发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Six perspectives on the ethics of access to health care 关于获得保健服务的伦理问题的六个观点:导论。
Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics Pub Date : 1981-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/0271-5392(81)90001-0
Michael B. Kleiman
{"title":"Six perspectives on the ethics of access to health care","authors":"Michael B. Kleiman","doi":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90001-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90001-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 127-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5392(81)90001-0","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78152577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The right of public access to cadaver organs. 公众获取尸体器官的权利。
Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics Pub Date : 1981-12-01
C Perry
{"title":"The right of public access to cadaver organs.","authors":"C Perry","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 4","pages":"163-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18346056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What is the obligation 0f the medical profession in the distribution of health care? 医疗专业人员在提供保健服务方面的义务是什么?
Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics Pub Date : 1981-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/0271-5392(81)90002-2
Norman Daniels
{"title":"What is the obligation 0f the medical profession in the distribution of health care?","authors":"Norman Daniels","doi":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90002-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90002-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Justice requires that health care facilities and physicians (and other providers) be available to meet health care needs. These obligations are primarily social. They constrain the institutions through which providers are trained and through which incentives to work in various specialities and locations are arranged. Individual physicians come to have particular obligations concerning the delivery of care through their responses to these institutions, not through the direct appeal to principles of distributive justice. It is argued that many institutional arrangements for distributing physicians in accordance with the requirement of justice violate no basic liberties, contrary to some libertarian views.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 129-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5392(81)90002-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85499945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
The right to health care: Some cross-national comparisons and U.S. Trends in policy 医疗保健权:一些跨国比较和美国的政策趋势。
Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics Pub Date : 1981-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/0271-5392(81)90006-X
Caroline L. Kaufmann
{"title":"The right to health care: Some cross-national comparisons and U.S. Trends in policy","authors":"Caroline L. Kaufmann","doi":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90006-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90006-X","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>All developed, industrialized nations provide some system of health care for the treatment of acute and chronic illness. However, nations differ in terms of their policy toward the provision and distribution of health services. Basic to policy regarding access to medical care is the notion of health care as a right. This paper examines the evolution of the concept of a right to health care in three industrialized nations—the U.S.S.R., Great Britain and the U.S. Trends in the U.S. health care delivery system suggest an emerging policy which favors equity through federally subsidized care for the indigent. However, the U.S. health care system tolerates unequal distribution of services. The U.S.S.R. and U.K. health care systems have adopted explicit policies which support the right of all their citizens to health care. U.S. policy supporting the right to health care has been hampered by two primary factors. First is opposition within the medical profession toward the notion of health care as a right. Second is the inability of federal agencies to develop a comprehensive plan for health care delivery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 157-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5392(81)90006-X","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81710988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Justice and a universal right to basic health care. 正义和普遍享有基本保健的权利。
Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics Pub Date : 1981-12-01
D T Ozar
{"title":"Justice and a universal right to basic health care.","authors":"D T Ozar","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 4","pages":"135-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18346052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The involuntary commitment and treatment of mentally ill persons. 对精神病患者的非自愿收容和治疗。
Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics Pub Date : 1981-12-01
J M Humber
{"title":"The involuntary commitment and treatment of mentally ill persons.","authors":"J M Humber","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 4","pages":"143-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18346055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The involuntary commitment and treatment of mentally ill persons 对精神病患者的非自愿收容和治疗。
Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics Pub Date : 1981-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/0271-5392(81)90004-6
James M. Humber
{"title":"The involuntary commitment and treatment of mentally ill persons","authors":"James M. Humber","doi":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90004-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90004-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Some persons who are mentally ill and refuse treatment constitute a threat to themselves and/or others. Many psychiatrists, psychologists and jurists believe that society has only two ways of dealing with such individuals: it can involuntarily hospitalize these people for an indefinite amount of time and attempt to ‘cure’ them, or it can outlaw their behavior and incarcerate. In this essay I argue that neither of these options is morally defensible, and that it is far preferable when dealing with mentally ill persons who threaten either themselves or others to pursue a course of action which combines determinate sentencing with involuntary treatment. In developing my argument I proceed as follows. First, I consider the major justifications for the involuntary civil commitment of mentally ill persons and show that none is sound. Next, I argue that the only acceptable justification for denial of a mentally ill person's liberty is that he has broken some criminal law. Finally, I contend that involuntary hospitalization and treatment of some prisoners may be morally acceptable, but only when certain safeguards have been assured. Chiefly: (1) the prisoner must be judged to be incompetent to make an informed decision concerning treatment, and (2) the prisoner must serve the sentence imposed upon him by law, i.e. he cannot be forced to undergo treatment beyond the limit of his sentence, nor may he be released early because he is considered ‘cured’.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 143-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5392(81)90004-6","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78375442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
The right of public access to cadaver organs 公众获取尸体器官的权利。
Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics Pub Date : 1981-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/0271-5392(81)90007-1
Clifton Perry
{"title":"The right of public access to cadaver organs","authors":"Clifton Perry","doi":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90007-1","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90007-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is argued that waste during a period of scarcity which results in human suffering and death is bad. It is then argued that it is immoral for waste to continue especially if nonwaste requires no sacrifice to the responsible parties. Allowing one's organs, which might otherwise be transplanted to help others, to deteriorate in the grave is an example of waste. Since a prodigious number of people might benefit from an organ transplant, the waste of organs is wrong. Moreover, since the deceased no longer exists, the removal of his organs constitutes no sacrifice on the deceased's part. Therefore, it is immoral to waste transplantable human organs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 163-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5392(81)90007-1","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72503736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Triage in medical practices: An unacceptable model? 医疗实践中的分诊:一种不可接受的模式?
Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics Pub Date : 1981-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/0271-5392(81)90005-8
Nora K. Bell
{"title":"Triage in medical practices: An unacceptable model?","authors":"Nora K. Bell","doi":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90005-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90005-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Because many medical practices in conditions of scarcity mimic triage decisions, this paper undertakes an examination of justifications for such practices.</p><p>The paper addresses, first, a very important principle commonly accepted in medical ethics—namely, other things being equal, it is ‘better’ to save more lives rather than less. It is argued that there are compelling reasons to challenge this principle—among them: (1) that acceptance of the principle commits one to an odd conception of valuing human life; and (2) that while ‘more is better’ may be a perfectly <em>good</em> reason for choosing the larger number, it doesn't have the status of a universally binding moral evaluation.</p><p>In the final section of the paper, it is argued that there is a basic disanalogy between triage in wartime or disaster contexts and in more general allocation contexts in medicine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 151-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5392(81)90005-8","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88309040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Justice and a universal right to basic health care 正义和普遍享有基本保健的权利。
Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics Pub Date : 1981-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/0271-5392(81)90003-4
David T. Ozar
{"title":"Justice and a universal right to basic health care","authors":"David T. Ozar","doi":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90003-4","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90003-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The first section of this article examines Sade's argument refuting the notion of a right to health care, showing that his argument is inconclusive. The second section sets out three principles of justice through an examination of one of the simplest instances of justice—a just exchange of goods or services between two persons. In the third section, a general theory of justice and of the just society is outlined; and in the fourth section an argument is presented to show that in any society which has the resources to provide basic health care to all its citizens, there is a universal right to basic health care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 135-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5392(81)90003-4","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76356569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信