The right of public access to cadaver organs

Clifton Perry
{"title":"The right of public access to cadaver organs","authors":"Clifton Perry","doi":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90007-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is argued that waste during a period of scarcity which results in human suffering and death is bad. It is then argued that it is immoral for waste to continue especially if nonwaste requires no sacrifice to the responsible parties. Allowing one's organs, which might otherwise be transplanted to help others, to deteriorate in the grave is an example of waste. Since a prodigious number of people might benefit from an organ transplant, the waste of organs is wrong. Moreover, since the deceased no longer exists, the removal of his organs constitutes no sacrifice on the deceased's part. Therefore, it is immoral to waste transplantable human organs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 163-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5392(81)90007-1","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0271539281900071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

It is argued that waste during a period of scarcity which results in human suffering and death is bad. It is then argued that it is immoral for waste to continue especially if nonwaste requires no sacrifice to the responsible parties. Allowing one's organs, which might otherwise be transplanted to help others, to deteriorate in the grave is an example of waste. Since a prodigious number of people might benefit from an organ transplant, the waste of organs is wrong. Moreover, since the deceased no longer exists, the removal of his organs constitutes no sacrifice on the deceased's part. Therefore, it is immoral to waste transplantable human organs.

公众获取尸体器官的权利。
有人认为,在物资匮乏时期浪费会导致人类痛苦和死亡,这是不好的。然后有人认为继续浪费是不道德的,特别是如果不浪费不需要对责任方做出牺牲的话。一个人的器官本来可以被移植去帮助他人,但任由它在坟墓里腐烂是一种浪费。由于大量的人可能会从器官移植中受益,因此浪费器官是错误的。此外,由于死者已不存在,摘除其器官并不构成死者的牺牲。因此,浪费可移植的人体器官是不道德的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信