Anesthesia & Analgesia最新文献

{"title":"Evaluation and Acceptance of Open-Source 3D-Printed Tracheobronchial Tree Models for Improving Pediatric Lung Isolation Techniques Training","authors":"Martina Bordini, Calvin Lo, Clyde T. Matava","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000006908","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000006908","url":null,"abstract":"An abstract is unavailable.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142670731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Unveiling the Anesthesiologist’s Impact on Childbirth-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder","authors":"Joanna A. Kountanis, Tracey M. Vogel","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000006991","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000006991","url":null,"abstract":"An abstract is unavailable.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142670785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sugammadex versus Neostigmine in Renal Impairment","authors":"James R. Nielsen","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007233","url":null,"abstract":"An abstract is unavailable.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142670729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Middle Eastern and North African: Recognizing the New US Census Category in Anesthesiology Research and Practice","authors":"Karen Semaan, Dmitry Tumin","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007198","url":null,"abstract":"An abstract is unavailable.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142670733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Substance-Use Disorders in Young Patients—Much More Than Preop Questions and Potential for Drug Interactions","authors":"Timothy W. Martin, Elizabeth A. Steele","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007232","url":null,"abstract":"An abstract is unavailable.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142670734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of Phenylephrine Bolus and Infusion Regimens on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes During Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Heena Garg, Vishnu Narayanan M R., Puneet Khanna, Bharat Yalla","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007156","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007156","url":null,"abstract":"US Clinical registry databases were searched. Studies comparing phenylephrine boluses (both therapeutic and prophylactic) with infusion (both fixed- and variable-rate) assessing various feto-maternal outcomes were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of maternal hypotension. Secondary maternal outcomes included the incidence of reactive hypertension, bradycardia, nausea, or vomiting; secondary neonatal outcomes included umbilical arterial pH, partial pressure of oxygen (paO2), umbilical venous pH, fetal acidosis, Apgar Scores at 1 and 5 minutes. All outcomes were quantitatively analyzed using the random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration R0B 2.0 tool. RESULTS: We included 15 studies with 2153 parturients. The parturients receiving phenylephrine bolus during cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia had a significant increase in the incidence of predelivery hypotension compared to phenylephrine infusion (risk ratio [RR], 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72–3.18). Reactive hypertension (RR, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.29–0.79) and bradycardia (RR, 0.57, 95% CI, 0.41–0.79) were less common in the parturients receiving phenylephrine bolus; whereas, vomiting (RR, 2.15, 95% CI, 1.53–3.03) was more common compared to the infusion group. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of nausea or any fetal outcomes (umbilical artery pH, paO2, umbilical venous pH, fetal acidosis, and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes) between either of the groups. Three studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: A prophylactic phenylephrine infusion significantly reduces the incidence of predelivery hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia in comparison to the therapeutic or prophylactic phenylephrine bolus group. A prophylactic phenylephrine infusion may be considered in all parturients without preexisting hypertensive disorder or cardiovascular disorders to reduce the risk of predelivery hypotension. More evidence is needed to guide optimal hemodynamic management for patients with hypertensive or cardiovascular disorders....","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"197 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142670786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Defining Postinduction Hemodynamic Instability With an Automated Classification Model.","authors":"Eline Kho,Rogier V Immink,Bjorn J P van der Ster,Ward H van der Ven,Jimmy Schenk,Markus W Hollmann,Johan T M Tol,Lotte E Terwindt,Alexander P J Vlaar,Denise P Veelo","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007315","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007315","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDPostinduction hypotension (PIH) may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In earlier studies, the definition of PIH is solely based on different absolute or relative thresholds. However, the time-course (eg, how fast blood pressure drops during induction) is rarely incorporated, whereas it might represent the hemodynamic instability of a patient. We propose a comprehensive model to distinguish hemodynamically unstable from stable patients by combining blood pressure thresholds with the magnitude and speed of decline.METHODSThis prospective study included 375 adult elective noncardiac surgery patients. Noninvasive blood pressure was continuously measured between 5 minutes before up to 15 minutes after the first induction agent had been administered. An expert panel rated whether the patient experienced clinically relevant hemodynamic instability or not. Interrater correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation were computed to check for consistency between experts. Next, an automated classification model for clinically relevant hemodynamic instability was developed using mean, maximum, minimum systolic, mean, diastolic arterial blood pressure (SAP, MAP, and DAP, respectively) and their corresponding time course of decline. The model was trained and tested based on the hemodynamic instability labels provided by the experts.RESULTSIn total 78 patients were classified as having experienced hemodynamic instability and 279 as not. The hemodynamically unstable patients were significantly older (7 years, 95% confidence interval (CI), 4-11, P < .001), with a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (3% higher, 95% CI, 1-8, P = .036). Before induction, hemodynamically unstable patients had a higher SAP (median (first-third quartile): 161 (145-175) mm Hg vs 150 (134-166) mm Hg, P < .001) compared to hemodynamic stable patients. Interrater agreement between experts was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94). The random forest classifier model showed excellent performance with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.96, a sensitivity of 0.84, and specificity of 0.94.CONCLUSIONSBased on the high sensitivity and specificity, the developed model is able to differentiate between clinically relevant hemodynamic instability and hemodynamic stable patients. This classification model will pave the way for future research concerning hemodynamic instability and its prevention.