Lydia Emm-Collison, Robert Walker, Ruth Salway, Danielle House, Kate Sansum, Katie Breheny, Sarah Churchward, Joanna G Williams, Frank de Vocht, Russell Jago
{"title":"Exploring parents' physical activity motivation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study from a self-determination theory perspective.","authors":"Lydia Emm-Collison, Robert Walker, Ruth Salway, Danielle House, Kate Sansum, Katie Breheny, Sarah Churchward, Joanna G Williams, Frank de Vocht, Russell Jago","doi":"10.3310/KPKW8220","DOIUrl":"10.3310/KPKW8220","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The COVID-19 lockdowns impacted physical activity for all, but especially parents, because they had to balance home, work and leisure activities. Motivation for exercise is consistently shown to be associated with physical activity levels. Self-determination theory provides a framework through which the motivation for exercise and its social-contextual antecedents can be explored. The purpose of this study is to explore the role of motivation in determining physical activity in parents and carers of English primary school children before, during and after the COVID-19 lockdowns.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and participants: </strong>This study uses a mixed-methods design combining quantitative data and individual interviews. Participants were all parents/carers of children in year 6 (aged 10-11 years) at English primary schools in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quantitative data were collected on three occasions: between March 2017 and May 2018 (Wave 0, <i>N</i> = 1296), between May and December 2021 (Wave 1, <i>N</i> = 393) and between January and July 2022 (wave 2, <i>N</i> = 436). Motivation for exercise was assessed using the Behavioural Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire-2 and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was estimated via waist-worn accelerometers. Data were analysed via regression models. Interviews with a subsample of parents (<i>N</i> = 43) were conducted on two occasions: between September and December 2021 and between February and July 2022. Interviews covered the impact of the pandemic on children and parents' physical activity and changes over time. This study focuses on discussions around the parents' own physical activity behaviour and their motivation. The framework method was used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In separate linear regression models, intrinsic and identified regulation were associated with higher moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in waves 0 and 2. Amotivation was associated with lower moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in waves 0 and 2. In fully adjusted multivariable regression models, identified regulation was associated with a 4.9-minute increase in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and introjected regulation was associated with a 2.3-minute decrease in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at wave 0. Associations with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were different in wave 2, with introjected regulation changing direction and a negative association with amotivation, although confidence intervals were wide due to smaller sample sizes. In the interviews, parents spoke of the effects that the COVID-19 lockdowns had on their motivation to be physically active in four theoretically driven themes: (1) motivation for physical activity, (2) perceived autonomy for physical activity, (3) perceived competence for physical activity and (4) perceived relatedness for physical activity.</p><p><strong>Limitati","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":" ","pages":"105-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140320103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lorraine Hansford, Katrina Wyatt, Siobhan Creanor, Sheena McCready, Richard Harding
{"title":"Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.","authors":"Lorraine Hansford, Katrina Wyatt, Siobhan Creanor, Sheena McCready, Richard Harding","doi":"10.3310/ATFA4287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3310/ATFA4287","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The South West Peninsula (Cornwall, Devon, Somerset) has the highest proportion of over 65s (24.2%) and is the only English rural population with greater economic deprivation than in urban areas. Coastal populations have the worst health outcomes in England. Despite innovation among communities to support those with health and care needs in later life, recruitment to palliative care research in the region is low and there has been no evaluation of public health palliative care interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A new South West Peninsula Palliative Care Research Partnership was funded for 15 months, bringing together four universities, the voluntary and community sector (including hospices) and local National Institute for Health and Care Research networks. The aim was to establish a sustainable multisectoral partnership that would identify community-based support needs for underserved rural and coastal populations by: • conducting a literature scoping review on interventions to enable community members to support the dying; • delivering a research capacity-building programme; • co-creating public and patient involvement capacity; • determining the resources and needs for communities to support dying well; • integrating findings to develop a framework of community-based support and identify future research questions; • establishing a sustainable research network infrastructure for the long-term design and delivery of palliative care research.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We convened partners to identify research needs and co-designed activities to meet our objectives. These included a scoping review; a capacity-building programme of training, seminars and a journal club; forming a patient and public involvement group; a multistranded community engagement programme using different creative approaches; four focus groups with members of the public and one with community workers; and producing three 'storytelling' audio recordings. Findings were presented to the partnership at a regional workshop.