Annals of surgery最新文献

{"title":"The Use and Impact of a Decision Support Tool for Appendicitis Treatment.","authors":"Joshua E Rosen, Sarah E Monsell, Sara C DePaoli, Erin C Fannon, Johnathan E Kohler, Caroline E Reinke, Lillian S Kao, Ryan B Fransman, Jonah J Stulberg, Michael B Shapiro, Deepika Nehra, Pauline K Park, Sabrina E Sanchez, Katherine N Fischkoff, Giana H Davidson, David R Flum","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006412","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006412","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since introducing new and alternative treatment options may increase decisional conflict, we aimed to describe the use of the decision support tool (DST) and its impact on treatment preference and decisional conflict.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>For the treatment of appendicitis, antibiotics are an effective alternative to appendectomy, with both approaches associated with a different set of risks (eg, recurrence vs surgical complications) and benefits (eg, more rapid return to work vs decreased chance of readmission). Patients often have limited knowledge of these treatment options, and DSTs that include video-based educational materials and questions to elicit patient preferences about outcomes may be helpful. Concurrent with the Comparing Outcomes of Drugs and Appendectomy trials, our group developed a DST for appendicitis treatment ( www.appyornot.org ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort including people who self-reported current appendicitis and used the AppyOrNot DST between 2021 and 2023. Treatment preferences before and after the use of the DST, demographic information, and Ottawa Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) were reported after completing the DST.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8243 people from 66 countries and all 50 U.S. states accessed the DST. Before the DST, 14% had a strong preference for antibiotics and 31% for appendectomy, with 55% undecided. After using the DST, the proportion in the undecided category decreased to 49% ( P < 0.0001). Of those who completed the Ottawa Decisional Conflict Score (DCS; n = 356), 52% reported the lowest level of decisional conflict (<25) after using the DST; 43% had a DCS score of 25 to 50, 5.1% had a DCS score of >50 and 2.5% had and DCS score of >75.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The publicly available DST appyornot.org reduced the proportion that was undecided about which treatment they favored and had a modest influence on those with strong treatment preferences. Decisional conflict was not common after use. The use of this DST is now a component of a nationwide implementation program aimed at improving the way surgeons share information about appendicitis treatment options. If its use can be successfully implemented, this may be a model for improving communication about treatment for patients experiencing emergency health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141445333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evolution of Pancreas Transplantation At A Single Institution-50+ Years and 2500 Transplants.","authors":"Erik B Finger, Abraham J Matar, Ty B Dunn, Abhinav Humar, Angelika C Gruessner, Rainer W G Gruessner, Karthik Ramanathan, Vanessa Humphreville, Arthur J Matas, David E R Sutherland, Raja Kandaswamy","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006415","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006415","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the evolution of pancreas transplantation, including improved outcomes and factors associated with improved outcomes over the past 5 decades.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The world's first successful pancreas transplant was performed in December 1966 at the University of Minnesota. As new modalities for diabetes treatment mature, we must carefully assess the current state of pancreas transplantation to determine its ongoing role in patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective review of 2500 pancreas transplants was performed over >50 years in bivariate and multivariable models. Transplants were divided into 6 eras; outcomes are presented for the entire cohort and by era.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All measures of patient and graft survival improved progressively through the 6 transplant eras. The overall death-censored pancreas graft half-lives were >35 years for simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK), 7.1 years for pancreas after kidney (PAK), and 3.3 years for pancreas transplants alone (PTA). The 10-year death-censored pancreas graft survival rate in the most recent era was 86.9% for SPK recipients, 58.2% for PAK recipients, and 47.6% for PTA. Overall, graft loss was most influenced by patient survival in SPK transplants, whereas graft loss in PAK and PTA recipients was more often due to graft failures. Predictors of improved pancreas graft survival were primary transplants, bladder drainage of exocrine secretions, younger donor age, and shorter preservation time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pancreas outcomes have significantly improved over time through sequential, but overlapping, advances