Cardozo law review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Common Sense, Rationality and the Legal Process 常识、理性与法律程序
Cardozo law review Pub Date : 2002-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_3
R. Allen
{"title":"Common Sense, Rationality and the Legal Process","authors":"R. Allen","doi":"10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":80891,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo law review","volume":"25 1","pages":"43-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51413821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis 宪法学中的仇恨言论:比较分析
Cardozo law review Pub Date : 2001-04-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.265939
M. Rosenfeld
{"title":"Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis","authors":"M. Rosenfeld","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.265939","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.265939","url":null,"abstract":"The United States protects much hate speech that is banned in other Western constitutional democracies and under international human rights covenants and conventions. In the United States, only hate speech that leads to \"incitement to violence\" can be constitutionally restricted, while under the alternative approach found elsewhere, bans properly extend to hate speech leading to \"incitement to hatred.\" The article undertakes a comparative analysis in light of changes brought by new technologies, such as the internet, which allow for worldwide spread of protected hate speech originating in the United States. After evaluating the respective doctrines, arguments and values involved, the article concludes that the United States approach is less defensible than its counterparts elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":80891,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo law review","volume":"24 1","pages":"1523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.265939","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68241863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 140
Hegel's Theory of Quantity 黑格尔的量论
Cardozo law review Pub Date : 2001-04-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.269089
D. G. Carlson
{"title":"Hegel's Theory of Quantity","authors":"D. G. Carlson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.269089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.269089","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is the second of nine installments explaining how Hegel's \"Science of Logic\" functions. This installment covers Hegel's three chapters on quantity. To the author's knowledge, no philosopher has ever bothered to define what \"quantity\" or \"number\" is. Hegel takes this enterprise seriously. Quantity is here defined as being that is subject to yet indifferent to outside determination. Pure quantity is equated with space, time, and the ego. Each of these is self-externalizing--that is, subject to outside determination.. The task of the concept of quantity over the three chapters that Hegel dedicates to the topic is to re-unite with quality. , Hegel has prodQuality stands for the indifference of quantum to externality. When quality is fully actualized, uced \"measure.\" This paper is apparently the first paper in English to analyze Hegel's prescient critique of calculus.","PeriodicalId":80891,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo law review","volume":"23 1","pages":"2027"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68256061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
The Newness of New Technology 新技术的新颖性
Cardozo law review Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/4533.003.0009
M. Price
{"title":"The Newness of New Technology","authors":"M. Price","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/4533.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4533.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"Every new technology transforms the world around it. A century ago, in a gentle preface to his novel Under the Greenwood Tree Thomas Hardy wrote of the transformation of little church orchestras in village England. Humble and amateur community instrumentalists were being displaced by an \"isolated organist\" employing a newly manufactured and more cheaply distributed technology, the harmonium or barrel organ. The new device presented certain advantages in control and accomplishment, but, he suggested, the change caused the stultification of the clergy's aims and resulted in loss of interest among parishioners. In these tiny hamlets the technology of musical development had consequences for participation, organization of the institution, the nature of the music that was played, and, Hardy seemed to be saying, for country life as well. Of these multiple and small transformations major changes in society take place. Comments NOTE: At the time of publication, author Monroe Price was affiliated with the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University. Currently(February, 2008), he is an Adjunct Full Professor at the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/56","PeriodicalId":80891,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo law review","volume":"22 1","pages":"1885"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71238875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Muddy Rules for Cyberspace 网络空间的模糊规则
Cardozo law review Pub Date : 2000-05-16 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.204188
D. Burk
{"title":"Muddy Rules for Cyberspace","authors":"D. Burk","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.204188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.204188","url":null,"abstract":"Digital communication media such as the Internet pose difficult challenges for traditional forms of intellectual property protection. Much recent scholarship and considerable governmental attention has been focused on adapting and expanding copyright to encompass digital works of authorship. These efforts have been justified on the grounds that clear property rights are necessary to allow efficient allocation of intellectual property between private parties. However, these rationales ignore the literature regarding the efficiency of unclear or \"muddy\" property entitlements. Where transaction costs of private bargaining are high, \"muddy\" rules will tend to force parties into informal bargaining transactions. Transaction costs on the Internet may tend to be high because of the number of parties involved, the difficulty of locating the parties, increased opportunity for strategic behavior, and the transborder nature of the medium. Thus, informal transactions or \"self-help\" may be the most efficient means for provision of digital works. In such a case, \"muddy\" or unclear rules should perhaps be favored for on-line entitlements.","PeriodicalId":80891,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo law review","volume":"21 1","pages":"121-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67876073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23
