超声影像诊断滤泡样甲状腺肿瘤的无创深度学习系统:一项多中心回顾性研究。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hui Shen,Yue Huang,Wenxiao Yan,Chifa Zhang,Ting Liang,Dan Yang,Xiaoxiao Feng,Shuyi Liu,Yu Wang,Weihan Cao,Ying Cheng,Hongyan Chen,Qiujie Ni,Fei Wang,Jingjing You,Zhe Jin,Wenle He,Jie Sun,Dexing Yang,Lijuan Liu,Boling Cao,Xiao Zhang,Yingjia Li,Shufang Pei,Shuixing Zhang,Bin Zhang
{"title":"超声影像诊断滤泡样甲状腺肿瘤的无创深度学习系统:一项多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Hui Shen,Yue Huang,Wenxiao Yan,Chifa Zhang,Ting Liang,Dan Yang,Xiaoxiao Feng,Shuyi Liu,Yu Wang,Weihan Cao,Ying Cheng,Hongyan Chen,Qiujie Ni,Fei Wang,Jingjing You,Zhe Jin,Wenle He,Jie Sun,Dexing Yang,Lijuan Liu,Boling Cao,Xiao Zhang,Yingjia Li,Shufang Pei,Shuixing Zhang,Bin Zhang","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000006841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo propose a deep learning (DL) system for the preoperative diagnosis of follicular-like thyroid neoplasms (FNs) using routine ultrasound images.\r\n\r\nSUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA\r\nPreoperative diagnosis of malignancy in nodules suspicious for an FN remains challenging. Ultrasound, fine-needle aspiration cytology, and intraoperative frozen section pathology cannot unambiguously distinguish between benign and malignant FNs, leading to unnecessary biopsies and operations in benign nodules.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis multicenter, retrospective study included 3634 patients who underwent ultrasound and received a definite diagnosis of FN from 11 centers, comprising thyroid follicular adenoma (n=1748), follicular carcinoma (n=299), and follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (n=1587). Four DL models including Inception-v3, ResNet50, Inception-ResNet-v2, and DenseNet161 were constructed on a training set (n=2587, 6178 images) and were verified on an internal validation set (n=648, 1633 images) and an external validation set (n=399, 847 images). The diagnostic efficacy of the DL models was evaluated against the ACR TI-RADS regarding the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and unnecessary biopsy rate.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWhen externally validated, the four DL models yielded robust and comparable performance, with AUCs of 82.2%-85.2%, sensitivities of 69.6%-76.0%, and specificities of 84.1%-89.2%, which outperformed the ACR TI-RADS. Compared to ACR TI-RADS, the DL models showed a higher biopsy rate of malignancy (71.6% -79.9% vs 37.7%, P<0.001) and a significantly lower unnecessary FNAB rate (8.5% -12.8% vs 40.7%, P<0.001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis study provides a noninvasive DL tool for accurate preoperative diagnosis of FNs, showing better performance than ACR TI-RADS and reducing unnecessary invasive interventions.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive Deep Learning System for Preoperative Diagnosis of Follicular-Like Thyroid Neoplasms Using Ultrasound Images: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hui Shen,Yue Huang,Wenxiao Yan,Chifa Zhang,Ting Liang,Dan Yang,Xiaoxiao Feng,Shuyi Liu,Yu Wang,Weihan Cao,Ying Cheng,Hongyan Chen,Qiujie Ni,Fei Wang,Jingjing You,Zhe Jin,Wenle He,Jie Sun,Dexing Yang,Lijuan Liu,Boling Cao,Xiao Zhang,Yingjia Li,Shufang Pei,Shuixing Zhang,Bin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/sla.0000000000006841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nTo propose a deep learning (DL) system for the preoperative diagnosis of follicular-like thyroid neoplasms (FNs) using routine ultrasound images.\\r\\n\\r\\nSUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA\\r\\nPreoperative diagnosis of malignancy in nodules suspicious for an FN remains challenging. Ultrasound, fine-needle aspiration cytology, and intraoperative frozen section pathology cannot unambiguously distinguish between benign and malignant FNs, leading to unnecessary biopsies and operations in benign nodules.