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scoping review showed that community-engaged palliative care interventions can improve outcomes for individuals but provided little evidence about which approaches work for different communities. Five online seminars and a quarterly journal club to develop research capacity were regularly attended by 15 to 25 participants from across the partnership. While evaluating our engagement methods was beyond the partnership's scope, levels of participation suggested that creative methods of engagement show potential to help researchers and practitioners better understand the needs and priorities of underserved populations. Data showed that rural, coastal and low-income communities face challenges in accessing end-of-life care and support due to issues such as transport to and distance from services, erosion of neighbourhood networks, isolation from family and friends, 'patchiness' ","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139991997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Danielle House, Robert Walker, Ruth Salway, Lydia Emm-Collison, Katie Breheny, Kate Sansum, Sarah Churchward, Joanna G Williams, Frank de Vocht, Russell Jago
{"title":"The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the physical activity environment in English primary schools: a multi-perspective qualitative analysis.","authors":"Danielle House, Robert Walker, Ruth Salway, Lydia Emm-Collison, Katie Breheny, Kate Sansum, Sarah Churchward, Joanna G Williams, Frank de Vocht, Russell Jago","doi":"10.3310/KLML4701","DOIUrl":"10.3310/KLML4701","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 lockdowns and social distancing measures, including school closures, had a major impact on children's physical activity in England, with data showing an initial reduction in activity in the short-term post-lockdown phase of the pandemic followed by a recovery on average in the medium-term post-lockdown period. The school environment is an important context for child physical activity. The purpose of this study is to understand the changes that took place to school physical activity environments once schools reopened after lockdowns. This information will improve understanding of why changes to children's physical activity have occurred over the course of the pandemic and the implications for future promotion of physical activity in schools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews with parents (<i>n</i> = 43), school staff (<i>n</i> = 18) and focus groups with 10- to 11-year-old children (participant <i>n</i> = 92) were conducted at two time points: between September-December 2021 and February-July 2022. Interview and focus group guides covered the impact of the pandemic on child physical activity and changes to this over time. The framework method was used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes and three subthemes were generated: (1) the return to school; (2) over-pressured staff and environment and (3) the uneven impact of the pandemic. Theme 3 consists of three subthemes: (a) retained pandemic policies, (b) impact on physical activity culture and (c) different children need different things.</p><p><strong>Limitations and future work: </strong>Conducting this research in schools during ongoing COVID-19 disruptions was a challenge and may have limited school and participant participation, particularly school staff. The parent interview sample is predominantly female, active and of higher socioeconomic status, so the experiences of male, less active and lower socioeconomic parents are limited. This study suggests that the impact of COVID-19 on child physical activity is uneven, affecting some children more than others. Future work is therefore needed to explore the details of this potential diverging experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic, school closures and post-lockdown school policies have impacted upon primary school physical activity environments. The post-lockdown school environment is highly pressured, impacting the extent to which schools can support and encourage child physical activity. Future research is needed to further explore the impact of post-lockdown changes on physical activity environments in schools, particularly over the longer term, as schools continue to adapt post lockdowns. Strategies required to support school physical activity environments must be context specific and sensitive to these changes, pressures and needs.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute ","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":" ","pages":"59-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139725305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Niamh Fitzgerald, Andrea Mohan, Richard Purves, Rachel O'Donnell, Matt Egan, James Nicholls, Nason Maani, Maria Smolar, Andrew Fraser, Tim Briton, Laura Mahon
{"title":"Factors influencing public health engagement in alcohol licensing in England and Scotland including legal and structural differences: comparative interview analysis.","authors":"Niamh Fitzgerald, Andrea Mohan, Richard Purves, Rachel O'Donnell, Matt Egan, James Nicholls, Nason Maani, Maria Smolar, Andrew Fraser, Tim Briton, Laura Mahon","doi":"10.3310/BGTR4277","DOIUrl":"10.3310/BGTR4277","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Greater availability of alcohol is associated with higher consumption and harms. The legal systems, by which premises are licensed to sell alcohol in England and Scotland, differ in several ways. The 'Exploring the impact of alcohol licensing in England and Scotland' study measured public health team activity regarding alcohol licensing from 2012 to 2019 and identified seven differences between England and Scotland in the timing and type of activities undertaken.