一种特殊的练习?顺势疗法医生弗里德里希·冯Böninghausen(1828-1910)。

M. Baschin
{"title":"一种特殊的练习?顺势疗法医生弗里德里希·冯Böninghausen(1828-1910)。","authors":"M. Baschin","doi":"10.1163/9789004303324_015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More than 11,500 people consulted the physician Friedrich von Bönninghausen between 1864 and 1889. He noted down details of these consultations in his case journals, devoting a page to each patient. Today, these journals provide documentation of a medical practice in the second half of the nineteenth century in the Westphalian city of Münster.1 On the basis of Bönninghausen’s journals it is possible to reconstruct his activities against the general historical context. Bönninghausen was, in fact, no ‘orthodox’ physician: although he had graduated from medical school and been sworn in by the authorities of the city of Münster as ‘physician, surgeon and obstetrician’ in 1862, he differed in one essential aspect from other physicians offering their services in the city at the time. He was a homeopath and treated his patients according to principles put forward by Samuel Hahnemann (1755–1843), who had founded this medical approach in the early nineteenth century. Did this make his practice special and, if so, in what way was it different from that of other physicians? These are the questions that this paper seeks to investigate. We begin by introducing Bönninghausen. His case journals form part of this process because they constitute the source on which this research is based. We will then present one case history to illustrate Bönninghausen’s mode of treatment. Next, Bönninghausen’s homeopathic practice – as established from the journals – will be briefly outlined: its size, its clientele and the range of complaints treated. In conclusion, we will offer an answer to the question as to whether and to what extent Bönninghausen’s practice was ‘special’.2","PeriodicalId":75720,"journal":{"name":"Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"96 1","pages":"287-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Special Kind of Practice? The Homeopath Friedrich von Böninghausen (1828-1910).\",\"authors\":\"M. Baschin\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004303324_015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"More than 11,500 people consulted the physician Friedrich von Bönninghausen between 1864 and 1889. He noted down details of these consultations in his case journals, devoting a page to each patient. Today, these journals provide documentation of a medical practice in the second half of the nineteenth century in the Westphalian city of Münster.1 On the basis of Bönninghausen’s journals it is possible to reconstruct his activities against the general historical context. Bönninghausen was, in fact, no ‘orthodox’ physician: although he had graduated from medical school and been sworn in by the authorities of the city of Münster as ‘physician, surgeon and obstetrician’ in 1862, he differed in one essential aspect from other physicians offering their services in the city at the time. He was a homeopath and treated his patients according to principles put forward by Samuel Hahnemann (1755–1843), who had founded this medical approach in the early nineteenth century. Did this make his practice special and, if so, in what way was it different from that of other physicians? These are the questions that this paper seeks to investigate. We begin by introducing Bönninghausen. His case journals form part of this process because they constitute the source on which this research is based. We will then present one case history to illustrate Bönninghausen’s mode of treatment. Next, Bönninghausen’s homeopathic practice – as established from the journals – will be briefly outlined: its size, its clientele and the range of complaints treated. In conclusion, we will offer an answer to the question as to whether and to what extent Bönninghausen’s practice was ‘special’.2\",\"PeriodicalId\":75720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"287-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004303324_015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004303324_015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1864年至1889年间,超过11500人咨询了弗里德里希·冯·Bönninghausen医生。他在他的病例日志中记录了这些咨询的细节,每个病人都有一页。今天,这些期刊提供了19世纪下半叶在威斯特伐利亚州的m nster市进行医疗实践的记录在Bönninghausen期刊的基础上,可以根据一般的历史背景重建他的活动。事实上,Bönninghausen并不是一个“正统的”医生:尽管他从医学院毕业,并在1862年被 nster市当局宣誓为“内科医生、外科医生和产科医生”,但他在一个重要方面与当时在该市提供服务的其他医生不同。他是一名顺势疗法医生,根据塞缪尔·哈内曼(Samuel Hahnemann, 1755-1843)提出的原则治疗病人,哈内曼在19世纪早期创立了这种医学方法。这是否使他的实践与众不同?如果是这样,他的实践与其他医生有何不同?这些都是本文试图探讨的问题。我们首先介绍Bönninghausen。他的病例日志是这一过程的一部分,因为它们构成了本研究的基础。然后,我们将介绍一个病例史来说明Bönninghausen的治疗模式。接下来,Bönninghausen顺势疗法的实践——从这些期刊中建立起来的——将简要概述:它的规模、客户和治疗的投诉范围。总之,我们将提供一个问题的答案,Bönninghausen的做法是否和在多大程度上是“特殊的”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Special Kind of Practice? The Homeopath Friedrich von Böninghausen (1828-1910).
More than 11,500 people consulted the physician Friedrich von Bönninghausen between 1864 and 1889. He noted down details of these consultations in his case journals, devoting a page to each patient. Today, these journals provide documentation of a medical practice in the second half of the nineteenth century in the Westphalian city of Münster.1 On the basis of Bönninghausen’s journals it is possible to reconstruct his activities against the general historical context. Bönninghausen was, in fact, no ‘orthodox’ physician: although he had graduated from medical school and been sworn in by the authorities of the city of Münster as ‘physician, surgeon and obstetrician’ in 1862, he differed in one essential aspect from other physicians offering their services in the city at the time. He was a homeopath and treated his patients according to principles put forward by Samuel Hahnemann (1755–1843), who had founded this medical approach in the early nineteenth century. Did this make his practice special and, if so, in what way was it different from that of other physicians? These are the questions that this paper seeks to investigate. We begin by introducing Bönninghausen. His case journals form part of this process because they constitute the source on which this research is based. We will then present one case history to illustrate Bönninghausen’s mode of treatment. Next, Bönninghausen’s homeopathic practice – as established from the journals – will be briefly outlined: its size, its clientele and the range of complaints treated. In conclusion, we will offer an answer to the question as to whether and to what extent Bönninghausen’s practice was ‘special’.2
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信