Journal of forensic psychology practice最新文献_第6页

Suicidal ideation and attempts among court-involved, non-incarcerated youth. 有自杀念头和企图自杀的有法院介入的非监禁青少年。

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-05-10 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1172424

Kathleen Kemp, Marina Tolou-Shams, Selby Conrad, Emily Dauria, Kira Neel, Larry Brown

引用次数: 0

Incorporating the Jesness Inventory-Revised (JI-R) in a Best-Practice Model of Juvenile Delinquency Assessments 在青少年犯罪评估的最佳实践模型中纳入杰西量表修订(JI-R)

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1119516

Robert A Semel

{"title":"Incorporating the Jesness Inventory-Revised (JI-R) in a Best-Practice Model of Juvenile Delinquency Assessments","authors":"Robert A Semel","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2016.1119516","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1119516","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines use of the Jesness Inventory-Revised (JI-R) in the juvenile delinquency assessment context. The JI-R was identified by Hoge and Andrews (2010) among several standardized personality tests that are useful as part of a best-practice comprehensive juvenile forensic assessment. The JI-R is particularly relevant in forensic contexts with respect to identifying personality characteristics associated with juvenile delinquency. It is proposed that the JI-R can be integrated into the contemporary risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model of correctional assessment and rehabilitative programming and its application for juvenile delinquents. Studies suggest that the Jesness Inventory may identify an antisocial orientation dimension associated with dynamic risk-need factors in youths that influence criminal or delinquent behavior and that can be targeted for intervention. The JI-R also assesses internalizing psychological problems that may identify responsivity factors relevant for disposition and treatment planning in forensic contexts. This article identifies some technical limitations of the JI-R, including the issue of item overlap. The questionable effectiveness of this instrument in detecting response bias, especially underreporting, is also considered. Directions for future research are suggested.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"58 1","pages":"1 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2016.1119516","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59840645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Do Psycholegal Abilities Mediate the Relationship between Psychiatric Diagnoses and Competence to Stand Trial Opinions? 心理法律能力是否在精神病诊断与出庭作证能力之间起中介作用?

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2015.1090230

M. Stein, L. Kan, C. Henderson

引用次数: 3

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Factors Related to Drug Use Among Adult Female Offenders: Implications for Treatment 成年女性罪犯吸毒相关因素的种族和民族差异:对治疗的启示

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1124595

Roslyn M. Caldwell-Gunes, Kellie Smith, Kerri A. Norton

引用次数: 2

Web-Based Violence Risk Monitoring Tool in Psychoses: Pilot Study in Community Forensic Patients 基于网络的精神病暴力风险监测工具:社区法医患者试点研究

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1128301

G. Gulati, Robert Cornish, H. Al-Taiar, C. Miller, V. Khosla, C. Hinds, J. Price, J. Geddes, S. Fazel

引用次数: 15

Offenders’ Crime Narratives Across Different Types of Crimes 不同类型犯罪中罪犯的犯罪叙述

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2015-10-20 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2015.1065620

Maria Ioannou, D. Canter, Donna Youngs, J. Synnott

引用次数: 27

We Don’t Always Mean What We Say: Attitudes Toward Statutory Exclusion of Juvenile Offenders From Juvenile Court Jurisdiction 我们并不总是言行一致:对少年法院法定排除少年犯的态度

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2015-10-20 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2015.1099335