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To qualitatively describe the seven previously identified differences between Scotland and England in public health approaches to alcohol licensing, and to examine, from the perspective of public health professionals, what factors may explain these differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-four interviews were conducted with 52 professionals from 14 English and 6 Scottish public health teams selected for diversity who had been actively engaging with alcohol licensing. Interviews focused primarily on the nature of their engagement (<i>n</i> = 66) and their rationale for the approaches taken (<i>n</i> = 28). Interview data were analysed thematically using NVivo. Findings were constructed by discussion across the research team, to describe and explain the differences in practice found.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Diverse legal, practical and other factors appeared to explain the seven differences. (1) Earlier engagement in licensing by Scottish public health teams in 2012-3 may have arisen from differences in the timing of legislative changes giving public health a statutory role and support from Alcohol Focus Scotland. (2) Public Health England provided significant support from 2014 in England, contributing to an increase in activity from that point. (3) Renewals of statements of licensing policy were required more frequently in Scotland and at the same time for all Licensing Boards, probably explaining greater focus on policy in Scotland. (4) Organisational structures in Scotland, with public health stakeholders spread across several organisations, likely explained greater involvement of senior leaders there. (5) Without a public health objective for licensing, English public health teams felt less confident about making objections to licence applications without other stakeholders such as the police, and instead commonly negotiated conditions on licences with applicants. In contrast, Scottish public health teams felt any direct contact with applicants was inappropriate due to conflicts of interest. (6) With the public health objective in Scotland, public health teams there were more active in making independent objections to licence applications. Further in Scotland, licensing committee meetings are held to consider all new applications regardless of whether objections have been submitted; unlike in England where there was a greater incentive to resolve objections, because then a meeting was not required. (","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139725303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ruth Ponsford, G J Melendez-Torres, Alec Miners, Jane Falconer, Chris Bonell
{"title":"Whole-school interventions promoting student commitment to school to prevent substance use and violence, and improve educational attainment: a systematic review.","authors":"Ruth Ponsford, G J Melendez-Torres, Alec Miners, Jane Falconer, Chris Bonell","doi":"10.3310/DWTR3299","DOIUrl":"10.3310/DWTR3299","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole-school interventions modify the school environment to promote health. A subset of these interventions promotes student commitment to school to prevent substance (tobacco, alcohol, other drugs) use and/or violence. A previous review identified the theory of human functioning and school organisation as a comprehensive theory of such interventions, and found evidence that these interventions reduce substance use and/or violence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives were to search for, appraise and synthesise evidence to address the following questions: (1) What whole-school interventions promoting student commitment to school to prevent substance use and/or violence have been evaluated, what intervention subtypes are apparent and how closely do these align with the theory of human functioning and school organisation? (2) What factors relating to setting, population and intervention affect implementation? (3) What are the effects on student substance use, violence and educational attainment? (4) What is the cost-effectiveness of such interventions? (5) Are intervention effects mediated by student commitment to school or moderated by setting or population?</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A total of 56 information sources were searched (in January 2020), then an updated search of 48 of these was carried out (in May 2021). Reference lists were also searched and experts were contacted.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Eligible studies were process/outcome evaluations of whole-school interventions to reduce student violence or substance use among students aged 5-18 years attending schools, via actions aligning with the theory of human functioning and school organisation: modifying teaching to increase engagement, enhancing student-staff relationships, revising school policies, encouraging volunteering or increasing parental involvement. Data extraction and quality assessments used existing tools. Theory and process reports were synthesised qualitatively. Outcome and economic data were synthesised narratively; outcome data were meta-analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Searches retrieved 63 eligible reports on 27 studies of 22 interventions. We identified four intervention subtypes focused on student participation in school-wide decisions, improving staff-student relationships, increasing engagement in learning and involving parents. The theories of change of most intervention subtypes aligned closely with the theory of human functioning and school organisation, and informed refinement of an intervention theory of change. Theories of change for interventions increasing learning engagement did not align with this theory, aiming instead to increase school commitment primarily via social skills curricula. Factors influencing the implementation included whether or not interventions were tailorable, workable and well explained. Interventions with action groups comprising staff/students, etc. and","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":"12 2","pages":"1-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139736884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
G J Melendez-Torres, Noreen Orr, Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Annah Chollet, Andrew J Rizzo, Fraizer Kiff, Emma Rigby, Ann Hagell, Sidnei R Priolo Filho, Bruce Taylor, Honor Young, Chris Bonell, Vashti Berry
