{"title":"Signature Pedagogy and Beyond: Reflections on Baltrinic and Wachter Morris (2020)","authors":"Borders, L. Dianne","doi":"10.7290/tsc020202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc020202","url":null,"abstract":"In a response to Baltrinic and Wachter Morris (2020), I expand on the term signature pedagogy and illustrate how clinical supervision satisfies the criteria for this designation in the counseling field. I then suggest an alternative term, “ pedagogical foundations ” (from Baltrinic and Wachter Morris), to ground work toward the authors’ goals of asking the “right questions” about the “best things” underlying counselor education practices and research. Finally, I outline some additional avenues (toward the same goals) via explorations of traditional learning theories and science of learning principles that emphasize student learning processes in the classroom — how students learn.","PeriodicalId":74907,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and supervision in counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44741453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reflections on the Pedagogical Foundations in Counselor Education","authors":"Eric R. Baltrinic, C. Morris","doi":"10.7290/tsc020209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc020209","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we provide a summary and concluding remarks to this special edition on signature pedagogies in counselor education. We summarize contributing authors’ perspectives and considerations for bolstering the profession’s discussion on teaching and pedagogical foundations. Focusing on how contributing authors assessed and used the concept of signature pedagogies to facilitate the broader discussion on pedagogical foundations, we pose reflections and offer considerations for future instructional research in counselor education.","PeriodicalId":74907,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and supervision in counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49491382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supervision as the Signature Pedagogy for Counseling Leadership","authors":"M. Luke, H. Peters","doi":"10.7290/tsc020204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc020204","url":null,"abstract":"authors apply the signature pedagogies framework for pedagogical foundations in counselor education put forth by Baltrinic and Wachter Morris (2020) to counseling leadership. Accordingly, we first define counseling leadership and describe the limited literature focused on pedagogical practices related to counseling leadership. Next, we discuss supervision and use the notion of broad and specific features as discussed within Baltrinic and Wachter Morris (2020) to system-atically examine whether there is a signature pedagogy for counseling leadership, and purport how supervision of counseling leadership largely fulfills the criteria. Finally, we discuss how supervision of counseling leadership can be utilized and further expanded, followed by a consideration of the subsequent implications for counseling leadership practice and future research.","PeriodicalId":74907,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and supervision in counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47009612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Signature Pedagogies: A Framework for Pedagogical Foundations in Counselor Education","authors":"Eric R. Baltrinic, C. Morris","doi":"10.7290/tsc020201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc020201","url":null,"abstract":"Twenty years ago, in a special section of Counselor Education and Supervision (CES), Thomas Sexton (1998) identified a lack of research on the fundamental pedagogical assumptions used in counselor education to prepare counselors and counselor educators. Specifically, he noted that the manner in which counseling content was delivered and the use of developmental and theoretical models to guide teaching efforts in counselor education had “largely gone unexplored” (Sexton, 1998, p. 66). In fact, Nelson and Neufeldt (1998) were unable to find any scholarly articles on pedagogy in the counseling literature, which was justifiably concerning. Fortunately, there is now some evidence in the counselor education literature addressing this concern (e.g., Association for Counselor Education and Supervision [ACES], 2016; Barrio Minton et al., 2014). Recently, Barrio Minton et al. (2018) found a sharp increase in empirical articles in counselor education articles between 2001–2010 and 2011–2015 incorporating pedagogical foundations, potentially due to the expansion of doctoral-level teaching and learning curricula and internships required by the 2016 Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Education Program (CACREP) Standards (2015). Korcuska (2016) cautioned that simply grounding the rationale for pedagogy studies in the CACREP standards could lead authors to overlook the underlying pedagogical structures and lead to studies without “heft or staying power” (p. 156). It is plausible to presume that it is uncertain if, as a profession, we are asking the “right” questions, and studying the “best” things to increase our collective understanding of the pedagogical foundations in counselor education. Overall, both Korcuska and Barrio Minton and colleagues (2014) recommended that more research be conducted on the processes (i.e., pedagogy) for preparing teachers in counselor education, and examining the links between pedagogy, effectiveness in the classroom, and preparing students for professional practice.","PeriodicalId":74907,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and supervision in counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43769507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Newhart, P. Mullen, Ashley J Blount, W. Hagedorn
{"title":"Factors Influencing Publication Rates among Counselor Educators","authors":"S. Newhart, P. Mullen, Ashley J Blount, W. Hagedorn","doi":"10.7290/tsc020105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc020105","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74907,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and supervision in counseling","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41841590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shawna M. Corley, Jessica Lloyd-Hazlett, Hope Schuermann, Noel Blessing