in surgical technique, immunosuppressive protocols, reduced preservation time, and the more recent reduction of immune-mediated graft loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141449451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Prognostic Impact of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy on Survival After Esophagectomy Following a Delayed Interval After Chemoradiotherapy: A Secondary Analysis of the DICE Study.","authors":"Sheraz R Markar, Bruno Sgromo, Richard Evans, Ewen A Griffiths, Rita Alfieri, Carlo Castoro, Caroline Gronnier, Christian A Gutschow, Guillaume Piessen, Giovanni Capovilla, Peter P Grimminger, Donald E Low, James Gossage, Suzanne S Gisbertz, Jelle Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg, Xavier Benoit D'journo, Alexander W Phillips, Ricardo Rosati, George B Hanna, Nick Maynard, Wayne Hofstetter, Lorenzo Ferri, Mark I Berge Henegouwen, Richard Owen","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006411","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006411","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate prognostic differences between minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) in patients with surgery after a prolonged interval (>12 wk) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Previously, we established that a prolonged interval after CRT before esophagectomy was associated with poorer long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an international multicenter cohort study involving 17 tertiary centers, including patients who received CRT followed by surgery between 2010 and 2020. Patients undergoing MIE were defined as thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 428 patients (145 MIE and 283 OE) had surgery between 12 weeks and 2 years after CRT. Significant differences were observed in American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, radiation dose, clinical T stage, and histologic subtype. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, sex, body mass index, pathologic T or N stage, resection margin status, tumor location, surgical technique, or 90-day mortality. Survival analysis showed MIE was associated with improved survival in univariate ( P =0.014), multivariate analysis after adjustment for smoking, T and N stage, and histology (HR=1.69; 95% CI: 1.14-2.5) and propensity-matched analysis ( P =0.02). Further subgroup analyses by radiation dose and interval after CRT showed survival advantage for MIE in 40 to 50 Gy dose groups (HR=1.9; 95% CI: 1.2-3.0) and in patients having surgery within 6 months of CRT (HR=1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MIE was associated with improved overall survival compared with OE in patients with a prolonged interval from CRT to surgery. The mechanism for this observed improvement in survival remains unknown, with potential hypotheses including a reduction in complications and improved functional recovery after MIE.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141431220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Real-world Decision-making Process for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Lung Cancer Patients.","authors":"Stijn Vanstraelen, Kay See Tan, Prasad S Adusumilli, Manjit S Bains, Matthew J Bott, Robert J Downey, Daniel R Gomez, Katherine D Gray, James Huang, James M Isbell, Daniela Molena, Bernard J Park, Andreas Rimner, Valerie W Rusch, Narek Shaverdian, Smita Sihag, Abraham J Wu, David R Jones, Gaetano Rocco","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006552","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006552","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To generate a prediction model for selection of treatment modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Summary background data: </strong>Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) are used in the local treatment of early-stage NSCLC. However, selection of patients for either SBRT or MIS remains challenging, due to the multitude of factors influencing the decision-making process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 1291 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC treated with intended MIS or SBRT from January 2020 to July 2023. A prediction model for selection for SBRT was created based on multivariable logistic regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis stratified the cohort into 3 treatment-related risk categories. Post-procedural outcomes, recurrence and overall survival (OS) were investigated to assess the performance of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1116 patients underwent MIS and 175 SBRT. The prediction model included age, performance status, previous pulmonary resection, MSK-Frailty score, FEV1 and DLCO, and demonstrated an area-under-the-curve of 0.908 (95%CI, 0.876-0.938). Based on the probability scores (n=1197), patients were stratified into a low-risk (MIS, n=970 and SBRT, n=28), intermediate-risk (MIS, n=96 and SBRT, n=53) and high-risk category (MIS, n=10 and SBRT, n=40). Treatment modality was not associated with OS (HR of SBRT, 1.67 [95%CI: 0.80-3.48]; P=0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical expertise can be translated into a robust predictive model, guiding the