Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)最新文献_第3页

Medical Practice in Context: Religion, Family, Politics and Scientific Networks. 背景下的医疗实践:宗教、家庭、政治和科学网络。

Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Ruth Schilling, Kay Peter Jankrift

引用次数: 0

'What a Magnificent Work a Good Physician is': The Medical Practice of Johannes Magirus (1615-1697). “一个好医生是多么伟大的工作啊”:约翰内斯·马吉鲁斯的医疗实践(1615-1697)。

Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Sabine Schlegelmilch

引用次数: 0

Social Mobility and Medical Practice: Johann Friedrich Glaser (1707-1789). 社会流动和医疗实践:约翰·弗里德里希·格拉泽(1707-1789)。

Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Ruth Schilling

引用次数: 0

Unlicensed Practice: A Lay Healer in Rural Switzerland. 无证执业:瑞士农村的一名普通治疗师。

Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789004303324_012

Alois Unterkircher, Iris Ritzmann

引用次数: 1

Cornucopia Officinae Medicae: Medical Practice Records and Their Origin. 药用聚宝盆:医疗实践记录及其来源。

Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Volker Hess, Sabine Schlegelmilch

引用次数: 0

The Sources. 的来源。

Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2016-01-01

引用次数: 0

Observationes et Curationes Nurimbergenses: The Medical Practice of Johann Christoph Götz (1688-1733). 《纽伦堡观察与治疗：约翰·克里斯托夫·戈茨的医学实践》（1688-1733）。

Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Annemarie Kinzelbach, Susanne Grosser, Kay Peter Jankrift, Marion Ruisinger

引用次数: 0

Anthropometry, Race, and Eugenic Research: “Measurements of Growing Negro Children” at the Tuskegee Institute, 1932–1944. 人体测量、种族和优生研究:1932-1944年，塔斯基吉研究所“黑人儿童成长的测量”。

Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Paul A Lombardo

引用次数: 0

Experimenting with Radium Therapy: In the Laboratory & the Clinic. 镭疗法的实验:在实验室和诊所。

Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789004286719_009

Katherine Zwicker

{"title":"Experimenting with Radium Therapy: In the Laboratory & the Clinic.","authors":"Katherine Zwicker","doi":"10.1163/9789004286719_009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004286719_009","url":null,"abstract":"In 1932 a leading American cancer specialist, physician Francis Carter Wood, addressed the New York Academy of Medicine about the state of cancer therapy and research.1 For the treatment of cancer, he said, surgery and radiation were the only effective options. Though considered effective, Wood spoke of the need for research aimed at improving the practices of both surgery and radiation therapy. He noted a particular need for animal experimentation conducted by scientists in laboratories since, as he stated, “human patients bearing cancer cannot be experimented upon. They must be given the best treatment known to science.”2 As Wood stood before his colleagues, he painted a picture in which cancer patients and the treatment they received benefitted from scientific experimentation, but were separate from it. On the contrary, the development of radium therapy as a cancer treatment in the United States from the mid-1910s to the mid-1920s reveals that physicians’ efforts to provide their patients with “the best treatment known to science” meant that patients were not, in fact, separate from scientific experimentation. Rather, as physicians worked with scientists – mostly physicists – to create technologically sophisticated cancer therapies, they blurred the practices of clinical therapy and scientific experimentation. As a result, patients became objects of study. They served as experimental subjects that helped advance a process through which physicians and physicists collaborated in an effort to establish radium therapy as an effective and scientific cancer treatment. The collaborative work of physicians and physicists also fuelled the development of biomedical science. While this paper draws attention to the dual role of cancer patients as both patients and subjects, its primary focus is on the relationship established between physicians and physicists. Physicians who sought to exploit the therapeutic value they believed existed in radium enlisted the help of physicists to","PeriodicalId":75720,"journal":{"name":"Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"95 ","pages":"194-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35766020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A Special Kind of Practice? The Homeopath Friedrich von Böninghausen (1828-1910). 一种特殊的练习?顺势疗法医生弗里德里希·冯Böninghausen(1828-1910)。

Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789004303324_015

M. Baschin

{"title":"A Special Kind of Practice? The Homeopath Friedrich von Böninghausen (1828-1910).","authors":"M. Baschin","doi":"10.1163/9789004303324_015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004303324_015","url":null,"abstract":"More than 11,500 people consulted the physician Friedrich von Bönninghausen between 1864 and 1889. He noted down details of these consultations in his case journals, devoting a page to each patient. Today, these journals provide documentation of a medical practice in the second half of the nineteenth century in the Westphalian city of Münster.1 On the basis of Bönninghausen’s journals it is possible to reconstruct his activities against the general historical context. Bönninghausen was, in fact, no ‘orthodox’ physician: although he had graduated from medical school and been sworn in by the authorities of the city of Münster as ‘physician, surgeon and obstetrician’ in 1862, he differed in one essential aspect from other physicians offering their services in the city at the time. He was a homeopath and treated his patients according to principles put forward by Samuel Hahnemann (1755–1843), who had founded this medical approach in the early nineteenth century. Did this make his practice special and, if so, in what way was it different from that of other physicians? These are the questions that this paper seeks to investigate. We begin by introducing Bönninghausen. His case journals form part of this process because they constitute the source on which this research is based. We will then present one case history to illustrate Bönninghausen’s mode of treatment. Next, Bönninghausen’s homeopathic practice – as established from the journals – will be briefly outlined: its size, its clientele and the range of complaints treated. In conclusion, we will offer an answer to the question as to whether and to what extent Bönninghausen’s practice was ‘special’.2","PeriodicalId":75720,"journal":{"name":"Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"96 1","pages":"287-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64525005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1