox regression were utilized to build SM-related prognostic signature. ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT algorithms were employed to assess the tumour immune microenvironment. OncoPredict package was used to predict drug sensitivity. CCK-8, scratch, and transwell experiments were performed to analyze the function of ANKRD22 in PC cell line PANC-1 and BxPC-3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 153 SMRGs were acquired, of which 48 were linked to PC patients' prognosis. Two SM-related subtypes (SMRGcluster A and B) were identified in PC. SMRGcluster A had a poorer outcome and more active SM process compared to SMRGcluster B. Immune analysis revealed that SMRGcluster B had higher immune and stromal scores and CD8 + T cell abundance, while SMRGcluster A had a higher tumour purity score and M0 macrophages and activated dendritic cell abundance. PC with SMRGcluster B was more susceptible to gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and oxaliplatin. Then SM-related prognostic model (including ANLN, ANKRD22, and DKK1) was built, which had a very good predictive performance. Single-cell analysis revealed that in PC microenvironment, macrophages, epithelial cells, and endothelial cells had relatively higher SM activity. ANKRD22, DKK1, and ANLN have relatively higher expression levels in epithelial cells. Cell subpopulations with high expression of ANKRD22, DKK1, and ANLN had more active SM activity. In vitro experiments showed that ANKRD22 knockdown can inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion of PC cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed the important significance of SM in PC and identified SM-associated molecular subtypes and prognostic model, which provided novel perspectives on the stratification, prognostic prediction, and precision treatment of PC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1347"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531184/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142563740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Integrating clinical and image-based parameters for prediction of early post-prostatectomy incontinence recovery: simplified nomogram approach.","authors":"I-Hung Shao, Sy-Yuan Chen, Hung-Yi Chen, Ting-Wen Sheng, Ying-Hsu Chang, Chung-Yi Liu, Liang-Kang Huang, Hung-Chen Kan, Po-Hung Lin, Kai-Jie Yu, Cheng-Keng Chuang, See-Tong Pang, Chun-Te Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13072-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12885-024-13072-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop a novel model that combines both clinical and image-based parameters to predict early recovery of urinary incontinence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) more easily and precisely.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled data from patients who underwent RARP performed by a single surgeon. Clinical parameters were collected through medical chart review. All patients received cystography one week after RARP to evaluate the anastomosis healing condition. All cystography images were analyzed by a single radiologist who was blinded to the clinical status of the patients. Multivariate analysis was performed to select significant predictors for early post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) recovery, defined as being pad-free within four weeks after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 293 patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, 26.7% experienced immediate dryness after surgery, while 47.6% achieved being pad-free within one month. The overall continence rate was over 90% six months after surgery. In univariate analysis, factors associated with early PPI recovery were BMI, T stage, NVB preservation, surgical margin status, downward bladder neck, and bladder neck angle on cystography. BMI, NVB preservation, and downward bladder neck remained significant in multivariate analysis (p-values = 0.041, 0.027, and 0.023, respectively). A nomogram model was established based on these three predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first model to combine preoperative clinical factors, peri-surgical factors, and postoperative image-based factors to predict PPI recovery after RARP. This model can assist clinicians in taking optimal actions for PPI and also reduce patient anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1344"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142557152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}