selection of stage I NSCLC patients for MIS versus SBRT and effectively categorizing them into three distinct risk groups. Patients in the intermediate category could benefit most from multidisciplinary evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142339783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Metformin Preconditioning Augments Cardiac Perfusion and Performance in a Large Animal Model of Chronic Coronary Artery Disease.","authors":"Christopher Stone, Sharif A Sabe, Dwight D Harris, Mark Broadwin, Rajeev J Kant, Meghamsh Kanuparthy, M Ruhul Abid, Frank W Sellke","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006437","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006437","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the efficacy of metformin (MET) during the induction of coronary ischemia on myocardial performance in a large animal model of coronary artery disease (CAD) and metabolic syndrome (MS), with or without concomitant extracellular vesicular (EV) therapy.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Although surgical and endovascular revascularization are durably efficacious for many patients with CAD, up to one-third are poor candidates for standard therapies. For these patients, many of whom have comorbid MS, adjunctive strategies are needed. EV therapy has shown promise in this context, but its efficacy is attenuated by MS. We investigated whether MET pretreatment could ameliorate therapeutic decrements associated with MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Yorkshire swine (n = 29) were provided a high-fat diet to induce MS, whereupon an ameroid constrictor was placed to induce CAD. Animals were initiated on 1000 mg oral MET or placebo; all then underwent repeat thoracotomy for intramyocardial injection of EVs or saline. Swine were maintained for 5 weeks before the acquisition of functional and perfusion data immediately before terminal myocardial harvest. Immunoblotting and immunofluorescence were performed on the most ischemic tissue from all groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regardless of EV administration, animals that received MET exhibited significantly improved ejection fraction, cardiac index, and contractility at rest and during rapid myocardial pacing, improved perfusion to the most ischemic myocardial region at rest and during pacing, and markedly reduced apoptosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MET administration reduced apoptotic cell death, improved perfusion, and augmented both intrinsic and load-dependent myocardial performance in a highly translatable large animal model of chronic myocardial ischemia and MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141747261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Anatomical Feasibility of Endobentall Strategies for Management of Acute type A Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Aurelien Vallée, Guillaume Guimbretière, Julien Guihaire, Antoine Guery, Maira Gaillard, Le Houerou Thomas, Antoine Gaudin, Ramzi Ramadan, Deleuze Phillippe, Blandine Maurel, Jean Christian Roussel, Said Ghostine, André Vincentelli, Francis Juthier, Dominique Fabre, Jonathan Sobocinski, Stephan Haulon","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006548","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006548","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assesses the feasibility of acute type A dissections treatment with a dedicated aortic root endograft concept and introduces a new aortic classification.</p><p><strong>Summary background data: </strong>Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains a catastrophic aortic condition with perioperative mortality ranging from 12% and 20%. Total Aortic root endovascular repair, \"Endobentall concept\", has been explored as an alternative but only documented on case report.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Imaging study of all consecutive patients treated in three French centers were achieved. The study introduces an adapted aortic classification to report entry tear locations. Measurements included aortic annulus mensuration, coronary height, and several aortic lengths. Two treatment concepts were described \"fenestrated Endobentall\" and \"branched Endobentall\". Patients were eligible to the \"fenestrated endobentall\" design if their aortic root dimensions fitted the Edwards Sapien® and Corevalve Medtronic® instruction for use. Eligibility for the \"branched Endobentall\" required meeting the criteria for a \"fenestrated Endobentall\" and having a left coronary main stem length exceeding 5 mm. \"Branched Endobentall\" was mandatory when the entry was located in the aortic root.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 CT scans for acute type A aortic dissection were reviewed, 116 were finally included for analysis. The primary entry tear was found in the aortic root in 9% of patients, and in 31% of cases, it was located within the first centimeter distal to the sinotubular junction (STJ). 