下一代肺癌细胞学样本测序面板的前瞻性多中心验证:cPANEL。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Kei Morikawa, Yuta Takashima, Masahide Oki, Akifumi Tsuzuku, Shuji Murakami, Daisuke Minami, Shinji Fujii, Naofumi Shinagawa, Fumihiro Asano, Seiji Nakamura, Yoshiharu Sato, Yumi Ueda, Fumihiko Suzuki, Tomoyuki Yokose, Kenichiro Tanabe, Masamichi Mineshita
{"title":"下一代肺癌细胞学样本测序面板的前瞻性多中心验证:cPANEL。","authors":"Kei Morikawa, Yuta Takashima, Masahide Oki, Akifumi Tsuzuku, Shuji Murakami, Daisuke Minami, Shinji Fujii, Naofumi Shinagawa, Fumihiro Asano, Seiji Nakamura, Yoshiharu Sato, Yumi Ueda, Fumihiko Suzuki, Tomoyuki Yokose, Kenichiro Tanabe, Masamichi Mineshita","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14770-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no prospective studies to estimate whether cytology specimens can replace tissue samples using lung cancer gene panel analysis. We evaluated the success rate of gene panel testing and nucleic acid yield and quality when using cytology specimens for lung cancer over tissue specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, clinical cytology specimens collected via transbronchial brushing, needle aspiration washing, and pleural effusion were stored in a nucleic acid stabilizer. The primary endpoint was the superior success rate of gene analysis using cytology specimens over the conventional success rate using tissue specimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The full analysis set included 248 cases. The success rate for gene panel analysis using cytology specimens was 98.4% (95% confidence interval (CI), 95.9-99.6%) with a positive concordance rate of 97.3% (95% CI, 90.7-99.7%) by other companion diagnostic kits. The median value for nucleic acid yield and quality (DNA/RNA integrated number) of cytology specimens was 546.0/426.5 ng and 9.2/4.7 for DNA/RNA, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient of variant allele frequency between tissue formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sample and cytology specimens for mutant cases was 0.815. The ratio of double-stranded to total DNA showed that cytology specimens were of significantly higher quality than FFPE specimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The success rate of cytology specimens in gene analysis was significantly higher than conventional data. Because of the sufficient nucleic acid yield, high quality, and high correlation of mutant allele frequency compared to FFPE specimens, cytology specimens are suitable for panel testing as tissue substitutes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN Registry UMIN000047215 (cPANEL trial).  https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000053766 .</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"1538"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective multicenter validation of a next-generation sequencing panel using cytology specimens for lung cancer: cPANEL.\",\"authors\":\"Kei Morikawa, Yuta Takashima, Masahide Oki, Akifumi Tsuzuku, Shuji Murakami, Daisuke Minami, Shinji Fujii, Naofumi Shinagawa, Fumihiro Asano, Seiji Nakamura, Yoshiharu Sato, Yumi Ueda, Fumihiko Suzuki, Tomoyuki Yokose, Kenichiro Tanabe, Masamichi Mineshita\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12885-025-14770-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no prospective studies to estimate whether cytology specimens can replace tissue samples using lung cancer gene panel analysis. We evaluated the success rate of gene panel testing and nucleic acid yield and quality when using cytology specimens for lung cancer over tissue specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, clinical cytology specimens collected via transbronchial brushing, needle aspiration washing, and pleural effusion were stored in a nucleic acid stabilizer. The primary endpoint was the superior success rate of gene analysis using cytology specimens over the conventional success rate using tissue specimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The full analysis set included 248 cases. The success rate for gene panel analysis using cytology specimens was 98.4% (95% confidence interval (CI), 95.9-99.6%) with a positive concordance rate of 97.3% (95% CI, 90.7-99.7%) by other companion diagnostic kits. The median value for nucleic acid yield and quality (DNA/RNA integrated number) of cytology specimens was 546.0/426.5 ng and 9.2/4.7 for DNA/RNA, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient of variant allele frequency between tissue formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sample and cytology specimens for mutant cases was 0.815. The ratio of double-stranded to total DNA showed that cytology specimens were of significantly higher quality than FFPE specimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The success rate of cytology specimens in gene analysis was significantly higher than conventional data. Because of the sufficient nucleic acid yield, high quality, and high correlation of mutant allele frequency compared to FFPE specimens, cytology specimens are suitable for panel testing as tissue substitutes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN Registry UMIN000047215 (cPANEL trial).  https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000053766 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512683/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14770-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14770-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前尚无前瞻性研究评估细胞学标本是否可以用肺癌基因面板分析替代组织样本。我们评估了肺癌细胞学标本与组织标本相比,基因面板检测的成功率以及核酸产量和质量。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,临床细胞学标本通过经支气管刷牙,针吸洗涤和胸腔积液保存在核酸稳定剂中。主要终点是使用细胞学标本进行基因分析的成功率优于使用组织标本的常规成功率。结果:全分析集纳入248例。使用细胞学标本进行基因面板分析的成功率为98.4%(95%可信区间(CI), 95.9-99.6%),其他配套诊断试剂盒的阳性一致性率为97.3% (95% CI, 90.7-99.7%)。细胞学标本的核酸产率和质量(DNA/RNA积分数)中位数分别为546.0/426.5 ng和9.2/4.7 ng。组织福尔马林固定和石蜡包埋(FFPE)标本与突变病例细胞学标本变异等位基因频率的Pearson相关系数为0.815。双链DNA与总DNA的比值表明,细胞学标本的质量明显高于FFPE标本。结论:细胞学标本在基因分析中的成功率明显高于常规资料。与FFPE标本相比,细胞学标本核酸产率高,质量好,突变等位基因频率相关性高,适合作为组织替代品进行面板检测。试验注册:UMIN注册表UMIN000047215 (cPANEL试验)。https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000053766。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prospective multicenter validation of a next-generation sequencing panel using cytology specimens for lung cancer: cPANEL.