{"title":"A Phenomenological Investigation of Doctoral Students’ Gatekeeping Experiences","authors":"Shawna M. Corley, Jessica Lloyd-Hazlett, Hope Schuermann, Noel Blessing","doi":"10.7290/tsc020109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc020109","url":null,"abstract":"There is a clear need for further investigations of professional impairment and gatekeeping practices of counselor education programs. A vast majority (92%) of counselor educators report having at least one student with a professional impairment, and training programs dismissed 20% of these students (Crawford & Gilroy, 2013). Gatekeeping is an ethical responsibility of counselors, entailing ongoing monitoring of suitability for professional practice (American Counseling Association (ACA), 2014). At its core, gatekeeping is a mechanism to provide intervention, including facilitating exit from the profession, on behaviors that could threaten client welfare (Foster & McAdams, 2009). The Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP, 2016) lists gatekeeping as a national accreditation requirement for both master’s and doctoral-level programs. For the purpose of this study, gatekeeping is viewed within the university setting and involves preand post-admission evaluation and remediation to monitor students’ ongoing fitness for the program and professional field (Ziomek-Daigle & Christensen, 2010). Gatekeeping requires counselor educators and supervisors to make developmentally appropriate assessments of student counselors’ progress. Faculty evaluations of counselors-in-training occur in academic (e.g., course grades) and interpersonal contexts; including interactions during supervision in practicum and internships, and interactions in and outside of class (Ziomek-Daigle & Christensen, 2010). As counselor educators-in-training, doctoral students have opportunities to serve in evaluative roles as teaching assistants and supervisors of master’s level students (Scarborough, Bernard, & Morse, 2006; Fernando, 2013). As part of these roles, doctoral students hold gatekeeping responsibilities (CACREP, 2016; Limberg et al., 2013). However, the literature has yet to thoroughly explore doctoral students’ experiences as gatekeepers (Rapp, Moody, & Stewart, 2018).","PeriodicalId":74907,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and supervision in counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49450050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Peeper McDonald, Catharina Y. Chang, Caroline O’Hara, Kan Guvensel, Lindy K. Parker
{"title":"Racial Mislabeling in Multiracial Individuals: Implications for Professional Counseling and Education","authors":"Peeper McDonald, Catharina Y. Chang, Caroline O’Hara, Kan Guvensel, Lindy K. Parker","doi":"10.7290/tsc020102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc020102","url":null,"abstract":"Williams (1999) discussed the importance of claiming the \"I\" in her account of growing up in the 1950s as a Biracial individual in America. She asserted that individuals should choose for themselves how to identify racially and reject the social constructions of race that push individuals into racial boxes. Still, Williams failed to recognize the challenges that individuals face when others reject this alternative classification. For example, Biracial individuals racially classified themselves based on their assumptions of how others perceived their race (Brunsma & Rockquemore, 2001). Pressure to conform to socially constructed racial categories subverted the empowerment that Williams (1999) spoke of to claim the “I” (Giamo, Schmitt, & Outten, 2012; Terry & Winston, 2010).","PeriodicalId":74907,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and supervision in counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43084025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laura R. Shannonhouse, Amanda D. Rumsey, Nikki C. Elston, Marie Mize, J. Hightower, Y. Lin
{"title":"Analysis of a Standardized Suicide Intervention Training for Counselor Trainees","authors":"Laura R. Shannonhouse, Amanda D. Rumsey, Nikki C. Elston, Marie Mize, J. Hightower, Y. Lin","doi":"10.7290/tsc010209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc010209","url":null,"abstract":"The present study evaluates the impact of an evidence-based suicide intervention model and how pedagogical practices of counselor education programs may prepare counselors-in-training (CIT) to respond to clients considering suicide. Using content analysis to explore preand post-training data, the researchers examined the impact of the 14-hour evidence-based Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) on 54 CITs (76% female, 24% male; 58% White, 20% African American, 11% Latinx/Hispanic, 11% other), with a mean age of 30 years (SD =8.6). Further data were collected six months later after CITs had the opportunity to utilize suicide intervention skills during their clinical experiences. Content analysis yielded several changes between preand post-training data that elucidate the process of suicide intervention skill acquisition. The CITs also reported frequently applying their skills during their clinical internships with clients considering suicide. The findings support the use of ASIST in the preparation of future counselors.","PeriodicalId":74907,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and supervision in counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42618580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Counseling Students’ Experiences Viewing Virtual Reality Case Studies","authors":"T. Wilkinson, Kathleen E. Bazile","doi":"10.7290/tsc010206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc010206","url":null,"abstract":"Virtual reality is a technological medium that provides a three-dimensional interactive environment in which individuals become immersed and, in some cases, manipulate the environment. This technology shows promise in applications with simulated educational experiences. Most of the applications discussed in the literature have involved medical training programs that attempted to use virtual reality for simulated patient–medical professional interactions. Research is lacking on the potential applications of virtual reality with counselor training. We applied virtual reality technology with counseling students at different points in their training programs and exposed them to virtual counseling situations. The participants in this phenomenological study indicated that simulated counseling situations felt more authentic than traditional role-plays and encouraged their use early in counselor training programs. Future applicability in counselor training, limitations, and research recommendations are discussed.","PeriodicalId":74907,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and supervision in counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43742813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Relational Cultural Theory: A Guiding Framework for Study Abroad Experiences","authors":"J. Harris, Syntia Santos Dietz, Loni Crumb","doi":"10.7290/tsc010208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc010208","url":null,"abstract":"Faculty-led study-abroad programs promote cultural competence and professional and personal development for students. However, students from historically marginalized and underrepresented groups do not participate in these experiences at the same rate as students from majority cultures. Counselor educators must seek ways to recruit diverse populations to promote equity in and access to international education experiences. Relational cultural theory provides a guiding framework for counselor educators to diversify study-abroad programs while attending to cultural and power dynamics. Implications for counselor educators and recommendations for future research are also included.","PeriodicalId":74907,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and supervision in counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46026719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}