{"title":"When to have another baby: A dynamic model of reproductive decision-making and evidence from Gabbra pastoralists","authors":"Ruth Mace","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00044-1","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00044-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Maximizing reproductive success involves having as many children as possible that can themselves reproduce successfully. Thus, when Gabbra parents decide to have another baby, they must trade off the probability that they will be able to afford to raise the child and marry it off successfully when it reaches maturity against the risk that feeding and raising that child would diminish the family herd, harming the marriage prospects of other children and possibly even leading to household destitution. Here I use a dynamic, state-dependent optimality model to analyze this trade-off. The decision to have another baby depends on household wealth and the number of children they already have. Parents should not necessarily reproduce at the maximum rate to maximize reproductive success, and the costs of marrying off a child have a large impact on the optimal family size. In the Gabbra, the cost of marrying off boys greatly exceeds the cost of marrying off girls. An analysis of demographic data from Gabbra households with a living husband and a first wife that had reached menopause show that probability of remarriage is strongly dependent on the number of children the first wife had. Number of sons has a much greater influence than number of daughters on the probability of a second marriage, as predicted by the model. Men are attempting to create the optimal family.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"Pages 263-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00044-1","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53543074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Human collective aggression: A behavioral ecology perspective","authors":"Christian G. Mesquida, Neil I. Wiener","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00035-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00035-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Moller (1967/68) proposes that the presence of a large number of adolescents and young adults in a population is a precursor of violent conflicts. But acts of collective aggression are typically perpetrated by males, particularly young males between 15 and 30 years of age. This marked sex difference in the degree of participation is found in all human societies, and it has persisted since the beginning of recorded history. Sexually dimorphic behaviors are invariably found in the context of reproduction, and we discuss male coalitional aggression as a reproductive fitness-enhancing social behavior. This type of social behavior may not increase the welfare of an entire population but it is likely to promote the fitness of the coalition participants. This study argues that the age composition of the male population should be regarded as the critical ecological/demographic factor affecting a population's tendency toward peace or violent conflicts. Our analyses of interstate and intrastate episodes of collective aggression since the 1960s indicate the existence of a consistent correlation between the ratio of males 15 to 29 years of age per 100 males 30 years of age and older, and the level of coalitional aggression as measured by the number of reported conflict related deaths.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"Pages 247-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00035-0","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53543002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"An adaptive model for predicting !Kung reproductive performance: A stochastic dynamic programming approach","authors":"John M. Anderies","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00037-4","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00037-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A stochastic dynamic programming model is presented that supports and extends work on the reproductive performance of the !Kung Bushmen (Lee 1972; Blurton Jones and Sibly 1978; Blurton Jones 1986), proposing that !Kung women and their reproductive systems may be maximizing reproductive success. The stochastic dynamic programming approach allows the construction of a whole-life model where the physical/environmental constraints along with the uncertainty about future events !Kung women face when making reproductive choices can be explicitly built in. The model makes quantitative predictions for the optimal reproductive strategy assuming !Kung women are maximizing expected lifetime reproduction (ELR) given the physical parameters of !Kung life.</p><p>The model relies on data gathered from the works cited above and some considerations from simple probability theory. The model predictions for optimal birth spacing match the !Kung reproductive data very well and support earlier findings (Blurton Jones and Sibly; Blurton Jones 1986). The utility of the dynamic modeling approach is illustrated when the effects of varying certain model parameters are investigated.</p><p>By including the effect of the mother's mortality, which was not included in the Blurton Jones and Sibly (1978) analysis, the model allows for further exploration of the application of an adaptive approach to human reproductive performance. By adding some considerations about the risks of childbirth for the mother the model not only predicts optimal birth spacing, which is site specific, but also predicts the optimal time for a woman to begin and cease having children. These predictions coincide with menarche and menopause and shed light on their possible adaptive value.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"Pages 221-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00037-4","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53543020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Carrier females and sender males: An evolutionary hypothesis linking female attractiveness, family resemblance, and paternity confidence","authors":"Frank Salter","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00036-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00036-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article introduces and elaborates the hypothesis of carrier features, characteristics which in females are attractive to males as mate-choice cues. Female carrier features increase paternal resemblance and are ultimately attractive because they help pair-bonded males distinguish genetic offspring from those conceived by mates in extra-pair copulations. The proposed kin recognition mechanism, whether culturally evolved or innate, facilitates discriminatory paternal investment, and hence male fitness. Carrier features would be attractive to males in monogamous species where paternal investment is high, and cuckoldry represents a significant risk to male fitness. Logical space exists for male sender features, which tend to be expressed in offspring regardless of female characteristics. Conflict of genetic interests between the sexes should favor the evolution of carrier, rather than sender, features in both sexes. The argument centers on humans, for whom candidate carrier features are discussed with regard to physiognomy, behavior, recessive traits, and body odor. Criticisms are discussed, and testable predictions enumerated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"Pages 