{"title":"School-based interventions TO Prevent Dating and Relationship Violence and Gender-Based Violence: STOP-DRV-GBV systematic review.","authors":"G J Melendez-Torres, Noreen Orr, Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Annah Chollet, Andrew J Rizzo, Fraizer Kiff, Emma Rigby, Ann Hagell, Sidnei R Priolo Filho, Bruce Taylor, Honor Young, Chris Bonell, Vashti Berry","doi":"10.3310/KTWR6997","DOIUrl":"10.3310/KTWR6997","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Schools have a duty of care to prevent violence between students but a significant amount of dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence occurs in schools. These are important public health issues with important longitudinal consequences for young people.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand functioning and effectiveness of school-based interventions for the prevention of dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>We undertook a mixed-methods systematic review to synthesise different types of evidence relating to school-based interventions for the prevention of dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence to understand if, how and in what ways these interventions are effective. We searched 21 databases and 2 trial registers and undertook forwards and backwards citation chasing, author contact and other supplementary search methods. Searches identified all literature published to June 2021. All screening was undertaken in duplicate and independently, and we quality appraised all included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 247 reports (68 outcome evaluations, 137 process evaluations). Synthesis of intervention components produced an intervention typology: single-component, curricular, multicomponent, and multilevel programmes. Synthesis of intervention theories suggested that interventions aiming to increase students' sense of school belonging and sense of safety in the school building could encourage increased learning of prosocial skills and increased prosocial peer norms, and so potentially reducing dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence. Synthesis of factors affecting delivery highlighted school organisation and leaders who believed in the importance of addressing dating and relationship violence/gender-based violence, along with time and resources to deliver the interventions. The ease with which the intervention could be delivered and modified was also important. Meta-analysis found stronger evidence for intervention effectiveness in reducing dating and relationship violence than for gender-based violence, with significant long-term impacts on dating and relationship violence victimisation and perpetration, and some evidence that interventions in high-income countries could be effective for reducing victimisation and perpetration of gender-based violence in the long-term. Impacts on knowledge and attitudes were primarily short-term. Network meta-analysis did not suggest superiority of any intervention type. Moderation evidence suggested interventions reduced dating and relationship violence perpetration in boys more than girls, but reduced gender-based violence perpetration more in girls. Metaregression by intervention component did not explain heterogeneity in effectiveness, but qualitative comparative analysis suggested that reducing perpetration was important to reducing vict","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":"12 3","pages":"1-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139991998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Niamh Fitzgerald, Matt Egan, Rachel O'Donnell, James Nicholls, Laura Mahon, Frank de Vocht, Cheryl McQuire, Colin Angus, Richard Purves, Madeleine Henney, Andrea Mohan, Nason Maani, Niamh Shortt, Linda Bauld
{"title":"Public health engagement in alcohol licensing in England and Scotland: the ExILEnS mixed-method, natural experiment evaluation.","authors":"Niamh Fitzgerald, Matt Egan, Rachel O'Donnell, James Nicholls, Laura Mahon, Frank de Vocht, Cheryl McQuire, Colin Angus, Richard Purves, Madeleine Henney, Andrea Mohan, Nason Maani, Niamh Shortt, Linda Bauld","doi":"10.3310/FSRT4135","DOIUrl":"10.3310/FSRT4135","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International systematic reviews suggest an association between alcohol availability and increased alcohol-related harms. Alcohol availability is regulated through separate locally administered licensing systems in England and Scotland, in which local public health teams have a statutory role. The system in Scotland includes a public health objective for licensing. Public health teams engage to varying degrees in licensing matters but no previous study has sought to objectively characterise and measure their activity, examine their effectiveness, or compare practices between Scotland and England.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To critically assess the impact and mechanisms of impact of public health team engagement in alcohol premises licensing on alcohol-related harms in England and Scotland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 39 diverse public health teams in England (<i>n</i> = 27) and Scotland (<i>n</i> = 12). Public health teams more active in licensing were recruited first and then matched to lower-activity public health teams. Using structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 66), documentation analysis, and expert consultation, we developed and applied the Public Health Engagement In Alcohol Licensing (PHIAL) measure to quantify six-monthly activity levels from 2012 to 2019. Time series of PHIAL scores, and health and crime outcomes for each area, were analysed using multivariable negative binomial mixed-effects models to assess correlations between outcome and exposure, with 18-month average PHIAL score as the primary exposure metric. In-depth interviews (<i>n</i> = 53) and a workshop (<i>n</i> = 10) explored public health team approaches and potential mechanisms of impact of alcohol availability interventions with public health team members and licensing stakeholders (local authority licensing officers, managers and lawyers/clerks, police staff with a licensing remit, local elected representatives).