Tina M. Zottoli, Tarika Daftary-Kapur, P. Zapf

{"title":"We Don’t Always Mean What We Say: Attitudes Toward Statutory Exclusion of Juvenile Offenders From Juvenile Court Jurisdiction","authors":"Tina M. Zottoli, Tarika Daftary-Kapur, P. Zapf","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2015.1099335","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2015.1099335","url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, juvenile offenders are often excluded from the jurisdiction of juvenile court on the basis of age and crime type alone. Data from national surveys and data from psycholegal research on support for adult sanction of juvenile offenders are often at odds. The ways in which questions are asked and the level of detail provided to respondents and research participants may influence expressed opinions. Respondents may also be more likely to agree with harsh sanctions when they have fewer offender- and case-specific details to consider. Here, we test the hypothesis that attitudes supporting statutory exclusion laws measured in the absence of specific case-specific details may not be the best indicator of agreement with such laws in practice. We found that support for statutory exclusion was affected by exposure to information about an offender’s unique situation and by exposure to general scientific information about adolescent development. These results suggest that despite apparent widespread agreement with automatic exclusion statutes, laypersons consider factors other than those allowed by the law when they are asked how to treat an individual offender.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"423 - 448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2015.1099335","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59840890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

A Demonstrative Helps Opposing Expert Testimony Sensitize Jurors to the Validity of Scientific Evidence 示范有助于对方专家证词使陪审员对科学证据的有效性更加敏感

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2015-10-20 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2015.1090225

Angela M. Jones, M. B. Kovera

引用次数: 4

The Cognitive Interview: Improving Recall and Reducing Misinformation Among Arab Children 认知访谈:提高阿拉伯儿童的回忆和减少错误信息

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2015-10-20 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2015.1099350

Aiman El Asam, M. Samara

{"title":"The Cognitive Interview: Improving Recall and Reducing Misinformation Among Arab Children","authors":"Aiman El Asam, M. Samara","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2015.1099350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2015.1099350","url":null,"abstract":"It is well documented that the cognitive interview (CI) is a method of improving children’s recall, thereby limiting misinformation. Despite the popularity of the CI in Western societies, it is yet to be tested with native Arab children. The purpose of this study is to examine the usefulness, among Arab children, of the CI compared to a control interview (structured interview [SI]). The study is based on 80 Arabic children, aged 9–12 years, and the sample was stratified based on age and gender. Children viewed a short video clip of a theft crime, followed by a narrative containing misinformation; interviews were conducted 2 to 16 days following the stimuli. The CI led to significantly more correct details, and was shown to limit misinformation compared to the SI. Moreover, the CI led to a higher number of incorrect and confabulated details. The results also showed significant effects of age and delay (interval between scene and interview) on memory recall. Overall, it was concluded that the CI is a transferable technique to Arab children. However, careful consideration should be given to the difficulty of the two CI instructions (Change Perspective and Change Order) as well as culture-related characteristics.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"449 - 477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2015.1099350","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59840945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Examiner Agreement and Judicial Consensus in Forensic Mental Health Evaluations 法医心理健康评估中的审查员共识与司法共识

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2015-08-04 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2015.1051447

M. Acklin, Kristen Fuger, W. Gowensmith

{"title":"Examiner Agreement and Judicial Consensus in Forensic Mental Health Evaluations","authors":"M. Acklin, Kristen Fuger, W. Gowensmith","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2015.1051447","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2015.1051447","url":null,"abstract":"The reliability of forensic methods continues to be controversial. Hawaii is unique in utilizing a three-panel system for evaluating criminal defendants for competency to stand trial (CST), not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI), and postacquittal conditional release (CR). The study examined independent forensic reports with judicial determinations to assess examiner agreement and judicial consensus. Examinees (N = 450) were defendants charged with felony offenses. Three groups of examiners conducted independent forensic mental health evaluations: community-based psychiatrists, community-based psychologists, and psychologists employed by the Courts & Corrections branch of the Hawaii Department of Health. Five classes of reliability estimators were examined in a noncrossed data measurement design. The study examined field reliability of CST, NGRI, and CR as operationalized psycholegal constructs. Overall, findings revealed wide variability in examiner consensus and agreement between examiners and judges, depending on type of examination. Factors associated with examiner disagreement are discussed. Findings are similar to field reliability for other types of complex decision making. Procedural standardization, application of structured professional methods, use for forensic assessment instruments, and de-bias assessment are recommended to improve the quality of forensic mental health opinions.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"318 - 343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2015.1051447","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59840717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16