63.7% of the patients were eligible for an Endobentall procedure, even 73.3% when considering extended criterion. Fenestrated Endobentall accounted for 2/3 of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, 63.7% of patients with aortic type A dissections are deemed eligible to an \"Endobentall repair\", increasing to 73.3% when considering extended anatomical criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142339728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Extended Pharmacologic Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism After Colon Cancer Surgery Is Associated With Improved Long-term Survival: A Natural Experiment in the Chemotherapeutic Benefit of Heparin Derivatives.","authors":"Alexander Booth, Daniel Brinton, Colleen Donahue, Maggie Westfal, Virgilio George, Pinckney J Maxwell, Kit Simpson, David Mahvi, Thomas Curran","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006376","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006376","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This large database study assessed whether extended pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after colon cancer resection was associated with improved oncologic survival.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Heparin derivatives may confer an antineoplastic effect via a variety of mechanisms (eg, inhibiting angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment). Studies evaluating the oncologic benefit of heparin and its derivatives have been limited in postsurgical patients. Multiple society guidelines recommend consideration of 30-day treatment with low molecular weight heparin to reduce venous thromboembolism risk after abdominopelvic cancer surgery. However, utilization of extended prophylaxis remains low.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data were used to identify patients (age 65+) undergoing resection for nonmetastatic colon cancer from 2016 to 2017. The primary outcomes were overall and cancer-specific survival. Log-rank testing and multivariable Cox regression compared survival in patients who received extended prophylaxis versus those who did not in an inverse propensity treatment weighted cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20,102 patients were included in propensity-weighting and analyzed. Eight hundred (3.98%) received extended pharmacologic prophylaxis. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were significantly higher in patients receiving prophylaxis on log-rank tests ( P =0.0017 overall, P =0.0200 cancer-specific). Multivariable Cox regression showed improved overall survival [adjusted hazard ratio 0.66 (0.56-0.78)] and cancer-specific survival [adjusted hazard ratio 0.56 (0.39-0.81)] with prophylaxis after controlling for patient, treatment, and hospital factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extended pharmacologic prophylaxis after colon cancer resection was independently associated with improved overall and cancer-specific survival. These results suggest a potential antineoplastic effect from heparin derivatives when used in the context of preventing postsurgical venous thromboembolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141299855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Improving Surgical Care and Outcomes in Older Cancer Patients Through Implementation of a Presurgical Toolkit (OPTI-Surg)-Final Results of a Phase III Cluster Randomized Trial (Alliance A231601CD).","authors":"George J Chang, Heather J Gunn, Anne K Barber, Lisa M Lowenstein, Daniel Dohan, Jeanette Broering, Travis Dockter, Angelina D Tan, Amylou Dueck, Selina Chow, Heather Neuman, Emily Finlayson","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006458","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006458","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effect of a practice-level preoperative frailty screening and optimization toolkit (OPTI-Surg) on postoperative functional recovery and complications in elderly cancer patients undergoing major surgery.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty is common in older adults. It increases the risk of poor postoperative functional recovery and complications. The potential for a practice-level screening/optimization intervention to improve outcomes is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thoracic, gastrointestinal, and urologic oncological surgery practices within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) were randomized 1:1:1 to usual care (UC), OPTI-Surg, or OPTI-Surg with an implementation coach. OPTI-Surg consisted of the Edmonton Frail Scale and guided recommendations for referral interventions. Patients 70 years old or above undergoing curative intent surgery were eligible. The primary outcome was 8 weeks postoperative function (kcal/wk). The key secondary outcome was complications within 90 days. Mixed models were used to compare UC to the 2 OPTI-Surg arms combined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From July 2019 to September 2022, 325 patients were enrolled in 29 practices. One hundred ninety-nine (64 UC, 135 OPTI-Surg) and 279 (78 UC, 201 OPTI-Surg) were evaluable for primary and secondary analysis, respectively. UC and OPTI-Surg patients did not significantly differ in total caloric expenditure (2.2 UC, 2.0 OPTI-Surg) after adjusting for baseline function ( P =0.53). UC and OPTI-Surg patients did not significantly differ in postoperative complications (25.6% UC, 35.3% OPTI-Surg, P =0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty assessment was successfully performed, but the OPTI-Surg intervention did not improve postoperative function nor reduce postoperative complications compared with UC. Future analysis will explore practice-level factors associated with toolkit implementation and the differences between the coaching and noncoaching arms.