James E Cooper, Jane Gralla, Oluwafisayo Adebiyi, Alexander C Wiseman, Laurence Chan
{"title":"肾移植前后供体特异性抗体:科罗拉多大学的经验。","authors":"James E Cooper, Jane Gralla, Oluwafisayo Adebiyi, Alexander C Wiseman, Laurence Chan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We summarize in this manuscript our donor specific antibody (DSA) screening experience in the past six years as it applies to pre-existing DSA, de novo DSA, and post-transplant DSA treatment. Of 547 patients receiving a kidney or kidney/pancreas with negative pre-transplant flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM), 196 had DSA (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI >or= 500) detected prior to transplant by single antigen bead analysis. Acute rejection rates at one year were similar in DSA+ versus DSA- (15% versus 12%, respectively, p=0.22), although acute rejection occurred earlier in the DSA+ group. De novo DSA was detected in 65 of 261 patients (27%). All DSA was detected within the first posttransplant year. While acute rejection was more likely in patients with de novo DSA (29% versus 9.5% in those with no DSA), prospective DSA screening failed to predict this outcome as DSA was detected at the time of or after a rejection episode in 16 of 19 patients with both DSA and acute rejection. Two-year estimated graft survival was significantly worse in patients with versus without DSA, but was identical when removing patients with a prior acute rejection episode from the analysis. We have used a protocol of high dose (5 gm/kg) intravenous immunoglobulin infused over the course of 6 months in patients with DSA and either chronic graft dysfunction or following a recent acute antibody mediated rejection (AMR) episode. DSA MFI was reduced by 18% from the time of initiation to last follow up. This effect was largely due to reductions in class I DSA (-37%) and DSA in patients with a recent acute AMR (-51.5%), with a minimal effect on class II DSA and DSA in patients with chronic graft dysfunction. Despite treatment directed at antibody-producing plasma cells, antibody levels either persisted or worsened with no improvement in graft function. Overall, DSA is more amendable to treatment when associated with a recent acute rejection event.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"407-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donor specific antibodies before and after kidney transplant: the University of Colorado Experience.\",\"authors\":\"James E Cooper, Jane Gralla, Oluwafisayo Adebiyi, Alexander C Wiseman, Laurence Chan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We summarize in this manuscript our donor specific antibody (DSA) screening experience in the past six years as it applies to pre-existing DSA, de novo DSA, and post-transplant DSA treatment. Of 547 patients receiving a kidney or kidney/pancreas with negative pre-transplant flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM), 196 had DSA (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI >or= 500) detected prior to transplant by single antigen bead analysis. Acute rejection rates at one year were similar in DSA+ versus DSA- (15% versus 12%, respectively, p=0.22), although acute rejection occurred earlier in the DSA+ group. De novo DSA was detected in 65 of 261 patients (27%). All DSA was detected within the first posttransplant year. While acute rejection was more likely in patients with de novo DSA (29% versus 9.5% in those with no DSA), prospective DSA screening failed to predict this outcome as DSA was detected at the time of or after a rejection episode in 16 of 19 patients with both DSA and acute rejection. Two-year estimated graft survival was significantly worse in patients with versus without DSA, but was identical when removing patients with a prior acute rejection episode from the analysis. We have used a protocol of high dose (5 gm/kg) intravenous immunoglobulin infused over the course of 6 months in patients with DSA and either chronic graft dysfunction or following a recent acute antibody mediated rejection (AMR) episode. DSA MFI was reduced by 18% from the time of initiation to last follow up. This effect was largely due to reductions in class I DSA (-37%) and DSA in patients with a recent acute AMR (-51.5%), with a minimal effect on class II DSA and DSA in patients with chronic graft dysfunction. Despite treatment directed at antibody-producing plasma cells, antibody levels either persisted or worsened with no improvement in graft function. Overall, DSA is more amendable to treatment when associated with a recent acute rejection event.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical transplants\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"407-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical transplants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical transplants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Donor specific antibodies before and after kidney transplant: the University of Colorado Experience.
We summarize in this manuscript our donor specific antibody (DSA) screening experience in the past six years as it applies to pre-existing DSA, de novo DSA, and post-transplant DSA treatment. Of 547 patients receiving a kidney or kidney/pancreas with negative pre-transplant flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM), 196 had DSA (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI >or= 500) detected prior to transplant by single antigen bead analysis. Acute rejection rates at one year were similar in DSA+ versus DSA- (15% versus 12%, respectively, p=0.22), although acute rejection occurred earlier in the DSA+ group. De novo DSA was detected in 65 of 261 patients (27%). All DSA was detected within the first posttransplant year. While acute rejection was more likely in patients with de novo DSA (29% versus 9.5% in those with no DSA), prospective DSA screening failed to predict this outcome as DSA was detected at the time of or after a rejection episode in 16 of 19 patients with both DSA and acute rejection. Two-year estimated graft survival was significantly worse in patients with versus without DSA, but was identical when removing patients with a prior acute rejection episode from the analysis. We have used a protocol of high dose (5 gm/kg) intravenous immunoglobulin infused over the course of 6 months in patients with DSA and either chronic graft dysfunction or following a recent acute antibody mediated rejection (AMR) episode. DSA MFI was reduced by 18% from the time of initiation to last follow up. This effect was largely due to reductions in class I DSA (-37%) and DSA in patients with a recent acute AMR (-51.5%), with a minimal effect on class II DSA and DSA in patients with chronic graft dysfunction. Despite treatment directed at antibody-producing plasma cells, antibody levels either persisted or worsened with no improvement in graft function. Overall, DSA is more amendable to treatment when associated with a recent acute rejection event.