Prospective multicenter validation of a next-generation sequencing panel using cytology specimens for lung cancer: cPANEL.

Prospective multicenter validation of a next-generation sequencing panel using cytology specimens for lung cancer: cPANEL.

Prospective multicenter validation of a next-generation sequencing panel using cytology specimens for lung cancer: cPANEL.

Background: There are no prospective studies to estimate whether cytology specimens can replace tissue samples using lung cancer gene panel analysis. We evaluated the success rate of gene panel testing and nucleic acid yield and quality when using cytology specimens for lung cancer over tissue specimens.

Methods: In this prospective study, clinical cytology specimens collected via transbronchial brushing, needle aspiration washing, and pleural effusion were stored in a nucleic acid stabilizer. The primary endpoint was the superior success rate of gene analysis using cytology specimens over the conventional success rate using tissue specimens.

Results: The full analysis set included 248 cases. The success rate for gene panel analysis using cytology specimens was 98.4% (95% confidence interval (CI), 95.9-99.6%) with a positive concordance rate of 97.3% (95% CI, 90.7-99.7%) by other companion diagnostic kits. The median value for nucleic acid yield and quality (DNA/RNA integrated number) of cytology specimens was 546.0/426.5 ng and 9.2/4.7 for DNA/RNA, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient of variant allele frequency between tissue formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sample and cytology specimens for mutant cases was 0.815. The ratio of double-stranded to total DNA showed that cytology specimens were of significantly higher quality than FFPE specimens.

Conclusions: The success rate of cytology specimens in gene analysis was significantly higher than conventional data. Because of the sufficient nucleic acid yield, high quality, and high correlation of mutant allele frequency compared to FFPE specimens, cytology specimens are suitable for panel testing as tissue substitutes.

Trial registration: UMIN Registry UMIN000047215 (cPANEL trial).  https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000053766 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信