Farsad Eskandary, Gregor Bond, Heinz Regele, Nicolas Kozakowski, Zeljko Kikić, Markus Wahrmann, Helmuth Haslacher, Rainer Oberbauer, Vido Ramassar, Philip Halloran, Georg A Böhmig
{"title":"Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection in a Large Prospective Cross-Sectional Study of Kidney Allograft Recipients--Preliminary Results of the Screening Phase of the BORTEJECT Trial.","authors":"Farsad Eskandary, Gregor Bond, Heinz Regele, Nicolas Kozakowski, Zeljko Kikić, Markus Wahrmann, Helmuth Haslacher, Rainer Oberbauer, Vido Ramassar, Philip Halloran, Georg A Böhmig","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is limited data on the rate of late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in unselected transplant cohorts. Here, we investigated the prevalence and characteristics of ABMR in a large cohort of long-term kidney allograft recipients. Patients were screened in the context of a randomized controlled trial (BORTEJECT study; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01873157) designed to investigate the impact of bortezomib on the course of late ABMR. The study (initiation in October 2013) includes a cross-sectional ABMR screening (key inclusion criterion: functioning graft at ≥ 180 days) to identify 44 recipients eligible for inclusion in the intervention trial. Patients were screened for donor-specific antibodies (DSA) applying solid phase technology and DSA+ recipients underwent protocol biopsies. Through November 2014, ABMR screening (after a median of 6.5 years post-transplantation) had been completed for 714 recipients. One hundred one patients (14%) had DSA above a threshold of 1,000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Forty-four of 78 DSA+ recipients (6% of the overall cohort) subjected to biopsy were diagnosed with C4d-positive (n = 17) or -negative (n = 27) ABMR and 40 consented to participate in the intervention trial. DSA+ABMR+ and DSA+ABMR- patients differed significantly with respect to the MFI of the highest level DSA (P < 0.001), whereby ABMR or C4d positivity were moderately predicted by MFI values (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.75 and 0.84, respectively). In conclusion, the results of this cross-sectional analysis suggest a ≥ 6% prevalence of late ABMR. We demonstrate that the more frequent finding of circulating DSA may not necessarily associate with ABMR diagnosis, especially in patients with low antibody levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"189-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33996232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sebastiaan Heidt, Michael Eikmans, Dave L Roelen, Frans H J Claas
{"title":"Novel strategies for immunological monitoring of kidney transplant recipients: from microRNA to alloantibodies.","authors":"Sebastiaan Heidt, Michael Eikmans, Dave L Roelen, Frans H J Claas","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predicting and diagnosing acute kidney allograft rejection by non-invasive biomarkers is a major goal in clinical transplantation research. Such biomarkers can be reduced to the various stages of the alloimmune response, from transcriptional regulation to immunological effector mechanisms. Here, we describe novel insights into exciting areas of transplantation-related biomarker research that may be translated to non-invasive monitoring strategies. First, we will elaborate on microRNAs, which represent stable, small non-coding ribonucleic acid molecules that can specifically regulate gene expression. Secondly, we will discuss novel methods to monitor human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-specific B cells, as well as the anti-HLA antibodies they produce. Incorporation of these new biomarkers and methodologies into cross-platform biomarker panels may help to improve non-invasive prediction and detection of allograft rejection.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"257-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32561744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
E Steve Woodle, Rita R Alloway, Nicole Schmidt Ejaz
{"title":"Plasma cell biology: principles for therapeutic design.","authors":"E Steve Woodle, Rita R Alloway, Nicole Schmidt Ejaz","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plasma cells represent the terminally differentiated cell population of the B-lymphocyte lineage. Plasma cells possess a unique biology, primarily as a result of their role as antibody factories. The unique features associated with the massive antibody production capacity confer upon the plasma cell a vulnerability to attack by specific targeted therapies. Over the past nine years, we have worked to develop therapies that exploit the unique features of plasma cells - therapies we have termed plasma cell targeted therapies. To date, these therapies have been almost exclusively based on proteasome inhibitor therapy, which has been used to treat antibody-mediated rejection and also to reduce chronic human leukocyte antigen antibody production via therapies commonly referred to as \"desensitization.