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nineteen public health team activity types were assessed in six categories: (1) staffing; (2) reviewing and (3) responding to licence applications; (4) data usage; (5) influencing licensing stakeholders/policy; and (6) public involvement. Usage and intensity of activities and overall approaches varied within and between areas over time, including between Scotland and England. The latter variation could be explained by legal, structural and philosophical differences, including Scotland's public health objective. This objective was felt to legitimise public health considerations and the use of public health data within licensing. Quantitative analysis showed no clear evidence of association between level of public health team activity and the health or crime outcomes examined, using the primary exposure or other metrics (neither change in, nor cumulative, PHIAL scores). Qualitative data suggested that public health team input was valued by many licensing stakeholders, and that alcoh","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139725304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Katrina Scior, Lisa Richardson, Elizabeth Randell, Michaela Osborne, Harriet Bird, Afia Ali, Eva-Maria Bonin, Adrian Brown, Celia Brown, Christine-Koulla Burke, Lisa Bush, Jason Crabtree, Karuna Davies, Paul Davies, David Gillespie, Andrew Jahoda, Sean Johnson, Richard Hastings, Laura Kerr, Rachel McNamara, Jane Menzies, Harry Roche, Melissa Wright, Kyann Zhang
{"title":"Digital adaptation of the Standing up for Myself intervention in young people and adults with intellectual disabilities: the STORM feasibility study.","authors":"Katrina Scior, Lisa Richardson, Elizabeth Randell, Michaela Osborne, Harriet Bird, Afia Ali, Eva-Maria Bonin, Adrian Brown, Celia Brown, Christine-Koulla Burke, Lisa Bush, Jason Crabtree, Karuna Davies, Paul Davies, David Gillespie, Andrew Jahoda, Sean Johnson, Richard Hastings, Laura Kerr, Rachel McNamara, Jane Menzies, Harry Roche, Melissa Wright, Kyann Zhang","doi":"10.3310/NCBU6224","DOIUrl":"10.3310/NCBU6224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stigma contributes to the negative social conditions persons with intellectual disabilities are exposed to, and it needs tackling at multiple levels. Standing Up for Myself is a psychosocial group intervention designed to enable individuals with intellectual disabilities to discuss stigmatising encounters in a safe and supportive setting and to increase their self-efficacy in managing and resisting stigma.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To adapt Standing Up for Myself to make it suitable as a digital intervention; to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of Digital Standing Up for Myself and online administration of outcome measures in a pilot; to describe usual practice in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic to inform future evaluation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Adaptation work followed by a single-arm pilot of intervention delivery.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Four third and education sector organisations. Individuals with mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities, aged 16+, members of existing groups, with access to digital platforms.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Digital Standing Up for Myself intervention. Adapted from face-to-face Standing Up for Myself intervention, delivered over four weekly sessions, plus a 1-month follow-up session.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Acceptability and feasibility of delivering Digital Standing Up for Myself and of collecting outcome and health economic measures at baseline and 3 months post baseline. Outcomes are mental well-being, self-esteem, self-efficacy in rejecting prejudice, reactions to discrimination and sense of social power.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adaptation to the intervention required changes to session duration, group size and number of videos; otherwise, the content remained largely the same. Guidance was aligned with digital delivery methods and a new group member booklet was produced. Twenty-two participants provided baseline data. The intervention was started by 21 participants (four groups), all of whom were retained at 3 months. Group facilitators reported delivering the intervention as feasible and suggested some refinements. Fidelity of the intervention was good, with over 90% of key components observed as implemented by facilitators. Both facilitators and group members reported the intervention to be acceptable. Group members reported subjective benefits, including increased confidence, pride and knowing how to deal with difficult situations. Digital collection of all outcome measures was feasible and acceptable, with data completeness ≥ 95% for all measures at both time points. Finally, a picture of usual practice has been developed as an intervention comparator for a future trial.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The pilot sample was small. It remains unclear whether participants would be willing to be randomised to a treatment as usual arm or whether they could be retained for ","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139704119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Nature-based interventions to support mental health and well-being of young women in pregnancy: exploratory work for future feasibility RCT.","authors":"Gina Sands, Holly Blake, Tim Carter, Helen Spiby","doi":"10.3310/NPGR3411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3310/NPGR3411","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of mental health and well-being issues among young women is increasing. Pregnancy is a time when new mental health challenges may arise, or existing conditions can be exacerbated. This project presents preparatory work on how nature-based interventions may help to support the mental health and well-being of young pregnant women (aged 16-24 years) in