211-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00036-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53543013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Attitudes toward homosexuals: An alternative darwinian view","authors":"John Archer","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00043-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00043-X","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gallup (1995) argued that there has been selection for parents to counter any social process that would increase the likelihood of one of their children becoming homosexual, and he indicated that contact between adult homosexuals and children was such a process. He therefore predicted (and found) that homophobia would be exaggerated where there was perceived contact with children. In this commentary, I argue that this hypothesis is based on supposing that sexual orientation occurs through a modeling process, when in fact it operates via an imprinting-like process. The specific findings regarding negative attitudes to homosexuals can be explained in terms of a more general evolved response, xenophobia. I argue that Gallup's hypothesis comes from a general willingness to view specific aspects of contemporary human behavior as adaptive when there are a number of reasons—all consistent with modern Darwinian thinking—why many of these are not themselves adaptive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"Pages 275-280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00043-X","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53543055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Attitudes toward homosexuals and evolutionary theory: The role of evidence","authors":"Gordon G. Gallup Jr.","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00042-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00042-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Archer (this issue) contends that seduction by homosexual pedophiles is largely a result of media exaggeration and that xenophobia explains the data I reported on attitudes toward homosexuals (Gallup 1995). However, a cursory review of the evidence shows that the incidence of child molestation by homosexual males is much higher than Archer implies, and when the specific findings on attitudes are considered, xenophobia fails to provide an adequate account of the way people react to homosexuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"Pages 281-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00042-8","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53543040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Attitudes toward homosexuals: A rejoinder","authors":"John Archer","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00045-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00045-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The differences in the positions adopted by Gallup and myself are highlighted: the developmental process underlying the origin of homosexuality is crucial, because Gallup's reason for parents reacting with hostility to homosexuals is that they will affect their children's sexual orientation. My alternative, a two-process imprinting model, involves a different developmental process, the implications of which are that cross-gender behavior in childhood, rather than seduction by adults, is important for developing homosexual orientation. Criticisms of my alternative explanation of Gallup's findings in terms of xenophobia are also addressed, but it is emphasized that Gallup's hypothesis ultimately relies on the accuracy of his seduction theory of homosexual orientation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"Pages 285-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00045-3","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53543089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Costs and benefits of monogamy and polygyny for Yanomamö women","authors":"Raymond Hames","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00003-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00003-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"17 3","pages":"Pages 181-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00003-9","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53542926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Parents' knowledge of students' beliefs and attitudes: An indirect assay of parental solicitude?","authors":"Martin Daly, Cheryl McConnell, Tammy Glugosh","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00004-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00004-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In two studies, undergraduates filled out questionnaires containing various attitude and belief items, and their parents then provided both their own responses to the same items and their best guesses as to how their children had responded. As predicted, stepfathers were significantly less accurate then genetic fathers, and maternal accuracy increased as a function of the mother's age when her child was born. On average, mothers and fathers did not differ in accuracy, nor was offspring sex a significant predictor of parental accuracy. However, mothers were most accurate in guessing the views of firstborn sons, whereas fathers tended to be more accurate about daughters' views. These results suggest that parents' ability to guess their children's views may provide a useful index of parental interest and/or of parent-child closeness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"17 3","pages":"Pages 201-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00004-0","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53542977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Influence of wording and framing effects on moral intuitions","authors":"Lewis Petrinovich, Patricia O'Neill","doi":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00041-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0162-3095(96)00041-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research considers biasing effects on the expression of moral intuitions. Participants in Study 1 were asked to resolve some hypothetical moral dilemmas that involved the death of one or another set of individuals. For half of the participants, the problems were phrased using a Kill wording and for the other half a Save wording, although the outcomes were identical in each case. In Study 2, framing effects were produced by posing dilemma problems in different orders and in different contexts. In Study 1, the Kill-Save wording difference strongly influenced the resolution of the problems. In Study 2, if the problems involved a single kind of dilemma, the order in which the dilemmas were presented affected the pattern of response, whereas order had no major effect for another two series using different dilemmas. Thus, there were framing effects produced by differences in wording and order that could influence the decisions people make when presented with dilemmas, but the effects were not always large nor did they always appear. The presence and strength of the effects seem to depend on a variety of psychological factors that the problem sets activate. These findings are considered within the perspective of the evolution of cognitive strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81211,"journal":{"name":"Ethology and sociobiology","volume":"17 3","pages":"Pages 145-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00041-6","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53543030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}