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141787063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"For the Love of the Game: Calculating the Premium Associated With Academic Surgical Practice.","authors":"Emily A Grimsley, David O Anderson, Melissa A Kendall, Tyler Zander, Rajavi Parikh, Ronald J Weigel, Paul C Kuo","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006414","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006414","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to determine the premium associated with a career in academic surgery, as measured by compensation normalized to the work relative value unit (wRVU).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>An academic surgical career embodying innovation and mentorship offers intrinsic rewards but is not well monetized. We know compensation for academic surgeons is less than their nonacademic counterparts, but the value of clinical effort, as normalized to the wRVU, between academic and nonacademic surgeons has not been well characterized. Thus, we analyzed the variations in the valuation of academic and nonacademic surgical work from 2010 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized Medical Group Management Association Provider Compensation data from 2010, 2014, 2018, and 2022 to compare academic and nonacademic surgeons. We analyzed raw total cash compensation (TCC), wRVU, TCC per wRVU (TCC/wRVU), and TCC to collections (TCCtColl). We calculated collections per wRVU (Coll/wRVU). We adjusted TCC and TCCtColl for inflation using the Consumer Price Index. Linear modeling for trend analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with nonacademic, academic surgeons had lower TCC (2010: $500,415.0±23,666 vs $631,515.5±23,948.2, -21%; 2022: $564,789.8±23,993.9 vs $628,247.4±15,753.2, -10%), despite higher wRVUs (2022: 9109.4±474.9 vs 8062.7±252.7) and higher Coll/wRVU (2022: 76.68±8.15 vs 71.80±6.10). Trend analysis indicated that TCC will converge in 2038 at an estimated $660,931.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 2022, academic surgeons had more clinical activity and superior organizational revenue capture, despite less total and normalized clinical compensation. On the basis of TCC/wRVUs, academia charges a premium of 16% over nonacademic surgery. However, trend analysis suggests that TCC will converge within the next 20 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445716/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141445332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Familiar Working Environment Influences Surgeon's Stress in the Operating Room: A Multi-Specialty Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Jake A Awtry, Sarah C Skinner, Léa Pascal, Stephanie Polazzi, Jean-Christophe Lifante, Antoine Duclos","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006543","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006543","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the influence of operating room familiarity on surgeon stress.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Regulating surgeon stress may improve patient safety. This study evaluated how assisting surgeon and operating room familiarity influence intraoperative heart rate variability among surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Attending surgeons from seven specialties within four university hospitals in France were enrolled from 11/01/20-12/31/21. Vagal tone, an indicator of stress derived from heart rate variability, was assessed during the first five minutes after incision using the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD). Higher RMSSD values indicate greater vagal tone. Team familiarity was quantified as the cumulative time the attending and assisting surgeons had operated together in the past, while operating rooms in which the surgeon conducted >10% of their operations were termed familiar. The effect of each on the RMSSD was assessed via a linear mixed-effect model adjusting for the random effect of the surgeon and possible confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 643 surgeries performed by 37 surgeons were included. Median surgeon age was 49 years, 29(78.4%) were male, and 22(59.5%) were professors. Surgeons spent an average of 21.2 hours with the assisting surgeon prior to surgery and conducted 585(91.0%) of their operations in a familiar operating room. For every 10 additional hours spent operating together, ln(RMSSD) significantly increased by 0.018 (95%CI: 0.003 to 0.033, P=0.016). Familiar operating rooms also tended to increase surgeon ln(RMSSD) [0.098 (95%CI: -0.007 to 0.203, P=0.068)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Familiar assisting surgeons, and potentially operating rooms, increased surgeon vagal tone. Maintaining a stable operating room environment may improve surgeon stress and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}