\" Future iterations of plasma cell targeted regimens, however, are more likely to depend on combination therapies designed specifically to achieve additivity and preferably synergy, using either small molecule inhibitors of metabolic pathways or alternatively, biologic agents. As such, these plasma cell targeted therapies provide a new approach for treating acute and chronic antibody responses in humans, not only in transplantation, but also in other disease states including autoimmune disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"277-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32561747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Incidence and hazards of alloantibodies in renal transplantation.","authors":"Matthew J Everly","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the last 10 years, many reports on the impact of antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) have been published. Now, in 2014, the overwhelming consensus is that antibodies cause allograft failure. Based on reports from East Carolina University, we now know that approximately 10% of patients will develop de novo donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) by 1-year post-transplant. Within 5 years, 20% of all transplanted patients will have de novo DSA. In those who develop de novo DSA, allograft failure rates are significantly higher than that of patients who do not develop DSA. By 1-year post-DSA appearance, 9% of patients' allografts will fail. By 3-years post-DSA appearance, 24% of patients' allografts will fail. In 2014, with estimates of incidence and risk defined for de novo DSA in renal transplantation, the focus is now on how to treat DSA. Currently, the options are limited. Future trials to investigate regimens that can durably remove de novo DSA and protect the allograft from antibody mediated damage are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"313-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32561751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Terry L Mangan, Kathleen A Benedetti, Thomas E Starzl
{"title":"Fifty years later.","authors":"Terry L Mangan, Kathleen A Benedetti, Thomas E Starzl","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>That concludes my remarks. If I have not made my purpose clear, let me summarize simply. I, like all others gathered here, have come to pay homage to Paul Terasaki, a man who bent in the winds of his time but never broke. Over the last 50 years, I have worked with many people. No collaboration has been dearer than that with Paul (Fig. 7).</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"105-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32562523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Impact of solid phase antibody testing on organ allocation in the United States.","authors":"Nancy L Reinsmoen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of the solid phase antibody assays has allowed for the detection and characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) specific antibodies with greater sensitivity and specificity. This information can then be used along with the donor's HLA typing to predict crossmatch results (a virtual crossmatch). Using these data and the level of immunological risk assessed to the antibodies detected, the determination of unacceptable antigens can be made. The calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA) provides for a means to determine the frequency of these unacceptable antigens in the donor population and thereby predict the probability of a positive crossmatch. In 2009, the Organ Procurement Transplant Network administered by the United Network for Organ Sharing adopted the CPRA as the means to define sensitization and to assign allocation points. Follow-up studies have shown that the number of organ offers refused due to a positive crossmatch has decreased significantly and has saved money through the elimination of unnecessary testing. An additional benefit has been the increased number of sensitized patients being transplanted successfully. Through technical improvements and the refined interpretation of the solid phase antibody assays, continual progress is being made in the definition of the unacceptable antigens and the ability to transplant sensitized patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"393-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32562699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
James E Cooper, Jane Gralla, Oluwafisayo Adebiyi, Alexander C Wiseman, Laurence Chan
{"title":"Donor specific antibodies before and after kidney transplant: the University of Colorado Experience.","authors":"James E Cooper, Jane Gralla, Oluwafisayo Adebiyi, Alexander C Wiseman, Laurence Chan","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We summarize in this manuscript our donor specific antibody (DSA) screening experience in the past six years as it applies to pre-existing DSA, de novo DSA, and post-transplant DSA treatment. Of 547 patients receiving a kidney or kidney/pancreas with negative pre-transplant flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM), 196 had DSA (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI >or= 500) detected prior to transplant by single antigen bead analysis. Acute rejection rates at one year were similar in DSA+ versus DSA- (15% versus 12%, respectively, p=0.22), although acute rejection occurred earlier in the DSA+ group. De novo DSA was detected in 65 of 261 patients (27%). All DSA was detected within the first posttransplant year. While acute rejection was more