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis multicenter, retrospective study included 3634 patients who underwent ultrasound and received a definite diagnosis of FN from 11 centers, comprising thyroid follicular adenoma (n=1748), follicular carcinoma (n=299), and follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (n=1587). Four DL models including Inception-v3, ResNet50, Inception-ResNet-v2, and DenseNet161 were constructed on a training set (n=2587, 6178 images) and were verified on an internal validation set (n=648, 1633 images) and an external validation set (n=399, 847 images). The diagnostic efficacy of the DL models was evaluated against the ACR TI-RADS regarding the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and unnecessary biopsy rate.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nWhen externally validated, the four DL models yielded robust and comparable performance, with AUCs of 82.2%-85.2%, sensitivities of 69.6%-76.0%, and specificities of 84.1%-89.2%, which outperformed the ACR TI-RADS. Compared to ACR TI-RADS, the DL models showed a higher biopsy rate of malignancy (71.6% -79.9% vs 37.7%, P<0.001) and a significantly lower unnecessary FNAB rate (8.5% -12.8% vs 40.7%, P<0.001).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThis study provides a noninvasive DL tool for accurate preoperative diagnosis of FNs, showing better performance than ACR TI-RADS and reducing unnecessary invasive interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006841\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006841","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的建立一种基于常规超声图像的甲状腺滤泡样肿瘤(FNs)术前诊断深度学习系统。背景资料疑似FN结节的术前诊断仍然具有挑战性。超声、细针穿刺细胞学和术中冷冻切片病理不能明确区分良性和恶性结节,导致不必要的良性结节活检和手术。方法本研究是一项多中心回顾性研究,纳入了来自11个中心的3634例经超声确诊为FN的患者,包括甲状腺滤泡性腺瘤(n=1748)、滤泡性癌(n=299)和滤泡变异型甲状腺乳头状癌(n=1587)。在训练集(n=2587、6178张图片)上构建了Inception-v3、ResNet50、Inception-ResNet-v2和DenseNet161四个深度学习模型,并在内部验证集(n=648、1633张图片)和外部验证集(n=399、847张图片)上进行了验证。根据ACR TI-RADS对DL模型的诊断效果进行评估,包括曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性和不必要的活检率。结果经外部验证,4种DL模型的auc值为82.2% ~ 85.2%,灵敏度为69.6% ~ 76.0%,特异性为84.1% ~ 89.2%,均优于ACR TI-RADS。与ACR TI-RADS相比,DL模型显示更高的恶性肿瘤活检率(71.6% -79.9% vs 37.7%, P<0.001)和显著降低的不必要的FNAB率(8.5% -12.8% vs 40.7%, P<0.001)。结论本研究为FNs术前准确诊断提供了一种无创DL工具,其性能优于ACR TI-RADS,减少了不必要的侵入性干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noninvasive Deep Learning System for Preoperative Diagnosis of Follicular-Like Thyroid Neoplasms Using Ultrasound Images: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.
OBJECTIVE To propose a deep learning (DL) system for the preoperative diagnosis of follicular-like thyroid neoplasms (FNs) using routine ultrasound images. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Preoperative diagnosis of malignancy in nodules suspicious for an FN remains challenging. Ultrasound, fine-needle aspiration cytology, and intraoperative frozen section pathology cannot unambiguously distinguish between benign and malignant FNs, leading to unnecessary biopsies and operations in benign nodules. METHODS This multicenter, retrospective study included 3634 patients who underwent ultrasound and received a definite diagnosis of FN from 11 centers, comprising thyroid follicular adenoma (n=1748), follicular carcinoma (n=299), and follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (n=1587). Four DL models including Inception-v3, ResNet50, Inception-ResNet-v2, and DenseNet161 were constructed on a training set (n=2587, 6178 images) and were verified on an internal validation set (n=648, 1633 images) and an external validation set (n=399, 847 images). The diagnostic efficacy of the DL models was evaluated against the ACR TI-RADS regarding the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and unnecessary biopsy rate. RESULTS When externally validated, the four DL models yielded robust and comparable performance, with AUCs of 82.2%-85.2%, sensitivities of 69.6%-76.0%, and specificities of 84.1%-89.2%, which outperformed the ACR TI-RADS. Compared to ACR TI-RADS, the DL models showed a higher biopsy rate of malignancy (71.6% -79.9% vs 37.7%, P<0.001) and a significantly lower unnecessary FNAB rate (8.5% -12.8% vs 40.7%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION This study provides a noninvasive DL tool for accurate preoperative diagnosis of FNs, showing better performance than ACR TI-RADS and reducing unnecessary invasive interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信