两个标准化的对外英语测试的可比性研究

Inn-Chull Choi, Youngsun Moon
{"title":"两个标准化的对外英语测试的可比性研究","authors":"Inn-Chull Choi, Youngsun Moon","doi":"10.30961/lr.2018.54.2.277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the degree of comparability between TEPS and TOEIC regarding test content and construct considering that these elements are important since they are frequently utilized as official English tests in Korea. The New TEPS, an updated version of the original TEPS that reflects the needs analysis, and TOEIC, which was revised in 2016, were analyzed based on the following theoretical frameworks that focus on language elements. This study systematically analyzed test attributes based on: 1) Test Task Characteristics (type, length, speed, etc.) of each test section and item distribution based on the type and content category, 2) Various corpus indices of the test content, and 3) Test Usefulness (construct validity, authenticity, and interactiveness), comparing the overall test comparability between the New TEPS and TOEIC. Results indicate that although the tests’ objectives and development foundations differ, there were similarities in content and construct. Nevertheless, a handful of discrepancies were also identified, necessitating the thorough examination of the tests’ compatibility when interpreting test results. In addition, based on the theoretical framework of Test Usefulness, the strengths and weaknesses of each test’s content and construct were examined. This study also postulates a suitable direction to develop a valid communicative proficiency test.","PeriodicalId":89433,"journal":{"name":"Language research","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparability Study of Two Standardized English\\n as a Foreign Language Tests\",\"authors\":\"Inn-Chull Choi, Youngsun Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.30961/lr.2018.54.2.277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the degree of comparability between TEPS and TOEIC regarding test content and construct considering that these elements are important since they are frequently utilized as official English tests in Korea. The New TEPS, an updated version of the original TEPS that reflects the needs analysis, and TOEIC, which was revised in 2016, were analyzed based on the following theoretical frameworks that focus on language elements. This study systematically analyzed test attributes based on: 1) Test Task Characteristics (type, length, speed, etc.) of each test section and item distribution based on the type and content category, 2) Various corpus indices of the test content, and 3) Test Usefulness (construct validity, authenticity, and interactiveness), comparing the overall test comparability between the New TEPS and TOEIC. Results indicate that although the tests’ objectives and development foundations differ, there were similarities in content and construct. Nevertheless, a handful of discrepancies were also identified, necessitating the thorough examination of the tests’ compatibility when interpreting test results. In addition, based on the theoretical framework of Test Usefulness, the strengths and weaknesses of each test’s content and construct were examined. This study also postulates a suitable direction to develop a valid communicative proficiency test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language research\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2018.54.2.277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2018.54.2.277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究探讨TEPS和TOEIC在测试内容和结构上的可比性程度,考虑到这些元素很重要,因为它们在韩国经常被用作官方英语测试。对反映需求分析的新版TEPS和2016年修订的托业考试(TOEIC),以语言要素为核心的理论框架为基础进行了分析。本研究系统分析了测试属性:1)每个测试部分的测试任务特征(类型、长度、速度等)以及基于类型和内容类别的项目分布;2)测试内容的各种语料库指标;3)测试有用性(结构效度、真实性和交互性),比较了新TEPS和托业的整体测试可比性。结果表明,虽然测试的目标和开发基础不同,但在内容和结构上有相似之处。然而,也发现了一些差异,因此在解释测试结果时需要彻底检查测试的兼容性。此外,基于测试有用性的理论框架,对每个测试的内容和结构的优缺点进行了检验。本研究也为开发有效的交际能力测试提供了一个合适的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparability Study of Two Standardized English as a Foreign Language Tests
This study investigates the degree of comparability between TEPS and TOEIC regarding test content and construct considering that these elements are important since they are frequently utilized as official English tests in Korea. The New TEPS, an updated version of the original TEPS that reflects the needs analysis, and TOEIC, which was revised in 2016, were analyzed based on the following theoretical frameworks that focus on language elements. This study systematically analyzed test attributes based on: 1) Test Task Characteristics (type, length, speed, etc.) of each test section and item distribution based on the type and content category, 2) Various corpus indices of the test content, and 3) Test Usefulness (construct validity, authenticity, and interactiveness), comparing the overall test comparability between the New TEPS and TOEIC. Results indicate that although the tests’ objectives and development foundations differ, there were similarities in content and construct. Nevertheless, a handful of discrepancies were also identified, necessitating the thorough examination of the tests’ compatibility when interpreting test results. In addition, based on the theoretical framework of Test Usefulness, the strengths and weaknesses of each test’s content and construct were examined. This study also postulates a suitable direction to develop a valid communicative proficiency test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信