Farsad Eskandary, Gregor Bond, Heinz Regele, Nicolas Kozakowski, Zeljko Kikić, Markus Wahrmann, Helmuth Haslacher, Rainer Oberbauer, Vido Ramassar, Philip Halloran, Georg A Böhmig
{"title":"在一项大型前瞻性横断面研究中,肾移植受者的晚期抗体介导的排斥反应——BORTEJECT试验筛选阶段的初步结果。","authors":"Farsad Eskandary, Gregor Bond, Heinz Regele, Nicolas Kozakowski, Zeljko Kikić, Markus Wahrmann, Helmuth Haslacher, Rainer Oberbauer, Vido Ramassar, Philip Halloran, Georg A Böhmig","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is limited data on the rate of late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in unselected transplant cohorts. Here, we investigated the prevalence and characteristics of ABMR in a large cohort of long-term kidney allograft recipients. Patients were screened in the context of a randomized controlled trial (BORTEJECT study; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01873157) designed to investigate the impact of bortezomib on the course of late ABMR. The study (initiation in October 2013) includes a cross-sectional ABMR screening (key inclusion criterion: functioning graft at ≥ 180 days) to identify 44 recipients eligible for inclusion in the intervention trial. Patients were screened for donor-specific antibodies (DSA) applying solid phase technology and DSA+ recipients underwent protocol biopsies. Through November 2014, ABMR screening (after a median of 6.5 years post-transplantation) had been completed for 714 recipients. One hundred one patients (14%) had DSA above a threshold of 1,000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Forty-four of 78 DSA+ recipients (6% of the overall cohort) subjected to biopsy were diagnosed with C4d-positive (n = 17) or -negative (n = 27) ABMR and 40 consented to participate in the intervention trial. DSA+ABMR+ and DSA+ABMR- patients differed significantly with respect to the MFI of the highest level DSA (P < 0.001), whereby ABMR or C4d positivity were moderately predicted by MFI values (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.75 and 0.84, respectively). In conclusion, the results of this cross-sectional analysis suggest a ≥ 6% prevalence of late ABMR. We demonstrate that the more frequent finding of circulating DSA may not necessarily associate with ABMR diagnosis, especially in patients with low antibody levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"189-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection in a Large Prospective Cross-Sectional Study of Kidney Allograft Recipients--Preliminary Results of the Screening Phase of the BORTEJECT Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Farsad Eskandary, Gregor Bond, Heinz Regele, Nicolas Kozakowski, Zeljko Kikić, Markus Wahrmann, Helmuth Haslacher, Rainer Oberbauer, Vido Ramassar, Philip Halloran, Georg A Böhmig\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is limited data on the rate of late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in unselected transplant cohorts. Here, we investigated the prevalence and characteristics of ABMR in a large cohort of long-term kidney allograft recipients. Patients were screened in the context of a randomized controlled trial (BORTEJECT study; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01873157) designed to investigate the impact of bortezomib on the course of late ABMR. The study (initiation in October 2013) includes a cross-sectional ABMR screening (key inclusion criterion: functioning graft at ≥ 180 days) to identify 44 recipients eligible for inclusion in the intervention trial. Patients were screened for donor-specific antibodies (DSA) applying solid phase technology and DSA+ recipients underwent protocol biopsies. Through November 2014, ABMR screening (after a median of 6.5 years post-transplantation) had been completed for 714 recipients. One hundred one patients (14%) had DSA above a threshold of 1,000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Forty-four of 78 DSA+ recipients (6% of the overall cohort) subjected to biopsy were diagnosed with C4d-positive (n = 17) or -negative (n = 27) ABMR and 40 consented to participate in the intervention trial. DSA+ABMR+ and DSA+ABMR- patients differed significantly with respect to the MFI of the highest level DSA (P < 0.001), whereby ABMR or C4d positivity were moderately predicted by MFI values (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.75 and 0.84, respectively). In conclusion, the results of this cross-sectional analysis suggest a ≥ 6% prevalence of late ABMR. We demonstrate that the more frequent finding of circulating DSA may not necessarily associate with ABMR diagnosis, especially in patients with low antibody levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical transplants\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"189-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical transplants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical transplants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection in a Large Prospective Cross-Sectional Study of Kidney Allograft Recipients--Preliminary Results of the Screening Phase of the BORTEJECT Trial.
There is limited data on the rate of late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in unselected transplant cohorts. Here, we investigated the prevalence and characteristics of ABMR in a large cohort of long-term kidney allograft recipients. Patients were screened in the context of a randomized controlled trial (BORTEJECT study; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01873157) designed to investigate the impact of bortezomib on the course of late ABMR. The study (initiation in October 2013) includes a cross-sectional ABMR screening (key inclusion criterion: functioning graft at ≥ 180 days) to identify 44 recipients eligible for inclusion in the intervention trial. Patients were screened for donor-specific antibodies (DSA) applying solid phase technology and DSA+ recipients underwent protocol biopsies. Through November 2014, ABMR screening (after a median of 6.5 years post-transplantation) had been completed for 714 recipients. One hundred one patients (14%) had DSA above a threshold of 1,000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Forty-four of 78 DSA+ recipients (6% of the overall cohort) subjected to biopsy were diagnosed with C4d-positive (n = 17) or -negative (n = 27) ABMR and 40 consented to participate in the intervention trial. DSA+ABMR+ and DSA+ABMR- patients differed significantly with respect to the MFI of the highest level DSA (P < 0.001), whereby ABMR or C4d positivity were moderately predicted by MFI values (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.75 and 0.84, respectively). In conclusion, the results of this cross-sectional analysis suggest a ≥ 6% prevalence of late ABMR. We demonstrate that the more frequent finding of circulating DSA may not necessarily associate with ABMR diagnosis, especially in patients with low antibody levels.