The Traumatic Dimension in Law 法律中的创伤维度
Cardozo law review Pub Date : 2000-03-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.214830
D. G. Carlson
{"title":"The Traumatic Dimension in Law","authors":"D. G. Carlson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.214830","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.214830","url":null,"abstract":"This paper applies Jacques Lacan's theory of retrospective cause to the jurisprudence of H.L.A. Hart and his followers. The thesis is that \"effect\" (judicial decision) precedes \"cause\" (law). The proper tense for legal discourse is, therefore, future anterior. The following points follow from this: (1) Positivism asserts that law is not necessarily connected to morality, but this is a priori wrong. Law wishes to be separate from morality, but it necessarily fails. (2) The theory vindicates Dworkin's notorious \"right answers\" theory, but makes the additional point that there is only one answer: you are guilty; you failed to conform to the law. In short, knowledge of the law is the very definition of the superego. (3) Positive law is the fantasy of the subject that cannot bear the prodigal weight of pure morality. The failure of this fantasy, however, is psychosis itself. (4) Conservative jurisprudence (\"judges should follow and not make the law\") is fundamentally necessary to any jurisprudence. Yet the \"limit\" of conservative jurisprudence (in calculus terms) is the Freudian superego. (5) Pragmatism is the vainglorious conceit of self-sovereignty, but it is logically an impossible position.","PeriodicalId":80891,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo law review","volume":"24 1","pages":"2287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.214830","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67951340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Pentagon Papers Case and the Path Not Taken: A Personal Memoir on the First Amendment and the Separation of Powers 五角大楼文件案和未采取的道路:关于第一修正案和三权分立的个人回忆录
Cardozo law review Pub Date : 1998-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim270040291
Joel M. Gora
{"title":"The Pentagon Papers Case and the Path Not Taken: A Personal Memoir on the First Amendment and the Separation of Powers","authors":"Joel M. Gora","doi":"10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim270040291","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim270040291","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":80891,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo law review","volume":"19 1","pages":"1311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64433897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Misuse of Tax Incentives to Align Management-Shareholder Interests 滥用税收优惠以协调管理层与股东的利益
Cardozo law review Pub Date : 1997-04-17 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.10404
James R. Repetti
{"title":"The Misuse of Tax Incentives to Align Management-Shareholder Interests","authors":"James R. Repetti","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.10404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.10404","url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. tax system contains many provisions which are intended to align management of large publicly traded companies more closely to stockholders. This article shows that many of the tax provisions that have been adopted are of questionable effectiveness because they fail to address the complexities of stockholder-management relations in attempting to motivate management to act in the best interests of stockholders. The article proposes that rather than Congress attempting to identify the best way that it can use the tax system to motivate management, Congress should eliminate tax provisions which subsidize management's inefficiencies in order to encourage stockholders, themselves, to find the best ways to motivate management. The article identifies three features in our tax system that subsidize managerial inefficiencies and that Congress should eliminate: (1) the preferential tax rate for capital gains, (2) the step-up in basis for stock at a stockholder's death, and (3) the lower tax rate for corporate taxable income as compared to the rate for individuals.","PeriodicalId":80891,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo law review","volume":"19 1","pages":"697-718"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1997-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68132232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Schrodinger's cat, eugenics, and the compulsory sterilization of welfare mothers: deconstructing an old/new rhetoric and constructing the reproductive right to natality for low-income women of color. 薛定谔的猫,优生学,福利母亲的强制绝育:解构旧/新修辞,为有色人种低收入妇女构建生育权。
Cardozo law review Pub Date : 1996-01-01
B Horsburgh
{"title":"Schrodinger's cat, eugenics, and the compulsory sterilization of welfare mothers: deconstructing an old/new rhetoric and constructing the reproductive right to natality for low-income women of color.","authors":"B Horsburgh","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":80891,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo law review","volume":"17 3","pages":"531-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24847276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Identity of the Constitutional Subject 宪法主体的同一性
Cardozo law review Pub Date : 1995-01-01 DOI: 10.4324/9780203868980
M. Rosenfeld
{"title":"The Identity of the Constitutional Subject","authors":"M. Rosenfeld","doi":"10.4324/9780203868980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203868980","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":80891,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo law review","volume":"16 1","pages":"1049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70599087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书