Language research最新文献_第9页

Non-aspectual Case and Duration/Frequency Adverbials in Korean 朝鲜语的非位格状语和持续时间/频率状语

Language research Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI: 10.30961/LR.2018.54.2.201

Kyumin Kim

引用次数: 0

Korean EFL Learners’ Use of I in English Argumentative Writing: Focusing on Genre-specific and Proficiency-specific Characteristics 韩国英语学习者在英语议论文写作中对I的使用：关注体裁和能力特征

Language research Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI: 10.30961/LR.2018.54.2.357

E. Lee, Sun-Young Oh

引用次数: 0

Exploring the Reference Requirements for Relativization with Special Reference to Korean 从朝鲜语专论看亲属化的参照要求

Language research Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI: 10.30961/LR.2018.54.2.249

Ji-Eun Lee

引用次数: 0

The Pseudo-resultative [V-ko (iss-)] Construction in Korean 韩国语的假动结果式[V-ko (iss-)]

Language research Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI: 10.30961/LR.2018.54.2.157

Hee-Rahk Chae

{"title":"The Pseudo-resultative [V-ko (iss-)] Construction in\u0000 Korean","authors":"Hee-Rahk Chae","doi":"10.30961/LR.2018.54.2.157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30961/LR.2018.54.2.157","url":null,"abstract":"Korean [... V-ko iss-] expressions are ambiguous between a progressive meaning (P-reading) and a resultative meaning (R-reading). Most previous analyses assume that there is only one construction involved. Only a few previous analyses assume that there are two: the progressive construction, which we will call the P(-reading) construction, and the resultative construction. Under this latter assumption, we argue that the resultative construction has to be further divided into two types. That is, we will show that the seeming resultative [... V-ko iss-] expressions are realizations of two different constructions: the (real) R(-reading) construction and the p(seudo)-R(-reading) construction. Although, unlike the P construction, both of them are modifier-modified constructions, they have different properties. The major source of differences is that of the verbs in the [... V] position: while the verbs in the R construction can indicate a present state with their past tense form, those in the p-R construction have a present state meaning inherently. The p-R construction comprises all those cases in which negative verbal expressions appear in the [... V] position. In addition, this construction is not subject to the constraints operating on the R construction. We will see that the present approach provides a systematic analysis and covers a wider range of data than previous approaches.","PeriodicalId":89433,"journal":{"name":"Language research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48549532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

A Comparability Study of Two Standardized English as a Foreign Language Tests 两个标准化的对外英语测试的可比性研究

Language research Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI: 10.30961/lr.2018.54.2.277

Inn-Chull Choi, Youngsun Moon

{"title":"A Comparability Study of Two Standardized English\u0000 as a Foreign Language Tests","authors":"Inn-Chull Choi, Youngsun Moon","doi":"10.30961/lr.2018.54.2.277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2018.54.2.277","url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the degree of comparability between TEPS and TOEIC regarding test content and construct considering that these elements are important since they are frequently utilized as official English tests in Korea. The New TEPS, an updated version of the original TEPS that reflects the needs analysis, and TOEIC, which was revised in 2016, were analyzed based on the following theoretical frameworks that focus on language elements. This study systematically analyzed test attributes based on: 1) Test Task Characteristics (type, length, speed, etc.) of each test section and item distribution based on the type and content category, 2) Various corpus indices of the test content, and 3) Test Usefulness (construct validity, authenticity, and interactiveness), comparing the overall test comparability between the New TEPS and TOEIC. Results indicate that although the tests’ objectives and development foundations differ, there were similarities in content and construct. Nevertheless, a handful of discrepancies were also identified, necessitating the thorough examination of the tests’ compatibility when interpreting test results. In addition, based on the theoretical framework of Test Usefulness, the strengths and weaknesses of each test’s content and construct were examined. This study also postulates a suitable direction to develop a valid communicative proficiency test.","PeriodicalId":89433,"journal":{"name":"Language research","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41282495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Comparative Markedness and Induced Opacity. 比较标记和诱导不透明。

Language research Pub Date : 2010-01-01

Daniel A Dinnsen, Judith A Gierut, Ashley W Farris-Trimble

引用次数: 0