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142490750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Comparison of Remimazolam versus Propofol on Blood Pressure Changes During Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yan-Ying Xiao,Hai-Ding Zou,Xiu-Nan Qin,Rong Zhu,Ru-Ping Dai","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007309","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDIntraoperative hypotension is the most common adverse event in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and is usually attributed to the vasodilatory effect of the anesthetic. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the impact of remimazolam versus propofol on blood pressure changes during the therapeutic ERCP procedure.METHODSAdult patients scheduled for elective therapeutic ERCP were randomized to receive either remimazolam or propofol anesthesia (40 patients in each group). The primary outcomes included the change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) during induction and the area under the baseline (AUB), calculated as the blood pressure below baseline multiplied by the duration, throughout the procedure. These measures, respectively, indicated the severity of blood pressure decrease during anesthesia induction and the overall impact of blood pressure changes throughout the procedure. Any incidences of hypotension, defined as MAP <65 mm Hg for at least 1 minute, were recorded. The recovery time and any adverse events were also reported.RESULTSThe change in MAP after induction was smaller in the remimazolam group compared to the propofol group (-7.5 [-14.0 to 0] mm Hg vs -25.0 [-33.8 to -14.3] mm Hg), with a median difference of 17.0 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.0-22.0; P <.001). The AUB in the remimazolam group was less than in the propofol group (-373 [-82 to -854] mm Hg·min vs -705 [-272 to -1100] mm Hg·min), with a median difference of 255 mm Hg·min (95% CI, 29-477; P =.021). The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower for remimazolam than propofol (5% vs 30%; P =.006). There were no serious adverse events in either group.CONCLUSIONSRemimazolam may be considered as an alternative to propofol for general anesthesia during therapeutic ERCP procedures, with the potential advantage of stable hemodynamics.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142490752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Xenon and Argon as Neuroprotective Treatments for Perinatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury: A Preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mariana Barros,Min Liang,Noemi Iannucci,Robert Dickinson","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007223","url":null,"abstract":"Xenon and argon are currently being evaluated as potential neuroprotective treatments for acquired brain injuries. Xenon has been evaluated clinically as a treatment for brain ischemia with equivocal results in small trials, but argon has not yet undergone clinical evaluation. Several preclinical studies have investigated xenon or argon as treatments in animal models of perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). A systematic review of MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed. After screening of titles, abstracts, and full text, data were extracted from included studies. A pairwise meta-analysis of neuroprotective efficacy was performed using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was investigated using subgroup analysis, funnel plot asymmetry, and Egger's regression. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022301986). A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. The data extracted included measurements from 1591 animals, involving models of HIE in mice, rats, and pigs. The meta-analysis found that both xenon and argon had significant (P < .0001) neuroprotective efficacies. The summary estimate for xenon was 39.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.3%-51.1%) and for argon it was 70.3% (95% CI, 59.0%-81.7%). The summary effect for argon was significantly (P < .001) greater than that of xenon. Our results provide evidence supporting further investigation of xenon and argon as neuroprotective treatments for HIE.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142490749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial of Adding Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block to Interpectoral-Pectoserratus Plane Block in Breast Cancer Surgery.","authors":"Bin Gu,Zhang-Xiang Huang,Hui-Dan Zhou,Yan-Hong Lian,Shuang He,Meng Ge,Hui-Fang Jiang","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007218","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDThe interpectoral-pectoserratus plane block is expected to anesthetize the lateral breast, but it is unclear whether the deep parasternal intercostal plane block may enhance recovery by providing analgesia to the medial breast.METHODSPatients undergoing breast cancer surgery were randomly assigned to receive either the interpectoral-pectoserratus block (single block) or interpectoral-pectoserratus combined with deep parasternal intercostal block (combined block). The primary outcome was the quality of recovery-15 questionnaire score assessed at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary measures included dermatomal block assessment, pain severity, opioid consumption, opioid-related adverse events, hospital length of stay, and chronic postsurgical pain at 3 months after surgery.RESULTSOne hundred and sixteen patients were recruited, 58 in the single block group and 58 in the combined block group. There was no important difference in the 24-hour quality of recovery scores with mean (standard deviation [SD]) 123.6 (6.3) in the single block group and 123.2 (7.1) in the combined block group (mean difference, 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.0 to 2.9; P =.731). There was greater dermatomal block on medial breast in the combined block group. There were no differences in other secondary outcomes.CONCLUSIONSAddition of deep parasternal intercostal plane block was not superior to interpectoral-pectoserratus plane block alone for the quality of recovery in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142490755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}