The Cognitive Interview: Improving Recall and Reducing Misinformation Among Arab Children

Aiman El Asam, M. Samara
{"title":"The Cognitive Interview: Improving Recall and Reducing Misinformation Among Arab Children","authors":"Aiman El Asam, M. Samara","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2015.1099350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well documented that the cognitive interview (CI) is a method of improving children’s recall, thereby limiting misinformation. Despite the popularity of the CI in Western societies, it is yet to be tested with native Arab children. The purpose of this study is to examine the usefulness, among Arab children, of the CI compared to a control interview (structured interview [SI]). The study is based on 80 Arabic children, aged 9–12 years, and the sample was stratified based on age and gender. Children viewed a short video clip of a theft crime, followed by a narrative containing misinformation; interviews were conducted 2 to 16 days following the stimuli. The CI led to significantly more correct details, and was shown to limit misinformation compared to the SI. Moreover, the CI led to a higher number of incorrect and confabulated details. The results also showed significant effects of age and delay (interval between scene and interview) on memory recall. Overall, it was concluded that the CI is a transferable technique to Arab children. However, careful consideration should be given to the difficulty of the two CI instructions (Change Perspective and Change Order) as well as culture-related characteristics.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"449 - 477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2015.1099350","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2015.1099350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

It is well documented that the cognitive interview (CI) is a method of improving children’s recall, thereby limiting misinformation. Despite the popularity of the CI in Western societies, it is yet to be tested with native Arab children. The purpose of this study is to examine the usefulness, among Arab children, of the CI compared to a control interview (structured interview [SI]). The study is based on 80 Arabic children, aged 9–12 years, and the sample was stratified based on age and gender. Children viewed a short video clip of a theft crime, followed by a narrative containing misinformation; interviews were conducted 2 to 16 days following the stimuli. The CI led to significantly more correct details, and was shown to limit misinformation compared to the SI. Moreover, the CI led to a higher number of incorrect and confabulated details. The results also showed significant effects of age and delay (interval between scene and interview) on memory recall. Overall, it was concluded that the CI is a transferable technique to Arab children. However, careful consideration should be given to the difficulty of the two CI instructions (Change Perspective and Change Order) as well as culture-related characteristics.
认知访谈:提高阿拉伯儿童的回忆和减少错误信息
有充分的证据表明,认知访谈(CI)是一种提高儿童回忆的方法,从而限制错误信息。尽管CI在西方社会很受欢迎,但它还没有在当地的阿拉伯儿童中进行测试。本研究的目的是检验在阿拉伯儿童中,与对照访谈(结构化访谈[SI])相比,CI的有效性。该研究基于80名9-12岁的阿拉伯儿童,样本根据年龄和性别分层。孩子们观看了一段盗窃犯罪的短视频片段,随后是一段包含错误信息的叙述;访谈在刺激后2至16天进行。与SI相比,CI带来了更多正确的细节,并显示出限制错误信息。此外,CI导致了更多不正确和虚构的细节。结果还显示,年龄和延迟(场景和访谈之间的间隔)对记忆回忆有显著影响。总的来说,结论是CI是一种可转让给阿拉伯儿童的技术。但是,需要仔细考虑两个CI指令(Change Perspective和Change Order)的难度以及与文化相关的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书