likely in patients with de novo DSA (29% versus 9.5% in those with no DSA), prospective DSA screening failed to predict this outcome as DSA was detected at the time of or after a rejection episode in 16 of 19 patients with both DSA and acute rejection. Two-year estimated graft survival was significantly worse in patients with versus without DSA, but was identical when removing patients with a prior acute rejection episode from the analysis. We have used a protocol of high dose (5 gm/kg) intravenous immunoglobulin infused over the course of 6 months in patients with DSA and either chronic graft dysfunction or following a recent acute antibody mediated rejection (AMR) episode. DSA MFI was reduced by 18% from the time of initiation to last follow up. This effect was largely due to reductions in class I DSA (-37%) and DSA in patients with a recent acute AMR (-51.5%), with a minimal effect on class II DSA and DSA in patients with chronic graft dysfunction. Despite treatment directed at antibody-producing plasma cells, antibody levels either persisted or worsened with no improvement in graft function. Overall, DSA is more amendable to treatment when associated with a recent acute rejection event.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"407-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32562701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"HLA-specific antibody distribution in renal transplant waiting list patients: utility of antigen frequency data in the definition of HLA-reactive epitopes.","authors":"David Lowe, James Jones, Derek Middleton","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of single antigen bead (SAB) technology has allowed for previously unheralded levels of antibody detection, both in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) specific antibody profiles can now be defined in clinically relevant timescales. However, a degree of expertise is still required in order to interpret SAB data and accurately assign antibodies to the epitope level. This study describes how the use of antigen frequency data can be used to support the identification of HLA-reactive epitopes. It also highlights how sharing of epitopes can explain SAB reactivity against HLA antigens found at extremely low frequency in the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"433-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32562704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Immunoregulation and allogenicity in cardiac stem cell regenerative therapy.","authors":"Dominique Charron, Reem Al-Daccak","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stem cell based strategies are fast track, novel, alternative therapies to repair damaged tissues of chronic diseases and have raised great hopes for incurable heart failure in particular. Various stem/progenitor populations are being put forward as potential therapies to achieve cardiac repair/regeneration. The recently described cardiac-derived progenitor/stem cells (CPC) received intensive investigation given their inherent programming to reconstitute the damaged myocardium. Clinical application of autologous cells provided convincing evidence of feasibility and efficiency but limited availability, and pointed out that the use of allogenic cells via cell banks, if proven safe, are a more realistic proposition for cardiac repair. Our recent findings reinforced this notion by demonstrating that the inherent immune features of human CPC shift their behavior within the allogenic settings towards the delivery of signals that promote the development, maintenance, and functioning of a PD-L1/PD1 mediated immune-modulator antiinflammatory reparative response, rather than a detrimental conventional allogenic process. In this context, we discuss how this allogenic immune response, if balanced, can be part of the dynamic and durable mechanisms proposed as critical to sustain cardiac regeneration and repair and propose, based on knowledge of transplantation practice strategies, to reach such balance.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"249-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32561743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Exchange donor renal transplantation.","authors":"Soo Jin Kim, Myoung Soo Kim, Kiil Park","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nearly 20 years of experience at Severance Hospital has shown that utilizing exchange donors increases the donor pool safely, with outcomes comparable to living related donor grafts. The exchange donor program is invaluable for incompatible donor-recipient pairs to consecutively proceed to transplantation. Recently, newer desensitization protocols have been devised to approach incompatible donor-recipient pairs, but not without risks. These desensitization protocols may be an alternative when confronting the limitations in the exchange program. Therefore, the exchange program and the desensitization protocols should be complementary, not competing strategies and centers should weigh the merits and limitations of each protocol in each incompatible donor-recipient pair to select the optimal method for a safe and successful transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"215-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32561811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}