a future study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project was formed of three main phases conducted from March to August 2022: (1) mapping nature activities available across the East Midlands region and two focus groups with providers of nature activities (<i>n</i> = 6); (2) public participation and involvement work to inform future research. This included four focus groups with young women (<i>n</i> = 11), leading to the formation of a new young women's panel (Research Influencers Group). Networking and stakeholder engagement to support future research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mapping survey identified 68 nature-based organisations/projects operating in the region, many of whom expressed interest in being involved in future research. The young women's focus groups confirmed the importance of the topic and generated a wealth of information to support the intervention design. A Research Influencer Group of five young women was established from the focus group participants. The Research Influencer Group chose the nature-based intervention and had input into all aspects of the study design. This group will continue into future projects. Focus groups with providers of nature activities have further advanced the study design. The project team have developed relationships with relevant stakeholders and networks that will inform the future trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preparatory co-design work suggested that a nature-based intervention may be acceptable to young women, and providers of such interventions felt it was feasible to offer these activities to young pregnant women. This preparatory work has led to an outline research plan which has been co-produced with public contributors and stakeholders throughout.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This preparatory work is limited by small focus group samples, and the possibility that not all providers were reached through the snowballing approach to the mapping survey.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Future research is needed to test the nature-based intervention; this would be in the form of a feasibility randomised controlled trial of nature-based interventions to promote the mental health and well-being of young pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme as award number NIHR135167.</p>","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138886713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emma Hock, Lindsay Blank, Hannah Fairbrother, Mark Clowes, Diana Castelblanco Cuevas, Andrew Booth, Elizabeth Goyder
{"title":"Exploring the impact of housing insecurity on the health and well-being of children and young people: a systematic review.","authors":"Emma Hock, Lindsay Blank, Hannah Fairbrother, Mark Clowes, Diana Castelblanco Cuevas, Andrew Booth, Elizabeth Goyder","doi":"10.3310/TWWL4501","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3310/TWWL4501","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Housing insecurity can be understood as experiencing or being at risk of multiple house moves that are (1) not through choice and (2) related to poverty. For example, due to short-term private rental tenancies, temporary or emergency housing, and homelessness. Housing insecurity has grown due to recent trends in the cost and availability of housing. The quality, affordability and stability of housing have all been shown to impact children's health and well-being. However, the pathways linking housing and child health and well-being are complex and poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify, appraise and synthesise research evidence that explores the relationship between housing insecurity and the health and well-being of children and young people.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE via Ovid (searched 8 April 2022), EMBASE via Ovid (searched 8 April 2022), PsycINFO via Ovid (searched 8 April 2022).</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>We undertook a systematic review synthesising qualitative data. We searched databases, reference lists and United Kingdom grey literature. We extracted and tabulated key data from the included papers, and appraised study quality. We synthesised the data qualitatively into an a priori conceptual framework using best-fit framework synthesis combined with thematic synthesis, and generated logic models to highlight links between specific exposures, impacts and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 59 studies and identified four populations: those experiencing housing insecurity in general (40 papers); associated with domestic violence (nine papers); associated with migration status (13 papers) and those forced to relocate due to demolition (two papers). Most published studies had an overall assessment of moderate-high quality, and most grey literature originated from known and valued sources. Housing insecurity took many forms and resulted from several, often inter-related, situations, including being evicted or having a forced move, living in temporary accommodation, exposure to problematic behaviour, overcrowded/poor-condition/unsuitable property, and making multiple moves. The resultant housing insecurity had multiple impacts, including school-related, psychological, financial and family well-being impacts, long-distance travel to attend school and see friends, living in a poor-condition or unsuitable property, all of which could further exacerbate housing insecurity. These experiences impacted health and well-being, in terms of mental health problems (often manifesting physically/behaviourally) and physical health problems related to poor housing conditions. Some factors lessened the impact of housing insecurity, including friendship and support, staying at the same school, having hope for the future and protective parenting. The negative impacts of housing insecurity on health and well-being may be compounded by specific situations an","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":"11 13","pages":"1-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142960037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}