Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment最新文献_第7页

Interdisciplinary technology assessment of service robots: the psychological/work science perspective. 服务机器人的跨学科技术评估:心理学/工作科学的视角。

Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-11-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10202-012-0113-6

Martin Fischer

{"title":"Interdisciplinary technology assessment of service robots: the psychological/work science perspective.","authors":"Martin Fischer","doi":"10.1007/s10202-012-0113-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-012-0113-6","url":null,"abstract":"The article sheds light on psychological and work science aspects of the design and utilization of service robots. An initial presentation of the characteristics of man-robot interaction is followed by a discussion of the principles of the division of functions between human beings and robots in service area work systems. The following aspects are to be considered: (1) the organisation of societal work (such as the different employment and professional profiles of service employees), (2) the work tasks to be performed by humans and robots (such as handling, monitoring or decision-making tasks), (3) the possibilities and the limitations of realizing such tasks by means of information technology (depending, for example, on the motoric capabilities, perception and cognition of the robot). Consideration of these three design perspectives gives rise to criteria of usability. Current debate focuses on the (work science) principles of man-machine communication, though in future these should be supplemented with robot-specific criteria such as \"motoric capabilities\" or \"relationship quality.\" The article concludes by advocating the convergence and combination of work science criteria with ideas drawn from participative design approaches in the development and utilization of service robots.","PeriodicalId":89217,"journal":{"name":"Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment","volume":"9 3-4","pages":"231-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10202-012-0113-6","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31112048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Editors' Note. 编者注。

Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-11-13 DOI: 10.1007/s10202-012-0114-5

Stephan Lingner, Katharina Mader

引用次数: 0

Service robots on their way? First steps of an interdisciplinary technology assessment. 服务机器人即将到来?跨学科技术评估的第一步。

Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-11-21 DOI: 10.1007/s10202-012-0112-7

Michael Decker, Ulrike Henckel

引用次数: 0

Service robotics: an emergent technology field at the interface between industry and services. 服务机器人:工业和服务之间的一个新兴技术领域。

Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-11-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10202-012-0110-9

Ingrid Ott

引用次数: 10

Mapping the ethical landscape of carbon capture and storage. 绘制碳捕获和储存的伦理景观。

Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-12-05 DOI: 10.1007/s10202-012-0117-2

Philip Boucher, Clair Gough

{"title":"Mapping the ethical landscape of carbon capture and storage.","authors":"Philip Boucher, Clair Gough","doi":"10.1007/s10202-012-0117-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-012-0117-2","url":null,"abstract":"This article describes a method of scoping for potential ethical contentions within a resource constrained research environment where actor participation and bottom-up analysis is precluded. Instead of reverting to a top-down analytical structure, a data-led process is devised. This imitates a bottom-up analytic structure in the absence of the direct participation of actors, culminating in the construction of a map of the ethical landscape; a high-resolution ethical matrix of coded interpretations of various actors' ethical framings of the technology. Despite its limitations, which are discussed, the map can subsequently support the identification of areas where ethical contentions may be raised. Here, the method is described with reference to the construction and analysis of a map of the ethical landscape of carbon capture and storage technology. Taken as a preliminary stage of a larger study, it can support the design and initiation of more sophisticated analyses which may integrate stronger bottom-up participation and facilitate a reflective, deliberative process amongst actors.","PeriodicalId":89217,"journal":{"name":"Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment","volume":"9 3-4","pages":"249-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10202-012-0117-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31112049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Ethical aspects of vulnerability in research. 研究中脆弱性的伦理问题。

Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment Pub Date : 2012-11-01 Epub Date: 2012-10-17 DOI: 10.1007/s10202-012-0109-2

Elisabeth Weisser-Lohmann

引用次数: 6

Assessing project approval procedures as formalised forms of public participation. 将项目审批程序作为公众参与的正式形式进行评估。

Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment Pub Date : 2012-11-01 Epub Date: 2012-11-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10202-012-0124-3

Michael Zschiesche

引用次数: 3

Legitimation problems of participatory processes in technology assessment and technology policy. 技术评价和技术政策参与性进程的合法性问题。

Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment Pub Date : 2012-11-01 Epub Date: 2012-11-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10202-012-0123-4

Thomas Saretzki

{"title":"Legitimation problems of participatory processes in technology assessment and technology policy.","authors":"Thomas Saretzki","doi":"10.1007/s10202-012-0123-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-012-0123-4","url":null,"abstract":"Since James Carroll (1971) made a strong case for \"participatory technology\", scientists, engineers, policy-makers and the public at large have seen quite a number of different approaches to design and implement participatory processes in technology assessment and technology policy. As these participatory experiments and practices spread over the last two decades, one could easily get the impression that participation turned from a theoretical normative claim to a working practice that goes without saying. Looking beyond the well-known forerunners and considering the ambivalent experiences that have been made under different conditions in various places, however, the \"if\" and \"how\" of participation are still contested issues when questions of technology are on the agenda. Legitimation problems indicate that attempts to justify participation in a given case have not been entirely successful in the eyes of relevant groups among the sponsors, participants, organizers or observers. Legitimation problems of participatory processes in technology assessment and technology policy vary considerably, and they do so not only with the two domains and the ways of their interrelation or the specific features of the participatory processes. If we ask whether or not participation is seen as problematic in technology assessment and technology policy-making and in what sense it is being evaluated as problematic, then we find that the answer depends also on the approaches and criteria that have been used to legitimize or delegitimize the call for a specific design of participation.","PeriodicalId":89217,"journal":{"name":"Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment","volume":"9 1-2","pages":"7-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10202-012-0123-4","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31092554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

One size fits all? On the institutionalization of participatory technology assessment and its interconnection with national ways of policy-making: the cases of Switzerland and Austria. 一刀切?参与性技术评价的制度化及其与国家决策方式的相互联系:瑞士和奥地利的案例。

Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment Pub Date : 2012-11-01 Epub Date: 2012-11-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10202-012-0120-7

Erich Griessler

{"title":"One size fits all? On the institutionalization of participatory technology assessment and its interconnection with national ways of policy-making: the cases of Switzerland and Austria.","authors":"Erich Griessler","doi":"10.1007/s10202-012-0120-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-012-0120-7","url":null,"abstract":"Science and technology policy is often confronted with issues that are both complex and controversial and which have to be decided upon in a delicate constellation of policy-makers, experts, stakeholders, non-governmental organizations and the public. One attempt to deal with such a complex problem is via citizen involvement. Participatory technology assessment (pTA) already goes back to several decades, and countries have made various experiences. While in some countries, governments established technology assessment organizations, which also included pTA in their methodological portfolio, others primarily rely on experts to make decisions on science and technology policy. In a third group of countries non-state actors, such as social scientists, experimented with pTA. However, they were often unable to link these experiments to policy-making. This paper deals with the question of why this variation exists and compares the use of pTA in Switzerland and Austria. Despite similarities between the two countries, both had quite different experiences with pTA so far. Whereas several pTAs have been carried out in Switzerland until today, Austrian pTAs have remained infrequent. The aim of this paper is to explain this difference as a result of different ways of policy-making which affect the use and chances of pTA.","PeriodicalId":89217,"journal":{"name":"Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment","volume":"9 1-2","pages":"61-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10202-012-0120-7","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31092418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

From invited to uninvited participation (and back?): rethinking civil society engagement in technology assessment and development. 从受邀参与到不受邀参与(再回来?):重新思考民间社会在技术评估和开发中的参与。

Poiesis & praxis : international journal of ethics of science and technology assessment Pub Date : 2012-11-01 Epub Date: 2012-11-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10202-012-0125-2

Peter Wehling

引用次数: 54