镭疗法的实验:在实验室和诊所。

Katherine Zwicker
{"title":"镭疗法的实验:在实验室和诊所。","authors":"Katherine Zwicker","doi":"10.1163/9789004286719_009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1932 a leading American cancer specialist, physician Francis Carter Wood, addressed the New York Academy of Medicine about the state of cancer therapy and research.1 For the treatment of cancer, he said, surgery and radiation were the only effective options. Though considered effective, Wood spoke of the need for research aimed at improving the practices of both surgery and radiation therapy. He noted a particular need for animal experimentation conducted by scientists in laboratories since, as he stated, “human patients bearing cancer cannot be experimented upon. They must be given the best treatment known to science.”2 As Wood stood before his colleagues, he painted a picture in which cancer patients and the treatment they received benefitted from scientific experimentation, but were separate from it. On the contrary, the development of radium therapy as a cancer treatment in the United States from the mid-1910s to the mid-1920s reveals that physicians’ efforts to provide their patients with “the best treatment known to science” meant that patients were not, in fact, separate from scientific experimentation. Rather, as physicians worked with scientists – mostly physicists – to create technologically sophisticated cancer therapies, they blurred the practices of clinical therapy and scientific experimentation. As a result, patients became objects of study. They served as experimental subjects that helped advance a process through which physicians and physicists collaborated in an effort to establish radium therapy as an effective and scientific cancer treatment. The collaborative work of physicians and physicists also fuelled the development of biomedical science. While this paper draws attention to the dual role of cancer patients as both patients and subjects, its primary focus is on the relationship established between physicians and physicists. Physicians who sought to exploit the therapeutic value they believed existed in radium enlisted the help of physicists to","PeriodicalId":75720,"journal":{"name":"Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"95 ","pages":"194-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimenting with Radium Therapy: In the Laboratory & the Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Zwicker\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004286719_009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1932 a leading American cancer specialist, physician Francis Carter Wood, addressed the New York Academy of Medicine about the state of cancer therapy and research.1 For the treatment of cancer, he said, surgery and radiation were the only effective options. Though considered effective, Wood spoke of the need for research aimed at improving the practices of both surgery and radiation therapy. He noted a particular need for animal experimentation conducted by scientists in laboratories since, as he stated, “human patients bearing cancer cannot be experimented upon. They must be given the best treatment known to science.”2 As Wood stood before his colleagues, he painted a picture in which cancer patients and the treatment they received benefitted from scientific experimentation, but were separate from it. On the contrary, the development of radium therapy as a cancer treatment in the United States from the mid-1910s to the mid-1920s reveals that physicians’ efforts to provide their patients with “the best treatment known to science” meant that patients were not, in fact, separate from scientific experimentation. Rather, as physicians worked with scientists – mostly physicists – to create technologically sophisticated cancer therapies, they blurred the practices of clinical therapy and scientific experimentation. As a result, patients became objects of study. They served as experimental subjects that helped advance a process through which physicians and physicists collaborated in an effort to establish radium therapy as an effective and scientific cancer treatment. The collaborative work of physicians and physicists also fuelled the development of biomedical science. While this paper draws attention to the dual role of cancer patients as both patients and subjects, its primary focus is on the relationship established between physicians and physicists. Physicians who sought to exploit the therapeutic value they believed existed in radium enlisted the help of physicists to\",\"PeriodicalId\":75720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"194-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004286719_009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004286719_009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimenting with Radium Therapy: In the Laboratory & the Clinic.
In 1932 a leading American cancer specialist, physician Francis Carter Wood, addressed the New York Academy of Medicine about the state of cancer therapy and research.1 For the treatment of cancer, he said, surgery and radiation were the only effective options. Though considered effective, Wood spoke of the need for research aimed at improving the practices of both surgery and radiation therapy. He noted a particular need for animal experimentation conducted by scientists in laboratories since, as he stated, “human patients bearing cancer cannot be experimented upon. They must be given the best treatment known to science.”2 As Wood stood before his colleagues, he painted a picture in which cancer patients and the treatment they received benefitted from scientific experimentation, but were separate from it. On the contrary, the development of radium therapy as a cancer treatment in the United States from the mid-1910s to the mid-1920s reveals that physicians’ efforts to provide their patients with “the best treatment known to science” meant that patients were not, in fact, separate from scientific experimentation. Rather, as physicians worked with scientists – mostly physicists – to create technologically sophisticated cancer therapies, they blurred the practices of clinical therapy and scientific experimentation. As a result, patients became objects of study. They served as experimental subjects that helped advance a process through which physicians and physicists collaborated in an effort to establish radium therapy as an effective and scientific cancer treatment. The collaborative work of physicians and physicists also fuelled the development of biomedical science. While this paper draws attention to the dual role of cancer patients as both patients and subjects, its primary focus is on the relationship established between physicians and physicists. Physicians who sought to exploit the therapeutic value they believed existed in radium enlisted the help of physicists to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信